Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAIO 010
'-'
Image Project Order File Cover Page
XHVZE
This page identifies those items that were not scanned during the initial production scanning phase.
They are available in the original file, may be scanned during a special rescan activity or are viewable
by direct inspection of the file.
A..L 0 0 J 0 Order File Identifier
Organizing (done)
o Two-sided
1111111111111111111
o Rescan Needed II11III1I1111111111
RESCAN
DIGITAL DATA
OVERSIZED (Scannable)
D Maps:
o Other Items Scannable by
a Large Scanner
o Color Items:
o Greyscale Items:
D Diskettes, No.
D Other, NolType:
o Poor Quality Originals:
OVERSIZED (Non-Scannable)
o Other:
D Logs of various kinds:
NOTES:
, ,
Date: 7. I c¡ f) b
~ther:: 111 fl P
BY: C Maria)
/s/
ýV\ : ()
Project Proofing
1111111111111111111
BY: C Maria ì
I I
Date:7. t ~ () b
Q
Isl ~
= TOTAL PAGES ~ \ 3
(Count does not include cover sheet) Jf\A 0
Isl , ' \
Scanning Preparation
BY: \_ Maria ")
x 30 = +
Date: 7/1 ~ / 0"
1111111111111111111
Production Scanning
Stage 1
Page Count from Scanned File: ~ } LJ- (Count does include cover sheet)
Page Count Matches Number in Scanning Preparation: V YES
, Maria) Date: 7 ( '9 / ð to
Stage 1 If NO in stage 1, page(s) discrepancies were found:
YES
NO
Isl M J)
NO
BY:
BY:
Maria
Date:
Isl
II " 111111111111111
Scanning is complete at this point unless rescanning is required.
ReScanned
1111111111111111111
BY:
Maria
Date:
Isl
Comments about this file:
Quality Checked
11I1111111111111111
10/6/2005 Orders File Cover Page.doc
.
.
INDEX
AREA INJECTION ORDER NO. 10
MILNE POINT UNIT
1. July 28, 1986
2. August 15, 1986
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
----------------
September 15, 1986
September 15, 1986
September 15,1986
November 4, 1986
8. February 1, 1988
9. September 3, 1991
10. September 19, 1991
11. September 21, 1991
12. October 28, 1991
13. November 7, 1991
14. April 20, 1994
15. September 19, 1995
Conoco's Request for Injection Order
Notice of Hearing, affidavit of mailing
Various Letters
Sign in sheet
Testimony, Protest, Transcript
Map
Letter from Burd re: termination ofEPA Emergency
Permits at the Milne Point Unit (KRU)
Ltr from Conoco from AOGCC
AIO Application
Attendance Sheet
Notice of Hearing, Affidavit of Publication
Conoco's Request for AIO Application
Fax from Conoco regarding Injection Fluid
Ltr from BP to AOGCC re: AIO 10 9/19/86, Amended
12/30/91 order
Letter from BP regarding AIO
AREA INJECTION ORDER #10
-"'"'\;J
~.
STATE OF ALASKA
ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192
Re: THE REQUEST of BP Exploration )
(Alaska), Inc. to amend Area )
Injection Order NO.1 0 for the )
Milne Point Unit. )
)
Area Injection Order No.1 0
Milne Point Unit
Kuparuk River field
September 19, 1986
Amended December 3D, 1991
Amended May 3, 1994
Amended November 13, 1995
IT APPEARING THAT:
1. Conoco Inc (Conoco) requested the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation
Commission to issue an Area Injection Order permitting the underground injection
of fluids within the Milne Point Unit for purposes of enhanced hydrocarbon
recovery.
2. Notice was published in the Anchorage Daily News on August 15. 1986 of an
opportunity for a public hearing on September 15, 1986, and an opportunity for a
public hearing on October 22, '199í in the Anchorage Times and the Anchorage
Daily !'Jews on September 21, 1991.
3 On August 22., ·';986, thE:: Commission ¡eceiveå a ietter from J. Lindauer,
Publisher, Barro'v\' Sun Newspaper, protesting the granting of subject order and
requested that a pUDîic hearing be held on Ule matter. No protests were filed
regarding the S-epternber 3, 1991 application by Canoco to amend Area Injection
Ordeí No.1 O.
4. On September 15, 1 ~86, the Commission heid a hearing as noticed and
requested. The hearing record was closed upon adjournment. Area Injection
Order NO.1 0, authorizing enhanced recovery injection operations within the
Kuparuk River Ojl Pool of the Milne Point Unit, was granted on September 19,
1980. By letter and documents dated September 3, 1991! Canoce sought to
Hmend Area injeciion ()rder No. 10 to ¡nclude enhanced recovery operations for
the Scl-Irader Bluff Oil ?ool of the Milne Point Unit, iesulting in the issuance of an
amendod Aiea injection Order No. 10 dated iJecember 30, 1991.
