Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCO 432 B
Index Conservation Order 432B
Kuparuk River Unit
1) September 4, 2002 Phillips Alaska Inc. request for pool area expansion for DS
3S
2) October 31, 2002 Phillips Alaska Inc. revised request for pool area expansion
for DS 3S
3) September 27, 2002 Notice of Public Hearing, Affidavit of Publication
4) April 1, 2003 ConocoPhillips submittal of proposed pressure survey plan
for 2003
Conservation Order 432B
STATE OF ALASKA
ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
333 West 7th Avenue, Suite 100
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Re: THE APPLICATION OF )
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. for an )
order to expand the affected area for )
pool rules for development of the )
Kuparuk River Oil Pool, Kuparuk )
River Field, North Slope, Alaska )
Conservation Order No. 432B
Kuparuk River Field
Kuparuk River Unit
Milne Point Unit
Kuparuk River Oil Pool
December 12, 2002
IT APPEARING THAT:
1. By application dated September 4, 2002 ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc., formerly known as
Phillips Alaska, Inc., seeks to expand the affected area of Conservation Order No. 432A
and Area Injection Order 2A, to accommodate Kupamk River Oil Pool development at
Drill Site 3S in the Kuparuk River Unit ("KRU").
2. Notice of opportunity for public hearing was published in the Anchorage Daily News on
September 27, 2002.
3. No comments concerning the application or timely requests for a public hearing were '
received.
FINDINGS:
1. Operator ConocoPhillips, Inc. ("CPA") is the operator of the Kuparuk River Oil Pool
within the Kupamk River Unit.
2. Oil Pool The Kuparuk River Oil Pool in the Kupamk River Field is defined as the
accumulation of oil that is common to and correlates with the accumulation found in the
Atlantic Richfield Company West Sak River State No. 1 well between the depths of
6,474 and 6,880 feet. The justification for the expansion of the pool centers on the
discovery in the exploration wells Palm #1 and #lA, which were drilled during the 2001
winter season.
3. Affected Area For The Kuparuk River Oil Pool Rules
a. Conservation Order 349A dated December 23, 1996 describes the affected area to
which the Kuparuk River Oil Pool rules apply.
b. Conservation Orders 432 and 432A (dated July 22, 1998 and August 11, 1999
respectively) incorrectly referred to the affected area described in CO 349 (dated
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
Page 2
December 16, 1994 and repealed by CO 349A on December 23, 1996). The correct
reference should have been to CO 349A.
C.
Conservation Order 471, dated May 29, 2002 defines the Borealis Oil Pool in the
Kuparuk River Formation within the Prudhoe Bay Unit ("PBU"). CO 471
contracted the following sections from CO 349A:
T12N-R10E Sections 13, 24;
T12N-R11E Sections 18, 19, 20, 29, 30, 32, and 33;
T11N-R11E Sections 3,4,9,10,11,14,15,24, and 25.
4. Proposed Expansion CPA requests expansion of the affected area to include the
following sections:
T12N, R7E Sections 1,2,11,12,13,14,15,16,21,22,23, and 24.
o
Strati~ra~}h.v The Kupamk River Formation is a sequence of clastic sediments
deposited on a shallow marine shelf during Neocomian (Early Cretaceous) time, about
140-120 million years ago. The formation is divided into Upper and Lower Members.
These two Members are comprised of 4 Units, in ascending order, Units "A", "B", "C",
and "D". The "A" and "C" units are the pay-bearing intervals in a major portion of the
field.
The Kupamk River "C" Unit is composed of sandstones with subordinate conglomerates
and lesser shales. "C" sediments were deposited in a variety of marginal marine
environments. In general, conditions were marine to the east, within and beyond the
KRU. In the west, evidence from secondary cements as well as trace fossils suggests a
nearby source of fresh water and a shoreline. The Unit is divided into four intervals,
"C 1" through "C4". Intervals are successively younger upward, and axes of deposition
shift successively southwest with time. Throughout the larger part of the KRU, "C"
sand deposition and trends are controlled by syndepositional, northwest-trending normal
faults.
Within the DS 3S area, the Palm #1 and #IA wells penetrated reservoir quality sands in
the Hauterivian Kuparuk River "C4" interval at a depth of approximately 5750-5800 feet
TVD. The Kupamk River "A" Sand was found to be absent through truncation by the
Lower Cretaceous Unconformity (LCU) and the "C 1" through "C3" intervals are absent
because of non-deposition in the area.
The Kuparuk "C4" sand reservoir is comprised of bioturbated, fine to medium-grained
sandstone with variable amounts of glauconite, clay pellets, and siderite cement. It is
separated from the underlying Miluveach mudstones by the regional LCU. A
transgressive surface of erosion marks the contact between "C4" sandstones and
overlying mudstones of the Kalubik Formation. The "C4" interval in the area is
interpreted to represent transgressive shoreface deposits on the flank of the Kuparuk
trough. Accommodation and preservation of these shoreface deposits was created in
part by deep-seated northwest-southeast trending normal faults.
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
Page 3
The gross reservoir thickness logged in the Palm #1 and lA wells ranges from 30 feet to
35 feet, with a corresponding net-to-gross ratio of approximately 0.73. A 15% porosity
cutoff from wire line log derived porosity data Log model is used to count net pay.
Average pay porosity ranges from 19% to 21%. Calculated log model water saturations
for the Palm #1 and #lA wells are 12% and 13% respectively. Permeability ranges from
less than 1 md to almost 1000 md. Fine scale (inches) changes in siderite composition
and concentration play a dominant role in determining sandstone reservoir quality.
Average permeability determined from well testing at Palm #lA is approximately 100
md.
Seismic mapping indicates that the gross thickness of the "C4" reservoir ranges from 7.5
feet to 35 feet in the DS 3S area.
6. Structure The top reservoir lies at a depth of 5750' to 5800' TVD subsea in the DS 3S
area. The oil-water contact in the main Kuparuk reservoir is at-6570' subsea and is
approximately 800' down structure from the Drill Site 3S area. The DS 3S extension of
the Kuparuk River Oil Pool is largely located west of a series of closely spaced north-
south trending normal faults that, prior to the drilling of the Palm and Palm lA
exploratory wells, had coincided with the western limit of Kuparuk River Unit
production. The western portion of the DS 3S extension of the Kupamk River Oil pool
is moderately faulted and gently dipping.
7. Pool Limits The western, northern and southern limit of the "C4" sand in the DS 3S
area is based on seismic mapping techniques. Additional drilling will be required to
more accurately define the boundaries. The thickness and areal extent of the "C4" sand
towards the east is also uncertain. However, pressure communication between the "C4"
in the DS 3S area and the main Kuparuk reservoir located approximately three miles
apart is suggested because of the existence of similar reservoir pressures- approximately
650 psi above original.
8. Fluid Contacts There is no evidence of free gas accumulation or an oil water contact
within the DS 3S extension of the Kupamk River Unit, Kupan~ River Oil Pool.
9. Fluid Properties Reservoir fluid properties are estimated from fluids recovered during
RFT sampling on the Palm #1 well and a cased-hole test of the Palm #lA well. The
range of AP1 gravities from these samples is 24-26° and solution GOR is approximately
485 SCF/STB. Paraffin and asphaltene content is low. The fluid sample measurements
show similarities to crude properties in the main Kuparuk River Field, Kuparuk River
Oil Pool.
10.
Hydrocarbon Recovery CPA estimates approximately 74 million barrels oil
("MMBO") originally in place ("OOIP") in. the Drill Site 3S area that will be developed
with 20 wells. An enhanced recovery process will be initiated within six months after
first production. Studies conducted by CPA resulted in selecting the alternating cycling
of water and miscible gas ("MWAG") process. The MWAG process yielded greater
recoveries than other processes evaluated which included primary, waterflood, miscible
injection ("MI") and lean gas flood. Recovery is expected to be 36 MMBO or about
48% of the OOIP including primary, waterflood and enhanced recovery. Estimated
recoveries from simulation studies of the DS 3S area are primary- 20%, waterflood-
20% and MWAG - 6-8%. As a comparison, ongoing MWAG processes in the main
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
Page 4
Kupamk reservoir "C" sands to the east have experienced incremental oil recovery of
8%-12% OOIP over base waterflood recoveries.
11.
12.
The miscible injectant will initially be the same as that currently used in the KRU Large
Scale EOR Project. It is manufactured at Kuparuk Central Production Facility ("CPF-
1") and CPF-2 by blending lean gas from the KRU's production facilities with solvent
(i.e., light hydrocarbon liquid streams) from the PBU and KRU.
The final phase, lean gas injection, is expected to maximize recovery of the light
hydrocarbon liquids that were injected into the reservoir as part of the MWAG stream.
The source of the lean gas will likely be KRU's CPF-2. However, other potential gas
sources will be considered.
Development Plan DS 3S development involves the addition of one new drill site to the
Greater Kuparuk Area ("GKA"), along with required ancillary and support facilities.
The drill site is designed to accommodate a total of 26 wells on 20-foot centers. Plans to
develop the DS 3S area on nominally a 160-acre well spacing are consistent with Rule 3
of Conservation Order No. 432A dated August 11, 1999. The project will include 12
producer and 8 injector wells. The Palm lA exploration well will be completed as a
producer.
The Drill Site will tie into the existing GKA infrastructure at DS 3G and utilize existing
Central Production Facility 3 (CPF-3) to process produced fluids. A new 8-inch water
injection line runs from DS 3G to 3S and an 8-inch MI injection line runs from KRU DS
3F past DS 3G to DS 3S.
The facilities are designed for daily operations to require minimal operator presence.
All data gathering and routine operations are to be accomplished remotely from CPF 3
or DS 3S control room. Facilities to be installed at the drill site include production, test,
water injection and MI injection lateral piping and headers; test separator for well
testing; and instrumentation, control, and communication equipment. Testing can take
place remotely through a divert valve system, which redirects the flow from the
production header to the test separator.
A 4.8 mile road will connect the new drill site to the existing road system is routed from
DS 3G to DS 3S.
Production is currently scheduled for start-up during 4th quarter 2002. Initial injection
support would commence no later than six months after first production.
Well Design and Completion CPA will construct two types of wells to develop the
Drill Site 3S area. Injectors and producers will be constructed with either long string or
top set completions. A long string completion will employ 30" conductor casing to
approximately 75 feet, 9-5/8" surface casing set below the base of the West Sak
Formation, 7" production casing run from surface through the Kuparuk River
Formation. Top set completions will employ 30" conductor casing to approximately 75
feet, 9-5/8" surface casing set below the base of the West Sak Formation, with 7"
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
Page 5
intermediate casing mn from surface to just above the Kupamk River Formation with a
3-1/2" production liner set through the production interval. Production wells will be
equipped with 3-1/2" tubing and completions will include down hole "jewelry" that will
allow the use of artificial lift, including hydraulic jet pump, hydraulic piston pumps, lift
gas, or plunger lift systems to be installed as needed. Initially, gas lift is planned.
13. Reservoir Surveillance Plans Reservoir surveillance plans adhere to the requirements
of CO 432A.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Kuparuk River Oil Pool rules apply to the affected area described in CO 349A, as
modified by CO 471.
2. There is sufficient data to support expansion of the affected area for Kupamk River Oil
Pool rules to include the Drill Site 3S area. Expansion under this order will prevent
waste, protect fresh water, protect correlative rights, and ensure greater ultimate
recovery.
3. It is appropriate to incorporate the affected area into this order.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. This Conservation Order supersedes Conservation Order 432A, dated August 11, 1999,
and Conservation Order 349A, dated December 23, 1996. The findings, conclusions and
administrative record for Conservation Orders 432A and 349A are adopted by reference
and incorporated in this decision.
2. The affected area of this conservation order is expanded to include T12N, R7E Sections
1,2,11,12,13,14,15,16,21,22,23, and 24.
3. In addition to statewide requirements under 20 AAC 25 (to the extent not superseded by
these rules or other conservation orders), the following rules apply to the Kupamk Oil
Pool within the following affected area:
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
T9N, R6E, U.M.
SECS. 1,2,11,12,13, and 14.
T9N, R7E, U.M.
SECS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,
14,15,16,17 and 18.
T9N, R8E U.M.
SECS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,
14,15,16,17, and 18.
T9N, R9E, U.M.
SECS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,15,
16,17and 18.
T9N, R10E U.M.
SECS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 and 12.
T 1 ON, R6E, U.M.
SECS. 1,2,3,4,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,21,
22,23,24,25,26,35 and 36.
T 1 ON, R7E, U.M.
ALL.
T 1 ON, R8E, U.M.
ALL.
T 1 ON, R9E, U.M.
ALL.
T10N, R10E, U.M.
ALL
T10N, R11E, U.M.
SECS. 5,6,7,8,17,18,19 and 20.
T11N, R6E, U.M.
SECS. 25,26,35 and 36.
T11N, R7E, U.M.
SECS. 1,2,3,4,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,
17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,
30,31,32,33,34,35 and 36.
T1 IN, R10E, U.M.
ALL
Page 6
T 12N, R7E, U.M.
SECS. 1,2,11,12,13,14,15,16,21,22,23,24,25,26,35
and 36.
T 12N, R8E, U.M.
ALL
T 12N R9E U.M.
ALL
T12N, R10E, U.M.
SECS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,14,15,16,17,
18,19,20,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,
34,35 and 36.
T12N, R1.1E, U.M.
SECS. 3,4,5,6,7,8, and 31.
T 13N, R8E, U.M.
SECS. 13,14,23,24,25,26,27,28,33,34,35 and 36.
T 13N, R9E, U.M.
ALL
T13N, R10E, U.M.
ALL
T13N, R11E, U.M.
SECS. 7,8,16,17,18,19,20,21,28,29,30,
31,32, and 33.
T 14N R9E U.M.
SECS. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,
15,16,17,18,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,
28,29,32,33,34,35 and 36.
T14N, R10E U.M.
TllN, R8E, U.M.
ALL
TllN, R9E, U.M.
ALL
SECS. 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,27,28,29,
30,31,32,33,34 and 35
T 15N, R9E U.M.
State lands within SECS. 25,26,27,31,
32,33,34,35, and 36.
T11N, R11E U.M.
SECS. 5,6,7,8,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,26,27,28,
29,30,31, 32,33,34,35 and 36.
