Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutERIO 003
e e
Image Project Order File Cover Page
XHVZE
This page identifies those items that were not scanned during the initial production scanning phase.
They are available in the original file, may be scanned during a special rescan activity or are viewable
by direct inspection of the file.
B:.R 10 003 Order File Identifier
Organizing (done)
D Two-sided
1111111111111111111
D Rescan Needed 11111111I1111111111
RESCAN
~olor Items:
D Greyscale Items:
DIGITAL DATA
OVERSIZED (Scannable)
D Maps:
D Other Items Scannable by
a Large Scanner
D Diskettes, No.
D Other, No/Type:
D Poor Quality Originals:
OVERSIZED (Non-Scannable)
D Other:
D Logs of various kinds:
NOTES:
Date tl hn/Of/;
D Other::
BY: ~
/5/
mE
,}IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII mp
&,[L
Project Proofing
BY: ~
Dateu) d-.7/ D h
Scanning Preparation
BY:
Date:
+
= TOTAL PAGES
(Count does not include cover sheet)
/5/
f£J
Production Scanning
1111111111111111111
Stage 1
Page Count from Scanned File:
(c;"3 (Count does include cover sheet)
VYES
BY:
Page Count Matches Number in Scanning Preparation:
~ Date: I' /~7 /O~
If NO in stage 1, page(s) discrepancies were found:
/5/
NO
VV\P
Stage 1
BY:
YES
NO
Maria
Date:
/5/
11111111111I11 "III
Scanning is complete at this point unless rescanning is required.
ReScanned
111111111111111111I
BY:
Maria
Date:
151
Comments about this file:
Quality Checked
1111111111111111111
10/6/2005 Orders File Cover Page. doc
• •
INDEX ENHANCED RECOVERY ORDER NO. 3
Redoubt Unit
1. May 10, 2006 Forest Oil Company's request for an Enhanced Recovery
Pilot Project, attachment 1 and 3 held confidential
2. May 21, 2006 Notice of Hearing Journal of Commerce and Peninsula
May 28, 2006 Clarion, Affidavit of Publication and e-mail and mailing
List
3. November 5, 2008 Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. request for extension of
Rule 1 until 11/6/2010 (erio 3 -001)
4. March 9, 2009 Pacific Energy Resources, Ltd. Filing of Chapter 11
Restructuring
5. December 27, 2010 CIE request for extension of ERIO WMRU 2A (ERIO 3.002)
ENHANCED RECOVERY ORDER NO. 3
.
.
STATE OF ALASKA
ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
333 West 7th Avenue, Suite 100
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Re: THE APPLICATION OF FOREST
OIL CORPORATION for an order
authorizing a pilot waterflood pro-
ject designed to test the potential for
enhanced oil recovery in the West
McArthur River Oil Pool, West
McArthur River Unit, Cook Inlet,
Alaska
IT APPEARING THAT:
) Enhanced Recovery Injection Order No. 03
)
) West McArthur River Unit
) West McArthur River Oil Pool
) Well West McArthur River Unit No. 2A
)
) November 06,2006
1. By letter and application dated May 10, 2006, Forest Oil Corporation ("Forest") as
Operator of the West McArthur River Unit ("WMRU") requested an order from the
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission ("Commission") to authorize pilot wa-
ter injection into well West McArthur River Unit No. 2A ("WMRU #2A") to test the
potential for enhanced oil recovery under 20 AAC 25.402.
2. Notice of a public hearing was published in the Peninsula Clarion on May 21, 2006,
and the Alaska Journal of Commerce on May 28, 2006.
3. No comments, protests or request for public hearing were received during the com-
ment period.
4. The Commission determined it had sufficient information as a basis for ruling, and the
tentative public hearing was vacated.
FINDINGS:
I. Operator:
Forest is operator of the West McArthur River Oil Pool in the WMRU, Cook Inlet,
Alaska.
2. Proiect Location:
The surface location of well WMRU #2A is 2,804' from the south line and 1,418'
from the west line of Section 16, T8N, R14W, Seward Meridian. The bottomhole lo-
cation is 2,067' from the south line and 2,616' from the east line of Section 10, T8N,
and RI4W, Seward Meridian. The surface location of the well is onshore on the west-
ern side of Cook Inlet and the bottomhole location is approximately 1.5 miles
offshore.
Enhanced Recovery Injectiotder No.3
November 6, 2006
.
Page 2
3. Operators/Surface Owners Notification:
Forest provided operators and surface owners within one-quarter mile of the proposed
area with a copy of the application for injection. The only affected operator is Forest.
The State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources and the Salamatof Native As-
sociation, Inc. are the only affected surface owners.
4. Description of Operation:
Current development of the field consists of three active production wells in the West
McArthur River Oil Pool. The WMRU waterflood pilot project plan includes a single
injector, Well WMRU #2A. WMRU #2A is an oil producer that has been shut-in
since January 2002. This well produced 2,095,933 barrels of oil.
Forest proposes to inject produced water from the WMRU along with other Commis-
sion-approved sources of water into well WMRU #2A, with the objective of testing
enhancing recovery from the West McArthur River Oil Pool. Forest's application did
not specify a proposed duration for this pilot project.
5. Geologic Information:
a. Injection will occur within WMRU #2A into the Hemlock formation ("Hemlock").
Conservation Order 332 defines the West McArthur River Oil Pool as the accumu-
lation of oil and gas that is common to and correlates with the accumulation found
in the WMRU No. I well between the measured depths of 13,174 and 13,660'
(9,292 to 9,632' true vertical depth subsea, or "TVDSS").
b. The Hemlock is an Oligocene-aged sequence of braided stream deposits consisting
of interbedded conglomerates and sandstones, separated by thin interbeds of im-
permeable claystone and siltstone. The Hemlock ranges from 400 to 500' thick
through the proposed pilot project area.
c. Non-reservoir facies consist of very fine-grained siltstone and generally imperme-
able carbonaceous claystone and coals.
d. The planned injection interval ranges from 9,251 to 9,438' ("TVDSS") in WMRU
#2A, the same intervals that produced oil.
6. Well Logs:
The initial formation logs obtained while drilling well WMRU #2A are on file with
the Commission.
7. Mechanical Integrity and Well Design of Iniection Wells:
The design and construction of WMRU #2A complies with the requirements of 20
AAC 25.030. The drilling and cementing records from WMRU #2A as well as
WMRU #2 were reviewed and found satisfactory to isolate injected fluids to the ap-
proved interval.
Enhanced Recovery Injectíolder No.3
November 6, 2006
.
Page 3
8. Injection Rates. Pressures. Fracture Propagation:
The initial injection rate will be 3,000 to 4,000 barrels water per day ("BWPD"), and
may vary according to production from WMRU wells. The injection rate will be less
than the reservoir off-take, but will help minimize reservoir pressure depletion.
The pilot water flood will be operated to prevent fracturing of the confining zone or
the Hemlock. The estimated maximum surface injection pressure for well WMRU
#2A that will prevent fracturing the Hemlock is 4,430 psi. Operation of the injection
well will be at pressures less than that required to initiate or propagate fractures
through confining zones.
9. Type of Fluid / Source Water Analysis:
The primary fluid requested for injection is produced water from wells WMRU #5,
WMRU #6, and WMRU #7STl within the West McArthur River Oil Pool. Compati-
bility is not an issue since the produced water source is the Hemlock.
In addition to the produced water, Forest is also requesting permission to inject water
from the following other sources of water. Osprey platform deck drainage, Osprey
platform gray water, Osprey platform treated sanitary waste, produced Hemlock water
from the Redoubt Unit, produced Tyonek water from West Foreland, storm water
from secondary containment areas around the tank farm at Kustatan Production Facil-
ity ("KPF"), and storm water from secondary containment areas round the tank farm at
WMRU. Laboratory testing and fluid studies showed no compatibility issues between
any of these sources.
10. Freshwater Information:
Salinity analysis of the nearby WMRU #4D disposal well indicates that waters con-
taining less than 10,000 ppm total sodium chloride extend to a depth of approximately
5,000' TVDSS in the project area, or about 4,250' shallower than the proposed injec-
tion interval for this operation.
11. Expected Increase in Hydrocarbon Recovery:
The crude oil being produced from the West McArthur River Oil Pool has an API
gravity of 27.7 degrees, a gas oil ratio of 235 scf/stb, and a bubble point pressure of
approximately 1,400 psia. Primary depletion of this pool from the initial reservoir
pressure of 4,095 psia to the bubble point pressure would be expected to result in re-
covery of 4.5% of the original oil in place ("OOIP"). Recovery to date has been
between 31 and 37%, depending on the estimate used for OOIP, which Forest attrib-
utes to aquifer pressure support. It is expected that the proposed pilot enhanced oil
recovery project will further enhance this pressure support and allow even greater re-
covery from the pool. Forest reports that other Hemlock water flood projects have
resulted in recoveries of as much as 42%. Data acquisition on injection response and
recovery benefits is an objective of the pilot project.
Enhanced Recovery Injectiotder No.3
November 6, 2006
.
Page 4
12. Mechanical Condition of Adjacent Wells:
There is one well that penetrates the Hemlock within a quarter mile of the WMRU
#2A. WMRU #7 A penetrates the Hemlock approximately 834' northwest of WMRU
#2A. The drilling and cementing records for #7 A were reviewed with no indication
that the wellbore would provide a conduit that could allow the escape of
fluids from the Hemlock.
CONCLUSIONS:
I. The application requirements of20 AAC 25.402 have been met.
2. A review of the well records indicates that well construction of WMRU #2A and sur-
rounding wells is satisfactory to isolate injected fluids to the Hemlock. Well integrity
for WMRU #2A must be demonstrated according to 20 AAC 25.412 (c).
3. Water injection is anticipated to increase recovery.
4. Proper well construction and more than 500 aggregate feet of interbedded siltstone
and claystone between the injection interval and water of less than 10,000 ppm so-
dium chloride will protect any potential underground sources of drinking water.
5. Sufficient information has been provided to authorize pilot water injection into the
West McArthur River Oil Pool to evaluate the responsiveness of the West McArthur
River Oil Pool to waterflood development.
6. Injection pressure will be maintained to prevent breaching the confining intervals.
7. Injected fluids will be confined within the appropriate receiving intervals by imper-
meable lithology, cement isolation of the well bore and appropriate operating
conditions.
8. Reservoir and well surveillance coupled with regularly scheduled mechanical integ-
rity tests will demonstrate appropriate performance of the enhanced oil recovery
project and disclose anomalous performance.
9. An annual report will keep the Commission apprised of the pilot project's progress.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The underground injection of fluids for evaluation of enhanced oil recovery is author-
ized in the WMRU #2A, subject to the following rules and the statewide requirements
under 20 AAC Chapter 25 to the extent not superseded by these rules.
Rule 1: Expiration Date
This Order shall expire 24 months after its effective date.
Rule 2: Authorized Injection Strata
The West McArthur River Oil Pool, as defined in Conservation Order 332, is the strata
authorized for injection for pressure support and enhanced oil recovery injection.
Enhanced Recovery InjectiOltder No.3
November 6, 2006
.
Page 5
Rule 3: Fluid Injection Well
Well WMRU #2A is the only well authorized for fluid injection during this pilot project.
Well WMRU #2A's bottomhole location is in Section 10, T8N, and RI4W, Seward Me-
ridian.
Rule 4: Authorized Fluids for Enhanced Recovery
The only fluids authorized for injection are:
a. Produced water from the West McArthur River Oil Pool of the WMRU;
b. Osprey platform deck drainage;
c. Produced Hemlock water from the Redoubt Unit;
d. Produced Tyonek water from West Foreland;
e. Storm water from secondary containment areas around the tank farms at Kustatan
Production Facility and WMRU.
Rule 5: Authorized Injection Pressure for Enhanced Recovery
a. Normal injection pressures must be maintained below the parting pressure of the Hem-
lock formation.
b. Injection pressures must be maintained so that injected fluids do not fracture the con-
fining zone or migrate out of the approved injection stratum.
Rule 6: Demonstration of Tubin2/Casin2 Annulus Mechanical Inte2rity
The mechanical integrity of an injection well must be demonstrated before injection be-
gins, and before returning a well to service following a workover affecting mechanical
integrity. A Commission-witnessed mechanical integrity test must be performed after in-
jection is commenced for the first time in a well, to be scheduled when injection
conditions (temperature, pressure, rate, etc.) have stabilized. Subsequent tests must be
performed at least once every four years thereafter (except at least once every two years
in the case of a slurry injection well). The Commission must be notified at least 24
hours in advance to enable a representative to witness mechanical integrity tests. Unless
an alternate means is approved by the Commission, mechanical integrity must be dem-
onstrated by a tubing/casing annulus pressure test using a surface pressure of 1500 psi
or 0.25 psi/ft multiplied by the vertical depth of the packer, whichever is greater, that
shows stabilizing pressure and does not change more than 10 percent during a 30-minute
period. Results of mechanical integrity tests must be readily available for Commission
inspection.
Rule 7: Pilot Project Surveillance
Prior to initiating injection, a baseline temperature survey within WMRU #2A is re-
quired from above the West McArthur River Oil Pool to total depth of the well. Within
60 days after injection begins, a step rate test is required. The need for subsequent tem-
perature or step rate tests shall depend on injection performance or notable performance
anomalies.
The tubing and casing annuli pressures of each injection well must be monitored at least
daily, except if prevented by extreme weather condition, emergency situations, or simi-
Enhanced Recovery InjectiO!der No.3
November 6, 2006
.
Page 6
lar unavoidable circumstances. Monitoring results shall be documented and made avail-
able for Commission inspection.
Information gathered from the pilot, including daily wellhead injection pressures and
rates, results of injection surveys, shall be monitored and provided monthly to the
Commission until the maximum surface pressure is determined by a step-rate test.
In addition to reporting requirements of 20 AAC 25.432 (1) an annual progress report of
pilot operations shall be submitted within 90 days of the project startup anniversary and
annually thereafter. The progress report shall contain information regarding project pa-
rameters including but not limited to:
a. Reservoir V oidage balance within the project area.
b. Analysis of pressure response and production response.
c. Analysis of injection performance.
d. Analysis of fluid containment surveys, step-rate tests or MIT's that would demon-
strate confinement of injected fluids.
e. Review of any specialized tests performed to gauge performance and results of the
pilot project.
Rule 8: Notification of Improper Class II Injection
Injection of fluids other than those approved under Rule 4 is considered improper Class
II injection. Upon discovery of such an event, the operator must immediately suspend
injection, notify the Commission, and provide details of the operation. Additional noti-
fication requirements of any other State or Federal agency remain the operator's
responsibility.
Rule 9: Well Inte~rity Failure and Confinement
Whenever any pressure communication, leakage or lack of injection zone isolation is
indicated by injection rate, operating pressure observation, test, survey, log, or other
evidence, the operator shall immediately notify the Commission and submit a plan of
corrective action on a Form 10-403 for Commission approval. The operator shall im-
mediately shut in the well if continued operation would be unsafe or would threaten
contamination of freshwater, or if so directed by the Commission. A monthly report of
daily tubing and casing annuli pressures and injection rates must be provided to the
Commission for all injection wells indicating well integrity failure or lack of injection
zone isolation.
Rule 10: Other Conditions
It is a condition of this authorization that the operator complies with all applicable Com-
mission regulations.
The Commission may suspend, revoke, or modify this authorization if injected fluids
fail to be confined within the designated injection strata.
Rule 11 Administrative Actions
Enhanced Recovery Injectiotder No.3
November 6, 2006
.
Page 7
Unless notice and public hearing is otherwise required, the Commission may administra-
tively waive or amend any rule stated above as long as the change does not promote
waste or jeopardize correlative rights, is based on sound engineering and geoscience
principles, and will not result in fluid movement outside of the authorized injection
zone.
o age, Alaska and dated November 6,2006.
Daniel T. Seamount, Jr.
Commissioner
~~1'"
Cathy . Foerster
Commissioner
AS 31.05.080 provides'thå{wiihin 20 days after receipt of written notice of the entry of an order, a person affected by it Month file with
the Commission an application for rehearing. A request for rehearing must be received by 4:30 PM on the 23'd day following the date
of the order, or next working day if a holiday or weekend, to be timely filed. The Commission shall grant or refuse the application in
whole or in part within 10 days. The Commission can refuse an application by not acting on it within the 10-day period. An affected
person has 30 days from the date the Commission refuses the application or mails (or otherwise distributes) an order upon rehearing,
both being the final order of the Commission, to appeal the decision to Superior Court. Where a request for rehearing is denied by non-
action of the Commission, the 30-day period for appeal to Superior Court runs from the date on which the request is deemed denied
(i.e., 10th day after the application for rehearing was filed).
Mary Jones
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cartography
810 Houston Street, Ste 2000
Ft. Worth, TX 76102-6298
George Vaught, Jr.