5. On January 1, 1994, I3P Exp!·')ration (Alaska), Inc. (BP}.J\) became sole opeiator
of the Milne Point Unit
Area Injection Order No. 1~'~
November 13, 1995 '
Page 2
'~
6. By letter dated April 20, 1994, BPXA requested expansion of the affected area
and revision of Finding 3 to reflect the change in operatorship of the Milne Point
Unit. Area Injection Order No. 10 was revised in response to this request on
May 3, 1994.
7. By letter dated September 19, 1995 PBXA again requested expansion of the
affected area to include five PBXA operated leases located at the periphery of the
current affected area and for which delineation drilling has demonstrated
economically feasible development potential.
FINDINGS:
1. There was no substantive protest to issuance of the requested area injection
order.
2. An order permitting the underground injection of fluids on an area basis, rather
than for each injection well individually I provides for efficiencies in the
administration and surveillance of underground fluid injection operations. 20 AAC
25.460 provides the Commission with the authority to issue an order governing
underground injection operations on an area basis.
3. The Schrader Bluff Oil Pool and the portion of the Kuparuk River Oil Pool
underlying the Milne Point Unit constitute a compact "project area" which can
readily be described by governmental subdivisions. As of January 1, 1994 PBXA
is the sole operator of underground injection activities in the Project Area.
4. The Project Area includes all existing injection wells and injection well sites
planned for enhanced recovery of oil from that portion of the Kuparuk River Oil
Pool and the Schrader Bluff Oil Pool.
5. The vertical limits of injection strata and confining formations may be defined in
the ARGO Alaska, inc West Sak River State well NO.1 and the Conoco Milne
Point Unit A-1 well.
6. The strata into which fluids are to be injected will accept fluids at injection
pressures which are less than the fracture pressure of the injection strata and
their confining formations.
7. Statewide regulations and conserJation orders govern field operations except as
modified by this order.
8. To ensure that fluids injected are confined to injection strata, the mechanical
integrity of injection 'Neils should be demonstrated periodically and monitored
routinely for disclosure of possible abnorma!ities in operating conditions.
Area injection Order No. ¡'~
November 13, 1995
Page 3
'-~'
9. Injection wells existing on the date of this order were constructed and completed
in accordance with regulations which conform to the requirement of 20 AAC
25.412.
10. The operator has requested a variance to 20 AAC 25.030(g)(3) which requires
running a CBL in injection wells. Since the CBL is the main method of
establishing MIT Part II, the requested variance is not acceptable.
11. PBXA is the operator of the five leases proposed for inclusion in the Area
Injection Order No. 10 affected area in the September 19, 1995 correspondence
with the Commission.
12. The enhanced recovery operations (Class II) PBXA proposes to undertake in the
proposed expansion are an extension of, and will conform with, engineering
practices employed in the adjacent Milne Point Unit.
13. Rule 8 of Area Injection Order NO.1 0 provides the Commission with the authority
to amend the order, where appropriate, if such action will not increase the risk of
fluid movement into an underground source of drinking water.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the rules hereinafter set forth govern
Class" underground injection operations in the following described area referred to in
this order as the affected area:
UMIAT MERIDIAN
T12N R10E
T12N R11E
T13N R9E
T13N R10E
T13N R11E
T14N R9E
T14N R10E
Sections 1,2,11, &12
Sections 1 through 12
Sections 13, 14,23 & 24.
All Sections.
Sections 5,6,7,8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,27,28,29,
30,31,32,33, & 34.
Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,22,23,24,25,26,27,34,35, & 36
Sections 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,27,28,29,30,31,32,
33, 34, & 35
Rule 1 Authori~ed1Di~çtion Strata fOi Enhanced Recovery
Within the affected area, non-hazardous fluids may be injected for purposes of
pressure maintenance and enhanced oil recovery into strata defined as those strata
which correlate with the strata found in the Conoca MHne Point Unit well No. A-1
between the measured depths of 4,174 feet and 4,800 feet and the ARCO Alaska, Inc
West Sak River State we!1 N~. 1 between the measured depths of 6,474 feet and 6,880
feet.
Area Injection Order No. 'Il~
November 13, 1995
Page 4
.~
Rule 2 Fluid Injection Wells
The underground injection of fluids must be; 1) through a well permitted for drilling as a
service well for injection in conformance with 20 AAC 25.005; 2) through a well
approved for conversion to a service well for injection in conformance with 20 AAC
25.280; or 3) through a well that existed as a service well for injection purposes on the
date of this order.
Rule 3 MonitorinQ the Tubing/Casing Annulus Pressures
The tubing/casing annulus pressure of each injection well must be checked weekly to
ensure there is no leakage. The tubing/casing annulus must not be allowed to exceed
a pressure which will subject the casing to a hoop stress greater than 70% of the
casing's minimum yield strength.
Rule 4 ReportinQ the Tubing/Casing Annulus Pressure Variations
Tubing/casing annulus pressure variations of more than 200 psi between consecutive
pressure readings made when injecting under steady state conditions of fluid
temperature, rate, and pressure, must be reported to the Commission on the first
working day following tile observation.