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
Page 7
Rule 1. Name of Field Oief. CO 173)
The name of the field shall be the Kupamk River Field. (Source CO 173)
Rule 2. Def'mition of Pool 0tef. CO 173)
The name of the pool in the Kuparuk River Field shall be the Kuparuk River Oil Pool and is
defined as the accumulation of oil that is common to and correlates with the accumulation
found in the Atlantic Richfield Company West Sak River State No. 1 well between the
depths of 6,474 and 6,880 feet. (Source CO 173)
Rule 3. Well Spacing 01ef. CO 173, & 182)
Not more than one well may be drilled on any governmental quarter section or
governmental lot corresponding to it nor may any well be drilled on a governmental quarter
section or governmental lot corresponding to it which contains less than 125 acres, nor may
the pool be opened in a well bore that is closer than 500 feet to any property line nor closer
than 1,000 feet to the pool opened to the well bore in another well except that: (Source CO
173)
In Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 15, 16, 21, and 22, TllN, R10E, U.M., an unrestricted number of
wells may be drilled. (Source CO 182)
Rule 4. Casing and Cementing Requirements (Ref. CO 173~ 190, 193~ 203, 209, and 229)
(a) Casing and cementing requirements are as specified in 20 AAC 25.030, CASING AND
CEMENTING, except as modified below. (Source CO 173)
(b)
For proper anchorage and to prevent an uncontrolled flow, a conductor casing shall be
set at least 75 feet below the surface and sufficient cement shall be used to fill the
annulus behind the pipe to the surface. (Source CO 173)
(c)
For proper anchorage, to prevent an uncontrolled flow, and to protect the well from the
effects of permafrost thaw-subsidence and freeze back, a string of surface casing shall be
set at least 500 measured feet below the base of the permafrost section but not below
2700 feet true vertical depth. Sufficient cement shall be used to fill the annulus behind
the casing to the surface. (Source CO 173, CO 193, 203, 209 & 229 - authorized depths
of surface casing for various Drill Sites are detailed on following table)
1)
Drill Pad 2Z Kupamk River oil pool wells may be drilled to a maximum depth of
3250 feet true vertical depth before surface casing is set so long as drilling fluid
densities are monitored and maintained at 10.0 pounds per gallon. (Source CO 190,
modified by AA 190.01 - 190.15)
2)
Drill Pad 2X and 2C Kupamk River oil pool wells may be drilled to a maximum
depth of 2975 feet true vertical depth before surface casing is set. (Source CO 190,
modified by AA 190.01 - 190.15)
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
Page 8
3) In the event that geologic conditions are not as anticipated, the Commission may
change the maximum depth for setting surface casing by administrative action,
provided a recuest, in writing, is timely submitted. (Source CO 190)
Authorized Surface Casing
AA No. Drill Sites Depth Pursuant to
Rule 4(c) CO 190
AA 190.1 1F 3350' TVD
AA 190.4 2Z 3450' TVD
AA 190.6 2K 3000' TVD
AA 190.7 2K 3452' TVD
AA 190.10 3G 3500' TVD
AA 190.11 lA 3900' TVD
AA 190.12 3R 4200' TVD
AA 190.13 1H 4100' TVD
AA 190.14 1H 4400' TVD
AA 190.15 1Y 4400' TVD
Authorized Surface Casing
Conservation Drill Sites Depth Pursuant to CO 173
Order Rule 4(c) and 20 AAC
25.035(b)
CO 193 2A, 2B, 2D, 2F, 2G, 2H, 2V 3200' TVD
CO 203 IL, IQ, IR, 2E, 2U, 2W, 3B, 3800' TVD
3C
CO 209 IR, 2A, 2H, 2T, 3A, 3B, 3C, 4150' TVD
3F, 3.1, 3K, 3M, 3N, 30, 3Q
CO 229 2M, 3H 3700' TVD
(d) The surface casing, including connections, shall have minimum post-yield strain
properties of 0.9% in tension and 1.26% in compression. (Source CO 173)
1) The only types and grades of casing, with threaded connections, that have been
shown to meet the requirements in (d) above and have been approved for use as
surface casing are the following:
(A) 13 3/8 inch, 72 pounds/foot, L-80, Buttress;
(B) 13-3/8 inch, 72 pounds/foot, N-80, Buttress;
(C) 10-3/4 inch, 45.5 pounds/foot, K-55, Buttress;
2) The Commission may approve other types and grades of surface casing upon a
showing that the proposed casing and connection can meet the post-yield strain
requirements in (d) above. This evidence shall consist of one of the following:
(A) Full scale tensile and compressive tests,
(B) Finite element model studies; or,
(C) Other types of axial strain data acceptable to the Commission.
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
Page 9
(e)
(f)
Other means for maintaining the integrity of the well from the effects of permafrost
thaw-subsidence and freeze back may be approved by the Commission upon application.
(Source CO 173)
The Commission may approve alternative completion methods (to 20 AAC 25.030(b)(4)
and (5)) upon application and presentation of data that shows the alternatives are based
on accepted engineering principles. Such alternative designs may include: (Source CO
173)
1) Slotted liners, wire wrapped screen liners, or combinations thereof, landed inside
of open hole and may be gravel packed;
2) Open hole completions provided that the casing is set not more than 200 feet
above the productive zone.
Rule 5. Automatic Shut-In Equipment (Reft CO 173 & 348)
(a) Each well shall be equipped with a Commission approved fail-safe automatic surface
safety valve system (SVS) capable of preventing uncontrolled flow by shutting off flow
at the wellhead and shutting down any artificial lift system where an over pressure of
equipment may occur. (Source CO 348)
(b) The safety valve system (SVS) shall not be deactivated except during repairs, while
engaged in active well work, or if the pad is manned. If the SVS cannot be returned to
service within 24 hours, the well must be shut in at the wellhead and at the manifold
building. (Source CO 348)
1) Wells with a deactivated SVS shall be identified by a sign on the wellhead
stating that the SVS has been deactivated and the date it was deactivated. (Source
CO 348)
2) A list of wells with the SVS deactivated, the dates and reasons for'deactivating,
and the estimated re-activation dates must be maintained current and available for
Commission inspection on request. (Source CO 348)
(c) A representative of the Commission will witness operation and performance tests at
intervals and times as prescribed by the Commission to confirm that the SVS is in
proper working condition. (Source CO 348)
Rule 6. Safety Flares (Reft CO 173)
Repealed by 20 AAC 25.235.
Rule 7. Gas-Oil Ratio Tests (Reft CO 173 & 262)
Repealed by Conservation Order 262, dated October 23, 1990.
Rule 8. Pressure Surveys (Reft CO 173~ 230, 276 & 432)
(a) A bottom-hole pressure survey shall be taken on each well prior to initial sustained
production. (Source CO 230)
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
Page 10
(b)
The operator shall obtain pressure surveys as needed to effectively manage hydrocarbon
recovery processes subject to an annual plan outlined in (d) of this rule. (Source CO
432)
(c)
Bottom-hole pressures obtained by a static buildup pressure survey, a 24-hour shut-in
instantaneous test, a multiple flow rate test or an injection fall-off test will be acceptable.
Calculation of bottom-hole pressures from surface data will be permitted for water
injection wells. (Source CO 230)
(d)
Data from the surveys required in this rule shall be filed with the Commission by April 1
of the subsequent year in which the surveys are conducted. Along with the survey
submittal, the operator will provide a proposed survey plan for the upcoming year.
Reservoir Pressure Report, Form 10-412, shall be utilized for all surveys with
attachments for complete additional data. Data submitted shall include, but are not
limited to, rate, pressure, time, depths, fluid gradient, temperature, and other well
conditions necessary for complete analysis of each survey being conducted. The pool
pressure datum plane shall be 6,200 feet subsea. (Source CO 230, 432)
(e) Results and data from any special reservoir pressure monitoring techniques, tests, or
surveys shall also be submitted as prescribed in (d) of this rule. (Source CO 230)
(f) Upon application by the operator, the Commission in its discretion may administratively
approve exceptions to this rule. (Source CO 230)
Rule 9. Productivity Profiles (Re/CO 173, 276 & 432)
(a) During the first year of production, a production survey shall be run in each well that has
multiple sand intervals open to the well bore. (Source CO 173)
(b)
Subsequent surveys shall be run in wells that exhibit uncharacteristic changes in
performance. Subsequent surveys shall also be required in wells which have had
remedial work performed to change the production profile unless the remedial work
results in only one sand interval being open to the well bore. (Source CO 173,276)
(c)
All completed production surveys taken during a calendar year be filed with the
Commission by April 1 of the subsequent year. The Commission may request data be
provided in advance of an annual submittal if required. (Source CO 173,432)
(d) By administrative order, the Commission shall specify additional surveys should it be
determined that the surveys submitted under (a) and (b) are inadequate. (Source CO 173)
Conservation Order 432B
December 12, 2002
Page 11
Rule 10. Production Well Tests (Reft CO 432A)
(a) A well test must be performed on each active producing well at least once every 30
days.
(b)
Twinned production wells commingled through the same surface flowline, must be
tested at least once every 30 days as a combined production stream and the individual
wells must be tested separately at least once every six months or more often if the
combined well test indicates uncharacteristic performance.
DONE at Anchorage, Alaska and dated December 12, 2002.
Cammy Oech~ Taylor, Chair
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Daniel T. Seamount, Jr., Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Michael L. Bill, P.E., Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
AS 31.05.080 provides that within 20 days after receipt of written notice of the entry of an order, a person
affected by it Month file with the Commission an application for rehearing. A request for rehearing must be
received by 4:30 PM on the 23rd day following the date of the order, or next working day if a holiday or
weekend, to be timely filed. The Commission shall grant or refuse the application in whole or in part within
10 days. The Commission can refuse an application by not acting on it within the 10-day period. An affected
person has 30 days from the date the Commission refuses the application or mails (or otherwise distributes) an
order upon rehearing, both being the final order of the Commission, to appeal the decision to Superior Court.
Where a request for rehearing is denied by non-action of the Commission, the 30-day period for appeal to
Superior Court runs from the date on which the request is deemed denied (i.e., l0th day after the application for
rehearing was filed).
John Katz
State of Alaska
Alaska Governor's Office
444 North Capitol St., NW, Ste 336
Washington, DC 20001
Daniel Donkel
2121 North Bayshore Drive, Ste 1219
Miami, FL 33137
SD Dept of Env & Natural Resources
Oil and Gas Program
2050 West Main, Ste 1
Rapid City, SD 57702
Alfred James
107 North Market Street, Ste 1000
Wichita, KS 67202-1822
Christine Hansen
Interstate Oil & Gas Compact Comm
Excutive Director
PO Box 53127
Oklahoma City, OK 73152
Citgo Petroleum Corporation
PO Box 3758
Tulsa, OK 74136
Conoco Inc.
PO Box 1267
Ponca City, OK
74602-1267
Mir Yousufuddin
US Department of Energy
Energy Information Administration
1999 Bryan Street, Ste 1110
Dallas, TX 75201-6801
Mary Jones
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cartography
810 Houston Street, Ste 2000
Ft. Worth, TX 76102-6298
Gregg Nady
Shell E&P Company
Onshore Exploration & Development
PO Box 576
Houston, TX 77001-0576
Michael Nelson
Purvin Gertz, Inc.
Library
600 Travis, Ste 2150
Houston, TX 77002
Paul Walker
Chevron
1301 McKinney, Rm 1750
Houston, TX 77010
G. Scott Pfoff
Aurora Gas, LLC
10333 Richmond Ave, Ste 710
Houston, TX 77042
G. Havran
Gaffney, Cline & Associations
Library
1360 Post Oak Blvd., Ste 2500
Houston, TX 77056
David McCaleb
IHS Energy Group
GEPS
5333 Westheimer, Ste 100
Houston, TX 77056
William Holton, Jr.
Marathon Oil Company
Law Department
5555 San Fecipe St.
Houston, TX 77056-2799
T.E. AI~rd
ExxonMobil Exploration Company
PO Box 4778
Houston, TX 77210-4778
Texico Exploration & Production
PO Box 36366
Houston, TX 77236
CorryWoolington
ChevronTexaco
Land-Alaska
PO Box 36366
Houston, TX 77236
W. Allen Huckabay
Phillips Petroleum Company
Exploration Department
PO Box 1967
Houston, TX 77251
Chevron USA
Alaska Division
PO Box 1635
Houston, TX 77251
Donna Williams
World Oil
Statistics Editor
PO Box 2608
Houston, TX 77252
Chevron Chemical Company
Library
PO Box 2100
Houston, TX 77252-9987
Shelia McNulty
FinancialTimes
PO Box 25089
Houston, TX 77265-5089
Shawn Sutherland
Unocal
Revenue Accounting
14141 Southwest Freeway
Sugar Land, TX 77478
Kelly Valadez
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co.
Supply & Distribution
300 Concord Plaza Drive
San Antonio, TX 78216
James White
Intrepid Prod. Co./Alaskan Crude
4614 Bohill
SanAntonio, TX 78217
Doug Schultze
XTO Energy Inc.
3000 North Garfield, Ste 175
Midland, TX 79705
Robert Gravely
7681 South Kit Carson Ddve
Littleton, CO 80122
George Vaught, Jr.
PO Box 13557
Denver, CO 80201-3557
Jerry Hodgden
Hodgden Oil Company
408 18th Street
Golden, CO 80401-2433
Richard Neahdng
NRG Associates
President
PO Box 1655
Colorado Springs, CO
80901
John Levorsen
200 North 3rd Street, #1202
Boise, ID 83702
Kay Munger
Munger Oilln~rmation Se~ice, lnc
PO Box 45738
Los Angeles, CA 90045-0738
John F. Be~quist
Babson and Sheppa~
PO Box 8279
Long Beach, CA 90808-0279
Samuel Van Vactor
Economic Insight Inc.
3004 SW First Ave.
Portland, OR 97201
Thor Cutler OW-137
US EPA egion 10
1200 Sixth Ave.
Seattle, WA 98101
Michael Parks
Marple's Business Newsletter
117 West Mercer St, Ste 200
Seattle, WA 98119-3960
Tim Ryherd
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
550 West 7th Ave., Ste 800
Anchorage, AK 99501
Richard Mount
State of Alaska
Department of Revenue
500 West 7th Ave., Ste 500
Anchorage, AK 99501
Jim Arlington
Forest Oil
310 K Street, Ste 700
Anchorage, AK 99501
Duane Vaagen
Fairweather
715 L Street, Ste 7
Anchorage, AK 99501
Williams VanDyke
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
550 West 7th Ave., Ste 800
Anchorage, AK 99501
Julie Houle
State of Alaskan DNR
Div of Oil & Gas, Resource Eval.