PO Box 13557
Denver, CO 80201-3557
John Levorsen
200 North 3rd Street, #1202
Boise, ID 83702
Mark Wedman
Halliburton
6900 Arctic Blvd.
Anchorage, AK 99502
Ciri
Land Department
PO Box 93330
Anchorage, AK 99503
Gordon Severson
3201 Westmar Cr.
Anchorage, AK 99508-4336
James Gibbs
PO Box 1597
Soldotna, AK 99669
Richard Wagner
PO Box 60868
Fairbanks, AK 99706
North Slope Borough
PO Box 69
Barrow, AK 99723
.
David McCaleb
IHS Energy Group
GEPS
5333 Westheimer, Ste 100
Houston, TX 77056
Jerry Hodgden
Hodgden Oil Company
408 18th Street
Golden, CO 80401-2433
Kay Munger
Munger Oil Information Service, Inc
PO Box 45738
Los Angeles, CA 90045-0738
Schlumberger
Drilling and Measurements
2525 Gambell Street #400
Anchorage, AK 99503
Ivan Gillian
9649 Musket Bell Cr.#5
Anchorage, AK 99507
Jack Hakkila
PO Box 190083
Anchorage, AK 99519
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge
Refuge Manager
PO Box 2139
Soldotna, AK 99669-2139
Cliff Burglin
PO Box 70131
Fairbanks, AK 99707
Williams Thomas
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Land Department
PO Box 129
Barrow, AK 99723
.
Mona Dickens
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co.
Supply & Distribution
300 Concord Plaza Drive
San Antonio, TX 78216
Richard Neahring
NRG Associates
President
PO Box 1655
Colorado Springs, CO 80901
Michael Parks
Marple's Business Newsletter
117 West Mercer St, Ste 200
Seattle, WA 98119-3960
Baker Oil Tools
4730 Business Park Blvd., #44
Anchorage, AK 99503
Jill Schneider
US Geological Survey
4200 University Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99508
Darwin Waldsmith
PO Box 39309
Ninilchick, AK 99639
Penny Vadla
399 West Riverview Avenue
Soldotna, AK 99669-7714
Bernie Karl
K&K Recycling Inc.
PO Box 58055
Fairbanks, AK 99711
\t~ 1,
~(\ \Q \ 11 (6Lf
\' \ \ \ \
Various Orders
.
.
Subject: Various Orders
From: Jody Colombie <jody_colombie@admin.state.ak.us>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 200608:35:35 -0900
To: undisclose n
BCC: ,Christ n <c.hansen@iogcc.state.ok.us>, ·e Hubble <hubbletl@bp.com>, Sondra
Stewman <Ste a D@BP.com>, stanekj <stanekj@unocal.com>, ecolaw <ecolaw@trustees.org>,
trmjrl <trmjrl@aol.com>,jdarlington <jdarlington@forestoil.com> son
<knelson@petroleumnews.com>, cboddy <cboddy@usibelli.com>, Dalton
<mark.dalton@hdrinc.com>, Shannon Donnelly <shannon.donnelly@conocophillips.com>, "Mark P.
Worcester" <mark.p.worcester@conocophillips.com>, Bob <bob@inletkeeper.org>, wdv
<wdv@dnr.state.ak.us>, tjr <tjr@dnr.state.ak.us>, bbritch <bbritch@alaska.net>, mjnel
<mjnelson@purvingertz.com>, Charles O'Donnell <charles.o'donnell@veco.com>, "R L. Skillern"
<SkilleRL@BP.com>, "Deborah J. Jones" <JonesD6@BP.com>, "St R. Rossberg"
<RossbeRS@BP.com>, Lois <lois@inletkeeper.org>, Dan Bross <ku s@kuac.org ordon
Pospisil <PospisG@BP.com>, "Francis S. Sommer" <SommerFS@BP.co >, Mikel Schultz
<Mikel.Schultz@BP.com>, "Nick W. Glover" <GloverNW@BP.com>, "Daryl J. Kleppin"
<KleppiDE@BP.com>, "Janet D. Platt" <PlattJD@BP.com>, "Rosanne M. Jacobsen"
<JacobsRM@BP.com>, ddonkel <ddonkel@cfl.rr.com>, mckay <mckay@gci.net>, Barbara F Fullmer
<barbara.f.fu conocophillips.com>, Charles Barker <barker@usgs.gov>, doug_ ultze
<doug_schul ergy.com>, Hank Alford <hank.alford@exxonmobil.com>, M
<yesnol@g . et>, gspfoff <gspfoff@aurorapower.com>, Gregg Nad <gregg.nady@s
Steece <fred.steece@state.sd.us>, rcrotty <rcrotty@ch2m.com>,jejo 'ejone uro wer.com>,
dapa <dapa@alaska. , jroderick <jroderick@gci.net>, eyancy <ey @se et>, "James M.
Ruud" <james.m.ruu onocophillips m>, Brit Lively <mapalaska@ak.ne
<jah@dnr.state.ak.us>, buonoje <bu bp.com>, Mark Hanley <mark_hanley anadarko.com>,
loren_leman <loren_leman@gov.state.ak.us>, Julie Houle <julie_houle@dnr.state.ak.us>, John W Katz
<jwkatz@sso.org>, tablerk <tablerk@unocal.com>, Brady <brady@aoga.org>, Brian Havelock
<beh@dnr.state.ak.us>, bpopp <bpopp@borough.kenai.ak.us>, Jim White <jimwhite@satx.rr.com>,
"John S. Haworth" <john.s.haworth@exxonmobil.com>, marty <marty@rkindustrial.com>, ghammons
<ghammons@aol.com>, rmclean <rmclean@pobox.alaska.net>, mkm7200 <mkm7200@aol.com>,
Brian Gillespie <ifbmg@uaa.alaska.edu>, David L Boelens <dboelens@aurorapower.com>, Todd
Durkee <TDURKEE@KMG.com>, Gary Schultz <gary_schultz@dnr.state.ak.us>, Wayne Rancier
<RANCIER@petro-canada.ca>, Brandon Gagnon <bgagnon@brenalaw.com>, Paul Winslow
<pmwinslow@forestoil.com>, Sharmaine Copeland <copelasv@bp.com>, Kristin Dirks
<kristin_dirks@dnr.state.ak.us>, Kaynell Zeman <kjzeman@marathonoil.com>, John Tower
<John.Tower@eia. e.gov>, Bill Fowler <Bill_Fowler@anadarko.COM>, Scott Cranswick
<scott.cranswick s.gov>, Brad McKim <mckimbs@BP.com>, Steve Lambe
<lambes@unocal.com>,jack newell <jack.newell@acsalaska.net>, James Scherr
<james.scherr@mms.gov>, n1617 nocophillips.com, Tim Lawlor <Tim_Lawlor@ . m.gov>,
Lynnda Kahn <Lynnda_Kahn@fws.gov>, Jerry Dethlefs <Jerry.C.Dethlefs@conocophillips.com>,
crockett@aoga.org, Tamera Sheffield <s d@aoga.org>, Jon Golt
<Jon.Goltz@conocophillips.com>, Rog lman <roger.belman@con ophillips.com>, Mindy Lewis
<mlewis@brenalaw.com>, Kari Moriarty <moriarty@aoga.org>, Patty Alfaro <palfaro@yahoo.com>,
Jeff <smetankaj@unocal.com>, Todd Kratz <ToddKratz@chevron.com>, Gary Rogers
<garyJogers@revenue.state.ak.us>, Arthur Copoulos <Arthur_Copoulos@dnr.state.ak.us>, Ken
<ken@secorp-inc.com>, Steve Lambert <salambert@unocal.com>, Joe Nicks <news@radiokenai.com>,
Jerry McCutcheon <susitnahydronow@yahoo.com>, Bill Walker <bill-wwa@ak.net>, Iris Matthews <Iris_Matthews@legis.state.ak.us>, Paul Decker <paul_decker@dnr.state.ak.us>, ,Aleutians East
lof2
11/8/2006 8:50 AM
Various Orders
.
.
Borough <admin@aleutianseast.org>, Marquerite kremer <marguerite_kremer@dnr.state.ak.us>, ,Mike
Mason <mike@kbbi.org>, Garland Robinson <gbrobinson@marathonoil.com>, Cammy Taylor
<Camille_Taylor@law.state.ak.us>, Winton GAubert <winton_aubert@admin.state.ak.us>, Thomas E
Maunder <tom_maunder@admin.state.ak.us>, Stephen F Davies <steve_davies@admin.state.ak.us>,
Keith Wiles <kwiles@marathonoil.com>, Deanna Gam gamble@kakivik.com>, James B Regg
<jim_regg@admin.state.ak.us>, Catherine P Foerster <c _foerster@admin.state.ak.us>, Bob
<Bob@fairweather.com>, gregory micallef <micallef@c1earwire.net>, Laura Silliphant
<laura _ silliphant@dnr.state.ak.us>, David Steingreaber <david.e.steingreaber@exxonmobil.com>,
akpratts@acsalaska.net, Robert Campbell <Robert.Campbell@reuters.com>, Steve Moothart
<steve _ moothart@dnr.state.ak.us>, A <anna.raff@dowjones.com>, Cliff Posey
<c1iff@posey.org>, Paul Bloom <paul_ @ml.com>" Meghan Powell
<Meghan.Powell@asrcenergy.com>, Temple Davidson <temple _ davidson@dnr.state.ak.us>, Walter
Featherly <WFeatherly@PattonBoggs.com>, Cynthia B Mciver <bren_mciver@admin.state.ak.us>
Jody Colombie <iody colombie@,admin.state.ak.us>
Special Staff Assistant
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Department of Administration
i. Content-Type: application/pdf
erlO3.pdf
Content-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: application/pdf
aio12-1.pdf
Content-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: application/pdf
co478a-01.pdf
Content-Encoding: base64
20f2
11/8/2006 8:50 AM
.
.
DONE
-
Operator:
Hearing Date:
E/20
w Mc.,4r./-4.ur Ia~,... t/pt//- æ. 2A
r:c:> re..6~
~"-~ ~I -Z-COh
ORDER:
Area / Well:
V' Application Complete
Additional Information: Requested
_ Additional Information: Requested
_ Additional Information Complete
~ublic Notice
Text Drafted on
; Received
; Received
VIa
VIa
VIa
VIa
on ~~
on 2-
d Questions for Operator
Questions Drafted
Questions Reviewed: By Team ; By Attorney General's Office
Questions Sent to Operator VIa
Response Received
Response Complete
V AU1œÞpublic Hearing
Hearing Held
Additional Information: Requested
Additional Information: Requested
Additional Information Complete
VIa
(o..COr.W
; Received
; Received
VIa
VIa
VIa
VIa
Orde~
~ Text Drafted f/zk by ':bR-
_ Text Reviewed by Team f· 7 ß
Text Sent to Attorney General's Office
Text Reviewed by Attorney General's Office
Text Reviewed by Other Agency
Text Sent to Jody for Formatting / Publishing
Text Sent to Commissioners
Approved by Commissioners
Published
• •
~~p~C~ 0~ pL q~~lp / ,.a..M~,.~o.FA.o.
~sC~~7~ OI~ ~ `IAS 333 W. 7th AVENUE, SUITE 100
CO1~T5ERQA'1'IO1~T COMAIISSIOH ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501-3539
PHONE (907) 279-1433
FAX (907) 276-7542
ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL NO. ERIO 3.001
Mr. Jim Arlington
Vice President, Land & Government Affairs
Pacific Energy Resources Ltd.
310 K Street, Suite 700
Anchorage, AK 99501
Re: Extension of Enhanced Recovery Injection Order No. 3
West McArthur River Unit; West McArthur River Oil Pool;
Well West McArthur River Unit No. 2A
Dear Mr. Arlington:
By letter dated and received November 5, 2008, Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. (PERL) requests that the
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (Commission) approve a 24-month extension of the
November 6, 2008, expiration date for the pilot waterflood project in the West McArthur River Oil Pool
(WMROP), West McArthur River Unit (WMRU); the pilot waterflood project is authorized by
Enhanced Recovery Injection Order No. 3 (ERIO 3).
In accordance with Rule 11, Administrative Actions, of ERIO 3, PERL's request is approved: the
expiration date specified in Rule 1 of ERIO 3 is extended from November 6, 2008 to November 6,
2010. All other conditions of ERIO 3 remain in effect.
The Commission issued ERIO 3 to Forest Oil Corporation (Forest) on November 6, 2006. Under Rule 1
of ERIO 3, the order expired 24 months later: i. e., on November 6, 2008. The pilot waterflood
authorized by ERIO 3 has not been initiated, but PERL, which succeeded Forest as operator of the
WMRU, stated in the extension request that it intends to initiate the pilot waterflood after well WMRU
No. 2A is worked over to repair tubing and restore the well's mechanical integrity. PERL anticipates
that this work will occur in the spring of 2009, and then PERL intends to commence injection and gather
the data necessary to determine whether waterflooding is an effective means of enhancing recovery in
the WMROP.
Amending the expiration date of ERIO 3 will allow PERL adequate time to conduct and analyze the
results of the pilot waterflood project and decide whether to apply to make the project permanent or
expand the project to the entire pool or both. Approving the extension request will not promote waste or
jeopardize correlative rights, is based on sound engineering and geoscience principles, and will not
result in fluid movement outside of the authorized injection zone. Therefore, the Commission is
• •
ERIO 3.001
November 10, 2008
Page 2 of 2
authorized, under Rule 11 of ERIO 3, to administratively amend Rule 1 of ERIO 3 to extend the
expiration date to November 6, 2010.
ENTERED at Anchorage, Alaska, and
~~
Daniel T. Seamount, Jr.
Chair
10, 2008.
Orman Cathy P. Foerster ~~~,~,~
b
over Commissioner ,;~
TIt i~ ~'~
RECONSIDERATION AND APPEAL NOTICE
As provided in AS 31.05.080(a), within 20 days after written notice of the entry of this order or decision, or such further time as
the Commission grants for good cause shown, a person affected by it may file with the Commission an application for reconsid-
eration of the matter determined by it. If the notice was mailed, then the period of time shall be 23 days. An application for re-
consideration must set out the respect in which the order or decision is believed to be erroneous.
The Commission shall grant or refuse the application for reconsideration in whole or in part within 10 days after it is filed. Fail-
ure to act on it within ]0-days is a denial of reconsideration. If the Commission denies reconsideration, upon denial, this order
or decision and the denial of reconsideration are FINAL and may be appealed to superior court. The appeal MUST be filed
within 33 days after the date on which the Commission mails, OR 30 days if the Commission otherwise distributes, the order or
decision denying reconsideration, UNLESS the denial is by inaction, in which case the appeal MUST be filed within 40 days af-
ter the date on which the application for reconsideration was filed.
If the Commission grants an application for reconsideration, this order or decision does not become final. Rather, the order or
decision on reconsideration will be the FINAL order or decision of the Commission, and it may be appealed to superior court.
That appeal MUST be filed within 33 days after the date on which the Commission mails, OR 30 days if the Commission other-
wise distributes, the order or decision on reconsideration. As provided in AS 31.05.080(b), "[t]he questions reviewed on appeal
are limited to the questions presented to the Commission by the application for reconsideration."
In computing a period of time above, the date of the event or default after which the designated period begins to run is not in-
cluded in the period; the last day of the period is included, unless it falls on a weekend or state holiday, in which event the period
runs until 5:00 p.m. on the next day that does not fall on a weekend or state holiday.
•
Mary Jones David McCaleb Cindi Walker
XTO Energy, Inc. IHS Energy Group Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co.
Cartography GEPS Supply & Distribution
810 Houston Street, Ste 2000 5333 Westheimer, Ste 100 300 Concord Plaza Drive
Ft. Worth, TX 76102-6298 Houston, TX 77056 San Antonio, TX 78216
George Vaught, Jr. Jerry Hodgden Richard Neahring
PO Box 13557 Hodgden Oil Company NRG Associates
Denver, CO 80201-3557 408 18th Street President
Golden, CO 80401-2433 PO Box 1655
Colorado Springs, CO 80901
Mark Wedman Schlumberger Ciri
Halliburton Drilling and Measurements Land Department
6900 Arctic Blvd. 2525 Gambell Street #400 PO Box 93330
Anchorage, AK 99502 Anchorage, AK 99503 Anchorage, AK 99503
Baker Oil Tools Ivan Gillian Jill Schneider
4730 Business Park Blvd., #44 9649 Musket Bell Cr.#5 US Geological Survey
Anchorage, AK 99503 Anchorage, AK 99507 4200 University Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99508
Gordon Severson Jack Hakkila Darwin Waldsmith
3201 Westmar Cr. PO Box 190083 PO Box 39309
Anchorage, AK 99508-4336 Anchorage, AK 99519 Ninilchick, AK 99639
James Gibbs Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Penny Vadla
PO Box 1597 Refuge Manager 399 West Riverview Avenue
Soldotna, AK 99669 PO Box 2139 Soldotna, AK 99669-7714
Soldotna, AK 99669-2139
Richard Wagner Cliff Burglin Bernie Karl
PO Box 60868 PO Box 70131 K&K Recycling Inc.