Rule 5 Demonstration of Tubing/Casing Annulus MechanicallnteQritv
A schedule must be developed and coordinated with the Commission which ensures
that the tubing/casing annulus for each injection well is pressure tested prior to initiating
injection and at least once every four years thereafter. A test surface pressure of 1500
psi, or, 0.25 psilft multiplied by the vertical depth of the packer, whichever is greater;
but not to exceed a hoop stress greater than 70% of the casing's minimum yield
strength. The test pressure must be held on the tubing/casing for 30 minutes with no
more than a 10% decline. Alternative EPA approved methods may also be used, with
Commission approval; including but not necessarily limited to timed-run radioactive
tracer surveys (RTS), oxygen activation logs (OAL) temperature logs (TL) and noise
logs (NL). Wells with tubing-ta-casing communication must be surveyed or logged
every other year and wells which demonstrate mechanical integrity every fourth year.
The Commission must be notified at ¡east 24 hours in advance to enable a
representative to witness pressure tests or the application of alternative methods.
Rule 6 Welllntegritv Failure
Whenever operating pressure observations or pressure tests indicate pressure
communication or leakage of any casing~ tubing or packer, the operator must
immediately cease injection: notify the Commission, and obtain approval for corrective
action.
Area Injection Order No. 'i~
November 13. 1995
Page 5
'-'"
Rule 7 PluQQing and Abandonment of Fluid Injection Wells
An injection well located within the affected area must not be plugged or abandoned
unless approved by the Commission in accordance with 20 AAC 25.105.
Rule 8 Administrative Action
Upon request, the Commission may administratively amend any rule stated above as
long as the operator demonstrates to the Commission's satisfaction that sound
engineering practices are maintained and the amendment will not result in an increased
risk of fluid movement into an underground source of drinking water.
DONE at Anchorage, Alaska and dated September 19, 1986;
First Amendment December 30, 1991;
Second Amendment May 3, 1994.
I hird e [lent embe 3, 1995
------------
/;æ:.i,~~Il1 ~~
-v I" 11~ ~ "',,1-/# G\y
~·..,~W·,
IIf' ~~"".". . .(..~ ,1ft
¿::: T . ~.¡?~ çÿ~¡:,>" ~.' Ù·
, . Øfi1J,.", .to ~~ .
C'~".{~~.';' . '
n· ~ ~~. ...!htt"',~ ~ ,\';, .
~ -- ".Z>\:t. \'
'\ ~-~.·-'1ftil;
~~~, -s,·....,l,1V JI. ~:\.~/
Al" ----- ~~"/'
rl(/~'T ~-'o,}"
_ I. ...,.
.......,~~
Russell A. Douglass, Commissio
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation ommission
.í:t~ X$~-
¡':~~rman Babcock, Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
AS 31.05.080 provides that within 20 days after receipt of written notice of the entry of an order, a person affected by it may
file with the Commission an application for rehearing. A request for rehearing must be received by 4:30 PM on the 23rd day
following the date of the order, or next working cay if a holiday or weekend, to be timely filed. The Commission shall grant or
refuse the application in whole or În part within 10 days. The Commission can refuse an application by not acting on it
within the 10-day period. All affected person has 30 days from the date the Commission refuses the application or mails (or
otherwise distribLites) an order upon rehearing, both being the fin a: order of the Commission, to appeal the decision to
Superior Court. Where a request for rehearing is den~ed by nonaction of the Commission, the 30-day period for appeal to
Superior Court runs from the date un which the request is deemed denied (i.e., 10th day after the application for rehearing
was filed).
-----
~
-.~
.r~~\.
/1/
'(\....,..;
STATE OF ALASKA
ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192
Re: THE REQUEST of CONOCO INC
for an Area Injection Order for
the Milne Point Unit.
)
)
)
)
Milne Point Unit
Kuparuk River field
Area Injection Order NO.1 0
September 19, 1986
Amended May 3, 1994
IT APPEARING THAT:
1. Conoco Inc (Conoco) requested the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission to
issue an Area Injection Order permitting the underground injection of fluids within the Milne
Point Unit for purposes of enhanced hydrocarbon recovery. By letter and documents
dated September 3, 1991, Conoco sought to amend Area Injection Order NO.1 0 to include
enhanced recovery operations for the Schrader Bluff Oil Pool of the Milne Point Unit.
2. Notice was published in the Anchorage Daily News on August 15, 1986 of an opportunity
for a public hearing on September 15, 1986, and an opportunity for a public hearing on
October 22, 1991 in the Anchorage Times and the Anchorage Daily News on
September 21, 1991.
3. On August 22, 1986, the Commission received a letter from J. Lindauer, Publisher, Barrow
Sun Newspaper, protesting the granting of subject order and requested that a public
hearing be held on the matter. No protests were filed regarding the September 3, 1991
application by Conoco to amend Area Injection Order NO.1 O.
4. On September 15, 1986, the Commission held a hearing as noticed and requested. The
hearing record was closed upon adjournment.