550 West 7th Ave., Ste 800
Anchorage, AK 99501
Cammy Taylor
1333 West 11th Ave.
Anchorage, AK 99501
Robert Mintz
State of Alaska
Department of Law
1031 West 4th Ave., Ste 200
Anchorage, AK 99501
Susan Hill
State of Alaska, ADEC
EH
555 Cordova Street
Anchorage, AK 99501
Ed Jones
Aurora Gas, LLC
Vice President
1029 West 3rd Ave., Ste 220
Anchorage, AK 99501
Trustees for Alaska
1026 West 4th Ave., Ste 201
Anchorage, AK 99501-1980
Mark Wedman
Halliburton
6900 Arctic Blvd.
Anchorage, AK 99502
John Harris
NI Energy Development
Tubular
3301 C Street, Ste 208
Anchorage, AK 99503
Ciri
Land Department
PO Box 93330
Anchorage, AK 99503
Rob Crotty
CIO CH2M HILL
301 West Nothern Lights Blvd
Anchorage, AK 99503
Schlumberger
Drilling and Measurements
3940 Arctic Blvd., Ste 300
Anchorage, AK 99503
Mark Dalton
HDR Alaska
2525 C Street, Ste 305
Anchorage, AK 99503
Jack Laasch
Natchiq
Vice President Government Affairs
3900 C Street, Ste 701
Anchorage, AK 99503
Baker Oil Tools
4730 Business Park Blvd., #44
Anchorage, AK 99503
Mark Hanley
Anadarko
3201 C Street, Ste 603
Anchorage, AK 99503
Judy Brady
Alaska Oil & Gas Associates
121 West Fireweed Lane, Ste 207
Anchorage, AK 99503-2035
Arlen Ehm
2420 Foxhall Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99504-3342
Greg Noble
Bureau of Land Management
Energy and Minerals
6881 Abbott Loop Rd
Anchorage, AK 99507
Rose Ragsdale
Rose Ragsdale & Associates
3320 E. 41st Ave
Anchorage, AK 99508
Thomas R. Marshall, Jr.
1569 Birchwood Street
Anchorage, AK 99508
Jeff Walker
US Minerals Management Service
Regional Supervisor
949 East 36th Ave., Ste 308
Anchorage, AK 99508
Paul L. Craig
Trading Bay Energy Corp
5432 East Northern Lights, Ste 610
Anchorage, AK 99508
Jill Schneider
US Geological Survey
4200 University Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99508
Jim Scherr
US Minerals Management Service
Resource Evaluation
949 East 36th Ave., Ste 308
Anchorage, AK 99508
Richard Prentki
US Minerals Management Service
949 East 36th Ave., 3rd Floor
Anchorage, AK 99508
Chuck O'Donnell
Veco Alaska,Inc.
949 East 36th Ave., Ste 500
Anchorage, AK 99508
Gordon Severson
3201 Westmar Cr.
Anchorage, AK 99508-4336
Jim Ruud
Phillips Alaska, Inc.
Land Department
PO Box 100360
Anchorage, AK 99510
Kristen Nelson
IHS Energy
PO Box 102278
Anchorage, AK
99510-2278
Perry Markley
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
Oil Movements Department
1835 So. Bragaw- MS 575
Anchorage, AK 99515
Jordan Jacobsen
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
Law Department
1835 So. Bragaw
Anchorage, AK 99515
Robert Britch, PE
Northern Consulting Group
2454 Telequana Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99517
David Cusato
600 West 76th Ave., #508
Anchorage, AK 99518
Jeanne Dickey
BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
Legal Department
PO Box 196612
Anchorage, AK 99518
Tesoro Alaska Company
PO Box 196272
Anchorage, AK 99519
J. Brock Riddle
Marathon Oil Company
Land Department
PO Box 196168
Anchorage, AK 99519-6168
Kevin Tabler
Unocal
PO Box 196247
Anchorage, AK
99519-6247
Sue Miller
BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
PO Box 196612
Anchorage, AK 99519-6612
BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
Land Manager
PO Box 196612
Anchorage, AK 99519-6612
Dudley Platt
D.A. Platt & Associates
9852 Little Diomede Cr.
Eagle River, AK 99577
Bob Shavelson
Cooklnlet Keeper
PO Box 3269
Homer, AK 99603
Shannon Donnelly
Phillips Alaska, Inc.
HEST-Enviromental
PO Box 66
Kenai, AK 99611
Peter McKay
55441 Chinook Rd
Kenai, AK 99611
Kenai Peninsula Borough
Economic Development Distr
14896 Kenai Spur Hwy #103A
Kenai, AK 99611-7000
Penny Vadla
Box 467
Ninilchik, AK
99639
James Gibbs
PO Box 1597
Soldotna, AK
99669
Claire Caldes
US Fish & Wildlife Service
Kenai Refuge
PO Box 2139
Soldotna, AK 99669
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge
Refuge Manager
PO Box 2139
Soldotna, AK 99669-2139
John Tanigawa
Evergreen Well Service Company
PO Box 871845
Wasilla, AK 99687
Charles Boddy
Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc.
100 Cushman Street, Suite 210
Fairbanks, AK 99701-4659
Richard Wagner
PO Box 60868
Fairbanks, AK 99706
Cliff Burglin
PO Box 131
Fairbanks, AK
99707
Harry Bader
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
3700 Airport Way
Fairbanks, AK 99709
Bernie Karl
K&K Recyclinglnc.
PO Box 58055
Fairbanks, AK 99711
North Slope Borough
PO Box 69
Barrow, AK 99723
Williams Thomas
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Land Department
PO Box 129
Barrow, AK 99723
Senator Loren Leman
State Capitol Rm 113
Juneau, AK 99801-1182
ConocOPhillips
James R. Hand
Supervisor- Drillsite Petroleum Engineering
Greater Kuparuk Area
ConocoPhillips Alaska Inc.
ATO- 1276
PO Box 100360
Anchorage AK 99510-0360
Phone (907)263-4027
Fax: (907)265-6133
April 1,2003
Ms. Sarah H. Palin, Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7th Ave. Suite #100
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3539
Re: Kuparuk River Oil Pool- Proposed Pressure Survey Plan for 2003
Dear Ms. Palin,
In compliance with Rule 8, Conservation Order No. 432, ConocoPhillips Alaska,
Inc., operator of the Kuparuk River Oil Pool, is hereby submitting the proposed
pressure survey plan for 2003.
There were 191 pressure surveys reported for the Kuparuk River Oil Pool to
the AOGCC in 2002.
In 2003, we expect to conduct approximately 180 pressure surveys which
inclUdes initial surveys for new wells prior to initial sustained production.
If you have any questions concerning this data, please contact Robed
Christensen at (907) 659-7535.
Sincerely,
Supervisor- Drillsite Petroleum Engineering
Greater Kuparuk Area
ConocoPhillips
November 18, 2002
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Cammy Taylor, Chair
333 W. 7th Ave Suite 100
Anchorage, AK 99501
RECEIVED
NOV 2 2 2002
N~sk; 0il & Gas Oons. Commission
Anchorage
Attention: Commissioner Seamount
Subject: A request for a variance in packer setting depth for Drill Site 3S (Palm) ~a L- ~,~'~ ¥'
injectors under AAC 25.412 (b)
Dear Commissioner Taylor:
With this letter, ConocoPhillips Alaska requests a Drill Site 3S (Palm) variance in the
200 feet measured depth limit between the packer and the formation top specified in
statewide AOGCC regulations. Specifically, we request that CPA be permitted to set
injector packers up to 350 feet measured depth above the formation top in Drill Site 3S
(Palm) injection wells. The following discussion is provided to support this request:
20 AAC 25.412 (b) states: "... The packer must be placed within 200 feet measured
depth above the top of the perforations, unless the commission approves a different
placement depth as the commission considers appropriate given the thickness and depth
of the confining zone."
In the Drill Site 3S (Palm) development area, the Kuparuk formation is found between
5700 and 5900 feet vertical depth. Overlying the Kuparuk is the Lower Kalubik, Upper
Kalubik, and HRZ confining intervals which are thick sequences of shales and claystones
with no known reservoir potential.
The Drill Site 3S (Palm) injection wells are planned with a 7" long/production string with
3.5" tubing. To maintain the regulation of 200 feet measured depth maximum spacing
between packer depth and formation top, the injector packer setting depth is planned for
100 feet measured depth above the anticipated top of formation. With this configuration,
the available logging interval between the tubing tail (approximately 30 feet below the
packer setting depth) and formation top would be limited to ~- 70 feet measured depth;
therefore on previous wells, CPA has chosen to perform a cement bond log on the drilling
rig prior to running the 3.5" tubing completion. In an effort to lower the development
program drilling costs, we are requesting that CPA be permitted to set injector packers up
to 350 feet measured depth above the formation top. With a longer interval in which to
illustrate a hydraulic barrier exists behind the 7" casing, it becomes practical to run the
cement bond logs after the drilling rig runs the completion and moves off of the well. It
is also proposed to plan the cement top in the 7" annulus to be raised by an equal distance
(250 feet) in order to maintain the same interval of cemented 7" annulus above the packer
and therefore the same level of security against an annulus leak path behind the 7"
(around and above the packer).
The first well on which CPA proposes to apply a 350 feet measured depth rule is
injection well 3S-09. Nabors 7ES is scheduled to spud this injector on December 07,
2002. 3S-09 will be used as the example for this concept. The planned completion
strategy of 3S-09 is essentially analogous to all planned completions for Drill Site 3S
(Palm) injectors. Please refer to the attached wellbore diagram.
Illustrating the application of a 350 feet measured depth rule in the 3S-09 injection well,
the packer would most likely be placed at a measured depth of 8903 to 9003 feet. The
prognosed top for the Kuparuk formation in 3S-09 is 9253 feet measured depth (5734 feet
vertical depth). The top of cement will be designed at 8203 feet measured depth, 1050
feet measured depth above the top of the Kupamk target interval. The formation top for
the Lower Kalubik, Upper Kalubik, and HRZ intervals in 3S-09 are forecasted to be
9135, 8942, and 8702 feet measured depth, respectively.
In the above completion scenario, the packer is set in the shale/claystone sequence
overlying the Kuparuk reservoir and 700 feet below the top of cement. Also, the distance
between the tubing tail and Kuparuk formation top would be +/- 320 feet. In this case,
CPA would run a cement bond log below the tubing tail to confirm cement quality after
the drilling rig runs the completion and moves off of the well.
In summary, two primary risks are introduced by taking this action. One risk is the
increased exposure for an annulus leak path in the event of a leak in the 7" casing below
the packer. The other risk is a reduced interval length to be bond logged, which could
create difficulties in demonstrating a hydraulic barrier above the pay zone. To mitigate
the risks of increasing the distance between the packer and the top perforation by 250
feet, CPA proposes to increase the length of the cement column above the pay zone by an
equal amount. We believe that a 350 feet measured depth exception for Drill Site 3S
(Palm) provides protection to resources equivalent to what is provided under 20 ACC
25.412 (b) and serves to facilitate drilling operations. Adoption of this practice will
ultimately decrease development drilling costs on the Drill Site 3S (Palm) project.
We respectfully request consideration of this proposal and look forward to your favorable
reply. If you have further questions, please call me at 265-1606.
Sincerely,
Daniel E. Hensley
Palm Surveillance Engineer
KRU - 3S-09 InJ --,.tor
Proposed Completion Schematic
Single Completion
16"x30"
insulated
conductor @ ~ r~
+/-109'MD MN
TAM 9-5/8" Port, i~
Collar Stnd r~
Grade BTC r~
Threads (+/-
1000' MD/I'VD)
Surface csg. r~J
9-5/8-40# L-80 -,, r~
BTC (3589' MD /
2612' TVD)
Casing point
100' above the
C80 sand
ConocoPhillips
3-1/2" FMC Gen V tubing hanger, 3-1/2" L-80 EUE8RD pin down. Special Drift 2.91"
3-1/2", L-80, 9.34¢ EUE8RD Spaceout Pups as Required. Special
Drift 2.91"
3-1/2" Camco DS Landing Nipple with 2.875" ID No-Go profile set @ +/- 500' MD.
Use of port collar at the discretion of the drilling team.
RECEIVED
NOV £ 2002
Alaska 0il & Gas Cons. c0mmismm
Anchorage
Top of Cement
~ 8203' MD
8702' MD
3-1/2" x 1-1/2" 'MMG' GLM w/DCR Dump Kill Valve (3000 psi casing to tubing shear). 6' L-80
handling pups installed on top and bottom of mandrel.
1 Joint 3-1/2", L-80, 9.3# EUE 8rd Mod Tubing.
HRZ
8942' MD
Upper
Kalubik
9135' MD
Lower
Kalubik
9253' MD
Kuparuk Target
3-1/2" Camco 'DS' nipple w/2.813" No-Go profile
1 Joint 3-1/2", L-80, 9.3# EUE 8rd Mod Tubing.
6' Handling Pup Joint 3-1/2", L-80, 9.3# EUE 8rd Mod Tubing.
Baker '80-40' PBR.
Baker 7" x 3-112" 'SAB-3' Permanent Packer set ~ 8903' MD (350' MD above top planned
perf). Minimum ID through the packer 3.00".
6' Pup Joint 3-1/2", L-80, 9.3# EUE 8rd Mod Tubing.
3-1/2" Camco 'D' nipple w/2.75" No-Go profile.
6' Pup Joint 3-1/2", L-80, 9.3# EUE 8rd Mod Tubing.
Baker 3-1/2" WL Re-entry Guide wi shear out sub. Tubing tail +1- 320' above top planned
perforation.
C
Sand Perfs
(to be done after
rig moves oft)
Production csg.