Fairbanks, AK 99706 Fairbanks, AK 99707 PO Box 58055
Fairbanks, AK 99711
North Slope Borough
PO Box 69
Barrow, AK 99723
a~~~o~ ~ ~~z~~
Page 1 of 1
•
Colombie, Jody J (DOA)
From: Colombie, Jody J (DOA)
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:33 AM
Subject: co505A-001 (Orion) aio26A-002 (Orion) co471-007 (Borealis) erio3-001 (West McArthur River)
Attachments: erio3-001.pdf; co505A-001 A1026A-002 CO 341-007.pdf
BCC:'Aaron Gluzman'; caunderwood@marathonoil.com; 'Dale Hoffman'; Fridiric Grenier; 'Joe Longo'; 'Lamont
Frazer'; Marc Kuck; 'Mary Aschoff; Maurizio Grandi; P Bates; Richard Garrard; 'Sandra Lemke'; 'Scott Nash'; 'Steve
Virant'; Tom Gennings; 'Willem Vollenbrock'; 'William Van Dyke'; Woolf, Wendy C (DNR); 'Aleutians East
Borough'; 'Anna Raff ; 'Barbara F Fullmer'; 'bbritch'; 'Bill Walker'; 'Brad McKim'; 'Brandon Gagnon'; 'Brian Gillespie';
'Brian Havelock'; 'Brit Lively'; 'Bruce Webb'; 'buonoje'; 'Cammy Taylor'; 'Cande.Brandow'; 'carol smyth ; 'Cary
Carrigan'; 'Charles O'Donnell'; 'Chris Gay'; 'Cliff Posey'; 'Dan Bross'; 'dapa'; 'Daryl J. Kleppin'; 'David Brown'; 'David
Hall'; David House; 'David L Boelens'; 'David Steingreaber'; 'ddonkel'; 'Deborah J. Jones'; 'doug_schultze'; 'Eric Lidj i ';
'Evan Harness'; 'eyancy'; 'foms2@mtaonline.net'; 'Francis S. Sommer'; 'Fred Steece'; 'Garland Robinson'; 'Gary
Laughlin'; 'Gary Rogers'; 'Gary Schultz'; 'ghammons'; 'Gordon Pospisil'; 'Gregg Nady'; 'gregory micallef ; 'gspfoff ;
'Hank Alford'; 'Harry Engel'; 'jah'; 'James Scherr'; 'Janet D. Platt'; 'jejones'; 'Jerry McCutcheon'; 'Jim Arlington'; 'Jim
White'; 'Jim Winegarner'; 'Joe Nicks'; 'John Garing'; 'John S. Haworth'; 'John Spain'; 'John Tower'; 'John W Katz';
johnny.aiken@north-slope.org; 'Jon Goltz'; 'Julie Houle'; 'Kari Moriarty'; 'Kaynell Zeman'; 'Keith Wiles';
knelson@petroleumnews.com; 'Krissell Crandall'; 'Kristin Dirks'; 'Laura Silliphant'; 'Lois'; 'Lynnda Kahn';
'mail=akpratts@acsalaska.net'; 'mail=fours@mtaonline.net'; 'Marilyn Crockett'; 'Mark Dalton'; 'Mark Hanley'; 'Mark
Kovac'; 'Mark P. Worcester'; 'Marguerite kremer'; 'Matt Rader'; Melanie Brown; 'Mike Bill'; 'Mike Mason'; 'Mikel
Schultz'; 'Mindy Lewis'; 'MJ Loveland'; 'mjnelson'; 'mkm7200'; 'Nick W. Glover'; NSK Problem Well Supv; NSU,
ADW Well Integrity Engineer; 'Patty Alfaro'; 'Paul Decker'; 'Paul Winslow'; Pierce, Sandra M (DNR); 'Randall
Kanady'; 'Randy L. Skillern'; 'rcrotty'; Rice, Cody J (DNR); 'rmclean'; 'Rob McWhorter ';
rob.g.dragnich@exxonmobil.com; 'Robert Campbell'; 'Robert Fowler'; 'Robert Province'; 'Roger Belman'; 'Rudy
Brueggeman'; 'Scott Cranswick'; 'Shannon Donnelly'; 'Sharmaine Copeland'; 'Sondra Stewman'; 'Sonja Frankllin'; 'Stan
Porhola'; 'stanekj'; 'Steve Lambert'; 'Steve Moothart'; 'Steven R. Rossberg'; 'tablerk'; 'Tamera Sheffield'; 'Temple
Davidson'; 'Terrie Hubble'; 'Tim Lawlor'; 'Todd Durkee'; Tony Hopfinger; 'trmjrl'; 'Walter Featherly'; 'Walter Quay';
'Wayne Rancier'; Birnbaum, Alan J (LAW); Crisp, John H (DOA); Davies, Stephen F (DOA); Fleckenstein, Robert J
(DOA); Foerster, Catherine P (DOA); Grimaldi, Louis R (DOA); Johnson, Elaine M (DOA); Jones, Jeffery B (DOA);
Laasch, Linda K (DOA); Mahnken, Christine R (DOA); Maunder, Thomas E (DOA); McIver, C (DOA); McMains,
Stephen E (DOA); Noble, Robert C (DOA); Norman, John K (DOA); Okland, Howard D (DOA); Paladijczuk, Tracie L
(DOA); Pasqual, Maria (DOA); Regg, James B (DOA); Roby, David S (DOA); Saltmarsh, Arthur C (DOA); Scheve,
Charles M (DOA); Seamount, Dan T (DOA); Smith, Chasity R (DOA); Williamson, Mary J (DOA)
Attachments:erio3-OO1.pdf;co505A-001 AI026A-002 CO 341-007.pdf;
Jody J. Colombie
Special Assistant to the Commission
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7th Avenue, Suite 100
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
(907) 793-1221 Direct Line
(907) 276-7542 Fax
11/12/2008
• •
s = A =.= 1 __ E
SEAN PARNELL, GOVERNOR
ALASKA OIL AND GAS 333 W. 7th AVENUE, SUITE 100
CONSERVATION COMMISSION ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 -3539
PHONE (907) 279 -1433
FAX (907) 276 -7542
ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL
ENHANCED RECOVERY INJECTION ORDER 3.002
Mr. David Hall, CEO
Cook Inlet Energy
601 W. 5th Ave., Ste. 310
Anchorage, AK 99501
Re: Request for Time Extension of Enhanced Recovery Injection Order No. 03, West
McArthur River Unit, West McArthur River Oil Pool, Well West McArthur River
Unit No. 2A.
Dear Mr. Hall:
By letter dated and received December 27, 2010 Cook Inlet Energy (CIE) requests a time
extension of the West McArthur River Unit (WMRU) pilot waterflood project, authorized
by Enhanced Recovery Injection Order (ERIO) No. 03.
In accordance with Rule 11, Administrative Actions, of ERIO No. 03, CIE's request
is approved. The expiration date specified in Rule 1 of ERIO No. 03 is extended until
December 31, 2013. All other Rules of ERIO No. 03 remain in effect.
On November 6, 2006 the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission ( AOGCC)
issued ERIO No. 03, authorizing a pilot waterflood project by Forest Oil Corporation
(Forest) in the West McArthur River Oil Pool, WMRU, Cook Inlet, Alaska. Forest did
not initiate the approved waterflood, and Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. (PERL)
succeeded Forest as operator of the WMRU. On November 10, 2008 the AOGCC
approved a time extension of ERIO No. 03 until November 6, 2010, however PERL
never undertook the necessary repair to well WMRU 2A to allow fluid injection. Since
becoming operator of the WMRU, CIE has completed a tubing repair of WMRU 2A, and
CIE now desires a further time extension of ERIO No. 03.
WMRU 2A is currently producing, but CIE is in position to begin fluid injection. The
requested ERIO No. 03 time extension should provide adequate time for pilot water
injection and data acquisition necessary for prudent project evaluation. This time
extension will not promote waste or jeopardize correlative rights, is based upon sound
engineering and geoscience principles, and will not result in fluid movement outside of
the authorized injection zone. Therefore, the AOGCC is authorized under Rule 11 of
ERIO 3.002 •
January 11, 2011
Page 2 of 2
ERIO No. 03 to administratively amend Rule 1 of ERIO No. 03, to extend the expiration
date to December 31, 2013.
ENTERED at Anchorage, Alaska and dated January 11, 20 .
z}
•
4 1°11
1 • ,,., .
e
• Cathy 9 . Foerster M K. Norman av r bmt#"'
Commissioner Co is oner
RECONSIDERATION AND APPEAL NOTICE
As provided in AS 31.05.080(a), within 20 days after written notice of the entry of this order or decision, or such further time as the Commission
grants for good cause shown, a person affected by it may file with the Commission an application for reconsideration of the matter determined
by it. If the notice was mailed, then the period of time shall be 23 days. An application for reconsideration must set out the respect in which the
order or decision is believed to be erroneous.
The Commission shall grant or refuse the application for reconsideration in whole or in part within 10 days after it is filed. Failure to act on it
within 10 -days is a denial of reconsideration. If the Commission denies reconsideration, upon denial, this order or decision and the denial of re-
consideration are FINAL and may be appealed to superior court. The appeal MUST be filed within 33 days after the date on which the Com-
mission mails, OR 30 days if the Commission otherwise distributes, the order or decision denying reconsideration, UNLESS the denial is by in-
action, in which case the appeal MUST be filed within 40 days after the date on which the application for reconsideration was filed.
If the Commission grants an application for reconsideration, this order or decision does not become final. Rather, the order or decision on re-
consideration will be the FINAL order or decision of the Commission, and it may be appealed to superior court. That appeal MUST be filed
within 33 days after the date on which the Commission mails, OR 30 days if the Commission otherwise distributes, the order or decision on re-
consideration. As provided in AS 31.05.080(b), "[t]he questions reviewed on appeal are limited to the questions presented to the Commission
by the application for reconsideration."
In computing a period of time above, the date of the event or default after which the designated period begins to run is not included in the period;
the last day of the period is included, unless it falls on a weekend or state holiday, in which event the period runs until 5:00 p.m. on the next day
that does not fall on a weekend or state holiday.
• •
Fisher, Samantha J (DOA)
From: Fisher, Samantha J (DOA)
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 1:47 PM
To: Ballantine, Tab A (LAW); '(foms2 @mtaonline.net)'; '( michael .j.nelson @conocophillips.com)';
'(Von.L .Hutchins @conocophillips.com)'; 'AKDCWeIIIntegrityCoordinator'; 'Alan Dennis';
'alaska @petrocalc.com'; 'Anna Raff; 'Barbara F Fullmer'; 'bbritch'; 'Becky Bohrer'; 'Bill
Penrose'; 'Bill Walker'; 'Bowen Roberts'; 'Brad McKim'; 'Brady, Jerry L'; 'Brandon Gagnon';
'Brandow, Cande (ASRC Energy Services)'; 'Brian Havelock'; 'Bruce Webb'; 'carol smyth';
'caunderwood'; 'Chris Gay'; 'Cliff Posey; 'Crandall, Krissell'; 'D Lawrence'; 'dapa'; 'Daryl J.
Kleppin'; 'Dave Matthews'; 'David Boelens'; 'David House'; 'David Steingreaber';
'ddonkel @cfl.rr.com'; 'Deborah J. Jones'; Delbridge, Rena E (LAA); 'Dennis Steffy'; 'Elowe,
Kristin'; 'Erika Denman'; 'eyancy'; 'Francis S. Sommer; 'Fred Steece'; 'Gary Laughlin'; 'Gary
Rogers'; 'Gary Schultz'; 'ghammons'; 'Gordon Pos isil 'Gorney, David L.% Greg Duggin';
o Y
9
rY � 9 � P
'Gregg Nady'; 'gspfoff; 'Harry Engel'; 'Jdarlington (jarlington @gmail.com)'; 'Jeanne
McPherren'; 'Jeff Jones'; 'Jerry McCutcheon'; 'Jill Womack'; 'Jim White'; 'Jim Winegarner ,
'Joe Nicks'; 'John Garing'; 'John Katz'; 'John S. Haworth'; 'John Spain'; 'John Tower'; 'Jon
Goltz'; 'Judy Stanek'; 'Julie Houle'; 'Kari Moriarty'; 'Kaynell Zeman'; 'Keith Wiles'; 'Kelly
Sperback'; 'Kim Cunningham'; 'Larry Ostrovsky'; 'Laura Silliphant'; 'Marilyn Crockett'; 'Mark
Dalton'; 'Mark Hanley (mark.hanley @anadarko.com)'; 'Mark Kovac'; 'Mark P. Worcester';
'Marguerite kremer'; 'Michael Dammeyer'; 'Michael Jacobs'; 'Mike Bill'; 'Mike Mason'; 'Mikel
Schultz'; 'Mindy Lewis'; 'MJ Loveland'; 'mjnelson'; 'mkm7200'; 'nelson'; 'Nick W. Glover'; 'NSK
Problem Well Supv'; 'Patty Alfaro'; 'Paul Decker (paul.decker @alaska.gov)'; 'Paul Figel';
'PORHOLA, STAN T'; 'Randall Kanady'; 'Randy L. Skillern'; ' rob.g.dragnich @exxonmobil.com';
'Robert Brelsford'; 'Robert Campbell'; 'Ryan Tunseth'; 'Scott Cranswick'; 'Scott Griffith'; Scott,
David (LAA); 'Shannon Donnelly'; 'Sharmaine Copeland'; Shellenbaum, Diane P (DNR);
Slemons, Jonne D (DNR); 'Sondra Stewman'; 'Steve Lambert'; 'Steve Moothat; 'Steven R.
Rossberg'; 'Suzanne Gibson'; 'tablerk'; 'Tamera Sheffield'; Taylor, Cammy 0 (DNR); 'Temple
Davidson'; 'Teresa Imm'; 'Terrie Hubble'; 'Thor Cutler'; 'Tina Grovier'; 'Todd Durkee'; 'Tony
Hopfinger'; 'trmjrl'; 'Valenzuela, Mariam '; 'Vicki Irwin'; 'Walter Featherly'; 'Will Chinn';
Williamson, Mary J (DNR); 'Yereth Rosen'; 'Aaron Gluzman'; Bettis, Patricia K (DNR);
caunderwood @marathonoil.com; 'Dale Hoffman'; 'David Lenig'; 'Gary Orr'; 'Jason Bergerson';
'Joe Longo'; 'Lara Coates'; 'Marc Kuck'; 'Mary Aschoff; 'Matt Gill'; 'Maurizio Grandi';
Ostrovsky, Larry Z (DNR); 'Richard Garrard'; 'Sandra Lemke'; 'Talib Syed'; 'Tiffany Stebbins';
'Wayne Wooster'; 'William Van Dyke'; Woolf, Wendy C (DNR); Aubert, Winton G (DOA)
(winton.aubert@alaska.gov); Brooks, Phoebe L (DOA) (phoebe.brooks @alaska.gov);
Colombie, Jody J (DOA) (jody.colombie @alaska.gov); Crisp, John H (DOA)
(john.crisp @alaska.gov); Davies, Stephen F (DOA) (steve.davies @alaska.gov); Foerster,
Catherine P (DOA) (cathy.foerster @ alaska.gov); Grimaldi, Louis R (DOA)
(lou.grimaldi @alaska.gov); Johnson, Elaine M (DOA) (elaine.johnson @ alaska.gov); Jones,
Jeffery B (DOA) (jeff.jones @alaska.gov); Laasch, Linda K (DOA) (linda.laasch @alaska.gov);
Maunder, Thomas E (DOA) (tom.maunder @alaska.gov); McIver, Bren (DOA)
(bren.mciver @alaska.gov); McMains, Stephen E (DOA) (steve.mcmains @alaska.gov);
Mumm, Joseph (DOA sponsored); Noble, Robert C (DOA) (bob.noble @alaska.gov); Norman,
John K (DOA) (john.norman @alaska.gov); Okland, Howard D (DOA)
(howard.okland @alaska.gov); Paladijczuk, Tracie L (DOA) ( tracie.paladijczuk @ alaska.gov);
Pasqual, Maria (DOA) (maria.pasqual @alaska.gov); Regg, James B (DOA)
(jim.regg @alaska.gov); Roby, David S (DOA) (dave.roby @alaska.gov); Saltmarsh, Arthur C
(DOA) (art.saltmarsh @alaska.gov); Scheve, Charles M (DOA) (chuck.scheve @alaska.gov);
Schwartz, Guy L (DOA) (guy.schwartz @alaska.gov); Seamount, Dan T (DOA)
(dan.seamount @alaska.gov); Shartzer, Christine R (DOA)
Subject: ERIO 3.002 (WMRU 2A) and CO 642 Correction
Attachments: erio 3- 002.pdf; co 642 correction.pdf
Sam/La/at-ha/ J & h&r
Alaokai Oar a Cave wattoo-w C
(907)793-1223
(907)276-754-2 (/ x)
1
• •
Mary Jones David McCaleb
XTO Energy, Inc. IHS Energy Group George Vaught, Jr.