5. On January 1, 1994, BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. became sole operator of the Milne Point
Unit.
6. By letter dated April 20, 1994, BP Exploration requested expansion of the affected area
and revision of Finding 3 to reflect the chanQe in operatorship of the Milne Point Unit.
FINDINGS:
1. There was no substantive protest to issuance of the requested area injection order.
Area Injection Order No. '~
May 3, 1994 [September 19, 1986]
Page 2
-~
2. An order permitting the underground injection of fluids on an area basis, rather than for
each injection well individually, provides for efficiencies in the administration and
surveillance of underground fluid injection operations. 20 AAC 25.460 provides the
Commission with the authority to issue an order governing underground injection
operations on an area basis.
3. The Schrader Bluff Oil Pool and t[T]he portion of the Kuparuk River Oil Pool underlying the
Milne Point Unit constitute[s] a compact "project area" which can readily be described by
governmental subdivisions. As of January 1, 1994 BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. [Conoco]
is the sole operator of underground injection activities in the Project Area.
4. The Project Area includes all existing injection wells and injection well sites planned for
enhanced recovery of oil from that portion of the Kuparuk River Oil Pool and the Schrader
Bluff Oil Pool.
5. The vertical limits of injection strata and confining formations may be defined in the ARCO
Alaska, Inc West Sak River State well NO.1 and the Conoco Milne Point Unit A-1 well.
6. The strata into which fluids are to be injected will accept fluids at injection pressures which
are less than the fracture pressure of the injection strata and their confining formations.
7. Statewide regulations and conservation orders govern field operations except as modified
by this order.
8. To ensure that fluids injected are confined to injection strata, the mechanical integrity of
injection wells should be demonstrated periodically and monitored routinely for disclosure
of possible abnormalities in operating conditions.
9. Injection wells existing on the date of this order were constructed and completed in
accordance with regulations which conform to the requirement of 20 AAC 25.412.
10. The operator has requested a variance to 20 AAC 25.030(g)(3) which requires running a
CBl in injection wells. Since the CBl is the main method of establishing MIT Part II, the
requested variance is not acceptable.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the rules hereinafter set forth govern Class II
underground injection operations in the following described area referred to in this order as the
affected area:
UMIAT MERIDIAN
T13N
T13N
T13N
T14N
T14N
R9E
R10E
R11E
R9E
R10E
Sections 13, 14, 23 & 24.
All Sections.
Sections 5,6,7,8,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,29,30,31 & 32.
Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 34, 35,c& 36
Sections 15, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,
& 35
Area Injection Order No...."...'
May 3, 1994 [September 19, 1986]
Page 3
'~
Rule 1 Authorized Injection Strata for Enhanced Recovery
Within the affected area, non-hazardous fluids may be injected for purposes of pressure
maintenance and enhanced oil recovery into strata defined as those strata which correlate with
the strata found in the Conoco Milne Point Unit well No. A-1 between the measured depths of
4,174 feet and 4,800 feet and the ARCO Alaska, Inc West Sak River State well NO.1 between
the measured depths of 6,474 feet and 6,880 feet.
Rule 2 Fluid Injection Wells
The underground injection of fluids must be: 1) through a well permitted for drilling as a service
well for injection in conformance with 20 AAC 25.005; 2) through a well approved for conversion
to a service well for injection in conformance with 20 AAC 25.280; or 3) through a well that
existed as a service well for injection purposes on the date of this order.
Rule 3 Monitoring the Tubing/Casing Annulus Pressures
The tubing/casing annulus pressure of each injection well must be checked weekly to ensure
there is no leakage. The tubing/casing annulus must not be allowed to exceed a pressure which
will subject the casing to a hoop stress greater than 70% of the casing's minimum yield strength.
Rule 4 Reporting the Tubing/Casing Annulus Pressure Variations
Tubing/casing annulus pressure variations of more than 200 psi between consecutive pressure
readings made when injecting under steady state conditions of fluid temperature, rate, and
pressure, must be reported to the Commission on the first working day following the observation.
Rule 5 Demonstration of Tubing/Casing Annulus Mechanical Integrity
A schedule must be developed and coordinated with the Commission which ensures that the
tubing/casing annulus for each injection well is pressure tested prior to initiating injection and at
least once every four years thereafter. A test surface pressure of 1500 psi, or, [assuming a
0.465 psi/ft geo-pressure gradient, a surface pressure that imposes a differential pressure
gradient across the casing of] 0.25 psi/ft [at] multiplied by the vertical depth of the packer,
whichever is greater; but not to exceed a hoop stress greater than 70% of the casing's minimum
yield strength. The test pressure must be held on the tubing/casing for 30 minutes with no more
than a 10% decline. Alternative EPA approved methods may also be used, with Commission
approval; including but not necessarily limited to timed-run radioactive tracer surveys (RTS),
oxygen activation logs (OAL), temperature logs (TL) and noise logs (NL). Wells with tubing-to-
casing communication must be surveyed or logged every other year and wells which
demonstrate mechanical integrity every fourth year. The Commission must be notified at least
24 hours in advance to enable a representative to witness pressure tests or the application of
alternative methods.
