Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGMC Data Report No. 053A SCANNING ELECTRON MICROGRAPHS OF
SELECTED RADIALARIANS AND QUARTZ
~ -
~.~ .SAND-GRAINS FROM -
· '~"~'~.~-'- ARCO ALASKAi INC. W. MIKKELSEN S,T.
·
.. ~
·
GMC-Data Report No. 53A
.. i~.-ii' .~-
#1
· .
BAY- .[IN I.T-
ARCO
WEST MIKKELSEN BAY STATE UNIT #1
ALASKA NORTH SLOPE
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROGRAPHS
OF
SELECTED RADIOLARIANS
AND
QUARTZ SAND.'GRAINS
Five (5) samples of ditch cuttings at 100'
intervals between 10,700 and 11,200 were selected for scan-
ning electron microscope (SEM) examination of radiolarians
and quartz sand grains. Specimens were chosen from picked
and unpicked foraminifera samples, examined in the SEM,
and returned to separate foraminifera slides according to
procedures described below.
A drop of dilute solution of polyvinyl acetate
(PVA) in methanol was spread over a cover glass and allowed
to dry, leaving a thin film of PVA. The cover glass was
then mounted on an SEM stub with a carbon-emulsion adhe-
sive. Specimens were arranged on the cover glass in rows
with a picking brush. The stub was then heated on a hot
plate to soften the PVA and allow the specimens to sink
slightly into it. Upon cooling, the specimens adhered
firmly to the cover glass.
Specimens were arranged On ~the~cOver glass.in
rows starting generally with spheroidal and discoidal
forms and ending with conical forms. For reference pur-
poses rows were considered to be numbered from top to
bottom, and specimens within rows from left to right.
Thus each Specimen was assigned a location number in the
form: row number/specimen number. The sketch below
illustrates a typical arrangement of specimens on a cover
glass.
Row 1
Row 2
Row 3
Specimen No. 2/4
The stubs were coated with gold-palladium in a
sputter coater and placed in the SEM. Photographs were
taken on Polaroid type 665 positive-negative film. Ea6h
photograph bears the well name, footage interval, speci-
men location-number and magnification. Most specimens
were photographed at approximately the same magnification.
.
.
In a few cases a specimen was photographed at a lower mag-
nification in order to fit it within the format, and sand-
grain surfaces were photographed at higher magnifications.
After completion of the SEM work, 'Cover glasses,-
with specimens intact, were removed from the SEM stubs and
transferred to labeled depressions in cardboard foraminifera
slides. .Specimens can thus be re-examined in the light micro-
scope, using· the~l'ocation-number ~o find~.the speCimen cOr-
responding to a particular SEM photograph.
An attempt was made to provide a general overview
of the range of morphotypes in each sample. However, preser-
vation is poor in these West Mikkelsen Bay State ~1 samples
and, in many cases, the SEM revealed little or no detail
not observable in the light microscope. Therefore, not all
the mounted specimens have been photographed, particularly
in the lower part of the studied range where down-hole
repetition was prominent. A few quartz sand grains 'were
.
·
.
o .
included with the radiolarians from one sample to aid in
determining the depositional environment of the grains
by detailed examination of their surface morphologies.
Two of the sand grains showed excessive electrical charg-
ing in the SEM and could not be photographed.
Prints of the SEM photographs obtained in this
study are arranged in this notebook acCording to sample
number starting with the highest sample.
o.
LIST OF PLATES
ARCO WEST MIKKELSEN BAY STATE UNIT #1
10,700 - 10,800' .....
10,800 - 10,900'
Plate(s)
1, 2
4
6'~ '7','8-
·
· .
·
·
.