7" 26# L-80
BTCM (+/- 9486'
MD)
TD @ 9,486' MD / 5921' TVD
(200' MD below Miluveach)
ConnocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
MD Inc Azim. SSTVD 'I'VD N/S E/W
(fi) (Deg) (Deg) (fi) (fi) (fi) (fi)
0.00 0.00 0.00 -56.10 0.00 0.00 N 0.00
200.00 0.00 0.00 143.90 200.00 0.00 N 0.00
700.00 10.00 41.00 641.37 697.47 32.85 N 28.55
1700.13 50.00 41.86 1490.00 1546.10 398.68 N 354.52
1846.60 55.86 41.89 1578.25 1634.35 485.67 N 432.50
2517.96 55.86 41.89 1955.00 2011.10 899.34 N 803.52
3310.93 55.86 41.89 2400.00 2456.10 1387.95 N 1241.75
3589.00 55.86 41.89 2556.05 2612.15 1559.29 N 1395.42
3688.71 55.86 41.89 2612.00 2668.10 1620.73 N 1450.52
6338.49 55.86 41.89 4099.00 4155.10 3253.44 N 2914.90
8216.68 55.86 41.89 5153.00 5209.10 4410.73 N 3952.87
8701.38 55.86 41.89 5425.00 5481.10 4709.38 N 4220.73
8941.94 55.86 41.89 5560.00 5616.10 4857.61 N 4353.68
9134.39 55.86 41.89 5668.00 5724.10 4976.20 N 4460.04
9246.66 55.86 41.89 5731.00 5787.10 5045.37 N 4522.08
9252.00 55.86 41.89 5734.00 5790.10 5048.67 N 4525.03
9285.86 55.86 41.89 5753.00 5809.10 5069.53 N 4543.74
9486.00 55.86 41.89 5865.31 5921.41
Y
(ft)
X
5192.85 N 4654.35 E 5999097.06 N
E 5993919,00 N 476285.94 E
E 5993919.00 N 476285.94 E
E 5993951,76 N 476314.60 E
E 5994316,56 N 476641,72 E
E 5994403.30 N 476719,98 E
E 5994815,79 N 477092,31 E
E 5995303,00 N 477532.09 E
E 5995473,85 N 477686,30 E
E 5995535,12 N 477741.60 E
E 5997163,18 N 479211.15 E
E 5998317.17 N 480252.78 E
E 5998614.97 N 480521,59 E
E 5998762,78 N 480655.01 E
E 5998881.02 N 480761.74 E
E 5998950,00 N 480824.00 E
E 5998953.29 N 480826.97 E
E 5998974,09 N 480845,74 E
480956,74 E
DLS
(°/lOOft)
0.00
0.00
2.00
4.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
V.S.
(ft)
0.00
0.00
43.52
533.50
650.33
1206.01
1862.35
2092.51
2175.03
4368.24
5922.81
6323.99
6523.11
6682.40
6775.32
6779.74
6807.77
6973.42
3S-09 (wp03)
Comment
SHL
Begin Dir in 12-1/4" Hole
Increase in Dir Rate @ 4.0°/100ft
B. Permafrost
End Dir
T. West Sak
B, West Sak
9-5/8" Csg Pt .,. Drill 8-1/2" Hole
C-80 (K-10)
C-40 (K-3)
Top Morraine
Top HRZ
Base HRZ
K-1
TARGET
Kuparuk
Miluveach
Total Depth
L.
RECEIVED
NOV ?..
Alaska 0il & Gas Cons. L;0mm~ss~or:
Anchorage
STATE OF ALASKA NOTICE TO PUBLISHER ADVERTISING ORDER NO.
INVOICI~ ~T BE IN TRIPLICATE SHOWING ADVERTISING ORDER NO.~ i^'-,'~TIFIED
ADVERTISING
~F,D^~ ~F PUBL,O^T,ON <P*.T2 OF ~.S ~O.~)W,~. ~.~ ~ O~ AO'02314017
ORDER ADVERTISEMENT MUST BE SUBMI~ED WI~ I~OICE
F AO~ AGENCY CO.ACT DATEOFA.O.
" 333 W 7~ Ave, Ste 100 Jody Co]ombie September 26, 2002
o ~chorage, ~ 99501 PHONE PeN
M
- (907~ 793 -1221
~ ~chorage D~ly News September 27, 2002
o
P O Box 149001
~chorage, ~ 99514 ~.~ m~m~ s~. ~.~ ~USL~ Lm~S ~US~ S~ em..~o ~. ~
EN~ ON THE DATES SHO~.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
Accost ~STOF0330
Adve~isement to be published w~ e-m~led
Type of Advedisement X Legal ~ Display ~ Classified ~Other (Specie)
,.
SEE ATTACHED PUBLIC HE~NG
I ITOTALOF I
S.E~D.INVDICE ~N.?~IpL!CATE I AOGEC, 333 W. ?th Ave., Suite 100 PAGE 1OF ALL PAGES$I
,..L,. ':,,.:'~. :.'..' .'"?~; "." .:' TO' :.~:;~.'..: :': '.-.~.'... :' ";? '. ~ ~ Anchorage: AK 99501 2 PAGES
REF ~PE NUMBER AMOUNT DATE COMMENTS
1 VEN
2 A~ 02910
FIN AMOUNT SY CC PGM LC ACCT FY NMR
DIST LIQ
1 03 02140100 ?3540
....
2
3
.....
~,, ,,,
02-902 (Rev. 3/94) Publisher/Original Copies: Department Fiscal, Department, Receiving AO.FRM
Notice of Public Hearing
STATE OF ALASKA
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Re:
Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion and
Kupamk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Phillips Alaska, Inc. by applications dated September 4, 2002, has applied to
expand the affected area of the Kupamk River Oil Pool defined in Conservation Order
No. 432A. The current affected area for the Kupamk River Oil Pool is set forth in
Conservation Order No. 349A (with certain area contracted per Conservation Order No.
471 defining the Prudhoe Bay Unit Borealis Oil Pool). Phillips Alaska, Inc has also
requested expansion of Area Injection Order #2, which established rules for enhanced
recovery operations within several pools in the Kupamk River Unit. The Commission
proposes to consolidate and clarify rules governing development and operation of the
Kupamk River Oil Pool and Area Injection Orders governing Kupamk River Unit.
The following acreage has been requested for inclusion within the Kupamk River
Oil Pool Area and within Area Injection Order #2A.
Umiat Meridian
T12N-R7E Section 1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24.
The Commission has tentatively set a public hearing on this application for
October 29, 2002 at 9:00 am at the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission at 333
West 7th Avenue, Suite 100, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. A person may request that the
tentatively scheduled hearing be held by filing a written request with the Commission no
later than 4:30'pm on October 17, 2002.
If a request for a hearing is not timely filed, the Commission will consider the
issuance of an order without a hearing. To learn if the Commission will hold the public
hearing, please call 793-1221.
In addition, a person may submit written comments regarding this application to
the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission at 333 West 7th AVenue, Suite 100,
Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Written comments must be received no later than 4:30 pmon
October 28, 2002 except that if the CommiSSion decides to hold a public hearing, written
comments must be received no later than 9:00 am on October 29, 2002.
If you are a person with a disability who may need a special modification in order
to comment or to attend the pu..ll!ic hearing, please contact Jody Colombie at 793-1221
before October 15, 2002.
~ Dan Seamount, Commissioner
Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Published Date: September 27, 2002
AO #0231017
Anchorage Daily News
Affidavit of Publication
1001 Northway Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508
9/30/2002
AD # DATE PO ACCOUNT
584492 09/2712002 02314017 STOF0330
PRICE OTHER OTHER
PER DAY CHARGES. CHARGES ..~2
$186.32
$186.32 $0.00 $0.00
OTHER OTHER OTHER GRAND
CHARGES#3 CHARG~ CHARGES~ TOTAL
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $186.32
STATE OF ALASKA
THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Amy Heath, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that
she is an advertising representative of the Anchorage Daily News, a
daily newspaper.
That said newspaper has been approved by the Third Judicial
Court, Anchorage, Alaska, and it now and has been published in
the English language continually as a daily newsp.aper in
Anchorage, Alaska, and it is now and during all saidtime was
printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of
publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a copy of an
advertisement as it was published in regular issueS (and not in
supplemental form) of said newspaper on the above dates and
that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged
for the foregoing publication is not in excess of the rate charged
private individuals.
Subscribed and sworn to me before this date:
Notary Public in and for the State of Alaska.
Third Division. Anchorage, Alaska
MY COMMISSIO_.N E X. PIRES: {~,~>~ ~~~ ....
.~o~.' '---" ~ ~_
~'''' "m 9
I' "Notic"e of Public Hearing'
, ' STATE OF ALASKA '
. 'AlaSka Oil.and. Gas Conservation Commission
' R'e:- :'KuparUk River Oil Pool Area Expansion and
Kuparuk R'Jver Unit Area Injection Order
Expansion ~, . , ,,,'r.,.",'..' ,,
Phillips Alaska, Inc. by applications dated Sep-
tember 4, 2002, has applied to expand .the affected
area of the Kuparuk River Oil Pool defined, in Con-
servotion Order No. 432A. The current affected
area for the Kuparuk Ri'vet Oil Poo. I is set forth in
Conservation. Order No. 349A (with.ce. rtain area
contracted per Conservation' Order N0. 471 defin-
ing thePrudhoe BayUnit BorealisOll Pool). Phil-
lipS 'Alaska, Inc has also requested expansion of
Ar'ea 'l'niection Order #2, ~hich eSfablish~ed rules
'for enhanced recovery 'operations within seve~ral
.pools in the Kuporuk River Unit. The commiSsion
proposes to consolJ'date and'clarify rules goverm
lng development and' operation Of the Kuparuk
River Oil Pool an'd"A~ea' Ini'ectio6 Orders govern-
Kuparuk Rivet'Unit. ' '
The'f011owing acreage has been re'quested for
inclusion within the Kuparok River Oil Pool Area
and Within Area I nlection Order #2A. .
Umiat. Meridian
T12N~R7E Section.I, 2, il,' 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21',~.
. i 22, '23, 24....' ' ':.
, , ,
The Commission has tentatively set'a public
hearing on this application for October 29,.2002 at
9:00 am at the. A. aska O I andGas Conservation
Commission at 333 West'.Tth Avenue; suite. 100, An-'
chorage, A aska 99501. A person' may request that
the tentatively scheduled hearing be held by. filing
a written request with the commission no later
.;than 4~30 pm o~'Oct0ber 17, 2002.'
If a reqUest for a heari'ng is.not timely filed,
ihe Commission. Will consider the'issuance of an
Order without a' hearing. 'To 'learn if the. Commis:
'simon will hold the public hearing, please call
.793-1221. ' ~
In additi0n, a person may sUb'rfllit Written
comments regarding this application t0ithe Alaska
Oil and Gas Conservation' Commissi'0n'a, 333 West
7th Avenue, Suite 100, Anchorage, Aldska 9950].
.Written comments must be received:nb later than
4:30 pm On. October 28, 2002.excePt that' if the
Commission decides to h'old a public hearing,' wri't-
ten comments must be received, no later than 9:00
am on October 29; 2002.
,
,, ,
If.you area .person with a disability who may
need a special.modification in order to comment or
to attend the public hearing,, p.lease contact Jody
Colombie at 793~1221 before October 15, 2002'.
,
Dan Seamount, Commissioner'
Oil and Gas Conservation COmmission
Publish:September 27,. 2002: ~ . .
Re: Advertising Order
Subject: Re: Advertising Order
Date: 26 Sep 2002 11:49:42 -0800
From: Amy Heath <aheath@adn.com>
To: Jody Colombie <jody_colombie~admin.state.ak.us>
__
Account Number: STOF0330
Legal Ad Number: 584492 (Public Notice)
Run Dates: September 27, 2002
Total Amount: $186.32
Thanks Jody! :) Please let me know if I can help you with anything else.
Amy L. Heath
__
Legal Customer Service Representative
Phone: (907) 257-4296
Fax: (907) 279-8170
Office Hours 8:00am - 5:00pm
aheath@adn.com
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, Jody Colombie <jody_colombie@admin.state.ak.us>
wrote:
>
>Amy:
>
>Please publish the attached Notice. Jody
1 of 1 9/26/2002 1:11 PM
STATE OF ALASKA NOTICE TO PUBLISHER ADVERTISING ORDER NO.
ADVERTISING INVOICi' ST BE IN TRIPLICATE SHOWING ADVERTISING ORDER NO~"' ~RTIFIED
^FF,D^.,, AO'02314017
ORDER ~VERTISEME~ MUST SE SUBMI~D WITH INVOICE
· : ",: :" SEE. B ~;~J~.~ DR~[~
; AOGCC AGENC~ CO~A~ ~ATE O; ~.0.
a 333 WeSt 7m Avenue, Suite 100 Jodv Colombie Sentembcr Z6. ~00~
o ~cho~gc, ~ 99~01 ~HOn~ PC~
M - (907~ 793 -1ZZ]
~ATE~ AD~RTISEMENT ~QUI~D:
T ~choragc D~ly News September 27, 2002
o
P O Box 149001
~choragc, ~ 99514 wnE ~TEmAL BE~EN ~E ~L[ LINES MUST BE P~N~D IN I~
ENTI~ ON ~E DA~S SHOWN.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
Acco=t ~STOF0330
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
United states of ATe,ca REMINDER
~tate of ss INVOICE MUST BE IN TRIPLICATE AND MUST ~EFERENCE
THE ADVERTISING ORDER NUMBER.
division. A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
MUST BE SUBMI~ED WITH THE INVOICE.
Before me, the undersigned, a nota~ public this day personally appeared ATTACH PROOF OF PUBLICATION HERE.
who, b~ing first duly sworn, according to law, says that
he/she is the of
Published at in said division and
state of and that th~ adve~isement, of which the annexed
is a true copy, was published in said publication o~ th~ day of
2002, and thereafter for ~ consecutive days, the last
publication appearing on th~ ~ day of ,2002, and that
th~ rate char~ed thereo~ is not in ~xcess of the rat~ char~ed private
i~dividuals.
Subscribed a~d sworn to b~fom m~
This ~ day of 2002,
Nota~ public for state of
My commission expires
02-901 (Rev. 3/94) AO.FRM
Page 2 PUBLISHER
John Katz
State of Alaska
Alaska Governor's Office
444 North Capitol St., NW, Ste 336
Washington, DC 20001
Daniel Donkel
2121 North Bayshore Drive, Ste 1219
Miami, FL 33137
SD Dept of Env & Natural Resources
Oil and Gas Program
2050 West Main, Ste 1
Rapid City, SD 57702
Alfred James
107 North Market Street, Ste 1000
Wichita, KS 67202-1822
Christine Hansen
Interstate Oil & Gas Compact Comm
Excutive Director
PO Box 53127
Oklahoma City, OK 73152
Citgo Petroleum Corporation
PO Box 3758
Tulsa, OK 74136
Conoco Inc.
PO Box 1267
Ponca City, OK
74602-1267
Mir Yousufuddin
US Department of Energy
Energy Information Administration
1999 Bryan Street, Ste 1110
Dallas, TX 75201-6801
Mary Jones
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cartography
810 Houston Street, Ste 2000
Ft. Worth, TX 76102-6298
Gregg Nady
Shell E&P Company
Onshore Exploration & Development
PO Box 576
Houston, TX 77001-0576
Michael Nelson
Purvin Gertz, Inc.