Rule 6 Well Integrity Failure
Whenever operating pressure observations or pressure tests indicate pressure communication or
leakage of any casing, tubing or packer, the operator must immediately cease injection, notify
the Commission, and obtain approval for corrective action.
Area Injection Order No':---J
May 3, 1994 [September 19, 1986]
Page 4
'~
Rule 7 PluQQinQ and Abandonment of Fluid Injection Wells
An injection well located within the affected area must not be plugged or abandoned unless
approved by the Commission in accordance with 20 AAC 25.105.
Rule 8 Administrative Action
Upon request, the Commission may administratively amend any rule stated above as long as the
operator demonstrates to the Commission's satisfaction that sound engineering practices are
maintained and the amendment will not result in an increased risk of fluid movement into an
underground source of drinking water.
DONE at Anchorage, Alaska and dated September 19, 1986;
First Amendment December 30, 1991;
Second Amendment May 3, 1994.
. -
-----
an
ation Commission
~¡J
Russell A. Douglass, Commi loner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
/Î, . !;. -; (9 /
f'¡,,({ ¡ [£1 :fV' );{.A/1A:-~/~
T/uckerman Babcock, Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
AS 31.05.080 provides that within 20 days after receipt of written notice of the entry of an order, a person affected by it may
file with the Commission an application for rehearing. A request for rehearing must be received by 4:30 PM on the 23rd day
following the date of the order, or next working day if a holiday or weekend, to be timely filed. The Commission shall grant or
refuse the application in whole or in part within 10 days. The Commission can refuse an application by not acting on it
within the 10-day period. An affected person has 30 days from the date the Commission refuses the application or mails (or
otherwise distributes) an order upon rehearing, both being the final order of the Commission, to appeal the decision to
Superior Court. Where a request for rehearing is denied by nonaction of the Commission, the 30-day period for appeal to
Superior Court runs from the date on which the request is deemed denied (i.e., 10th day after the application for rehearing
was filed).
~-
--
STATE OF ALASKA
ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
3001 PORCUPINE DRIVE
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501-3192
Re: THE REQUEST OF CONOCO INC )
for an Area Injection Order for )
the Milne Point Unit. )
Area Injection Order No. 10
Milne Point Unit
Kuparuk River Field
September 19, 1986
Amended December 30, 1991
IT APPEARING THAT:
1. Conoco Inc (Conoco) requested the Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission to issue an Area Injection Order
permitting the underground injection of fluids within the Milne
Point Unit for purposes of enhanced hydrocarbon recovery. ~
letter and documents dated September 3, 1991 Conoco sought to
amend Area Injection Order No. 10 to include enhanced recovery
operations for the Schrader Bluff Oil Pool of the Milne Point Unit.
2. Notice was published in the Anchorage Daily News on August 15,
1986 of an opportunity for a public hearing on September 15,
1986, and opportunity for a public hearing on October 22, 1991 in
the Anchorage Times and the Anchorage Daily News on
September 21, 1991.
3. On August 22, 1986, the Commission received a letter from
J. Lindauer, Publisher, Barrow Sun Newspaper, protesting the
granting of subject order and requested that a public hearing be
held on the matter. No protests were filed regarding the
September 3, 1991 application by Conoco to amend Area Injection
Order No. 10.
4. On September 15, 1986, the Commission held a hearing as noticed
and requested. The hearing record was closed upon
adjournment.
Area Injection Ord~ No. 10
December 30, 1991 [September 19, 1986]
Page 2
~~
FINDINGS:
1. There was no substantive protest to issuance of the requested
area injection order.
2. An order permitting the underground injection of fluids on an
area basis, rather than for each injection well individually,
provides for efficiencies in the administration and surveillance of
underground fluid injection operations. 20 AAC 25.460 provides
the Commission with the authority to issue an order governing
underground injection operations on an area basis.
3. The Schrader Bluff Oil Pool and t [T] he portion of the Kuparuk
River Oil Pool underlying the Milne Point Unit constitutes a
compact "project area" which can readily be described by
governmental subdivisions. Conoco is the sole operator of
underground injection activities in the Project Area.
4. The Project Area includes all existing injection wells and injection
well sites planned for enhanced recovery of oil from that portion
of the Kuparuk River Oil Pool and the Schrader Bluff Oil Pool.
5. The vertical limits of injection strata and confining formations may
be defined in the ARCO Alaska, Inc West Sak River State well
No. 1 and the Conoco Milne Point Unit A-I well.
6. The strata into which fluids are to be injected will accept fluids
at injection pressures which are less than the fracture pressure
of the injection strata and their confining formations.
7. Statewide regulations and conservation orders govern field
operations except as modified by this order.
8. To ensure that fluids injected are confined to injection strata, the
mechanical integrity of injection wells should be demonstrated
periodically and monitored routinely for disclosure of possible
abnormalities in operating conditions.