Cartography GEPS P.O. Box 13557
810 Houston Street, Ste 200 5333 Westheimer, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80201 -3557
Ft. Worth, TX 76102 -6298 Houston, TX 77056
Jerry Hodgden Richard Neahring Mark Wedman
Hodgden Oil Company NRG Associates Halliburton
President
408 18 Street 6900 Arctic Blvd.
Golden, CO 80401 -2433 P. Box 1655 Anchorage, AK 99502
Colorado Springs, CO 80901
Bernie Karl CIRI
K &K Recycling Inc. Land Department Baker Oil Tools
P.O. Box 58055 P.O. Box 93330 795 E. 94 Ct.
Anchorage, AK 99515 -4295
Fairbanks, AK 99711 Anchorage, AK 99503
Jill Schneider
North Slope Borough Gordon Severson
US Geological Survey
P.O. Box 69 3201 Westmar Circle
4200 University Drive
Barrow, AK 99723 Anchorage, AK 99508 -4336 I
Anchorage, AK 99508
Jack Hakkila Darwin Waldsmith James Gibbs
P.O. Box 190083 P.O. Box 39309 P.O. Box 1597
Anchorage, AK 99519 Ninilchick, AK 99639 Soldotna, AK 99669
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge
Penny Vadla Cliff Burglin
Refuge Manager 399 West Riverview Avenue 319 Charles Street
P.O. Box 2139 Soldotna, AK 99669 -7714 Fairbanks, AK 99701
Soldotna, AK 99669 -2139
Richard Wagner
P.O. Box 60868
Fairbanks, AK 99706
• •
4
Cook Inlet Energy_
RECEIVED
December 27, 2010
DEC 2 7 2010
Mr. Dan Seamount, Chair Alaska Oil & Gas Cans. Commission
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Anchorage
333 West 7 Ave., Suite 100
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Re: Extension of Enhanced Recovery Injection Order No.3, West McArthur River Unit, West
McArthur River Oil Pool, Well West McArthur River Unit No. 2A
Dear Chairman Seamount:
The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission ( "Commission "), on November 6, 2006, issued
Enhanced Recovery Injection Order No.3 ( "ERIO3 ") approving the application submitted by Forest
Oil Corporation dated May 10, 2006 to authorize pilot water injection into well West McArthur
River Unit No. 2A (WMRU #2A ") to test the potential for enhanced oil recovery under 20 AAC
25.402. Pacific Energy Resources, Ltd. ( "PERL "), as Operator of the West McArthur River Unit
( "WMRU "), requested and received an additional 24 months until the expiration of ERIO3 so that
Rule 1 read, after it was amended, "This Order shall expire 48 months after its effective date." Cook
Inlet Energy, LLC ( "CIE "), as current owner and operator of the WMRU and WMRU #2A, hereby
respectfully requests that the Commission administratively amend Rule 1 of ERIO3 to allow an
additional 24 months until the expiration of ERIO3 so that Rule 1 would read, "This Order shall
expire 72 months after its effective date."
During the previous extension PERL never undertook the necessary tubing repair in WMRU #2A to
allow injection of fluids. CIE completed the tubing repair in the WMRU #2A in early winter of
2010, completing the well as both a producer and injector. CIE is currently producing the WMRU
#2A, but plans to commence fluid injection within the next three to twelve months should the
Commission grant the extension of ERIO3. The requested extension would provide adequate time to
commence the pilot water injection project and acquire data required for prudent evaluation prior to
the amended expiration date requested for Rule 1 of ERIO3. CIE foresees no need to amend any
other Rule in ERIO3 and considers all other issues and actions discussed in Forest's original
application as still viable.
Please feel free to call me (907- 433 -3805) with any questions or to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely, `e/f,
David Hall
CEO
Cc: Wendy Woolf, SOA/DNR/DO &G
601 W. 5` Avenue, Suite 310, Anchorage, AK 99501
(907) 334 -6745 * (907) 334 -6735 fax
~ 4
•
Fr®m: Saltmarsh, Arthur C (DOA)
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 11:08 AM
Subject: FW: Pacific Energy files chapter-11, it's official!!!
FYI.
PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES LTD. ~ ~ ` Q
111 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 1240
Long Beach, California 90802
Telephone: (562) 628-1526; Fax: (562) 628-1536
Files for Chapter ii to Facilitate a Restructuring
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA, Monday, March 9, 2009 - -Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. (the "Company")(TSX:PFE)
announces today that it and its wholly owned subsidiaries have filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.
The filing was precipitated by the dramatic decrease in the market price of oil over the past five months.
Combined with the Company's pre-existing level of debt related to past acquisitions and poor capital market
conditions, the Company's liquidity and cash flow is insufficient to operate its business and invest in its oil
producing assets to increase production. Faced with these constraints, the Company and its subsidiaries filed
petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 to facilitate access to an immediate source of liquidity as it works to
restructure its debt.
In connection with the filing, the Company is seeking customary authority from the Bankruptcy Court that will
enable it to continue operating its business in the ordinary course of business. The requested approvals include
requests for the authority to make wage and salary payments and continue various benefits for employees. In
addition, the Company has negotiated a commitment for $40 million in debtor-in-possession ("DIP") financing.
The DIP facility wraps and replaces two of the Company's three asset-based credit facilities and is being provided
by the lenders of the two credit facilities that are being replaced. Upon Court approval, the DIP financing
combined with the Company's operating revenue will provide sufficient liquidity to fund working capital, meet
ongoing obligations and ensure that normal operations continue without interruption during its restructuring.
About Pacific Energy Resources
Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. is an oil and gas exploration and production company based in Long Beach, California,
U.S.A. Additional information relating to the Company may be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. The
Company's web site is www.PacEnergy.com.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES LTD.
I~ J
Pacific Irner~, Resources Ltd.
310 K. Street, Suite 700
A.nchora~e, AK 99507
Office: 907-2~8-8600
Fa~c: 907-258-8601
~av~d Hall
Alaska ®perations Manager
Main: 907-868-2133
Cell: 907-317-8239
d mh al lr'cc~,pace nerQv.com
www_.pacenerw.com
~3
•
Pacific Energy Resources Ltd
310 K Street, Suite 700
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
(907) 258-8600 Fax: (907) 258-8601
November 5, 2008 ~. _ .
Chairman Daniel T. Seamount, Jr.
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7~' Avenue, Suite 100
Anchorage, AK 99501
Re: Extension of Enhanced Recovery Injection Order No.3
West McArthur River Unit; West McArthur River Oil Pool;
Well West McArthur River Unit No. 2A
Dear Chairman Seamount:
The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission ("Commission"), on November 6, 2006, issued Enhanced
Recovery Injection Order No.3 ("ERI03") approving the application submitted by Forest Oil Corporation
("Forest") dated May 10, 2006 to authorize pilot water injection into well West McArthur River Unit No. 2A
(WMRU #2A") to test the potential for enhanced oil recovery under 20 AAC 25.402. Pacific Energy
Resources, Ltd. ("PEKE"), as Operator of the West McArthur River Unit ("WMRU") and for the Lessee,
Pacific Energy Alaska Operating LLC "PEAO"), hereby respectfully requests that the Commission
administratively amend Rule 1 of ERI03 to allow an additiona124 months until the expiration of ERI03 so that
Rule 1 will read, after it is amended, "This Order shall expire 48 months after its effective date: '
PERL assumed responsibilities asOperator of the WMRU from Forest in January 2008. The repair of the
tubing in the WMRU #2A, required in order to allow injection of fluids and compliance with Rule 6 of ERI03,
had not been completed by Forest prior to PERL becoming Operator of the WMRU. PERL plans to commence
and complete the tubing repair in the WMRU #2A in the spring of 2009 and commence fluid injection upon
completion of the activities described in Rule 6 and Rule 7 of the ERI03. The requested extension would
provide time to initiate the tubing repair, commence the pilot water injection project and acquire data required
for prudent evaluation prior to the expiration date originally specified in Rule 1 of ERI03. PERL foresees no
need to amend any other Rule in ERI03 and considers all other issues and actions discussed in Forest's original
application as still viable.
Please feel free to call either David Hall (907-868-2133) or myself (907-868-2112) to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,
PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES, LTD.
a
~ - _.
Jim Arlington
Vice President, Land & Government Affairs
cc: David Ha11
Joe Kilchrist
Page 1 of 1
Colombie, Jody J (DOA)
From: Roby, David S (DOA)
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 3:59 PM
To: jdarlington@pacenergy.com
Cc: Davidson, Temple (DNR); Foerster, Catherine P (DOA)
Subject: Expiration date for ERIO 3
Jim,
I noticed while reviewing your proposed 18th Plan of Development (POD) for the West McArthur River Unit that you make
reference to activities authorized under Enhanced Recovery Injection Order 3 (ERIO 3). Specifically, in the cover letter you state
"While Pacific Energy has yet to initiate the pilot water flood project using the shut-in well WMRU #2A pursuant to the approval
granted to Forest by the AOGCC in ERIO No.3 on November 6, 2006, Pacific Energy intends to initiate the pilot water flood..."
And on page 3 of 9 of the proposed POD, which covers the time period of January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, it states
"Pacific Energy intends to commence the pilot waterflood activities during the term of the 18th POD."
I would like to point out that in accordance with Rule 1 of ERIO 3 the order expires 24 months after its effective date, or on
November 6, 2008. In order to undertake the pilot water flood project authorized under ERIO 3 you would need to apply for and
receive an extension from the Commission, which may be done administratively. An application for an extension must be filed
with the Commission prior to the expiration of the original order, which means the Commission needs to receive it prior to the
close of business on November 5th, or the Commission can not consider the extension request. If the Commission does not
receive a timely application for extension of the expiration date of ERIO 3 Pacific Energy would have to submit a new application
requesting an injection order from the Commission if you wish to initiate a water flood project. The new application would be
subject to the Commission's public comment and hearing requirements.
If you have any questions on this matter please let me know.
Regards,
Dave Roby
Reservoir Engineer
Alaska OiI and Gas Conservation Commission
Phone: 907-793-1232
Fax: 907-276-7542
email: dave.roby@alaska.gov
11/10/2008
=tf;;t
STATE OF ALASKA NOTICE TO PUBLISHER ADVERTISING ORDER NO.
ADVERTISING INVOICE MUST BE IN TRIPLICATE SHOWING ADVERTISING ORDER NO., CERTIFIED AO-02614037
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (PART 2 OF THIS FORM) WITH ATTACHED COPY OF
ORDER ADVERTISEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH INVOICE
<,it \~~~~I '~t'.
F AOGCC AGENCY CONTACT DATE OF A.O.
R 333 W 7th Ave, Ste 100 Jodv Colombie Mav 17 2006
0 Anchorage, AK 9950 I PHONE PCN
M (Q07) 7Q1 -1 ?? 1
-
DATES ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED:
T Alaska Journal of Commerce May 28, 2006
0
301 Arctic Slope Ave #350
Anchorage, AK 99514 THE MATERIAL BETWEEN THE DOUBLE LINES MUST BE PRINTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY ON THE DATES SHOWN.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
Advertisement to be published was e-mailed
Type of Advertisement X Legal D Display D Classified DOther (Specify)
SEE ATTACHED
S~ND_ AOGCC, 333 W. 7th Ave., Suite 100 PAGE 1 OF TOTAL OF ;1
Anchoraºe. AK 99501 2 PAGES ALL PAGES$
REF TYPE NUMBER AMOUNT DATE COMMENTS
1 VEN
2 ARD 02910
3
4
:IN AMnllNT o:::y r:r: ProM Ir: Ar:r:T :y NMR
DIST LlQ
1 05 02140100 73451
2
3
4 ....-... t'
REQUISITIONED BY: ( \ 6~ ) j{)hA~- ¡DIVISION APPROVAL:
A
( vV
V
.
.
.
.
Notice of Public Hearing
STATE OF ALASKA
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Re: West McArthur River Unit
West McArthur River Oil Pool
Application for Enhanced Recovery Operations (Pilot Waterflood Project)
By application dated May 10,2006, Forest Oil Corporation (Forest) as Unit Operator of
the West McArthur River Unit requested the Commission to approve Enhanced Recovery
Operations to authorize a pilot waterflood project in the West McArthur River Oil Pool. Forest
proposes to inject water into an offshore oil pool in the Hemlock formation at a depth of9,251 to
9,438 feet below sea level to improve oil recovery from this pool. The West McArthur River Oil
Pool ofthe West McArthur River Unit lies within T8N-R14W Seward Meridian.
The Commission has tentatively scheduled a public hearing on this application for July 6,
2006 at 9:00 am at the offices of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission at 333 West
7th Avenue, Suite 100, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. A person may request that the tentatively
scheduled hearing be held by filing a written request with the Commission no later than 4:30 pm
on June 13, 2006.
If a request for a hearing is not timely filed, the Commission may consider the issuance
of an order without a hearing. To learn if the Commission will hold the public hearing, please
call 793-1221 after June 21, 2006.
In addition, a person may submit a written protest or written comments regarding this
application and proposal to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission at 333 West 7th
Avenue, Suite 100, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Protests and comments must be received no later
than 4:30 pm on June 30, 2006 except that if the Commission decides to hold a public hearing,
protests or comments must be received no later than the conclusion ofthe July 6, 2006 hearing.
If you are a person with a disabili
comment or to attend the pu· rin, Ie
Colombie at 793-1221.
w 0 may need special accommodations in order to
contact the Commission's Special Assistant Jody
Published Date: May 28, 2006
AO # 02614037 AK Journal of Commerce
Published Date: May 21, 2006
AO # 02614038 Peninsula Clarion
Re: Public Notice
.
.
Subject: Re: Public Notice
From: D~nnis Caasi <dennis.caasi@alaskajournal.com>
Date: Thu, 18 2006 14:34:11 -0800
Jody,
Received 5/17/2006. Pub date: OS/28/06. Ad attached.
Thanks, Dennis
On 5/17/06 3:53 PM, "Jody Colombie" <jody colombie@admin.state.ak.us> wrote:
Please publish 5/28/06.
Thank you! Jody Colombie
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
AGOCC.pdf .
Content-Encodmg: base64
1 of 1
5/18/20062:35 PM
STATE OF ALASKA
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLAlaska Oil and Gas Conservation
Commission
Re: West McArthur River Unit
A TT ACH FWest McArthur River Oil Pool 'ION HERE
Application for Enhanced Recovery
Operations (Pilot Waterflood Project)
By application dated May 10, 2006,
Forest Oil Corporation (Forest) as Unit
Operator of
the West McArthur River Unit re-
quested the Commission to approve
Enhanced Recovery
Operations to authorize a pilot water-
flood project in the West McArthur
River Oil Pool. Forest
proposes to inject water into an off-
shore oil pool in the Hemlock forma-
tion at a depth of 9,251 to
9,438 feet below sea level to improve
oil recovery from this pool. The West
McArthur River Oil
Pool of the West McArthur River Unit
lies within T8N-R14W Seward Merid-
ian.
The Commission has tentatively
scheduled a public hearing on this ap-
plication for July 6,
2006 at 9:00 am at the offices of the
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation
Commission at 333 West
7th Avenue, Suite 100, Anchorage,
Alaska 99501. A person may request
that the tentatively
scheduled hearing be held by filing a
written request with the Commission
no later than 4:30 pm
on June 13, 2006.
If a request for a hearing is not timely
filed, the Commission may consider
the issuance
of an order without a hearing. To
learn if, the Commission will hold the
public hearing, please
call 793-1221 after June 21, 2006.
In addition, a person may submit a
written protest or written comments
regarding this
application and proposal to the Alaska
Oil and Gas Conservation Commis-
sion at 333 West 7th
Avenue, Suite 100; Anchorage, Alaska
99501. Protests and comments must
be received no later
than 4:30 pm on June 30, 2006 ex-
cept that if the Commission decides
to hold a public hearing,
protests or comments must be re-
ceived no later than the conclusion of
the July 6, 2006 hearing.
If you are a person with a disability
who may need special accommoda-
tions in order to
comment or to attend the public hear-
ing, please contact the Commission's
Special Assistant Jody
Colombie at 793-1221.
John K. Norman
Chairman
Pub Date: May 28, 2006
ôúrIÍàl
o.fmerce
Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commissio
Public Notices
FILE NO:
Ad#: 00053101
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE
OF ALASKA, THIRD DISTRICT BEFORE
ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY
PUBLIC THIS DAY PERSONALLY
APPEARED Lara Bickford WHO, BEING
FIRST DULY SWORN, ACCORDING TO
THE LAW, SAYS THAT SHE IS THE
Business Manager OF THE ALASKA
JOURNAL OF COMMERCE PUBLISHED
AT 301 ARTIC SLOPE AVENUE, SUITE 350,
IN SAID THIRD DISTRICT AND STATE OF
ALASKA AND THAT ADVERTISEMENT,
OF WHICH THE ANNEXED IS A TRUE
COPY, WHICH WAS PUBLISHED IN SAID
PUBLICATION APPEARING ON THE
OS/28/2006
28th DAY OF MAY 2006
AND THERE AFTER FOR 1
CONSECUTIVE WEEK(S) AND THE
LAST PUBLICATION APPEARING ON
OS/28/2006
28th DAY OF MAY 2006
I
Lara Bickford
Business Manager
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME
THIS 31st DAY OF May 2006
\ ~1 þ.l:..