Library
600 Travis, Ste 2150
Houston, TX 77002
Paul Walker
Chevron
1301 McKinney, Rm 1750
Houston, TX 77010
G. Scott Pfoff
Aurora Gas, LLC
10333 Richmond Ave, Ste 710
Houston, TX 77042
David McCaleb
IHS Energy Group
GEPS
5333 Westheimer, Ste 100
Houston, TX 77056
G. Havran
Gaffney, Cline & Associations
Library
1360 Post Oak Blvd., Ste 2500
Houston, TX 77056
William Holton, Jr.
Marathon Oil Company
Law Department
5555 San Fecipe St.
Houston, TX 77056-2799
T.E. Al~rd
ExxonMobil Exploration Company
PO Box 4778
Houston, TX 77210-4778
Texico Exploration & Production
PO Box 36366
Houston, TX 77236
Corry Woolington
ChevronTexaco
Land-Alaska
PO Box 36366
Houston, TX 77236
W. Allen Huckabay
Phillips Petroleum Company
Exploration Department
PO Box 1967
Houston, TX 77251
Chevron USA
Alaska Division
PO Box 1635
Houston, TX 77251
Donna Williams
World Oil
Statistics Editor
PO Box 2608
Houston, TX 77252
Chevron Chemical Company
Library
PO Box 2100
Houston, TX 77252-9987
Shawn Sutherland
Unocal
Revenue Accounting
14141 Southwest Freeway
Sugar Land, TX 77478
Kelly Valadez
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co.
Supply & Distribution
300 Concord Plaza Drive
San Antonio, TX 78216
James White
Intrepid Prod. Co./Alaskan Crude
4614 Bohill
SanAntonio, TX 78217
Doug Schultze
XTO Energy Inc.
3000 North Garfield, Ste 175
Midland, TX 79705
Robert Gravely
7681 South Kit Carson Drive
Littleton, CO 80122
George Vaught, Jr.
PO Box 13557
Denver, CO 80201-3557
Jerry Hodgden
Hodgden Oil Company
408 18th Street
Golden, CO 80401-2433
John Levorsen
200 North 3rd Street, #1202
Boise, ID 83702
Kay Munger
Munger Oil Information Service, Inc
PO Box 45738
Los Angeles, CA 90045-0738
John F. Bergquist
Babson and Sheppard
PO Box 8279
Long Beach, CA 90808-0279
Samuel Van Vactor
Economic Insight Inc.
3004 SW First Ave.
Portland, OR 97201
Thor Cutler OW-137
US EPA egion 10
1200 Sixth Ave.
Seattle, WA 98101
Michael Parks
Marple's Business Newsletter
117 West Mercer St, Ste 200
Seattle, WA 98119-3960
Robert Mintz.
State of Alaska
Department of Law
1031 West 4th Ave., Ste 200
Anchorage, AK 99501
Julie Houle
State of Alaskan DNR
Div of Oil & Gas, Resource Eval.
550 West 7th Ave., Ste 800
Anchorage, AK 99501
Ed Jones
Aurora Gas, LLC
Vice President
1029 West 3rd Ave., Ste 220
Anchorage, AK 99501
Richard Mount
State of Alaska
Department of Revenue
500 West 7th Ave., Ste 500
Anchorage, AK 99501
Williams VanDyke
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
550 West 7th Ave., Ste 800
Anchorage, AK 99501
Tim Ryherd
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
550 West 7th Ave., Ste 800
Anchorage, AK 99501
Jim Arlington
Forest Oil
310 K Street, Ste 700
Anchorage, AK 99501
Duane Vaagen
Fairweather
715 L Street, Ste 7
Anchorage, AK 99501
Cammy Taylor
1333 West 11th Ave.
Anchorage, AK 99501
Susan Hill
State of Alaska, ADEC
EH
555 Cordova Street
Anchorage, AK 99501
Trustees for Alaska
1026 West 4th Ave., Ste 201
Anchorage, AK 99501-1980
Mark Wedman
Halliburton
6900 Arctic Blvd.
Anchorage, AK
99502
Mark Hanley
Anadarko
3201 C Street, Ste 603
Anchorage, AK 99503
Rob Crotty
C/O CH2M HILL
301 West Nothern Lights Blvd
Anchorage, AK 99503
Baker Oil Tools
4730 Business Park Blvd., #-44
Anchorage, AK 99503
Schlumberger
Drilling and Measurements
3940 Arctic Blvd., Ste 300
Anchorage, AK 99503
Ciri
Land Department
PO Box 93330
Anchorage, AK 99503
Mark Dalton
HDR Alaska
2525 C Street, Ste 305
Anchorage, AK 99503
John Harris
NI Energy Development
Tubular
3301 C Street, Ste 208
Anchorage, AK 99503
Judy Brady
Alaska Oil& Gas Associates
121WestFireweed Lane, Ste 207
Anchorage, AK 99503-2035
Arlen Ehm
2420 Foxhall Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99504-3342
Greg Noble
Bureau of Land Management
Energy and Minerals
6881 Abbott Loop Rd
Anchorage, AK 99507
Jeff Walker
US Minerals Management Service
Regional Supervisor
949 East 36th Ave., Ste 308
Anchorage, AK 99508
Rose Ragsdale
Rose Ragsdale & Associates
3320 E. 41st Ave
Anchorage, AK 99508
Jill Schneider
US Geological Survey
4200 University Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99508
Paul L. Craig
Trading Bay Energy Corp
5432 East Northern Lights, Ste 610
Anchorage, AK 99508
Jim Scherr
US Minerals Management Service
Resource Evaluation
949 East 36th Ave., Ste 308
Anchorage, AK 99508
Chuck O'Donnell
Veco Alaska,Inc.
949 East 36th Ave., Ste 500
Anchorage, AK 99508
Richard Prentki
US Minerals Management Service
949 East 36th Ave., 3rd Floor
Anchorage, AK 99508
Thomas R. Marshall, Jr.
1569 Birchwood Street
Anchorage, AK 99508
Gordon Severson
3201 Westmar Cr.
Anchorage, AK 99508-4336
Jim Ruud
Phillips Alaska, Inc.
Land Department
PO Box 100360
Anchorage, AK 99510
Kristen Nelson
IHS Energy
PO Box 102278
Anchorage, AK
99510-2278
Perry Markley
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
Oil Movements Department
1835 So. Bragaw - MS 575
Anchorage, AK 99515
Jordan Jacobsen
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company
Law Department
1835 So. Bragaw
Anchorage, AK 99515
Robert Britch, PE
Northern Consulting Group
2454 Telequana Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99517
David Cusato
600 West 76th Ave., #508
Anchorage, AK 99518
Jeanne Dickey
BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
Legal Department
PO Box 196612
Anchorage, AK 99518
Jack Laasch
Natchiq
Vice President Government Affairs
6700 Arctic Spur Road
Anchorage, AK 99518
Tesoro Alaska Company
PO Box 196272
Anchorage, AK 99519
J. Brock Riddle
Marathon Oil Company
Land Department
PO Box 196168
Anchorage, AK 99519-6168
Kevin Tabler
Unocal
PO Box 196247
Anchorage, AK
99519-6247
Sue Miller
BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
PO Box 196612
Anchorage, AK 99519-6612
BP Explomtion(Alaska),lnc.
Land Manager
PO Box 196612
Anchomge, AK 99519-6612
Dudley Platt
D.A. Platt & Associates
9852 Little Diomede Cr.
Eagle River, AK 99577
Bob Shavelson
Cooklnlet Keeper
PO Box 3269
Homer, AK 99603
Shannon Donnelly
Phillips Alaska, Inc.
H EST-Enviromental
PO Box 66
Kenai, AK 99611
Kenai Peninsula Borough
Economic Development Distr
PO Box 3029
Kenai, AK 99611
James Gibbs
PO Box 1597
Soldotna, AK
99669
Claire Caldes
US Fish & Wildlife Service
Kenai Refuge
PO Box 2139
Soldotna, AK 99669
Penny Vadla
Box 467
Ninilchik, AK
99669
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge
Refuge Manager
PO Box 2139
Soldotna, AK 99669-2139
John Tanigawa
Evergreen Well Service Company
PO Box 871845
Wasilla, AK 99687
Richard Wagner
PO Box 60868
Fairbanks, AK
99706
Cliff Burglin
PO Box 131
Fairbanks, AK
99707
Harry Bader
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
3700 Airport Way
Fairbanks, AK 99709
Bernie Karl
K&K Recycling Inc.
PO Box 58055
Fairbanks, AK 99711
Williams Thomas
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Land Department
PO Box 129
Barrow, AK 99723
North Slope Borough
PO Box 69
Barrow, AK 99723
Senator Loren Leman
State Capitol Rm 113
Juneau, AK 99801-1182
PHILLIPS Alaska, Inc.
A Subsidiary of PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
Post Office Box 100360
700 G Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99510
Telephone 907 265-6806
Chris Alonzo, Drill Site 3S Coordinator
October 31,2002
Ms. Cammy Oechsli Taylor
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7th Avenue
Anchorage, AK 99501
RECEIVED
OCT 1 2OO2
Nasla 0il.& Gas Gons. C0mmlssl~n
Anchorage
Re: Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion for Drill Site 3S - Revision
Dear Commissioners:
By this letter, Phillips Alaska, Inc. (PAl) is seeking to expand the area of the Kuparuk
River Oil Pool described in Conservation Order No. 432 (via Order No. 349A) to include
the area encompassed by ongoing development activities at Kuparuk River Unit Drill
Site 3S. This document is a revision only to the requested confidentiality of information
submitted in the previous application dated September 4, 2002 and is identical to the
original application in all other aspects.
The Drill Site 3S Project is located Northwest of existing Kuparuk River Unit Drill Site
3G (Figure 1) and is in pressure communication with the main Kuparuk River Field.
The Drill Site 3S project consists of a single drill site with developable acreage located
partially outside the current Kuparuk River Unit (KRU) boundaries. An application to
expand the Kuparuk River Unit boundary to include the proposed development acreage
and expand the Kuparuk Participating Area (KPA) was filed with the Alaska Department
of Natural Resources on July 2, 2002 and is currently under review (Figure 2). PAl
anticipates the KRU and KPA expansion will be comj~leted prior to initiation of
production at Drill Site 3S currently scheduled for 4"' quarter 2002. Detailed
geophysical, geologic and engineering information describing the expansion area
associated with Drill Site 3S development is provided in Attachment A, portions of which
PAl considers confidential.
The majority of acreage associated with Drill Site 3S development is currently included
in the existing Kuparuk River Oil Pool described in Conservation Order No. 432 (via
349A) as depicted on Figure 2 and Figure 3. No changes to this Order other than
increasing the Kuparuk River Oil Pool area is requested.
Therefore, based on the data in this application PAl requests approval for the following
area to be added to those described in Conservation Order No. 432 (via Order No.
349A) for the Kuparuk River Oil Pool (Figure 3).
Phillips Alaska, Inc. is a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum Company
UMIAT MERIDIAN
T12N-R7E Section 1,2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21,22, 23, 24.
We appreciate your work on this application and would be happy to answer any related
questions. I can be reached at 265-6822 or calonzo@ppco.com via email.
Sincerely,
Drill Site 38 Coordinator
Attachments
Page 2/5
Figure 1
KRU Drill Site 3S Location
Alpine Unit
35
NPRA
Nuiqsit
I Kuparuk River Unit
Page 3/5
Figure 2
KRU and KPA Expansion Areas
Current KRU Pool Rule Area
T14.-~gE
[ ~
T11iN - R[7E
R7E :f'j.,~ [
,
i :
mm m m m
~I~8E ! ~'9N-',ROE
Legend
~ UIC Exemption Area
~ Area injection Order No 2A
F----J c ...... tion Order No 349A
~ Kuparuk River Unit
~ Proposed 8th Kuparuk River
Unit Expansion Areas
r----1 KuparuK Participating Area
~ Kuparuk Participating Area 8th Expansion
Proposed 9th Expansion Kuparuk
Participating Area
Tract Numbers
T14N -
Area4 ~, :,
PHILLIPS Alaska,
A Sub~idiRr¥
3S Development
8-12-02 3_lan katJMonthlylAug/200~E xhll)l~
Page 4/5
Figure 3
Drill Site 3S Development
Proposed KRU Pool Rule Area Expansion
PHILLIPS Alaska, Inc.
. . , ~ .:'.~ , -:..,:: _,~' ,,.,,.
3S Development
RTE
KRU Pool Rules Expansion
Area Request
III II III II IIi I
T12N -R
Tll N - R7E
T11N -
T13N -R8E
ADL026524 i ADL02552:
3H ADL02
ADL0:
ADL~)546
3G
ADL025547
i2'N R8E
ADL025548
,DL02563
Page 5/5
Attachment A - Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion
Attachment A
I. Introduction
The information presented in this Attachment A supports the Application before
the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) for expansion of the
area described in Conservation Order No. 432 (via Order No. 349A) for the
Kuparuk River Oil Pool in the area surrounding development at Kuparuk River
Unit Drill Site 3S. The scope of this information includes a discussion of
geological and reservoir properties, PAl's plans for reservoir development and
surveillance, well planning, facilities installation and project scheduling and
portions are considered confidential. PAl is presenting this information on behalf
of the Greater Kuparuk Area (GKA) Working Interest Owners (WlOs).
This information will enable the Commission to issue decision and findings to
expand the area identified by proposed development at Drill Site 3S under
existing Pool Rules established for the Kuparuk River Oil Pool by Conservation
Order No. 432 (via Order No. 349A). Road, pad and pipeline construction and
facility installation were initiated at Drill Site 3S during the first quarter of 2002
with on pad construction in progress. Development drilling and initial production
is scheduled for start-up during the fourth quarter of 2002.
Kuparuk River Unit (KRU) facilities will be employed to process production and
supply miscible injectant to Drill Site 3S. The Kuparuk Participating Area will be
expanded and operated in accordance with Kuparuk River Unit Operating
Agreements.
The Drill Site 3S area to be developed is leased from the State of Alaska. A
portion of the Drill Site 3S development is located within the present boundaries
of the Kuparuk River Unit. PAl, on behalf of the Greater Kuparuk Area WlOs,
filed an application ("8th Unit and 9th Participating Area Expansion Application")
with the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources on July 2, 2002
to expand the Kuparuk River Unit and Kuparuk Participating Area to include the
Drill Site 3S development area.
The interests of the Drill Site 3S area WlOs will be integrated within the Kuparuk
Participating Area of the Kuparuk River Unit. Costs and production will be
allocated in accordance with the Kuparuk River Unit Operating Agreement.