9. Injection wells existing on the date of this order were constructed
and completed in accordance with regulations which conform to the
requirement of 20 AAC 25.412.
Area Injection OrdWNo. 10
December 30, 1991 [September 19, 1986]
Page 3
-'
10. The operator has requested a variance to 20 AAC 25.030(~)(3)
which requires running a CBL in injection wells. Since the CBL
is the main method of establishin~ MIT Part II, the requested
variance is not acceptable.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the rules hereinafter set
forth govern Class II underground injection operations in the
following described area referred to in this order as the affected
area:
UMIAT MERIDIAN
T13N
T13N
T13N
R9E
R10E
R11E
Sections 13, 14, 23 & 24.
All Sections.
Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,
20, 21, 22, 29, 30, 31 & 32.
Injection Strata for Enhanced Recovery
Rule 1
Authorized
Within the affected area, non-hazardous fluids may be injected for
purposes of pressure maintenance and enhanced oil recovery into strata
defined as those strata which correlate with the strata found in the
Conoco Milne Point Unit well No. A-1 between the measured depths of
4,174 feet and 4,800 feet and the ARCO Alaska, Inc West Sak River
State well No. 1 between the measured depths of 6,474 feet and 6,880
feet.
Rule 2 Fluid Injection Wells
The underground injection of fluids must be: 1) through a well
permitted for drilling as a service well for injection in conformance with
20 AAC 25.005; 2) through a well approved for conversion to a service
well for injection in conformance with 20 AAC 25.280; or 3) through a
well that existed as a service well for injection purposes on the date of
this order.
Rule 3 Monitoring the Tubing/Casing Annulus Pressures
The tubing/ casing annulus pressure of each injection well must be
checked weekly to ensure there is no leakage. The tubing/casing
annulus must not be allowed to exceed a pressure which will subject the
casing to a hoop stress greater than 70% of the casing's minimum yield
strength.
Area Injection Order/No. 10
December 30, 1991 [September 19, 1986]
Page 4
--
Rule 4 Reporting the Tubing/Casing Annulus Pressure Variations
Tubing/ casing annulus pressure variations of more than 200 psi between
consecutive pressure readings made when injecting under steady state
conditions of fluid temperature, rate, and pressure, must be reported
to the Commission on the first working day following the observation.
Rule 5 Demonstration of Tubin~/Casin~ Annulus Mechanical
Integrity
A schedule must be developed and coordinated with the Commission
which ensures that the tubing/casing annulus for each injection well is
pressure tested prior to initiating injection and at least once every four
years thereafter. A test surface pressure of 1500 psi, or, [assuming a
0.465 psi/ft geo-pressure gradient, a surface pressure that imposes a
differential pressure gradient across the casing of] 0.25 psi/ft [at]
multiplied by the vertical depth of the packer, whichever is greater;
but not to exceed a hoop stress greater than 70% of the casing's
minimum yield strength. The test pressure must be held on the
tubing/ casing for 30 minutes with no more than a 10% decline.
Alternative EP A approved methods may also be used, with Commission
approval; includin~ but not necessarily limited to timed-run radioactive
tracer surveys (RTS), oxy~en activation logs (OAL), temperature lo~s
(TL) and noise logs (NL). Wells with tubing-to-casing communication
must be surveyed or logged every other year and wells which
demonstrate mechanical inte~rity every fourth year. The Commission
must be notified at least 24 hours in advance to enable a representative
to witness pressure tests or the application of alternative methods.
Rule 6 Well Inte~rity Failure
Whenever operating pressure observations or pressure tests indicate
pressure communication or leakage of any casing, tubing or packer, the
operator must immediately cease injection, notify the Commission, and
obtain approval for corrective action.
Rule 7 Plugging and Abandonment of Fluid Injection Wells
An injection well located within the affected area must not be plugged
or abandoned unless approved by the Commission in accordance with
20 AAC 25.105.
Area Injection Orcì~ No. 10
December 30, 1991 [September 19, 1986]
Page 5
c~'
Rule 8 Administrative Action [Relief]
Upon request, the Commission may administratively amend any rule
stated above as long as the operator demonstrates to the Commission's
satisfaction that sound engineering practices are maintained and the
amendment will not result in an increased risk of fluid movement into an
underground source of drinking water.
DONE at Anchorage, Alaska and dated September 19, 1986 and amended
December 30, 1991.
( \~-
Commission
~
.--,
~~
STATE OF ALASKA
ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192
Re: THE REQUEST OF CONOCO INC. )
for an Area Injection Order)
for the Milne Point Unit )
Area Injection Order No. 10
Milne Point Unit
Kuparuk River Field
September 19, 1986
IT APPEARING THAT:
1. Conoco Inc. (Conoco) requested the Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission to issue an Area Injection
Order permitting the underground injection of fluids
within the Milne Point Unit for purposes of enhanced
hydrocarbon recovery.
2. Notice was published in the Anchorage Daily News on
August 15, 1986 of an opportunity for a public hearing
on September 15, 1986.