"lS
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF ALASKA
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1/14/09
TRACV L. ALLISON
NOTARY pU~Llq
STATE OF ALAS
MyComrh. expo 01/14109
.
-'....._._-...,....,""-.'."'-_..'".,.,-'..-.~,.. .~ -.-.
AGOCC 10#06-0751
Notice of Public Hearing
10#06-0751
02-902 (Rev. 3/94)
PUbliShe.inal Copies: Department Fiscal, DepartmeeceiVing
AO.FRM
STATE OF ALASKA
ADVERTISING
ORDER
NOTICE TO PUBLISHER
ADVERTISING ORDER NO.
F
INVOICE MUST BE IN TRIPLICATE SHOWING ADVERTISING ORDER NO., CERTIFIED
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (PART 2 OF THIS FORM) WITH ATTACHED COPY OF
ADVERTISEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH INVOICE
AO-02614037
R
o
M
AOGCC
333 West ih Avenue. Suite 100
A nrhm~ap A K QQ;;;O 1
907-793-1221
AGENCY CONTACT
DATE OF A.O.
DATES ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED:
T
o
Alaska Journal of Commerce
301 Arctic Slope Ave #350
Anchorage, AK 99514
May 28, 2006
THE MATERIAL BETWEEN THE DOUBLE LINES MUST BE PRINTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY ON THE DATES SHOWN.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
United states of America
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
REMINDER
State of
ss
INVOICE MUST BE IN TRIPLICATE AND MUST
REFERENCE THE ADVERTISING ORDER NUMBER.
A CERTIFIED COpy OF THIS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE INVOICE.
ATTACH PROOF OF PUBLICATION HERE.
division.
Before me, the undersigned, a notary public this day personally appeared
who, being first duly sworn, according to law, says that
helshe is the
of
Published at
in said division
and
state of
and that the advertisement, of which the annexed
is a true copy, was published in said publication on the
day of
2005, and thereafter for _ consecutive days, the last
publication appearìng on the _ day of
. 2005, and that
the rate charged thereon is not in excess of the rate charged private
individuals.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
This _ day of
2005,
Notary public for state of
My commission expires
02-901 (Rev. 3/94)
AO.FRM
STATE OF ALASKA . NOTICE TO PUBLISHER . ADVERTISING ORDER NO.
ADVERTISING INVOICE MUST BE IN TRIPLICATE SHOWING ADVERTISING ORDER NO., CERTIFIED AO-02614038
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (PART 2 OF THIS FORM) WITH ATTACHED COPY OF
ORDER ADVERTISEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH INVOICE
SEE ..v I ...
F AOGCC AGENCY CONTACT DATE OF A.O.
R 333 W 7th Ave, Ste 100 Jodv Colombie Mav 17 2006
0 Anchorage, AK 99501 PHONE PCN
M - (<)07) 7Q1 _1')') 1
DATES ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED:
T Peninsula Clarion May 21,2006
0
Kenai, AK THE MATERIAL BETWEEN THE DOUBLE LINES MUST BE PRINTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY ON THE DATES SHOWN.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
Advertisement to be published was e-mailed
Type of Advertisement X Legal D Display D Classified DOther (Specify)
SEE ATTACHED
SENDINVOICEINTRIPuêATE AOGCC, 333 W. 7th Ave., Suite 100 PAGE 1 OF TOTAL OF 51
TO AnchoraQ'e. AK 99501 2 PAGES ALL PAGES$
REF TYPE NUMBER AMOUNT DATE COMMENTS
1 VEN
2 ARD 02910
3
4
:"IN 4MOIINT ~v f".f". Pt::M If". 4f".f".T :"v NMR
DIST UQ
1 05 02140100 73451
2
3
4 f\ í1 ,
REQUISITIONED BY: ( \ U ~ ItiV\UV IDIVISION APPROVAL:
/
'-..../ '-..
.
.
Notice of Public Hearing
STATE OF ALASKA
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Re: West McArthur River Unit
West McArthur River Oil Pool
Application for Enhanced Recovery Operations (Pilot Waterflood Project)
By application dated May 10, 2006, Forest Oil Corporation (Forest) as Unit Operator of
the West McArthur River Unit requested the Commission to approve Enhanced Recovery
Operations to authorize a pilot waterflood project in the West McArthur River Oil Pool. Forest
proposes to inject water into an offshore oil pool in the Hemlock formation at a depth of9,251 to
9,438 feet below sea level to improve oil recovery from this pool. The West McArthur River Oil
Pool of the West McArthur River Unit lies within T8N-RI4W Seward Meridian.
The Commission has tentatively scheduled a public hearing on this application for July 6,
2006 at 9:00 am at the offices of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission at 333 West
7th Avenue, Suite 100, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. A person may request that the tentatively
scheduled hearing be held by filing a written request with the Commission no later than 4:30 pm
on June 13,2006.
If a request for a hearing is not timely filed, the Commission may consider the issuance
of an order without a hearing. To learn if the Commission will hold the public hearing, please
call 793-1221 after June 21, 2006.
In addition, a person may submit a written protest or written comments regarding this
application and proposal to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission at 333 West ih
A venue, Suite 100, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Protests and comments must be received no later
than 4:30 pm on June 30, 2006 except that if the Commission decides to hold a public hearing,
protests or comments must be received no later than the conclusion ofthe July 6, 2006 hearing.
If you are a person with a disabili
comment or to attend the p. rin, Ie
Colombie at 793-1221.
w 0 may need special accommodations in order to
contact the Commission's Special Assistant Jody
Published Date: May 28, 2006
AO # 02614037 AK Journal of Commerce
Published Date: May 21, 2006
AO # 02614038 Peninsula Clarion
.
.
PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, }
STATE OF ALASKA ss:
x ¡)--I/)./';;p/ R1Lê.-€.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to me before
t~5th day of ~' 2006
l Jl)\i"-~~. {2J ~ 0 Q
NOTARY PUBLIC in favor for the
State of Alaska.
My Commission expires 26-Aug-08
r - -- - -- ----- _...-IIiiiiiii-IiiiiiiI-....--.,-
1 Notice of Public He8rInt
STATE OF ALASKA
1 Alaska Oil and GasCorÎServation Commission
1 Re: West McArthur River Unit
1 West McArthur River Oil Pool
Application for Enhanced Recovery
Operations (Pilot Waterfload Project)
By application dated May 10, 2006, Forest Oil
Corporation (Forest) as Unit Operator of the West
McArthur River Unit requested the Commission to
approve Enhanced Recovery Operations to author-
ize a pilot waterflood project in the West McArthur
River Oil Pool. Forest proposes to inject water into
an offshore. oil pool in the Hemlock formation at al
depth of 9,251 to 9,438 feet below sea level to
improve oil recovery from this pool. The West 1
McArthur River Oil Pool of the West McArthur River 1
Unit lies within T8N-R14W Seward Meridian. 1
The Commission has tentatively scheduled a 1
publiè hearing on this application for July 6, 2006 at 1
9:00 am at the offices of the Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission at 333 West 7th Avenue, 1
Suite 100, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. A person 1
may request that the tentatively scheduled hearing 1
be held by filing a written request with the 1
Commission no . later than 4:30 pm on June 13,
2006.
If a request for a hearing is not timely filed, the
1 Commission may consider the issuance of an order
1 without a hearing. To learn if the Commission will
hold the public hearing, please call 793-1221 after
June 21, 2006.
In addition, a person may submit a written
protest or written comments regarding this applica-
tion and proposal to the Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission at 333 West 7th Avenue,
Suite 100, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Protests and
comments must be received no later than 4:30 pm
on June 30, 2006 except that if the Commission
decides to hold a public hearing, protests or com-
ments must be received no later than the conclu-
sion of the July 6, 2006 hearing.
If you are a person with a disability who may
need special accommodations in order to èomment 1
ór to attend the public hearing, please contact the 1
Commission's Special Assistant Jody Colombie at 1
793-1221. 1
John K, Norman 1
Chairman
L~~~~~~_____~~~~
being first duly
sworn, on oath deposes and says:
Denise Reece
That I am and was at all times here
in this affidavit mentions, Supervisor of
Legals of the Peninsula Clarion, a news-
paper of general circulation and published
at Kenai, Alaska, that the
Public Hearing
AO-026l4038
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed was
published in said paper one each and
every day for one successive and
consecutive
day
in the issues on the
following dates:
May 21,2006
STATE OF ALASKA
ADVERTISING
ORDER
PUbliShe.inal Copies: Department Fiscal, DepartmeeceiVing
NOTICE TO PUBLISHER
AO.FRM
02-902 (Rev. 3/94)
ADVERTISING ORDER NO.
INVOICE MUST BE IN TRIPLICATE SHOWING ADVERTISING ORDER NO., CERTIFIED
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (PART 2 OF THIS FORM) WITH ATTACHED COpy OF
ADVERTISEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH INVOICE
AO-02614038
R
o
M
AOGCC
333 West 7th Avenue. Suite 100
An('.hor~u~ AK QQ,\Ol
907-793-1221
AGENCY CONTACT
DATE OF A.O.
DATES ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED:
T
o
Peninsula Clarion
May 21,2006
Kenai, AK
THE MATERIAL BETWEEN THE DOUBLE LINES MUST BE PRINTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY ON THE DATES SHOWN.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
United states of America
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
REMINDER
State of
ss
INVOICE MUST BE IN TRIPLICATE AND MUST
REFERENCE THE ADVERTISING ORDER NUMBER.
A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE INVOICE.
ATTACH PROOF OF PUBLICATION HERE.
division.
Before me, the undersigned, a notary public this day personally appeared
who, being first duly sworn, according to law, says that
helshe is the
of
Published at
in said division
and
state of
and that the advertisement, of which the annexed
is a true copy, was published in said publication on the
day of
2005, and thereafter for _ consecutive days, the last
publication appearing on the _ day of
. 2005, and that
the rate charged thereon is not in excess of the rate charged private
individuals.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
This _ day of
2005,
Notary public for state of
My commission expires
02-901 (Rev. 3/94)
AO.FRM
WRMU Pilot EOR Public Notice
.
.
Subject: WRMU Pilot EOR Public Notice
From: J ody Colombie <jody _ colombie@admin.state.ak.us>
Date: Wed, 17 May 200615:51:51 -0800
To: undisclos 'ents:;
BCC: Cyì1t . er <bren_mciver@admin.state.ak.us>, M z
<robert_mi state.ak.us>, Christine Hansen <c.hansen@iogcc.s
<hubbletl >, Sondra Stewman <StewmaSD@BP.com>, stanekj <s
<ecolaw >, trmjrl <trmjrl@ao1.com>, shaneg <shan er
<jdarlin . om>, nelson <knelson@petroleumnews.c cboddy
<cboddy M alton@hdrinc.com annon Donnelly
<shannon . Wester"
<mark.p eper.org>, wdv <wdv@dnr.state.ak.us>,
tjr <tjr jnels <mjnelson@purvingertz.com>,
Charles 'Donne charles.o', m>, "Randy L. Skil .com>,
"Deborah 1. Jone onesD6@BP.com>, "Steven R. Rossberg" <Ro S@ , Lois
<I . keeper.org>, Dan Bross < k rg>, Gordon Pospisil < BP.com>,
" Sommer" <SommerFS@ ik hultz <Mike1.Schultz@BP.com>, "Nick W.
Glov GloverNW@BP.com> "D . Kleppin' leppiDE@BP.com>, "Janet D. att"
<PlattJD@BP.com> "Rosanne J en" <Jaco s @BP.com>, ddonkel <ddonke
mckay <mckay . et>, Barbara F Imer <barbara.f.fullmer@conocophillips >,
<barker@usgs.g ,doug_schultze <doug_schultz xtoenergy.com>, Hank Al
<hank.alford@e o· om>, Mark Kovac <ye l@gci. spfoff
<gspfoff@a , Gregg Nady <gregg.nady@shell Steece
<fred.stee sd.us>, rcrotty <rcrotty@ch2m.com>,jejones 0 orapower.com>, dapa
<dapa@al t>, jroderick <jroderick@gci.net>, eyancy <eyancy@s .net>, "James M. Ruud"
<james.m. ud@ . >, Brit Lively <ma et>, jah <jah@dnr.state.ak.us>,
buonoje <bu anley <mark_hanl .com>,loren_leman
<loren_l em Houle <julie_houle ak.us>, John W Katz
<jwkatz@sso.org>, ,ta e unoca1.com>, Brady <brad ga.org>, Brian Havelock
<beh@dnr.state.ak.us>, bpopp <bpopp@boro .ke· .us>, Jim White <jimwhite@satx.rr.com>,
"John S. Haworth" <jo .haworth 0 l.c , marty <marty@rkindustria1.com>, ghammons
<ghammons@ao1.com, clean < @pobox.a ska.net> 0 <mkm 7200 . com> ,
Brian espie <ifbmg@uaa.alaska.edu>, David L Boelens <d Todd
Durk DURKEE .com>, Gary Schultz <gary_schultz nr.
<RANCIER a>, don Gagnon <bgagnon brenala
<pmwins , Saine Copeland <co bp.com>, Kristi
<kristin_ , Kaynell Zeman <kjzem athonoi1.com>, John er
<John. Tower a.d 0 ·11 Fowler <Bill_Fowler@ana arko.COM> tt Cranswick
<scott.cranswick@mms.gov>, Brad McKim <mckimbs@BP.com>, Steve be
<lambes@unoca1.co ·ack ell <jack.newell acsalaska.net>, James S
<james.scherr@mms 7@conocop com, Tim Lawlor <Tim_ lor@ak.blm.gov>,
Lynnda Kahn <Lynnd @fws , Je lefs <Jerry.C.Dethlefs@conocophillips.com>,
crockett@aoga.org, T ra Sheffiel heffiel aoga.org>, Jon Gol
@conocophillips.com>, Roger Belman <roger.belm phillips.com> 'ndy Lewis
< e brenalaw.com>, Kari Moriarty <moriarty@aoga.org ro <palfaro oo.com>,
Jeff <smet oca1.com>, Todd Kratz <ToddKratz@ .com>, Gary Rogers
<gary_rogers .s ak.us>, Arthur Copoulos <Art opoulos@dnr.state~ >, Ken
<ken@secorp-l e Lambert <salambert@unoca1.com>, Joe Nicks <news@radiokenai.com>,
s>, Terrie Hubble
a1.com>, ecolaw
>, jdarlington
.rr.com>,
les Barker
10f2
5/17/20063:52 PM
WRMU Pilot EOR Public Notice
.
.
cheon <su
< ak.net>, Iris a < Matthews legis. state
<paul_decker@dnr.state:ak.us>, Rob Dragnich <rob. ragnich exxo
Borough <adm' utianseast.org>, Marquerite kremer <marguerite
Alicia Konsor _ onsor@dnr.state.ak.us>, Mike Mason <mike
<gbrobinson@marathonoil.com>, Cammy Taylor <Camille _ Taylor@l
<winton_aube in. te.ak.us>, Thomas E Maunder <tom_maun
F Davies <ste s min.state.ak.us>, Keith Wiles <kwiles@m
iIot EOR Public Notic
20f2
5/17/20063:52 PM
Public Notice
.
.
Subject: Public Notice
From: Jody Colombie <jody _ colombie@admin.state.ak.us>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:53:25 -0800
To: legal@alask:åjournal.co.rn,
Please publish 5/28/06.
Thank you! Jody Colombie
Content-Type: application/msword
AK Journal Ad Order form. doc
Content-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: application/pdf
iForest WRMU Pilot EOR Public Notice.pdf
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1
5/17/2006 3 :54 PM
Public Notice
.
.
Subject: Public Notice
From: Jody Colombie <jody_colombie@admin.state.ak.us>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:54:29 -0800
To: Denise Reece <denise.reece@peninstllaclarion.com>
Please publish 5/21/06.
Content-Type: application/msword
Peninsula Clarion Ad Order form.doc
Content-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: application/msword
WRMU Pilot EOR Public Notice.doc
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1
5/17/20063:54 PM
.
Mary Jones
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cartography
810 Houston Street, Ste 2000
Ft. Worth, TX 76102-6298
George Vaught, Jr.
PO Box 13557
Denver, CO 80201-3557
John Levorsen
200 North 3rd Street, #1202
Boise,ID 83702
Michael Parks
Marple's Business Newsletter
117 West Mercer St, Ste 200
Seattle, W A 98119-3960
Ciri
Land Department
PO Box 93330
Anchorage, AK 99503
Jill Schneider
US Geological Survey
4200 University Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99508
Darwin Waldsmith
PO Box 39309
Ninilchick, AK 99639
Penny Vadla
399 West Riverview Avenue
Soldotna, AK 99669-7714
Bernie Karl
K&K Recycling Inc.