The KPA Area and Cost working interests in the Drill Site 3S area are as follows:
Page 1
Attacnment A - Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion
Area Cost
Phillips Alaska, Inc. 0.551667 0.55745573
BP 0.391920 0.39603247
Unocal 0.049506 0.03960480
Mobil (Heritage) 0.003648 0.00364800
Chevron 0.001086 0.00108600
Exxon 0.002173 0.00217300
Total 1.000000 1.00000000
II. Geology
Introduction
In this section, the geologic data supporting the Drill Site 3S expansion area
application to the Commission is discussed.
Geoloqic Interpretation of the Drill Site 3S Area
Within the Drill Site 3S area, exploration wells Palm #1 and #lA were drilled
during the 2001 winter season. Both wells penetrated reservoir quality sands in
the Kuparuk C4 interval. As expected, the Kuparuk A sand was absent being
fully truncated in this area.
The Hauterivian C4 sandstone, identified in the Palm wells, is separated from the
underlying Miluveach mudstones by the regional Lower Cretaceous
Unconformity. A transgressive surface of erosion marks the contact between C4
sandstones and overlying mudstones of the Kalubik Formation. The C4 interval
in this area is interpreted to represent transgressive shoreface deposits on the
flank of the Kuparuk trough. Accommodation and preservation of these
shoreface deposits was created in part by deep seated northwest-southeast
trending normal faults (Figure A-l). The Kuparuk C4 sand reservoir is comprised
of bioturbated, fine to medium-grained sandstone with variable amounts of
glauconite, clay pellets, and siderite cement (Figure A-2).
The western, northern and southern limit of the C4 sand in the Drill Site 3S area
is based on amplitude versus thickness mapping (Figure A-3). The thickness
and areal extent of the C4 sand towards the east is poorly defined at this time,
however pressure communication does exist with the main Kuparuk reservoir
with the Palm #1 and #lA reservoir pressure approximately 650 psi above
original, indicating a continuous permeable sand body through the area (Figures
A-4 and A-5). No GOC was observed in the Palm #lA well which is structurally
high and well testing indicated solution GOR. No OWC was observed in either
exploration well with very Iow (<15%) water saturation calculated from well log
Page 2
Att nment A- Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion
resistivity. The oil water contact in the main Kuparuk reservoir is at-6570'
subsea and is approximately 800' down structure from the Drill Site 3S area.
In summary, data from the Palm #1 and #lA exploration wells and seismic
mapping provides evidence of reservoir continuity extending the north western
limit of peripheral Kuparuk C4 sand pay within the Drill Site 3S area and west of
existing Kuparuk Drill Site 3G. This Kuparuk C4 Sand correlates with the
accumulation found in the Atlantic Richfield Company West Sak River State No.
1 Well per Rule 2 of Conservation Order No. 432 dated July 22, 1998 as applied
to the Kuparuk River Field, Kuparuk River Oil Pool.
III. RESERVOIR DESCRIPTION
This section summarizes reservoir description in the Drill Site 3S area based on
3D-seismic top Kuparuk amplitude mapping, two well penetrations, sidewall core
data and one production test. Sidewall core and log data provides the
foundation for much of the rock property information presented in this section.
Sidewall cores were collected from the Palm 1 exploration well. A cased hole
test of the Palm #lA provides the basis for the fluid information. A full logging
suite of LWD GR/Resistivity, porosity and CMR logs was completed on both
Palm 1 and lA wells.
Reservoir Description
The mapped gross reservoir interval in the Drill Site 3S area is approximately 7.5'
to 35' thick. The Palm #1 and #lA wells penetrated a range of gross reservoir
intervals from 30' to 35' thick, with a corresponding net-to-gross ratio of
approximately 0.73. Log model net pay is calculated using a 15% porosity cutoff
on log derived porosity data. Average porosity ranges from 19% to 21%.
Calculated log model water saturations for the Palm #1 and #lA wells are 12%
and 13% respectively (Figure A-6). Permeability ranges from less than 1 md to
almost 1000 md. Fine scale (inches) changes in siderite composition and
concentration play a dominant role in determining sandstone reservoir quality.
Average permeability from well testing at Palm #lA is approximately 100 md.
Top reservoir lies at a depth of 5750' to 5800' TVD subsea.
Rate and Pressure History
The oil accumulation within the Drill Site 3S area was discovered during the 2001
winter exploration program with the drilling of the Palm #1 exploration well from
an ice pad. Well logging in addition to sidewall coring and repeat formation
testing (RFT's) confirmed the presence of a hydrocarbon saturated C4 Sand with
similar rock properties to the main Kuparuk C4 Sand Reservoir. Pressure
analysis indicated the reservoir to be approximately 650 psi over pressured
confirming the accumulation is in communication with injectors in the main field.
Page 3
Attachment A - Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion
A sidetrack (Palm ¢1A) was drilled to the NE of the Palm ¢1 well using the
existing well bore to confirm areal extent of the accumulation. Well logging in
Palm ¢1A confirmed the presence of hydrocarbon saturated C4 Sand and the
well was completed for flow testing and pressure build-up analysis. Well testing
operations were initiated in April with the well producing an average final rate of
2350 bpd of 26° APl oil at 350 psi surface pressure and 3580 psi reservoir
pressure (Figure A-7). Approximately 14,000 bbls of crude were produced
during the seven-day flow period and the final build-up lasted over 11 days with
down hole data collection. Pressure build-up analysis confirmed the presence of
a high quality reservoir with a constant pressure boundary (Figure A-8). Original
reservoir pressure in the Drill Site 3S area was estimated at approximately 2950
psi. The measured pressure from RFT data in Palm ¢1 and pressure build-up
analysis on Palm ¢1A was approximately 3600 psi and was approximately 650
psi over pressured proving both wells are in communication with the main
Kuparuk Reservoir (Figures A-8 and A-9). At this time, this communication is
believed to occur from injectors located on the western boundary of Drill Site 3G
or Drill Site 3H, which may be linked up via the A Sand truncation LCU surface or
through thin laterally continuous C sands.
Reservoir Fluid Properties
Reservoir fluid properties are estimated from fluids recovered during RFT
sampling on the Palm ¢1 well and a cased-hole test of the Palm ¢1A well. The
range of APl gravities from these samples was 24-26° and solution GOR was
-485 SCF/STB. Paraffin and asphaltene content were Iow. These Drill Site 3S
fluid samples are in line with crude properties in the main Kuparuk River Field.
IV. Reservoir Development
This portion of the application includes a discussion of the recovery process
selection and the development and management strategies that are planned with
the Drill Site 3S development.
Recovery Process Selection
Screening analysis resulted in a decision to initially pursue a recovery process
involving altemating cycles of water and miscible gas (MWAG), which is currently used
in the main Kuparuk River Field.
Development Approach
The scope of the Drill Site 3S development project involves drilling approximately
19 additional wells (re-using Palm lA exploration well) in the Kuparuk C4
Interval. Development of this area is planned from a new Kuparuk extension Drill
Site which will tie into the existing GKA infrastructure at DS 3G and utilize
Page 4
Attacnment A - Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion
existing Central Production Facility 3 (CPF-3) to process produced fluids. The
development would consist of a single gravel pad, a 4.8 mile long gravel road,
pipelines, buried power line, on-pad facilities and approximately 20 total
development wells (12 producers and 8 MWAG injectors), re-using the Palm #lA
exploration well which was preserved on the pad (Figure A-10). Production is
currently scheduled for start-up during 4th quarter 2002. Initial injection support
would commence no later than six months after first production.
No Horizontal and/or high angle wells are planned at this time. In areas of thin
pay or poor continuity high angle wells may be required.
First year incremental production from the planned drill site following full
development is estimated at 16 MBPD of oil (Figure A-11).
Well Spacin_q
Plans are to develop the Drill Site 3S area on nominally a 160-acre well spacing
per Rule 3 of Conservation Order No. 432 dated July 22, 1998 as applied to the
Kuparuk River Field.
Stimulation Plans
The affects of siderite and glauconite on vertical and horizontal permeability in
the Kuparuk C4 Sand in the Drill Site 3S area makes producer propped hydraulic
fracture stimulations desirable. Presently a portion of the producers at Drill Site
3S are proposed for fracturing. Injection well fracturing is not planned on initial
completion. However, if injectivities are poor or if injection logs indicate
significant portions of the reservoir are not accepting injectant, injectors will be
stimulated with high-pressure breakdowns.
Artificial Lift
Drill Site 3S completions will include down hole jewelry that will allow the use of
artificial lift, such as hydraulic jet pump, hydraulic piston pumps, lift gas, or
plunger lift systems to be installed as needed. Current artificial lift plans are to
use lean gas for artificial lift followed by MI lift when MI is introduced into the
reservoir in this area. A single gas line is available to carry either lean gas or MI
gas to Drill Site 3S.
V. Facilities
Introduction
This portion of the application summarizes the injectant sources that will initially
be used at Drill Site 3S. Discussion of the pads, roads, drill site facilities and
other infrastructure is also presented below.
Page 5
Attachment A - Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion
General Overview
Drill Site 3S production will be commingled with Kuparuk production in surface
facilities prior to final processing and ultimate custody transfer. Sharing existing
production facilities is possible due to existing spare liquid capacity at Kuparuk's
CPF-3. Economical development is contingent upon utilization of these facilities.
Drill Site 3S will make maximum use of the existing Kuparuk River Unit (KRU)
infrastructure. This maximizes reserves and minimizes the environmental
impacts.
The miscible injectant employed at Drill Site 3S will initially be the same injectant
as that currently used in the KRU Large Scale EOR Project. This injectant is
manufactured at Kuparuk's CPF-1 and CPF-2 by blending lean gas from the
KRU's production facilities with solvent (i.e., light hydrocarbon liquid streams)
from the Prudhoe Bay Unit (PBU) and KRU. The light liquid hydrocarbons from
the PBU are NGLs from the Central Gas Facility (CGF). The light liquid
hydrocarbons from the KRU consist of scrubber liquids from artificial lift gas
compression systems at CPF-1 and CPF-2, NGLs from CPF-1 and naphtha from
the Topping Plant.
After completing the MWAG recovery process, plans are to eventually inject lean
gas into the Kuparuk River Oil Pool to maximize recovery of the light
hydrocarbon liquids that were injected into the reservoir as part of the miscible
injectant stream. The source of the lean gas will likely be Kuparuk River Unit's
CPF-2. However, other potential gas sources will also be considered.
Pads and Roads
Drill Site 3S development involves the addition of one new drill site to the Greater
Kuparuk Area (GKA), along with required ancillary and support facilities. Drill
Site 3S is 4.8 miles west of existing KRU Drill Site 3G. The drill site is designed
to accommodate a total of 26 wells on 20-foot centers.
A road connecting the new drill site to the existing road system is routed from
Drill Site 3G to Drill Site 3S. One triple span bridge was required along the
roadway to cross Kalubik Creek.
Pipelines
Cross-country pipelines include a 16-inch common line from Drill Site 3S to KRU
Drill Site 3G, where it ties into the existing common lines and flows to CPF-3. A
new 8-inch water injection line runs from Drill Site 3S to 3G and an 8-inch MI
injection line runs from Drill Site 3S past 3G to KRU Drill Site 3F. This pipeline
accelerates MI injection at the 3G Drill Site. Pipelines were generally offset from
gravel roads by at least 450 feet, are 7' above the tundra and coated with an
Page 6
Attacnment A - Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion
anti-reflective finish. This pipeline work was completed from an ice road during
winter 2002.
Power Line
Electrical power will be transmitted from Drill Site 3G to Drill Site 3S over a new
buried 34.5 kV power line installed in the tundra beneath the roadway in winter
2002.
Drill Site Facilities
The design premise for Drill Site 3S facilities is for daily operations to require
minimal operator presence. All data gathering and routine operations are to be
accomplished remotely from CPF 3 or Drill Site 3S control room.
Facilities to be installed initially at the drill site include:
· Production, test, water injection and MI injection lateral piping
headers
· Test separator for well testing
· Instrumentation, control, and communication equipment.
and
Testing can take place remotely through a divert valve system, which redirects
the flow from the production header to the test separator.
VI. Drilling & Well Design
Introduction
The information below discusses activities related to drilling and completing Drill
Site 3S wells. Discussion is also presented on safety systems.
Casing & Cementing
Casing and cementing plans for Drill Site 3S wells are consistent with AOGCC
Regulation 20 ACC 25.030. All casing and cementing requirements will adhere
to Rule 4 of Conservation Order No. 432 dated July 22, 1998 as applied to the
Kuparuk River Field.
Automatic Shut-in Equipment
All automatic shut-in equipment requirements will adhere to Rule 5 of
Conservation Order No. 432 dated July 22, 1998 as applied to the Kuparuk River
Field.
Page 7
Attachment A - Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion
VII. Reservoir Surveillance
Introduction
This section provides data regarding reservoir surveillance.
Reservoir Pressure Measurements
All Pressure measurements requirements will adhere to Rule 8 of Conservation
Order No. 432 dated July 22, 1998 as applied to the Kuparuk River Field.
Productivity Profiles
All productivity profiles requirements will adhere to Rule 9 of Conservation Order
No. 432 dated July 22, 1998 as applied to the Kuparuk River Field.
Hydraulic propped fracture stimulations will limit the usefulness of production and
injection logs. Surveillance logging will be used to monitor injection in wells that
have not previously been stimulated with hydraulic propped fracture stimulations.
VIII. Summary
The KRU working interest owners are first and foremost committed to a safe and
environmentally sound operation. The proposed drilling program at Drill Site 3S
meets or exceeds all requirements specified in the Commission's rules and
regulations. Drill Site 3S facilities are designed to operate safely and efficiently.
All well and facility designs meet or exceed the standards specified by state or
national codes, the recommended practices of the relevant advisory
organizations, and/or the time-proven practices of prudent operators. Plans are
to make maximum use of the existing KRU infrastructure, thus minimizing
environmental impacts while .maximizing reserves for the Greater Kuparuk Area.
Page 8
PHILLIPS Alaska, Inc.
A Subsidiary of PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
Post Office Box 100360
700 G Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99510
Telephone 907 265-6806
Chris Alonzo, Drill Site 3S Coordinator
September 4, 2002
Ms. Cammy Oechsli Taylor
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7th Avenue
Anchorage, AK 99501
Re: Kuparuk River Oil Pool Area Expansion for Drill Site 3S
Dear Commissioners:
By this letter, Phillips Alaska, Inc. (PAl) is seeking to expand the area of the Kuparuk
River Oil Pool described in Conservation Order No. 432 (via Order No. 349A) to include
the area encompassed by ongoing development activities at Kuparuk River Unit Drill
Site 3S.