3. On August 22, 1986, the Commission received a letter
from J. Lindauer, Publisher, Barrow Sun Newspaper,
protesting the granting of subject order and requested
that a public hearing be held on the matter.
4. On September 15, the Commission held a hearing as
noticed and requested. The hearing record was closed
upon adjournment.
FINDINGS:
1. There was no substantive protest to issuance of the
requested area injection order.
2. An order permitting the underground injection of fluids
on an area basis, rather than for each injection well
individually, provides for efficiencies in the adminis-
tration and surveillance of underground fluid injection
operations. 20 AAC 25.460 provides the Commission with
the authority to issue an order governing underground
injection operations on an area basis.
Area Injection""".cder No. 10
Page 2
September 19, 1986
--
~-
3. The portion of the Kuparuk River Oil Pool underlying
the Milne Point Unit constitutes a compact "project
area" which can readily be described by governmental
subdivisions. Conoco is the sole operator of under-
ground injection activities in the Project Area.
4. The Project Area includes all existing injection wells
and injection well sites planned for enhanced recovery
of oil from that portion of the Kuparuk River Oil Pool.
5. The vertical limits of injection strata and confining
formations may be defined in the ARGO Alaska, Inc. West
Sak River State well No.1.
6. The strata into which fluids are to be injected will
accept fluids at injection pressures which are less
than the fracture pressure of the injection strata and
their confining formations.
7. Statewide regulations and conservation orders govern
field operations except as modified by this order.
8. To ensure that fluids injected are confined to injec-
tion strata, the mechanical integrity of injection
wells should be demonstrated periodically and monitored
routinely for disclosure of possible abnormalities in
operating conditions.
9. Injection wells existing on the date of this order were
constructed and completed in accordance with regula-
tions which conform to the requirement of
20 AAC 25.412.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the rules hereinafter set
forth govern Class II underground injection, operations in the
following described area referred to in this order as the
affected area:
UMIAT MERIDIAN
T13N R9E
T13N R10E
T13N RIlE
Sections 13, 14, 23 & 24
All Sections.
Sections 5,6,7,8,15,16,17,18,19,
20, 21, 22, 29, 30, 31 & 32.
Area Injection~rder No. 10
Page 3
September 19, 1986
~...--
~-
Rule 1 Authorized Injection Strata for Enhanced Recovery
Within the affected area, non-hazardous fluids may be injected
for purposes of pressure maintenance and enhanced oil recovery
into strata defined as those strata which correlate with the
strata found in the ARCO Alaska, Inc. West Sak River State well
No.1 between the measured depths of 6,474 feet and 6,880 feet.
Rule 2 Fluid Injection Wells
The underground injection of fluids must be: 1) through a well
permitted for drilling as a service well for injection in
conformance with 20 AAC 25.005; 2) through a well approved for
conversion to a service well for injection in conformance with
20 AAC 25.280; or 3) through a well that existed as a service
well for injection purposes on the date of this order.
Rule 3 Monitoring the Tubing/Casing Annulus Pressures
The tubing/casing annulus pressure of each injection well must be
checked weekly to ensure there is no leakage. The tubing/casing
annulus must not be allowed to exceed a pressure which will
subject the casing to a hoop stress greater than 70% of the
casing's minimum yield strength.
Rule 4 Reporting the Tubing/Casing Annulus Pressure Variations
Tubing/casing annulus pressure variations of more than 200 psi
between consecutive pressure readings made when injecting under
steady state conditions of fluid temperature, rate, and pressure,
must be reported to the Commission on the first working day
following the observation.
Rule 5 Demonstration of Tubing/Casing Annulus Mechanical
Integrity
A schedule must be devel'oped and coordinated with the Commission
which ensures that the tubing/casing annulus for each injection
well is pressure tested prior to initiating injection and at
least once every four years thereafter. A test surface pressure
of 1500 psi, or, assuming a 0.465 psi/ft geo-pressure gradient, a
surface pressure that imposes a differential pressure gradient
across the casing of 0.25 psi/ft at the vertical depth of the
packer, whichever is greater; but not to exceed a hoop stress
greater than 70% of the casing's minimum yield strength. The
test pressure must be held on the tubing/casing for 30 minutes
with no more than a 10 percent decline. The Commission must be
notified at least 24 hours in advance to enable a representative
to witness pressure tests.
,~f
Area Injection"~der No. 10
Page 4
September 19, 1986
--
Rule 6 Well Integrity Failure
Whenever operating pressure observations or pressure tests
indicate pressure communication or leakage of any casing, tubing
or packer, the operator must immediately cease injection, notify
the Commission, and obtain approval for corrective action.
Rule 7 Plugging and Abandonment of Fluid Injection Wells
An injection well located within the affected area must not be
plugged or abandoned unless approved by the Commission in accord-
ance with 20 AAC 25.105.
Rule 8 Administrative Relief
Upon request, the Commission may administratively amend any rule
stated above as long as the operator demonstrates to the Com-
mission's satisfaction that sound engineering practices are
maintained and the amendment will not result in an increased risk
of fluid movement into an underground source of drinking water.
