Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGMC Data Report No. 083Rock-eval pyrolysis data and interpretation for the Alaska
Consolidated Oil Iniskin Unit Zappa No. I well.
Received 22 April 1988
Total of 7 pages in report
Geologic Materials Center Data Report 83
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION'
TOC/ROGK EVAL
Geochemical logs, tabulated TOC and Rock Eval data,
and pyrograms are provided for each well (Appendices
1, 2 and 3). Geochemical data are expressed as'
TOC
$1
S2
S3
Tmax
PI
HI
OI
= Total Organic Carbon, in weight percent
= Thermal extract of mobile hydrocarbons,
in mgHC/grock
= Hydrocarbons generated from kerogen during
pyrolysis, in mgHC/grock
= CO2 generated from kerogen during pyrolysis,
in mgCO2/grock
= Temperature of peak generation during
pyrolysis, in oc
= Production Index = S1/SI + S2
= Hydrogen Index = 100 x S2/TOC
= Oxygen Index = 100 x S3/TOC
W_ell LCI-Tnimkin
Thermal Maturity
The five samples analyzed show increasing Tmax with
depth, from thermally immature at 2000-2050' (Tmax
432oc) to within the oil window at 10770-10800'
(Tmax 443oc). Production Index (Si/S1 * S2) also
shows progressive increase with depth.
Organic Richness and Ouality
TOC values for the five samples range from fair (0.50)
£or potential source rocks to good (1.62). All samples,
however, show no current oil proneness, with low SI,
S2 and Hydrogen Index (52-124). The two deepest
submitted samples may be mature enough to have reduced
their oil proneness by having generated and expelled
hydrocarbons, but this is unlikely.
GMC Data Report 83 Page 1/7
Well LC! lniskin
TABLE I
Resutts of Total Organic Carbon Analysis and Rock-Eval Pyrolysis
Depth TOC S1 S2 S3 Tmax Production
(ft) (~Vt.%) (rog/g) (mg/g) (rog/g) (°C) Index -~,,
c ;'J~l .oo3 2000-2050 0.50 <0.10 <0. i0 0.30 432 ---
=~,r.~-010 55.10-5570 0.78 <0.10 0,40 0.48 434 ---
~,.~9-~1 l-I 7,170-7510 1.62 0.28 2.00 0.59 439 0.12
¢,l~-01tl 9540-9570 0.93 0.30 0.83 0.22 443 0.26
~j,jg-021 10770-10800 0.88 0.54 0.87 0.24 443 0.38
tlydrogen
Index
___
52
12-t
89
99
O×ygen
Index
60
61
36
24
28
Unable to determine due to insufficient S2 yield, multiple peaks, etc.
GMC Data Report 83 Page 2/7
GEOCHEMICAL LOG.~.~.~.~: LC~In|skin
! II I II I II I
'~ I- I I, !, I, 1,' I ' ' I,l,l,l,'.., .! h~ ~HYDROCARBONS1
- z ~ > SOURCE BED POTENTIAL MATURITY ~ INDICATIONS
m ~ ~ T.O.C. (wt. %1 S2 (m~g) S2f S3
~ ~ 5 4 3 4 5 ~0 20 ~ 25 5 15 I~ 2~a~ ~3" 06 ~0'410 30~
, ,,., ,, ~l~l~lmfllllflm~ll , , ,., ,.,,,.,,, , ,~ ,o ,~ .,,,.
II I
-
.,
.-
:1
I I II III I il m I I I~1 I
CO"GLO"1[RATE -5 SHALE-'SILTSTONE ;'X HALITE
SANDSTONE ~ LIMESTONE ((' ANHYDRITE S1 = Free Hydrocarbons Presenl ~n Rock S3 = CO, from Ke[oqen Pyrolysis
COAL ~.~ IGNEOUS S2 H?d~oca[bons t~on~ Kefogen PY~O,TS,S H-ldfogen index : S21 [.D.C.
CASIN~ CEMENT ~ DOLOMITE = .
' CHERT ,~ VOLCAt~ICS
/,.
.r-"~.., 2.4,
- [:, = 9 9 9 9
Fzr: fiTTE,.:~,-.-T - __
-. :~w,~, ! U!',I= 2'-?'
i Ut;' OTT --:-~I..,HT l,J,~= ":'
~:ooo
Page 4/7
L..o_,t- I ,~i s t<.c,.,
! i
TOC = 9.7,S
!.,iT = i£9.3
THAX : ~.s9 nEiZ-'-r:EES C
3£= +6. 421E-'.-'-'2 SU~'t=
5'-Z: '---'~ q2'~'c-!-'-~.! c:~.~- +.S,.s::,-/E+F;-"
--= +-a ?645 ....
"t-i ~..N O [,IH
,
i
i
!.~ c u .-~ u,, ! -
-lq.-/o-'l 5 t 0 '
GMC Data Report 83
Page 5/7
.3:2
2:2
.50%
3._=,3
- _.~, .~._.
/~ , -- -I '-.~
7>!AX : 448 r',?::~zz
~...i. ! .~-i ..- _ *.,. ~.,... _...,_
+" ':"-~'--:--a! SUM: ~ -'
~!:= -,-';' 2.Z:2E-a.~ '--"'~,:
· - .... z,u,,= +4. 9255+03
'J i"i E ....
i ~:_,,q
ia:3
u ~-.'_: :_-: U ['i ROC:~<
I o~1-10 - to~; o O
T f
GMC Data Report 83
2~ 39fi - ~& /
Page 6/7
e~r n~t~ I~nnrf R3 O::.::,.~:----e[': Ir-:---_-:.-'-:-'::-: (..?,:q.-'":;) Pa_qe 7/7