The Drill Site 3S Project is located Northwest of existing Kuparuk River Unit Drill Site
3G (Figure 1) and is in pressure communication with the main Kuparuk River Field.
The Drill Site 3S project consists of a single drill site with developable acreage located
partially outside the current Kuparuk River Unit (KRU) boundaries. An application to
expand the Kuparuk River Unit boundary to include the proposed development acreage
and expand the Kuparuk Participating Area (KPA) was filed with the Alaska Department
of Natural Resources on July 2, 2002 and is currently under review (Figure 2). PAl
anticipates the KRU and KPA expansion will be com,~leted prior to initiation of
production at Drill Site 3S currently scheduled for 4"' quarter 2002. Detailed
geophysical, geologic and engineering information describing the expansion area
associated with Drill Site 3S development is provided in Attachment A which PAl
considers confidential.
The majority of acreage associated with Drill Site 3S development is currently included
in the existing Kuparuk River Oil Pool described in Conservation Order No. 432 (via
349A) as depicted on Figure 2 and Figure 3. No changes to this Order other than
increasing the Kuparuk River Oil Pool area is requested.
Therefore, based on the data in this application PAl requests approval for the following
area to be added to those described in Conservation Order No. 432 (via Order No.
,.~ ,,~ ..
349A) for the Kuparuk River Oil Pool (Figure 3).
,.~.,.,,~.,
Phillips Alaska, Inc. Is a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum Company
UMIAT MERIDIAN
T12N-R7E Section 1,2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21,22, 23, 24.
We appreciate your work on this application and would be happy to answer any related
questions. I can be reached at 265-6822 or calonzo@ppco.com via email.
Sincerely,
Drill Site 3S Coordinator
Attachments
Page 2/5
Figure 1
KRU Drill Site 3S Location
Alpine Unit
35
NPRA
Nuiqsit
Kuparuk River Unit
Meltwater
Page 3/5
Figure 2
KRU and KPA Expansion Areas
Current KRU Pool Rule Area
L .
Legend
UIC Exemption Area
Area Injection Order No 2A
Conse~ation Order No 349A
Kuparuk River Unit
Proposed 8tl~ Kuparuk River
Unit Expansion Areas
Kuparuk Participating Area
Kuparuk Participating Area 8th E×pans~on
Proposed 9th Expansion Kuparuk
Participating Area
Tract Numbers
PHILLIPS Alaska, Inc.
A Subsidiary of PI..IILL, IPS PETROLEUM COMPAN~t
3S Development
8-12-02 3_lankatlMonthlylAugl2OO~Exhlblt
Page 4/5
Figure 3
Drill Site 3S Development
Proposed KRU Pool Rule Area Expansion
3S Development
i ADL02=r~24::i AD,L025523~
KRU Pool Rules Expansion
Area Request
I'IIII, I
T12N- R:
'Tll N -
,2
ADL02~31 ,:,.~
ADL~)546 3A(~
3G
ADL026547
"T~2N - R8E
AD'L025548
,DL02563
ADL021~,43
Page 5/5
PHILLIPS Alaska, Inc.
A Subsicliary of PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY
Post Office Box 100360
700 G Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99510
Telephone 907 265-6806
Chris Alonzo, Drill Site 3S Coordinator
September 4, 2002
Ms. Cammy Oechsli Taylor
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7th Avenue
Anchorage, AK 99501
Re:
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion for Drill Site 3S Project
20 AAC 25.4O2
Dear Commissioners:
Phillips Alaska, Inc. (PAl) is pursuing development of the Kuparuk C4 Sand at Kuparuk
River Unit Drill Site 3S. PAl initially briefed the Commission on Drill Site 3S
development activity during an August 27, 2002 meeting. The Drill Site 3S
development requires expansion of the area currently approved for enhanced recovery
operations in Kuparuk River Unit (KRU) Area Injection Order #2A. PAl submits this
application to expand the KRU Area Injection Order affected area to include the Drill
Site 3S development area, consistent with 20 AAC 25.402 (a). Approval of the
application would permit these operations to be conducted within the existing Kuparuk
River Field, Kuparuk River Oil Pool (KRKROP). This letter provides the technical
details sUpporting this application.
The
1.
.
,
1
1
8.
9.
10.
11.
following attachments are submitted pursuant to 20 AAC 25.402 (c):
Plat with location of all existing wells that penetrate the injection zone within one-
quarter mile of the area covered by this application.
List of operators and surface owners within one-quarter mile of the proposed
injection operations.
Affidavit showing that operators and surface owners within one-quarter mile of the
area affected by the Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order were provided a copy
of the September 4, 2002 application.
Full description of the proposed operation.
Description, depth, and name of the pOol to be affected.
Description of the formation into which fluids are to be injected and the associated
confining zones.
Type well log.
Casing description and proposed method for testing injection well casing.
Injection fluid data.
Estimated injection pressures.
Evidence and data to support a commission finding that injection wells will not
initiate or propagate fractures through the overlying strata.
Phillips Alaska, Inc. is a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum Company
12. Analysis of the water within the formation.
13. Reference to freshwater exemptions issued under 20 AAC 25.440.
14. Incremental increase in ultimate hydrocarbon recovery.
15. Mechanical condition of each well that has penetrated the proposed injection zone
within a one-quarter mile radius of a proposed injection well.
I appreciate your work on the Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order expansion
application and would be happy to answer any related questions. I can be reached at
265-6822 or calonzo@ppco.com via email.
Sincerely,
Chris Alonzo
Drill Site 38 Coordinator
cc: Chris Ruff, DNR
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion 'Page 2/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment I
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(1)
Plat of Wells Penetrating Injection Zone
The attached map (Attachment lA) shows all existing wells that penetrate the injection
zone within the Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order in the Drill Site 3S expansion
area as of September 1, 2002. The map also shows the Kuparuk River Unit (KRU) and
the Kuparuk Participating Area (KPA) proposed expansion areas for the Drill Site 35
project as filed with the Alaska Department of Natural Resources on July 2, 2002. In
addition, the map shows proposed Drill Site 3S development wells (with their expected
initial service) scheduled for drilling during late 2002 and 2003. Initial well location and
service plans may change as net pay and well performance data are gathered. The
total number, type and locations of wells ultimately drilled into the Drill Site 3S area will
also be a function of net pay and Well performance data.
KHn~r.k Riv~.r [init ArA~ Ini~.~.tic~n Order I::x[~ansion Pa.qe 3/25
Attachment lA
Drill Site 3S Area Wells
I I
2 Miles
I
· ' 1,o
mi i ii ii i B II ·
· °15 KALUEIK CRE El
"
· ,,17 '14 "~
·
7 ~J; '6
· .19 18
-'" PALM lA
· . 22,
F~ALM 1 3
· ·
· ,23 2,0 2
·
·
I II I I II II II II I I II I1'1
·
I
"24 ,
,,_
· m, mi rib mm, lB
.'ii :.~.~" ;~.i".:ii. 'ii';::'"..'~!?~a~.':i~.:.:.' .,,,,,:
:'-,'":::"~: '-...:.:: .? .!. :i..::.i.i:i'!:..?:v .': ~':"i !?::': '"' :'
:";:'.:?::,?!:.":.i',?: ~
.~.~....~.~..~...~..i:.;...;~i.........':.:".i:::.,...:.:'."..~, ,
..... ?.:..,...,..;....?. :..?...... !!.'!..~..
Proposed KRU
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 4/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 2
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(2)
Operators and Surface Owners within One Quarter Mile of Injection Operations
Operator:
Phillips Alaska, Inc.
Attention: Dan Kruse ATO-1220
P.O. Box 100360
Anchorage, AK 99510-0360
Surface Owner:
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
Attention: Chris Ruff
P.O. Box 107034
Anchorage, AK 99510
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 5/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 3
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(3)
Affidavit of Chris J. Alonzo Regarding Notice to Surface Owners
Chris J. Alonzo, on oath, deposes and says:
1. I am the Drill Site 3S Coordinator at Phillips Alaska, Inc., the designated operator of
the Kuparuk River Unit (which will include the Drill Site 3S expansion area).
2. On September 4, 2002, I caused copies of the Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection
Order Expansion Application to be provided to the surface owner and operator of all
land within a quarter mile of the unit as listed below:
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
Attention: Chris Ruff
P.O. Box 107034
Anchorage, AK 99510
Phillips Alaska, Inc.
Attention: Dan Kruse ATO-1220
P.O. Box 100360
Anchorage, AK 99510-0360
STATE OF ALASKA
THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 4th day of September, 2002.
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR ALASKA
My Commission Expires: %i I~'],O~'
Kun~ruk River tJnit Are~ Iniection Order ExDansion
'Page 6/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 4
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(4)
Description of the Proposed Operation
An expansion of the Kuparuk River Unit (KRU) Area Injection Order area is needed to
develop KRU Drill Site 3S. The expected scope of the current development project
involves drilling approximately 19 new wells (and re-using exploration well Palm #lA) to
develop 36 MMBO associated with an estimated 74 MMBO original oil in place (OOIP)
as delineated by existing exploratory wells and seismic mapping in the Kuparuk C4
Sand interval of the Kuparuk River Field, Kuparuk River Oil Pool.
Field Development
Development wells will be drilled from a single new drill site. Initial development drilling
operations are planned to start during the fourth quarter 'of 2002. The drilling program
will initially focus on developing the main portion of the reservoir and testing the
periphery. Well performance data and improved seismic calibrations acquired from the
initial development wells will help guide the extent of the overall development drilling
program.
Exploratory drilling targeting other zones within the Drill Site. 3S area will be conducted
concurrently with development drilling operations. Successful exploratory drilling results
could alter existing plans by (1) changing the location and target interval of the initial
development wells and (2) expanding the scope of the project to include additional
wells. An expanded project scope would likely invOlve additional development drilling
phases and may require additional areal expansion of the proffered Kuparuk River Unit
Area Injection Order.
Recovery Mechanism '
One of the most critical aspects to the Drill Site 3S deVelopment is the recovery
process. Screening analysis resulted in a decision to initially pursue a reCovery process
involving alternating cycles of water and miscible gas (MWAG). Following are the main
reasons for this selection:
1. Ongoing MWAG processes in the main Kuparuk reservoir C sands have expected
incremental recovery of 8% to 12% OOIP over base water flood recoveries.
.
Enriched natural gas is miscible with DS 3S fluids at reservoir conditions.
(Henceforth in this document, enriched natural gas will be referred to as "MI" for
Miscible Injectant.) Numerical simulation indicates that alternating cycles of water
and MI provide higher recoveries than any other competing recovery process (i.e.,
primary drainage, water flood, MI flood, and lean gas flood). For example,
simulation work indicates MWAG process is expected to increase recovery by
approximately 7% OOIP compared to water flood, alone.
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 7/25
1
MI is currently piped to offset Kuparuk DS 3F and is transportable to DS 3S for a
relatively small premium. Additional upside is captured at DS 3G, which will have
access to MI following pipeline construction at DS 3S.
e
Injecting MI at Drill Site 3S would have no appreciable recovery impact on existing
GKA developments. Although employing MWAG at Drill Site 3S would delay the
rate of Kuparuk EOR expansion, recovery would essentially remain unchanged as
the forecasted number of Kuparuk drill site expansions would remain unchanged.
In addition, injecting MI at Drill Site 3S would have near-term rate benefits at
Kuparuk. This is because Drill Site 3S would be more efficient at storing gas than
older Kuparuk EOR drill sites. Injecting MI at Drill Site 3S would therefore result in
less MI recycle. Since GKA production is limited by gas handling facilities, less MI
recycle translates into higher production rates.
Si
Initially pursing MWAG is imperative if this EOR process is to be employed. Drill
Site 3S MI supply is dependent on existing GKA infrastructure. The MWAG floods
in some portions of CPF-3 area are relatively mature. Delaying implementation of
MWAG at Drill Site 3S would therefore jeopardize this project's EOR reserves,' as
critical GKA infrastructure may not be available in the future to transport MI.
(Other potential uses of the GKA MI distribution system include de-bottlenecking
production/injection lines and providing high pressure lift gas).
After the cumulative target slug size of MI has been injected into the formation,
pressure support will be maintained with water injection. Current plans are to eventually
inject lean gas into the reservoir to help recover light liquid hydrocarbons (used to
manufacture MI) that will be trapped in the reservoir by the MWAG process.
Iniectant Sources
The miscible injectant employed at Drill Site 3S will initially be the same injectant as that
currently used in the KRU Large Scale EOR Project. This injectant is manufactured at
Kuparuk's CPF-1 and CPF-2 by blending lean gas from the KRU's production facilities
with solvent (i.e., light hydrocarbon liquid streams) from the Prudhoe Bay Unit (PBU)
and KRU. The light liquid hydrocarbons from the PBU are NGLs from the Central Gas
Facility (CGF). The light liquid hydrocarbons from the KRU consist of scrubber liquids
from artificial lift gas compression systems at CPF-1 and CPF-2, NGLs from CPF-1 and
naphtha from the Topping Plant.
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 8/25
Fluid and Cost Allocation
Drill Site 3S production will be commingled with other Kuparuk River Unit Drill Sites
prior to final processing and ultimate custody transfer in accordance with the Kuparuk
River Field Pool Rules. The interests of the Drill Site 3S area WIOs will be integrated
within the Kuparuk Participating Area of the Kuparuk River Unit. Costs and production
will be allocated in accordance with the Kuparuk River Unit Operating Agreement.
The KPA Area and Cost working interests in the Drill Site 3S area are as follows:
Area Cost
Phillips Alaska, Inc. 0.551667
BP 0.391920
Unocal 0.049506
Mobil (Heritage) 0.003648
Chevron 0.001086
Exxon 0.002173
0.55745573
0.39603247
0.03960480.
0.00364800
O.00108600
0.00217300
Total 1.000000 1.00000000
Injection Area
The proposed area of injection, which correspOnds to the proposed Kuparuk River
Participating Area expansion and possible upside C4 Sand development, is depicted in
Attachment 4A.