PO Box 58055
Fairbanks, AK 99711
David McCaleb
IHS Energy Group
GEPS
5333 Westheimer, Ste 100
Houston, TX 77056
Jerry Hodgden
Hodgden Oil Company
408 18th Street
Golden, CO 80401-2433
Kay Munger
Munger Oil Information Service, Inc
PO Box 45738
Los Angeles, CA 90045-0738
Mark Wedman
Halliburton
6900 Arctic Blvd.
Anchorage, AK 99502
Baker Oil Tools
4730 Business Park Blvd., #44
Anchorage, AK 99503
Gordon Severson
3201 Westmar Cr.
Anchorage, AK 99508-4336
James Gibbs
PO Box 1597
Soldotna, AK 99669
Richard Wagner
PO Box 60868
Fairbanks, AK 99706
North Slope Borough
PO Box 69
Barrow, AK 99723
.
Mona Dickens
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co.
Supply & Distribution
300 Concord Plaza Drive
San Antonio, TX 78216
Richard Neahring
NRG Associates
President
PO Box 1655
Colorado Springs, CO 80901
Samuel Van Vactor
Economic Insight Inc.
3004 SW First Ave.
Portland, OR 97201
Schlumberger
Drilling and Measurements
2525 Gambell Street #400
Anchorage, AK 99503
Ivan Gillian
9649 Musket Bell Cr.#5
Anchorage, AK 99507
Jack Hakkila
PO Box 190083
Anchorage, AK 99519
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge
Refuge Manager
PO Box 2139
Soldotna, AK 99669-2139
Cliff Burglin
PO Box 70131
Fairbanks, AK 99707
Williams Thomas
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Land Department
PO Box 129
Barrow, AK 99723
~1
@
. .
Forest Oil Corporation
310 K Street, Suite 700
Anchorage, Alas/w. 99501
(907) 258-8600 Fax: (907) 258-8601
..
"
May 10, 2006
John Norman, Chair
State of Alaska
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7th Avenue, Suite 100
Anchorage, AK 99501
Re: Application for Enhanced Recovery Pilot Proiect - West McArthur River Unit
Dear Chairman Norman:
Enclosed is Forest Oil Corporation's Application for an Enhanced Recovery Pilot Project for West
McArthur River Unit. The application conforms to the regulations specified under the Alaska
Administrative Code, Title 20 - Chapter 25, Article 05. More specifically the application conforms to
the Enhanced Recovery Operations regulations specified by 20 AAC 25.402( c).
Ifthere are any questions, please contact me at 868-2131.
Sincerely,
n 0-1'1 ."LÛ
Jr~ '. µ~...r
Paul M. Winslow
Reservoir Engineer
Forest Oil Corporation
cc: Leonard C. Gurule, Senior V.P. - Forest Oil Corporation
.
.
West McArthur River Unit
Enhanced Recovery Operations
(Pilot Waterflood Project)
Application
Forest Oil Corporation
May 10, 2006
.
.
20 AAC 25.402(c)
Enhanced Recovery Operations Application
1) Location Plat
Attachment 1 shows the location of all of the wells currently drilled on the West McArthur River Unit
structure. A total of eleven (11) wells and/or sidetracks have been drilled by Stewart Petroleum
Company and Forcenergy, Inc. (purchased by Forest Oil Corporation), on the West McArthur River
Unit structure. Currently only three (3) wellbores are productive, WMRU #5, WMRU #6, and
WMRU #7ST. In addition to the three producing wells, there are two (2) wellbores suspended
(WMRU #IA and WMRU #2A), one (1) wellbore plugged back and being utilized as a disposal well
(WMRU #4D), and five (5) wellbores abandoned (WMRU #1, WMRU #2, WMRU #3, WMRU
#3ST, and WMRU #7). All eleven of these wellbores penetrated the Hemlock fonnation.
In addition to the eleven wellbores drilled by Stewart Petroleum and Forcenergy, one (1) additional
well, West Foreland Unit #2, was drilled and abandoned by Pan American Petroleum, in 1966. Note
that the first Stewart Petroleum well (WMRU #1) was drilled in 1991, with first production starting in
Dec. 1991 (first sustained production starting Aug. 1993).
The oil accumulation on the West McArthur River Unit (WMRU) structure is located offshore in the
Cook Inlet, primarily under Section 10, T8N, RI4W, Seward Meridian. All of the WMRU wells have
been directionally drilled from two onshore pads, located in Section 16, T8N, RI4W, Seward
Meridian.
WMRU #2A is the proposed initial injection well for the Enhanced Recovery Pilot Project. WMRU
#2A produced from the Hemlock fonnation from 10/93 until 1/02 (the wellbore has remained
suspended since 1/02). WMRU #2A is the furthest down-dip well on the south side of the WMRU
structure, and thus is a prime wellbore to initiate a pilot waterflood from. Injection into the Hemlock
fonnation in the WMRU #2A wellbore is expected to increase the oil recovery from the remaining
three producing wells.
Note that the only non-abandoned wellbores within 1¡4 mile of the WMRU #2A wellbore are the
WMRU #IA wellbore and the WMRU #7ST wellbore. The top Hemlock penetration point (and
bottom hole location) for the WMRU #IA wellbore is considerably more than 1¡4 mile away fTom the
WMRU #2A penetration point, but the actual wellbores may be within a 1¡4 mile radius of each other.
In addition to the WMRU #IA and WMRU #7ST wellbores, the abandoned WMRU #1 original
wellbore Hemlock penetration is also within 1¡4 mile of the proposed injection well (WMRU #2A).
2) Offset Surface Owners and Operators
Forest Oil Corporation is the only operator within a 1¡4 mile radius of the proposed injection well,
WMRU #2A (regarding both surface and bottom-hole locations). The surface location for the
WMRU #2A well is on the western side of the Cook Inlet, in Section 16 - T8N, RI4W, Seward
Meridian. SalamatofNative Association, Inc. is the owner of the surface estate regarding the surface
location of the WMRU #2A well. The pad for the WMRU #2A well is within a 1¡4 mile radius of the
2
.
.
waters of the Cook Inlet. The waters of Cook Inlet within ~ mile of the WMRU #2A well pad are
owned by the State of Alaska and managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Division of
Mining, Land, & Water. The bottom hole location of the WMRU #2A well is located under these
same waters of the Cook Inlet, owned by the State of Alaska, on State of Alaska oil and gas lease
ADL-359111, which is managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Oil and Gas.
No other surface owners are within a ~ mile radius of the proposed injection well.
3) Affidavit Showing Notification of Other Operators and Surface Owners
The affidavit accompanying this Enhanced Recovery Operations Application (Attachment 11) is
provided to verify that a copy of this application has been sent to both the State of Alaska, the
Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land, & Water (being the manager for the
State of Alaska), and to Salamatof Native Association, Inc. (being the estate owner of the surface
location of the WMRU #2A well).
4) Description of Operation for which Approval is being Requested
The West McArthur River Unit (WMRU) presently consists of three (3) producing wells and two (2)
suspended wells, all of which are completed in the Hemlock formation. It is being proposed to
convert one of the suspended wells, WMRU #2A, to a Hemlock water injection well, for the purpose
of enhanced oil recovery. WMRU #2A is located on the south side of the field and is the furthest
down-dip well on the WMRU structure. Water injection into WMRU #2A should enhance the oil
recovery ftom the remaining three producing wells (WMRU #5, #6, and #7ST).
Depending upon the success of this Pilot Enhanced Recovery project, additional wells may be added,
sidetracked, and/or re-completed as water injection wells to maximize the oil recovery ftom the
Hemlock formation at West McArthur River Unit.
Currently there are three producing wells at West McArthur River Unit, WMRU #5, WMRU #6, and
WMRU #7ST. All three wells are being hydraulically lifted via the use of jet pmnps. The current
daily production capacity ftom of these wells is approximately 1,270 bopd and 3,350 bwpd (when all
three wells are producing).
· WMRU #5
· WMRU #6
· WMRU #7ST
· Total
660 bopd
510 bopd
100 bopd
1,270 bopd
900 bwpd
1,000 bwpd
1,450 bwpd
3,350 bwpd
Due to limited water disposal capacity in WMRU #4D, WMRU #7ST is often shut-in due to its high
water cut and relatively low oil production rate. Initiating water injection into WMRU #2A, will
allow WMRU #7ST to be produced continuously. Upon initiation of injection, it is expected that all
of the produced water ftom WMRU as well as additional AOGCC agreed upon altemative water
sources (such as treated sanitary waste, gray water, produced Hemlock water ftom Redoubt Unit
(RU), produced Tyonek water ftom West Foreland, and storm water ftom secondary containment
3
.
.
areas around the tank. farms at KPF and WMRU), will be injected into the Hemlock fonnation through
the WMRU #2A wellbore. The total injection rate is estimated to be on the magnitude of 3,000 to
4,000 bwpd.
As mentioned in the previous paragraph, the produced water at WMRU is currently being disposed of
in the WMRU #4D disposal well. WMRU #4 was originally drilled into the Hemlock fonnation on
the far south end of the WMRU structure. With the Hemlock being wet in that area, the well was
subsequently plugged back, sidetracked, and completed in the Upper Tyonek fonnation, as a Class II
disposal well. It should be pointed out that the disposal of produced water into the Tyonek fonnation
(stratigraphically higher than the producing Hemlock fonnation) in WMRU #4D has absolutely no
enhanced recovery effect on the oil production from WMRD. Commencing injection into the
Hemlock fonnation in WMRU #2A is expected to enhance the oil recovery from the West McArthur
River Unit.
This application is requesting approval to initiate an enhanced recovery pilot project by injecting
produced West McArthur River Unit water (as well as other AOGCC approved water sources) into
the WMRU #2A well.
5) Pools to be Affected
The West McArthur River Unit Hemlock oil pool is the only pool which will be effected by this
proposed enhanced recovery project. Injection into WMRU #2A is expected to support pressure and
enhance the oil recovery from WMRU #5, WMRU #6, and from WMRU #7ST. The nearest
producing well to the proposed WMRU #2A injection well, is WMRU #7ST which is completed in
the Hemlock fonnation from 9,257' - 9,398' SSTVD. WMRU #5 and WMRU #6 are both
completed in the Hemlock fonnation as well, from 9,136' - 9,502' SSTVD and 9,120' - 9,549'
SSTVD, respectively. WMRU #2A is currently completed in the Hemlock fonnation over the
interval 9,251 '- 9,438' SSTVD, but is temporarily suspended.
Note that a shale section which overlies the Hemlock fonnation at WMRU, will serve as a vertical
seal, thus confining the injected fluids to the Hemlock fonnation.
6) Injection Formations
The Hemlock fonnation is the only fonnation to have produced oil at West McArthur River Unit
(WMRU) and is the proposed fonnation for this enhanced recovery operation. The description, depth,
and thickness of the Hemlock fonnation at WMRU and the appropriate geologic data including
overlying and underlying fonnations, are described below.
Hemlock Description:
The Hemlock fonnation is of Oligocene age and is the primary oil producing horizon in the Cook Inlet
basin. The Hemlock is thought to have been deposited as an alluvial fan complex or series of alluvial
fans sourced from the Northwest and West. Hemlock lithology in the vicinity of WMRU is
4
.
.
comprised primarily of conglomeratic sandstones grading from coarse to medium grained sandstones,
fine grained siltstones, and stringers of impenneable carbonaceous siltstones further grading into thin
low grade coal stringers. Hemlock oil production is primarily from the conglomerates, coarse and
medium sandstones, and to some extent fine grained sandstones. Porosities in these zones range from
lows of 4-6% in the fmer grained members, up to 12-18% in the well to moderately sorted
gravel/pebble conglomerates and coarse moderately sorted sandstones composed of well rounded
sediment. The Hemlock is a fairly homogeneous reservoir with good porosities, penneabilities and
producing characteristics.
Six distinct sub-units or benches are identifiable within the Hemlock fonnation at WMRU, grading
from the coarse conglomerates down to very fine grained siltstones, carbonaceous claystones, and thin
coals. The Hemlock in the vicinity ofWMRU is approximately 450' to 500' thick vertically grading
up to approximately 600+' in thickness down dip and to the East in the vicinity of Redoubt Shoal and
McArthur Riverffrading Bay Fields.
The Hemlock unconfonnably overlies the West Foreland fonnation of Eocene Age. The West
Foreland is composed primarily of polymicritic conglomerates, graywackies, and siltstones with some
interbedded tuffs. The West Foreland fonnation was generally deposited in a lower energy
depositional environment than either the Hemlock or Tyonek fonnations. Porosities and
penneabilities within the upper portion of the West Foreland fonnation are generally poor.
The Tyonek fonnation of Oligocene to Miocene age overlies the Hemlock fonnation. It was generally
deposited in a higher energy fluvial dominated depositional environment than was the Hemlock or
West Foreland fonnations. Stratigraphy of the Tyonek fonnation consists of conglomerates,
subordinate sandstones, siltstones, and coals. Lithologies within the Tyonek fonnation are generally
more unifonn that those of the Hemlock fonnation. Zones within the lower Tyonek exhibit an affinity
for oil production whereas upper Tyonek members yield predominantly gas, where productive. Coal
beds, carbonaceous claystones, and siltstones within the basal Tyonek are sufficient to provide an
upward seal for the Hemlock producing intervals and to contain injected waters utilized in enhanced
recovery operations.
Both the West Foreland and Basal Tyonek fonnations provide an affective vertical seal (below and
above, respectively) for the Hemlock fonnation, both in regards to oil production and water ~ection
for enhanced oil recovery.
Hemlock Reservoir Characterization:
The Hemlock F onnation was deposited in a fluvial dominated environment of meandering low to
moderate relief anastomosing streams, as alluvial fans prograded onto areas of low structural relief.
The reservoir is generally fairly homogeneous both vertically and horizontally as interpreted from
wire line logs. Channel sands are seen to stack and interbed with conglomerates, pebble/gravel
conglomerates overbank and paludal deposits. Observed petrophysical properties within members of
the Hemlock fonnation range from good porosity and penneability in the sands and conglomerates to
very poor in the siltstone and carbonaceous claystone beds. These can have an effect on fluid flow
within the reservoir.
5
.
.
7) Logs of the Injection Well
Logs for all of the West McArthur River Unit (WMRU) wells, including the proposed injection well
(WMRU #2A), are already on file with the AOGCC. Included with this application (Attachment 2) is
a log section of the Hemlock portion of the WMRU #2A wellbore, demonstrating correlative zones
within the Hemlock formation. The Hemlock log section also demonstrates the presence of the six
lithofacies observed to be present in the WMRU producing area. Also included (Attachment 3) is a
diagrammatic cross section from Northwest to South showing the correlative nature of the zones
within the Hemlock formation for the various WMRU wells. Shown on the field cross section are the
perforated intervals within the Hemlock formation for each of the WMRU wells.
8) Casing Program and Mechanical Integrity Testing
Attached are the current wellbore completion schematics for the proposed injection well, WMRU #2A
(Attachment 4), as well as for WMRU #IA (Attachment 5) and WMRU #7ST (Attachment 6), which
are the only other wellbores within 'l4 mile of the proposed injection well. All three wells were
completed in and have produced from the Hemlock Formation. WMRU #7ST is currently producing
from the Hemlock formation and WMRU #IA and #2A are shut-in (since January 2002).
Once approval has been granted, WMRU #2A will be re-completed to allow injection into the
Hemlock formation. WMRU #2A is currently completed as a jet pump producer. In order to convert
this well in the most cost effective manner, Forest proposes that this conversion be performed without
employing the use of a workover rig. The conversion involves the removal of the standing valve and
insertion of a blanking sleeve across the jet pump cavity. This sleeve will be constructed to provide a
seal between the tubing-casing annulus while allowing water to be injected through tubing into the
existing perforations.
A problem arises in performing the initial Mechanical Integrity Test (MIT) when utilizing this
isolation sleeve. Below is a discussion of the problem and an alternative MIT procedure that Forest
hopes will meet with Commission approval for testing this well.
Discussion:
Due to the manner in which the isolation sleeve must seat into the jet pump cavity the cross sectional
area of the upper seals is larger than the cross sectional area of the lower seals. This will not affect the
performance of the sleeve when pumping down the tubing in water injection mode. The pressure of
the fluid will act on both seals but the upper seal having the greater surface area will act to push the
seals tighter into their respective seats.
During the initial MIT test (reverse pressure), the force of the fluid will act equally on both seals in the
opposite direction. Since the cross sectional area of the top seal is greater than the cross sectional area
of the bottom seal, there exists the tendency to pump the isolation sleeve off of its seat and back
towards the surface. Consulting with the manufacturer of the isolation sleeve, revealed that this
possibility exists when the pressure differential from casing to tubing is greater than 1,500 psi. (with
the casing being higher).
6
.
.