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Page 9/25
Attachment 4A
Proposed KRU Area Injection Order Expansion
Area
3S Development
KRU AIO Expansion
Area Request
T12N - R'
TltN -R7E
,
', ' T13N-R8E ~1
'ADL025524 , ADL025523L,
ADL~4& (~
,3G
ADL025647
,DL025631
T 1'1 N -
ADL025548 '
ADL02,~43
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order ExpanSion Page 10/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 5
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(5)
Description and Depth of Pool to be Affected
The Kuparuk Formation is defined and described in publicatiOns. It is a sequence of
clastic sediments deposited on a shallow marine shelf during Neocomian (Early
Cretaceous) time, about 140-120 million years ago. The Kuparuk Formation is divided
into Upper and Lower Members. These two Members are comprised of 4 Units, in
ascending order, Units A, B, C, and D. The A and C units are the pay-bearing intervals.
The following descriptions refer to the Kuparuk Formation in the general area of the
Kuparuk River Field.
The Kuparuk C Unit is composed of sandstones with subordinate conglomerates and
lesser shales. C sediments were deposited in a variety of marginal marine
environments. In general, conditions were more .marine to the east, within and beyond
the KRU. In the west, evidence from secondary cements as well as trace fossils
suggests a nearby source of fresh water and a shOreline.
The C Unit is divided into four intervals, C-1 through C-4. Intervals are successively
younger upward, and axes of deposition shift successively southwest with time.
Throughout the larger part of the KRU, C sand deposition and trends are controlled by
syndepositional, northwest-trending normal faults.
,
Within the Drill site 3s area, exploration wells Palm #1 and #lA were drilled during the
2001 winter season..Both wells penetrated reservoir quality sands in the Kuparuk C4
interval at a depth of approximately 5750-5800 feet TVD. As expected, the Kuparuk A
sand was absent being fully truncated by the LCU in this.area,
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion page 11/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 6
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(6)
Description of the Formation
The proposed injection zone is the Kuparuk C4 Sand within the Kuparuk River Field Oil
Pool. This zone lies between 5752' and 5786' tvd subsea in the Palm #lA well
(Attachment 7).
The Hauterivian C4 sandstone, identified in the Palm exploration wells in the Drill Site
3S area, is separated from the underlying Miluveach mudstones by the regional Lower
Cretaceous Unconformity. A transgressive surface of erosion marks the contact
between C4 sandstones and overlying mudstones of the Kalubik Formation. The C4
interval in this area is interpreted to represent transgressive shoreface deposits on the
flank of the Kuparuk trough. Accommodation and preservation of these shoreface
deposits was created in part by deep seated northWest-southeast trending normal
faults. The. Kuparuk C4 sand .reservoir is comprised of bioturbated, fine to medium-
grained sandstone with variable amounts of glauconite, clay pellets, and siderite.
cement.
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection order Expansion
Page 12/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 7
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(7)
Log of Drill Site 35 Type Well
PALM_lA ~PHILLIPS Alaska, Inc.
501032036101
~ A Subsidiary c~ PHILLIPS PETROLELIVl COMPANT
LOCATION FIELD
LAT: 70.394305 NORTH ALASKA TIGHT HOLE
LONG: -150.195639 DRILLED DEPTH
ZONE: ASP 4 9222
X: 475954.67 ELEVATION KB
,,Y:, 59~)3842.4
CORE.PERMHORZ_I
OH. BIT_SIZE_ 'i o.~ MO
8 -- ' -- --IN .... 1~ PAT3, PERM_NN_I"~f/' ~-I
SP ~.2 MD 2000 O~ OH, NPI-II S_MWD_/A_ 1
OH.ROP_MWD_R_I ~ O~ n- ~ --~;-"'-- o
5oo ~PHR ~ SSTVE Depth OH.RPM_MWD_R_I Iii Iii ( OH,OT_MWD_R_ 1
FEET tl FEET ~),2- - -~HMTvl- -- ~00~
OH.GR_I oH, RPF_). MWO_.R. 1 OH. RHOB_MWO_R_I
0 (~API lr300.2 OHMM 2.006 2 (~/C~
.. . . .. :'.. . ~ .. ~ :. ~.~,~ -.
..............
........ ~. . · ~ .......
_- "i ' ' ..... ...... - ................., ' , " " ...., ..... ·
..... ' ........ .~..~ .- .~ ...... I .-I.-
~- ~,- .... , i .....
- ~ '
- ~--'--_ ,"
"" .-
...... "'~;' _ ~ 5
......... .~. .... .... ~, .........
........... i ...........~ .I....
i ........ 3 ~ ' ........... ~ I .....
"-' "- ~ ~':~ · ~1~t'
..... ~ '
...I
............... ? ............. i ........ I ...................
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 13/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 8
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(8)
Casinq Description and Proposed Method for Testing Casing
The proposed casing programs for a typical Drill Site 3S well resembles the casing
programs employed in the Kuparuk River Unit (KRU) completions.
Standard Casin.q Proaram
As in KRU wells, conductor casing will be set below 75 feet to provide anchorage and
support for the rig diverter assembly. Insulated 16 inch by 30 inch conductors with spill
containment vessel are planned. Planned surface casing size is 9-5/8 inch (L-80, 40
pound). Surface casing will be set below the base of the West Sak interval, effectively
casing off the permafrost, Ugnu, and West Sak formations.
Following setting of surface casing, two options are proposed for completing Drill Site
3S wells. A 7 inch (L-80, 26 pound) long string set through the Kuparuk formation back
to surface with 3Y2" (L-80, 9.3 pound) tubing or 7 inch (L-80, 26 pound) top set above
the Kuparuk interval back to sudace and a 31/2 inch (L-80, 9,3 pound) liner set through
the Kuparuk. Leak off testing will be completed priOr to drilling the Kuparuk interval to
determine if the formation above the Kuparuk has integrity to handle the high reservoir
pressures found in the area. The liner across the Kuparuk interval is then tied back to
surface with a string of 3Y2" tubing inserted into a seal bore or polished bore receptacle
(positioned above the top pay zone perforation). This provides a tubing annulus with
isolation and pressure integrity (see diagrams shown in Attachment 8A).
Each of these well tYpes may be completed for either production or injection service.
Drilling and Completion plans for future Drill Site 3S wells may vary with time as
experience and knowledge are gained.
The proposed method casing testing method for Drill Site 3S injectors is to follow the
requirements of 20 AAC 25.412 (c & d). Sufficient notice of pressbre tests will be given
so that a Commission repreSentative may witness the test.
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 14/25
,
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 8A
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(8)
30' x 16' 62.6#
@ +/- 110' MD
(Insulated)
3S Pad Development
Proposed Completion Schematic
Surface csg.
9-518" 40.0# L-80 BTCM
Longstring Case
FutureProduction Perforations csg.
7" 26.0~ L-80 BTCM
3S Pad Development
Proposed Completion Schematic
Topset Case
30" x 16' 62.6#
@ +1- 110' MD
(Insulated)
Surface csg.
9-5~8' 40.0# L-80 BTCM
intermediate csg.
7' 26.0# L-80 BTCM
Future Perforations
Production Uner
3-1/2" 9.3# L-80 SLHT
,Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page, 15/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 9
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(9)
Injection Fluid Analysis
The vast majority of the MI initially employed at Drill Site 3S will originate from Kuparuk
River Unit's CPF-2. During late 2003/2004 timeframe, both MI and water will be
employed to provide pressure support and maximize sweep. After completing the
MWAG recovery process, plans are to eventually inject lean gas into the Drill Site 3S
area to maximize recovery of the light hydrocarbon liquids that were injected into the
reservoir as part of the miscible injectant stream.
The source of the lean gas will likely be Kuparuk River Unit's CPF-2. However, other
potential gas sources will also be considered. The initial water injection source will be
CPF-3 produced water. Fresh water collected in well cellars from snowmelt may also
be injected for short time periods to minimize road traffic dUring the caribou calving
season.
The average MI and lean gas compoSition produced at the Kuparuk CPF-2 facility
during 2000 is presented below. Also shown below is a CPF-3 produced water
analysis.
Maximum MI/lean gas and water injection rates into the Drill Site 3S area are estimated
at 22 MMSCFPD and 24 MBWPD, respectively.
There is no evidence from laboratory core flood experiments or compositional studies
that indicate the fluids proffered for long-term injection would pose any appreciable
compatibility problems for Kuparuk C4 Sand or its confining zones. Short periods of
fresh water injection are also not expected to cause any' appreciable compatibility
problems. If injectors do incur damage from fresh water injection, remedial treatments
(e.g., acid stimulations, high pressure breakdowns, etc.)can be employed.
KuDaruk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 16/25
Miscible Injectant & Lean Gas Composition Supplied by
the Kuparuk River Unit's CPF-2
Component
CO2
N2
C1
C2
C3
i-C4
n-C4
i-C5
n-C5
C6
C7
C8+
Lean Gas MI
(Mole %) (Mole %)
0.89 0.5
0.27 0.3
81.37 69.6
8.79 6.7
5.10 5.0
0.92 2.2
1.99 6.3
0.30 2.0
0.28 2.5
0.07 2.1
0.01 1.8
0.00 1.0
C, PF-3 produced Water Analysis
Component Concentration
Sulfate ' 159
Sulfide 12
Bicarbonate 1,920
Aluminum <0.15
Ammonia 20
Barium 35
Boron 18
CalCium 137
Chloride 13,131
Chromium <0.06
Fluoride < 10
IOdide 12.6
Iron 0.74
Lithium 1.2
Manganese <0.003
Magnesium 99
Phosphorus <0.5
Potassium 60
Silicon 20
Sodium 8,800
Strontium 6.7
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 17/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 10
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(10)
Estimated Pressures
The maximum MI and water injection pressures available at the plant will be 4,400 psi
and 3000 psi, respectively. Due to pressure losses in the distribution system, actual
maximum wellhead pressures will vary. Injection wells may also be choked to avoid
exceeding injection targets. MI and water wellhead injection pressures are expected to
range from 3,400 - 3,600 psi and 2500- 2800 psi, respectively.
K.n~ruk River Unit Area Iniection Order ExDansion
Page 18/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 11
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(11)
Fracture Information
The estimated maximum injection pressures for enhanced recovery wells will not initiate
or propagate fractures through the overlying confining strata, which might enable the
injection or formation fluid to enter freShwater strata.
Although bottom-hole pressures may exceed the formation parting pressure during
enhanced recovery operations (i.e., water and MI injection), the Kuparuk C4 Sands in
the Drill Site 3S area are overlain by approximately 600' of confining shales, which act
as an impermeable barrier. These confining layers provide a substantially greater
barrier than necessary to contain fractures within the Kuparuk interval, These confining
shale zones, comprised of -180 feet of Kalubik Shale, -170 feet of HRZ and -250 feet
Torok Shale, are the same shales that overly the main Kuparuk River Field Oil Pool and
have proven over time to limit fracture growth from injection activity.
Hydraulically propped fracture stimulations are planned for a portion of Drill Site 3S
producers. The-600' of confining shales and mudstones also provide a substantially
greater barrier than necessary to contain these fracture stimulations
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 19/25
Attachment 13A
KRU UIC Exemption Area
PHILLIPS Alaska, Inc.
A ~4J13~3t el PHILLIPS P'E~ROLEUM COMPANY
3S Development
T12N - R'
'.,,
Tll - E
T11N -
.i~.' '.-'" T 1
..*
N -R8E
ADL02552;
Q ,
ADL~646
3G
ADL025547
ADL025548
UlC ExemptionAre.
Ama Injection Order Ne 2A
Conservation Order No 34gA
Kuparuk River Unit
Propoled 8th KuPan. lk River
Unit ExpaneionArea
Kuparuk Pel~ictpatlng Area
KFA 8th Expanlion
KFI~ 9~h Expansion
Tract Numberl
KuDaruk River Unit Area Iniection Order Expansion
Page 22/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 14
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(14)
Incremental Hydrocarbon Recovery
The Kuparuk C4 Sand was tested in the Palm #lA exploration well. Fluids recovered
from this test and from RFT sampling in Palm #1 indicated this interval contains 24-26°
. ,APl gravity crude with a solution GOR of approximately 485 SCF/STB. There is no
evidence that this zone is in contact with a gas cap and the water oil contact is
approximately 600 feet down structure.
Simulation results indicate that an MWAG process with a cumulative 15% hydrocarbon
pore volume slug of MI would provide an overall recovery factor of approximately' 48%.
OOIP. This recovery factor is approximately 6-8% OOIP higher than that obtained from
waterflood and more than 20% OOIP higher than that obtained from primary depletion.
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion Page 23/25
Kuparuk River Unit Area Injection Order Expansion
Attachment 15
20 AAC 25.402 (c)(15)
Mechanical Condition of Existing Penetrations
There are no current active wells within a one-quarter mile radius of the Drill Site 3S
area. One exPloratory well (Palm #1) and a sidetrack (Palm #lA) were drilled to
evaluate the area during the winter of 2001. The Palm #lA sidetrack well (re-named
3S-26) was completed for future injection service following a brief' period of pre-
production. The schematic of this well is shown on Attachment 15A.
Older exploration well penetrations in the area (Colville 1 and Kalubik Creek 1) have
been PlUgged and abandoned as per AOGCC regulations (20 AAC 25.112). All casing
strings were cut three feet below the original ground level with well abandonment
markers installed as per 20 AAC 25.120. The well cellars were removed and the
remaining holes back filled to ground level with gravel.
V ....... b D; .... I In;+ ~,..-.n In;nnH~n ('trri,'-r I:::vn,-ne|nn Paoe 24/25
Attachment 15C
Palm #lA (3S-26) Well Bore Schematic
PHILLIP$ Alaska, Inc.
PHIL LiPS PETROL El.JlA O3N~,~JqT
KRU 3S-26
n3~'0'3~1 D 1
NIPPLE
c_.,~i~J c TOR
I=RCOUC1~N
. TUBING
Size
2.~T~
Thread
WELD
BI"CM
Thread
E IJE~Cl
Comenent
Mandre
VIv
Cn'nt
General Nobas
Note
Oo~criplierp
ICO'DS' NIFPLE 2. B'~', NO ~3
BAKER CMU ~.~L. ID fig E,U~EVE W~2519 'D,S; PROFILE? clcw,~l 4~ D¢Ol
BAKER ~ A~E~E~E~LY
.~JHED I~E RECEPTACLE V~q 2 SEAL ~L
2.81~' BDRE
SET ~ FL~
pa~,LANCEO 193 Toc~.1
_~a- ~olop G~ ~ ~t ~'2~" of ~n slao~a~ tubing ~t~
.=LI ~. DR~:DPPED 4¢ta"_rt WHEN FIRED'I
I0
2
O.C~O
2A40
ID
O.OCe
KuDaruk River Unit Area Iniection Order Expansion Page 25/25