After consulting 20 AAC 25.412 and applying the regulation to this well, it was determined that a
conventional MIT would need to be conducted with a surface pressure on the casing of 2,244 psi (9-
5/8" casing shoe with a TVD of 8,977'), which is 744 psi greater than the manufacturers differential
limitation. This condition exists during the initial MIT test, because no water would have been
injected into the well and therefore there is no pressure on the tubing to offset this pressure differential.
In subsequent years, as long as there is 744 psi on the tubing (which is likely), the MIT can be
conducted in the conventional manner at a pressure of2,244 psi.
Alternative Initial MIT Test:
Forest offers an alternative initial MIT test procedure which will prove that the well has mechanical
integrity and will thus allow for the utilization of the isolation sleeve. Forest proposes that before the
standing valve is pulled, a bundle test be performed according to the following procedure to
demonstrate that the mechanical integrity of the casing is intact and that the packer is not leaking.
1. Attach a chart recorder to the annulus of the well.
2. With the standing valve in place, pressure up the tubing and the casing together to 2,300 psi.
3. Shut in the tubing and casing valves on the well and monitor the chart recorder for 30 minutes.
A pressure decline of less than 10 percent (230 psi.) within the 30 minute interval would
indicate a good test.
Annular Pressure Monitoring:
After the sleeve has been installed and injection commenced, Forest will monitor the casing tubing
annulus pressure on a daily basis. Any increases in pressure will be reported to Forest's Anchorage
Office and subsequently the AOGCC will be notified.
Injection Zone Containment:
The casing and cementing procedure used to complete the WMRU #2A wellbore should minimize the
chance of injected fluids migrating upwards out of the Hemlock formation. Due to the high angle of
this well (greater than 68 degrees) slickline and/or wireline work may be problematic. Once injection
has commenced, Forest will attempt to run a temperature survey via slickline or electric line (with the
aid of a tractor). If Forest is unsuccessful in getting the logging tool to depth using wireline, it may be
necessary to convey the tool using coiled tubing. Due to the high cost of mobilizing and using a
coiled tubing unit (CTU), Forest would propose that future temperature surveys would be run only in
conjunction with other CTU work done by Forest on the west side ofthe Cook Inlet.
9) Type of Fluid to be Injected
The primary fluid that will be injected into the Hemlock formation via the WMRU #2A wellbore, will
be the produced Hemlock water fÌom WMRU #5, WMRU #6, and WMRU #7ST. In addition to the
produced water fÌom WMRU, Forest Oil Corporation is seeking permission to inject the following
waste streams in its WMRU Pilot Enhanced Oil Recovery project:
.
.
· Osprey platfonn deck drainage
· Osprey platfonn gray water (showers, sinks, laundry, etc.),
· Osprey platfonn treated sanitary waste,
· Produced Hemlock water from Redoubt Unit (RU),
· Produced Tyonek water from West Foreland,
· Stonn water from secondary containment areas around the tank farm at KPF, and
· Stonn water from secondary containment areas around the tank farm at WMRU.
Note that all of these fluid sources have been approved by the AOGCC for injection into the Redoubt
Unit Hemlock Enhanced Recovery Pilot Injection program. Laboratory testing and fluid
compatibility studies showed no compatibility issues between any of these fluid sources. Attachments
7 and 8 are the fluid analyses and fluid compatibility studies, respectively, that were conducted by BJ
Services for the RU Enhanced Oil Recovery application. It is also worthy to note that the injection at
Redoubt has experienced no adverse effects from adding small quantities of the above fluids to the
bulk matrix of RU Hemlock produced water. The fluid compatibility study indicates that there will
be no adverse effect with the WMRU Hemlock water as well.
Currently, the three producing wells at WMRU, produce approximately 3,350 bwpd. It is anticipated
that all of this water and possibly minor amounts of the secondary fluids listed above, will be re-
injected into the Hemlock fonnation through the WMRU #2A wellbore. Although this injection will
not quite match the reservoir off-take, it is expected to help minimize the reservoir pressure depletion
and is expected to enhance the aerial sweep efficiency of the Hemlock oil production. As further
discussed in section 14 to follow, the historical production and reservoir pressure data, suggests that
some degree of a natural water drive exists at WMRU. This natural aquifer support combined with
the proposed injection into WMRU #2A will defInitely help sustain the reservoir pressure and increase
the ultimate recovery.
10) Injection Pressure
The Hemlock fracture gradient at West McArthur River Unit is not empirically known. Fracture
gradients for other Hemlock reservoirs throughout the Cook Inlet, range from as low as 0.75 to as high
as 1.2 psi/ft. The closest Cook Inlet fIeld with oil production from, and water injection into, the
Hemlock fonnation is the McArthur River Field (Trading Bay Unit). Hemlock fracture gradients at
McArthur River Field range from 0.8 to 0.9 psi/ft.
Assuming an average fracture gradient of 0.85 psi/ft and an average reservoir injection depth of 9,250'
TVD, the maximum allowable surface injection pressure to avoid fracturing the Hemlock fonnation is
approximately 3,830 psi (0.85 psi/ft x 9,250' - 0.436 psi/ft Hemlock water hydrostatic gradient x
9,250'). This maximum allowable surface injection pressure does not take into account tubing friction
pressure loss. It is estimated that tubing friction pressure loss for an injection rate of 3,500 bwpd, will
be on the order of 600 psi, thus raising the maximum surface injection pressure to 4,430 psi.
8
.
.
11) Protection of Freshwater Strata
The casing and cementing program practiced at West McArthur River Unit ensures that no injected
water will be able to migrate above the Hemlock fonnation to contact any freshwater strata near the
surface. All WMRU wells, including WMRU #2A (which is the proposed injection well), have
intennediate casing set at or just above the top of the Hemlock Fonnation. This intennediate casing is
cemented to isolate any upward movement of fluids on the back-side of the casing. Prior to drilling
out the plug and drilling through the Hemlock fonnation, the cement is pressure tested.
Once the Hemlock fonnation has been drilled through, a casing liner is hung and cemented across the
entire Hemlock fonnation. Cement bond logs have been run in all of the WMRU wells and copies
have previously been sent to the AOGCC.
Even though the casing and cementing practice at WMRU is such to minimize the chance of any
injected fluids migrating above the Hemlock fonnation, periodic temperature surveys will be
conducted to monitor the injected fluids. Note that due to the high angle of the WMRU #2A wellbore
(greater than 68 degrees), temperature surveys may need to be done using a coiled tubing unit (CTU).
If a coiled tubing unit is necessary, these surveys will be coordinated with other CTU work being done
by Forest on the West side of the Cook Inlet.
Finally, salinity analysis for the nearby WMRU #4D disposal well indicates that waters containing
greater than 10,000 ppm total sodium chloride extend well above the Hemlock fonnation, to a depth
of approximately 5,000' SSTVD. Note that the Hemlock datum in the West McArthur River Unit is
at a depth of 9,200' SSTVD.
12) Water Analysis
Water analyses of the produced water from WMRU are attached to this application (page 9 of
Attachment 7, as well as Attachments 9 & 10). The following table summarizes the analyses that
have been conducted on the produced water.
West McArthur River Unit
Produced Water Analyses
Sample Water Na K Ca Mg Ba Fe B CI HC03 S04 TDS
Well Date Point Cut (mg/I) (mg/I) (mgll) (mg/I) (mg/I) (mg/I) (mg/I) (mg/I) (mg/I) (mg/I) Obs.
WMRU #6 28-Nov-01 Wellhead 8% 5,500 86 4700 34 8.7 7 8 16,000 617 --- 33,700
WMRU #6 28-Nov-01 Wellhead 8% 5,600 90 4800 34 8.8 3 13 15,700 675 --- 35,000
WMRU #5 & #6 1-Mar-05 Separator 54% 4,409 70 4812 364.5 < 25 < 0.5 15,963 817 36 26,472
Average: 5,170 82 4,771 144.17 8.75 5.0 10.5 15,888 703 36 31,724
Temp Resistivity
Well Density ph (F) (ohms)
WMRU #6 1.0150 6.49
WMRU #6 1.0160 6.62
WMRU #5 & #6 1.0205 6.98 68 0.254
Average: 1.0172 6.7 0.254
9
.
.
In addition to WMRU water analyses, Attachment 7 is the "Water Analysis for Injection Program"
report done by BJ Services Company in March 2005. This report contains water analyses of the
following list of sources, which have subsequently been approved for injection in the Hemlock
reservoir at Redoubt Unit.
· Osprey Deck Drainage (Attachment 7 - page 3)
· Osprey Gray Water (Attachment 7 - page 4)
· Osprey Sewer Fluid (Attachment 7 - page 5)
· Kustatan Production Facility (KPF) Secondary Containment Water (Attachment 7 - page 6)
· Redoubt Unit #5A Produced Water (Attachment 7 - page 7)
· WMRU Secondary Containment Water (Attachment 7 - page 8)
· WMRU Produced Water (Attachment 7 - page 9)
A second phase to the fluid compatibility study performed for the Redoubt Unit injection, was to test
the compatibility of all the fluids listed above. Attachment 8 is the fluid compatibility report
published by BJ Services Company in April 2005, which found no adverse interaction between any of
these fluid sources.
13) Freshwater Exemptions
There are currently no freshwater aquifer exemptions within the West McArthur River Unit. There is
however a Disposal Injection Order (DIO 16.000) allowing the injection of Class IT fluids into the
WMRU #4D wellbore. Note that the WMRU #4D disposal well is more than one mile from the
proposed Hemlock injection well (WMRU #2A), and is completed in the Tyonek formation from
5,108' TVD to 5,461' TVD.
Also note that the Hemlock formation itself is not a freshwater strata, so a freshwater aquifer
exemption should not be an issue.
14) Expected Incremental Increase in Ultimate Hydrocarbon Recovery
The crude oil being produced at West McArthur River Unit has an API gravity of27.7 degrees, a gas-
oil-ratio (GOR) of approximately 235 SCF/STB, and a bubble point pressure of approximately 1,400
psia. Initial reservoir pressure at WMRU was approximately 4,095 psia at a datum depth of 9,200'
SSTVD. Recovery under primary depletion of this relatively dead oil, is estimated to be about 4.5%
of the original oil-in-place (OOlP), from initial pressure down to the bubble point. Based upon the
current structural interpretation and the original petrophysical analyses, the original oil in place
(OOlP) in West McArthur River Unit is estimated to range from 30 to 36 MMbbls of oil. Assuming a
4.5% recovery down to the bubble point pressure, the primary recovery is expected to be
approximately 1.4 to 1.6 MMbbls.
As of 4/30/2006, WMRU has produced a cumulative oil volume of 11.1 MMbbls. This produced
volume equates to 31% to 37% of the OOIP, depending upon the OOIP estimate. Considering the
10
.
.
current recovery and noting that the reservoir pressure is still above the oil bubble point, it is appears
that WMRU is experiencing some degree of aquifer support. The extent and magnitude of this aquifer
support is not known. By injecting water into WMRU #2A and initiating a pilot waterflood in the
Hemlock formation at WMRU, it is hoped to further support the reservoir pressure and increase the
aerial sweep efficiency, thus increasing the overall EUR :trom the West McArthur River Unit.
Other Hemlock reservoirs in the Cook Inlet with mature water floods have achieved recoveries to date
of as much as 42% of the OOIP. The pilot project of converting WMRU #2A to an injection well is
being proposed to start gathering data on the responsiveness of the Hemlock formation at WMRU, to
waterflood.
15) Well Status (Mechanical)
There are two wellbores that have penetrated the Hemlock formation within ~ mile of the proposed
injection well, WMRU #2A. The first well, WMRU #7ST, is currently producing :trom the Hemlock
formation and the second well, WMRU #lA, has been shut-in (temporarily suspended) since January
2002. Both wellbores have 7-5/8" casing set at the top of the Hemlock formation, with production
liners across the Hemlock formation. The production liner in the WMRU #IA wellbore is a cemented
5-112" liner with perforations :trom 13,572' to 13,844' MD. The liner in the WMRU #7ST wellbore is
a 4-112" slotted production liner across the entire Hemlock interval. Note that the casing and tubing
status of each wellbore has previously been supplied to the AOGCC via the "Well Completion or
Recompletion Report and Log" (form 10-407).
11
.
.
List of Attachments:
Attachment 1: West McArthur River Unit - Top Hemlock Structure Map
Attachment 2: WMRU #2A Hemlock Fm - Log Section
Attachment 3: WMRU Wells (Hemlock Fm) - Cross Section
Attachment 4: WMRU #2A Wellbore Schematic
Attachment 5: WMRU #IA Wellbore Schematic
Attachment 6: WMRU #7A Wellbore Schematic
Attachment 7: BJ Services Company - Water Analysis for Injection Program
Attachment 8: BJ Services Company - Redoubt Fluid Compatibility Study
Attachment 9: WMRU #6 Water Analysis - Sample 1
Attachment 10: WMRU #6 Water Analysis - Sample 2
Attachment 11: Affidavit of Jim Arlington
12
.
.
CONFIDENTIAL
.
.
CONFIDENTIAL
Attachment 4
Forest Oil Co
WMRU #
Date: 5-5-2006
Date Drilled: 1-29-1993
Date Original Completion: 6-7-1993
Date Sidetracked: 6-8-1993
Date Sidetrack Completion: 10-26-1993
KB (Kelly Bushing): 163'
Tubing: 3.5", L-80', 9.3# @ 12,445'
Jet Pump:
Jet Pump set @ 12,317'-12,344'
Packer:
Packer Set @ 12,415' MD
Tailpipe with entry guide bottom
@ 12,445'
ration
30" 304.72#, X-52
@117'
" 133#, J-55
@ 2,190'
3" 3/8 68#, N-80
@ 6,429'
95/8" 47 & 53.5 #, NT-95/L-80
@ 11,380'
r~..;.
~~&.
/<.;
'4f!ß.
/<";
-,,"!t.
/<";
.<J.
".b.
".;
4~&.
~~
7 5/8" 29#, NT -95
@ 11,027' -12,981'
Perforations
12,480'-12,550'
12,482'-12,438'
12,620'-12,820'
12,900'-12,961'
12,961'-13,050'
13,178'-13,190'
JSPF
12
(sqz'd wI 41 Bbls Cmf)
12
04
06
10
(sqz'd wI 41 Bbls Cmt)
PBro 13,093'
Sqz'd wI 9 Bbls Cmt
'if
0.."; 5 1/2" 17#, 190
@ 12,839' TOl
1 3,449
.
Attachment 5
.
WMRU #lA Redrill
Completion Diagram
12/29/95
20"@2201' J
13-3/8" @ 6211'
Whipstock/Bridge Plug
at 10,228'
Bridge Plug @ 10,384'
7-5/8" liner top @ 11,130'
9-5/8" @ 11,502'
Calcualted TOe @ 12,801'
EZSV Ret @ 13,064'.MD
Prod Perfs @
13,184'-13,217'
13,254'-13,364' MD
EZSV Ret @ 13,382' MD
Sqz. Perfs @ 13,392'-13,397' and
13;407'-13,409'
EZSV Ret @ 13,417' MD
Sqz. Perfs @ 13,421'-13,423'
EZSV Ret @ 13,426' MD
Orig PBTD @ 13,696'
7-5/8" @ 13,742'
L
Top of 7-5/8" liner at 10,031'
Top Window at 10,214'
3-112" tubing to surface
Top of 5-112" liner@ 13,348'
3-1/2" PBR @ 13,371'
7-5/8" liner @ 13,456'
2-7/8" tbg
Perfs (Guns left in hole)
13,572'-13,582'
13,628'-13,844'
5-112" Liner @ 14,200'
.
.
Attachment 6
West McArthur River Unit #7 A
Completion
20" 129#, X-56
Driven Conductor
120' MO - 120'1VD
133/8" 68#, L-80 BTC
Surface Casing
17 1/2" Hole
1,987' MD - 1,967' TVD
95/8" 47#, L-80 BTC
Intermediate Casing
12 1/4" Hole
6,536' MD - 5,064' TVD
75/8" 29.7#, L-80 Hy 521
Intermediate Liner
8112"HoIe
Trico JetPump - 12,724' MD
Baker Model S-3 Packer - 12,792' MO
LinerTop-12,811' MD
12,946' MD - 9,420' lVO
4 112" 12.6#, L-80 1ST
Slotted Production Liner
6 3/4" Hole
14,273' MD - 9,561'lVD
.
.
~
BJ SERVICES COMPANY
PACIFIC REGION TECHNOLOGY CENTER
REPORT PREPARED FOR:
PAUL WINSLOW
FOREST OIL COPR.
ALASKA
MARCH 1, 2005
Attachment 7
.
BJ SERVICES LABORATORY REPORT #STM050228A
MARCH 1, 2005
.
PAGE 2
~
SCOPE AND PURPOSE
Seven different water samples from various locations were submitted for analysis to
determine their compositions. The project was initiated in order to comply with state
regulations for an upcoming injection program. The samples were submitted by Paul
Winslow of Forest Oil and assigned BJ Services laboratory sample number STM050228A.
The results are documented below and on the page that follows.
Water Analysis Results
Water analysis results from the water are attached at the end of this report.
The samples will be retained for further testing for incompatibilities when mixed at different
ratios.
Laboratory Report No.: STM050228A Reported by:
Matthew Kedzierski
Requested by: Jay Garner
Location: Alaska
Analyzed by: Matthew Kedzierski, Chris Jamison
Data Integration: Matthew Kedzierski
Distribution: Jay Garner, Region file, Lab copies
The above data is supplied solely for informational purposes and BJ Services Company makes no guarantees or warranties. either expressed
or implied. with respect to the accuracy or use of this data. All product warranties and guarantees shall be governed by the standard contract
terms at the time of sale.
Attachment 7
BJ SERVICES lABORATORY REPORT #STM05022BA
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 3
B J Services Water Analysis
D~e: Y1ro5
Company: Forest Oil
Lease:
State: Alaska
Analyst: C. Jamison
pH:
Specific Gravity:
6,21
1 .001 0
CATiONS
Sodium (calc.)
Calcium
Magnesium
Barium
Potassium
Iron
712
16.84
11.7
< 25
59.4
< .5
ANIONS
Chloride
Sulfate
Carbonate
Bicarbonate
1183.2
< 20
< 1
63.4
Total Dissolved Solids(calc.)
Total Hardness as CaC03
Resistivity (ohm-meters--calc.)
2.423938
Scale Index:
CaC03
SI == -2.54
CaS04
%KCI (based on potassium)
Stiff Plot
05
04
03
02
01
00
01
Sample #:
Well#:
County:
Date:
H20 type:
STM050217 A
Osprey
Deck
Temp (F):
mg!1
me!1 ppm
31.0 711
0.8 16.83
1.0 11.7
1.5 59.3
33.4
1182.0
1.0
2047
90.1
1.8
SI == #VALUE!
0.0
02
03
04
Na & K
Ca
Mg
Attachment 7
68
63.4
2045
90,0
05
CI
HC03
804
BJ SERVICES lABORATORY REPORT #STM050228A
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 4
J Services Water Analysis
D~e: ~1m5
Company: Forest Oil
Lease:
State: Alaska
Analyst: C. Jamison
pH:
Specific Gravity:
6.32
1.0000
CATIONS
Sodium (calc.)
Calcium
Magnesium
Barium
Potassium
Iron
-215
24.86
19.9
32
461.1
1.4
ANIONS
Chloride
Sulfate
Carbonate
Bicarbonate
61.2
15
< 1
229.4
Total Dissolved Solids(calc.)
Total Hardness as CaC03
144.1
Resistivity (ohm-meters--calc.)
#NUM!
Scale Index:
CaC03
SI=-1.43
CaS04
%KCI (based on potassium)
Stiff Plot
05
04
03
02
01
00
01
Sample #:
Well#:
County:
Date:
H20 type:
STM050217A
Osprey
9-Feb
Gray Water
Temp (F):
68
mg/l
mell ppm
-9.3 -215
1.2 24.86
1.6 19.9
0.5 32
11.8 461.1
0.0 1.4
1.7
0.3
61.2
15
3.8
229.4
630
630
2.9
144.1
SI = -3.46
0.1
02
04
05
03
Na& K
Ca
Mg
CI
HC03
804
Attachment 7
^~ ^~""-,~""
BJ SERVICES LABORATORY REPORT #STM05022BA
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 5
J Services Water Analysis
D~e: ~1m5
Company: Forest Oil
Lease:
State: Alaska
Analyst: C. Jamison
pH:
Specific Gravity:
7.40
1.0020
CATIONS
mg/l
Sodium (calc.)
Calcium
Magnesium
Barium
Potassium
Iron
457
60.15
32.1
< 25
65.6
<.5
ANIONS
Chloride
Sulfate
Carbonate
Bicarbonate
316.2
74
< 1
1024.8
Total Dissolved Solids(calc.)
2030
Total Hardness as CaC03
282.3
Resistivity (ohm-meters--calc.)
3.854787
Scale Index:
CaC03
SI = 0.58
CaS04
%KCI (based on potassium)
0.0
Stiff Plot
05
04
03
02
01
00
01
Sample #:
Well#:
County:
Date:
H20 type:
STM050217A
Osprey
Sewer
(F):
68
mell ppm
19.9 456
3.0 60.03
2.6 32.0
1.7 65.4
8.9
1.5
315.6
74
16.8
1022.8
2025
5.6
281.7
SI = -2.46
02
03
04
05
Na & K
Ca
Mg
Attachment 7
BJ SERVICES lABORATORY REPORT #STM050228A
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 6
B J Services Water Analysis
Date:
Company:
Lease:
State:
Analyst:
3/1/05
Forest Oil
Sample #:
Well#:
County:
Date:
H20 type:
STM050228A
KPF
Alaska
M. Kedzierski
pH:
Specific Gravity:
5.96
1.0015
9-Feb
Secondary
Containment
Temp (F): 68
CATIONS
mg/l mell ppm
18 0.8 18
<.5
< .5
<: 25
< 10
<.5
Sodium (calc.)
Calcium
Magnesium
Barium
Potassium
Iron
ANIONS
Chloride
Sulfate
Carbonate
Bicarbonate
10.2
< 20
< 1
29.3
0.3
10.2
0.5
29.2
Total Dissolved Solids(calc.)
57
57
Total Hardness as CaC03
0.0
0.0
0.0
Resistivity (ohm-meters--calc.)
18.73702
Scale Index:
CaC03
SI = #V ALUE! CaS04
SI = #VALUE!
%KCI (based on potassium)
#VALUE!
Stiff Plot
05
04
03
02
01
00
01
02
03
04
05
Na& K
Ca
Mg
CI
HC03
804
Attachment 7
BJ SERVICES lABORATORY REPORT #STM050228A
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 1
J Services Water Analysis
D~e: Y1ffiS
Company: Forest Oil
Lease:
State: Alaska
Analyst: M. Kedzierski
Specific Gravity:
6.50
1.0090
CATIONS
Sodium (calc.)
Calcium
Magnesium
Barium
Potassium
Iron
3500
1379.44
34.0
< 25
53.5
2.0
ANIONS
Chloride
Sulfate
Carbonate
Bicarbonate
7344.0
35
< 1
1098.0
Total Dissolved Solids( calc.)
13446
Total Hardness as CaC03
3584.9
Resistivity (ohm-meters--calc.)
0.508522
Scale Index:
CaC03
SI == 0.47
CaS04
%KCI (based on potassium)
Stiff Plot
Sample #:
Well#:
County:
Depth:
H20 type:
STM050228A
RU-5
Produced from
KPF
Temp (F):
mg/l
mell ppm
152.2 3468
68.8 1367.14
2.8 33.7
1.4 53.1
0.1 2.0
207.2
0.7
7278.5
35
18.0
1088.2
13326
71.6
3552.9
SI == -1.82
0.0
10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 01 02 03 04 05
Na& K
Ca
Mg
Attachment 7
69
CI
HC03
804
BJ SERVICES lABORATORY REPORT #STM050228A
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 8
J Services Water Analysis
Date:
Company:
Lease:
State:
Analyst:
3/1/05
Forest Oil
Sample #:
Well#:
County:
Depth:
H20 type:
STM050228A
WMRU
Alaska
M. Kedzierski
pH:
Specific Gravity:
5.96
1.0020
Secondary
Containment
Temp (F): 68
CATIONS
mgll mell ppm
14 0.6 14
< .5
<.5
< 25
< 10
< .5
Sodium (calc.)
Calcium
Magnesium
Barium
Potassium
Iron
ANIONS
Chloride
Sulfate
Carbonate
Bicarbonate
10.2
< 20
< 1
19.5
0.3
10.2
0.3
19.5
Total Dissolved Solids(calc.)
44
44
Total Hardness as CaC03
0.0
0.0
0.0
Resistivity (ohm-meters--calc.)
20.14507
Scale Index:
CaC03
SI = #V ALUE! CaS04
SI = #VALUE!
%KCI (based on potassium)
#VALUE!
Stiff Plot
05
04
03
02
01
00
01
02
03
04
05
Na& K
Ca
Mg
CI
HC03
804
Attachment 7
BJ SERVICES lABORATORY REPORT #STM050228A
MARCH 1, 2005
PAGE 9
B J Services Water Analysis
D~e: ~1m5
Company: Forest Oil
Lease:
State: Alaska
Analyst: M. Kedzierski
Specific Gravity:
6.98
1.0205
CATIONS
mg/l
Sodium (calc.)
Calcium
Magnesium
Barium
Potassium
Iron
4409
4812.00
364.5
< 25
69.9
<.5
ANIONS
Chloride
Sulfate
Carbonate
Bicarbonate
15963.0
36
< 1
817.4
Total Dissolved Solids(calc.)
26472
Total Hardness as CaC03
13517.5
Resistivity (ohm-meters--calc.)
0.254269
Scale Index:
CaC03
SI=1.08
CaS04
'YoKCI (based on potassium)
0.0
Stiff Plot
05
04
03
02
01
00
01
Sample #: STM050228A
Well #: WMRU
County:
Depth:
H20 type: Produced
Temp (F):
68
mell ppm
191.8 4321
240.1 4715.34
30.0 357.2
1.8 68.4
450.3 15642.3
0.8 35
13.4 801.0
25940
270.1 13246.0
SI = -1.45
02
03
04
05
Na& K
Ca
Mg
CI
HC03
804
Attachment 7
.
.
~
BJ SERVICES COMPANY
PACIFIC REGION TECHNOLOGY CENTER
REPORT PREPARED FOR:
PAUL WINSLOW
FOREST OIL COPR.
ALASKA
APRIL 21, 2005
Attachment 8
.
BJ SERVICES LABORATORY REPORT #STM050419A
APRIL 21, 2005
.
PAGE 2
~
SCOPE AND PURPOSE
Seven different water samples from various locations were submitted for analysis to
determine if there would be any precipitation when various mixtures of the waters were
made. The project was initiated in order to comply with state regulations for an upcoming
injection program. The samples were submitted by Paul Winslow of Forest Oil and assigned
BJ Services laboratory sample number STM050419A. The results are documented below
and on the page that follows.
Compatibility Study Results
1. The mixtures presented below were made using water samples that were received in
February 2005.
2. The samples were mixed and placed in a 180°F water bath for a period of 48 hours.
9.5ml Osprey Gray water/490.5 ml RU
Produced Water
1.8 ml Osprey sewer fluid/498.2 ml RU
Produced Water
4.3 ml Osprey Deck Fluid/495.7 ml RU
Produced Water
5.0 ml KPF berm fluid/495 ml RU Produced
Water
4.7 ml WMRU berm fluid/495.3 ml RU
Produced Fluid
250 ml WMRU Produced Water/250 ml RU
Produced Water
0.94%Gray Water/0.18% Sewage
Water/0.42% Deck Water/0.49% KPF
berm/0.46% WMRU berm/48.76% WMRU
Produced Water/48.76% RU Produced Water
No Precipitation Detected
No Precipitation Detected
No Precipitation Detected
No Precipitation Detected
No Precipitation Detected
No Precipitation Detected
No Precipitation Detected
Laboratory Report No.: STM050419A Reported by:
Matthew Kedzierski
Requested by:
Location:
Analyzed by:
Data Integration:
Distribution:
Jay Garner
Anchorage, Alaska
Matthew Kedzierski
Matthew Kedzierski
Jay Garner, Region file, Lab copies
Attachment 8
~
.
BJ SERVICES lABORATORY REPORT #STM050419A
APRil 21, 2005
.
PAGE 3
WJ
The above data is supplied solely for informational purposes and BJ Services Company makes no guarantees or warranties, either expressed
or implied, with respect to the accuracy or use of this data. All product warranties and guarantees shall be governed by the standard contract
terms at the time of sale.
Attachment 8
'\
.
Attachment 9
.
Tulare (357-15R)
Elk Hills Field Field
Kem County, Califomia
.
CorE!! LaI:Ï
FOREST OIL CORP.
WMRU #6 Water Sample
West McArthur River Unit
Alaska
CL File No. 57111 - 2001-029-FO
Water Compositional Analysis - Sample 1
5 Gallons received by Corelab Bakersfield on December 6th 2001
Two Water Samples Picked up in Anchorage November 28th 2001 - with no markings
Dissolved Solids
Cations Anions
mg/I me/I mg/I me/I
Sodium, Na 5500 239.2 Chloride, CI 16000 451.3
Potassium, K 86 2.20 Bicarbonate, HC03 617 10.1
Calcium, Ca 4700 234.5 Carbonate, C03 none detected N/A
Magnesium, Mg 34 2.80 Sulfate, S04 none detected N/A
Barium, Ba 8.7 0.06 Bromide, Br - N/A
Iron, Fe (Total) 7 0.24 Iodide, I - N/A
Boron, B 8 0.71 Sulfide, S - N/A
TOTAL SUSPENDED OIL (and Grease) = none noted
Other Properties
pH Value 6.49
Specific Gravity gm/cc (ASTM-D1429) 1.0150
Total Dissolved Solids, ppm 33700
PENCOR Reservoir Fluid Specialists
An ISO 9002 Certified Company
info@pencor-group.com· (800) 234-4205
Report No. Preliminary 27587
Project Manager: Ross Coleman 11/
5/3/2006, pg 1 of 1
.. .
.
Attachment 10
.
Tulare (357-15R)
Elk Hills Field Field
Kern County, California
.
ÛJre LaI:Ì
FOREST OIL CORP.
WMRU #6 Water Sample
West McArthur River Unit
Alaska
CL File No. 57111 - 2001-029-FO
Water Compositional Analysis - Sample 2
5 Gallons received by Corelab Bakersfield on December 6th 2001
Two Water Samples Picked up in Anchorage November 28th 2001 - with no markings
Dissolved Solids
Cations Anions
mg/I me/I mg/I me/I
Sodium, Na 5600 243.6 Chloride, CI 15700 442.8
Potassium, K 90 2.30 Bicarbonate, HC03 675 11.1
Calcium, Ca 4800 239.5 Carbonate, C03 none detected N/A
Magnesium, Mg 34 2.80 Sulfate, S04 none detected N/A
Barium, Ba 8.8 0.06 Bromide, Br - N/A
Iron, Fe (Total) 3 0.12 Iodide, I - N/A
Boron, B 13 1.20 Sulfide, S - N/A
TOTAL SUSPENDED OIL (and Grease) = none noted
Other Properties
pH Value 6.62
Specific Gravity gm/cc (ASTM-D1429) 1.0160
Total Dissolved Solids, ppm 35000
PENCOR Reservoir Fluid Specialists
An ISO 9002 Certified Company
info@pencor-group.com· (800) 234-4205
Report No. Preliminary 27587
Project Manager: Ross Coleman 11/
5/3/2006, pg 1 of 1
.. () ,~
.
.
Attachment 11
TO THE ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Before the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission )
In the Matter of the Application of )
Forest Oil Corporation for Injection )
For Enhanced Recovery Operations )
Subject to the provisions of 20 MC 25.402 )
)
VERIFICATION OF FACTS AND
AFFIDAVIT OF JIM ARLINGTON
Jim Arlington, being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states as follows:
1. My name is JIM ARLINGTON. I am over 19 years old and have personal
knowledge of the matters set forth herein.
2. I am the Land Manager for the well operator, Forest Oil Corporation ("Forest").
3. I am acquainted with the facts associated with the application of Forest Oil
Corporation for an application for injection for enhanced recovery operations pursuant to the
provisions of 20 MC 25.402 as they pertain to the proposed enhanced recovery operation
involving water injection in the West McArthur River Unit (WMRU) #2A well.
4. The only surface owners within a one-quarter mile radius of either the surface
location of the WMRU #2A well, or the bottom hole location of the WMRU #2A well are the State of
Alaska and Salamatof Native Association, Inc... To the best of my knowledge the surface owner of
the lands on which the bottom hole of the WMRU #2A well is located is the State of Alaska which
lands are managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water.
5. Forest is the only operator of any wells within a one-quarter mile radius of either
the surface location of the WMRU #2A well, or the bottom hole location of the WMRU #2A well.
6. On May 10, 2006, pursuant to 20 MC 25.402 (c), Forest sent a copy of its
application for injection by United States mail to the State of Alaska, the Department of Natural
Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water at 550 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 1070, Anchorage, Alaska
99501 and to the Business Manager, Salamatof Native Association, Inc, at 110 Willow Street, Suite
105, Kenai, Alaska 99611.
Subscribed and sworn to on May /Oi!:2006.
STATE OF ALASKA )
) ss.
THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT )
On this ð~ day of May 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public duly commissioned
and sworn, appeared Jim Arlington, personally known to me, to be the person whose name is
subscribed to within the Verification of Facts and Affidavit.
-
-
4 "Notary Public Þ
4 . REBEKAH J. HAYNES Þ
~ '.. ,. State of Alaska Þ
My Commission Expires Mar. 9, 201 0