DONE at Anchorage, Alaska and dated September 19, 1986.
Commission
'9
~~
Lonnie C. Smith, Commissioner
Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
1Iw:
W. W. Barnwell, Commissioner
Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
Telecopy No.
(907) 276-7542
February 10, 1988
ADM I N I S T RAT I V E
A P PRO V A L
N O. 10.2
-- -
Re: Amend Rule 2 of Area Injection Order (AID) No. 10
T R Painter
Division Hanager
ConocD Inc
3201 "e" Street, Suite.200
Anchorage, AK 99503-2689
Dear Nr Painter:
We have received your letter of February 1, 1988 requesting
modi.fication to Rule 2 of AIO No. 10. The modification requested
would a110\'1 pumping of excess non-hazardous fluids developed from
well operations or those necessary to control the fluid level of
reserve pits into surface/production casing annuli.
Aquifer Exemption Order No. 2 has exempted all aquifers lying
beneath the Milne Point Unit for Class II injection activities.
Therefore, Rule 2 of AlO No. 10 is amended to read:
Rule 2 -Eluic.l InJectior!- Wells
The underground injection of fluids must be: 1) through a new
well that has been pertnitted for drilling as a service well for
inj ec-tiolJ. in conforma.nce with 20 MC 25.005; 2) through a.n
~x~£._tJn.8. [A] "tolell _tha~þa~~een approved for conversion tõ a
service. well for injection in conformance with 20 MC 25.230; or
3) through D. w~ll tl1at f~X:Lstf.;d as a service Wt~ll for injection
purposes on the date of this order. PU~...Eing of exceßB n~n-
!la:::a~do~8~~u~ds tha~ ar~ _~c:...vel_~~-;-EoleJ+_£r~m .well.: o~~r(:t~ons-L
or nt;~C(~"Sdr) to contrel the fluid Itvel 0:- rf:.,erve ~~_, lnto
·surfaèeLProductiol:;-casìng-ã-:-n.nul i isexempted fi"õîñthe. above--
!e~I~r-¡;I!1~~f~. -------- ------ - - --------------
Síþ8crely,. /' . /
-J A> \/,'
:;-" "((;<I'~Ü
Lonnie C '. Smi th
Commissioner
jo/3.M AIO 10
Telecopy No.
(907) 276-7542
October 28, 1986
ADM I N 1ST RAT I V E A P PRO V A L N O. 10.1
---
Re: Amend Rule 6 of Area Injection Order (AID) No. 10
Mr. John R. Kemp
Division Manager
Conoco Inc.
3201 lie" Street, Suite 200
Anchorage, AK 99503-2689
Dear Hr. Kemp:
The Commission has determined that Rule 6 of AID No. 10 as set
forth is unclear as to the Commissionts intent. Therefore,
Rule 6 is amended to read:
Rule 6 Well Integrity Failure
Whenever operating pressure observations or pressure tests
indicate pressure communication or leakage of any casing, tubing
or packer, the operator mllst [Ir.1.NEDIATELY CEASE INJECTION,]
notify the Commission on the first working d.ay folIo-wing the
obs(~rvéJ.tion, [AND] obta.in Courrnission approvHJ.. [FOR CORRECTIVE
ACTION] of d plan for corrective action, and when an USDW is not
_endar~~rëd, - obtain c¿C?lTI!TIiss ion a.£.EEova} tõ fonti~ue inj ection. -
)_ifD j e~..e ~I'¡;;.. ,. .>-. /".. / .
( / . / //; Ç;;./'I;~/ í!/-
l . .: .'!'- --- . /
,,--- ,/ . ( y! ¡: /. ///. , ¿:.'
c. v. clìãtterton
Chairman
jo/3.AA AIO 10.1
#15
~
rêOMM ~
: COMM ~
¡ -I
'GOMM p~
,RES ENG
; SR ENG
-NRO .
SR GEQ.LAPrt
~ GEOL ASsf . _~
ßTATTECH. 3
~-~~-J
'_.êT A T_iECH~.. J
Mr. David W. Johnson, Chairman-~
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission ~i
3001 Porcupine Drive _J.
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192 .
RE: Milne Point Unit, AREA INJECTION ORDER 10, september£!ft;--,._l
1986, Amended December 30, 1991 and May 3, 1994
'-
'---"
BP EXPLORATION
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.
900 East Benson Boulevard
P.O. Box 196612
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6612
(907) 561-5111
September 19, 1995
Dear 1\,1r. Johnson:
BPXA is operator of five leases adjacent to the southeast side of the Milne Point
Unit (ADLs 380109, 380110, 375132, 375133, and 28232). These leases
include the Cascade discovery area which is currently under development and
an area south of H Pad which is currently producing.
It is our intention to request from the Alaska Department of Natural Resources
expansions of the Milne Point Unit and its participating areas to all or a portion
of these lands when appropriate.
To inject water into these areas, your approval is requested to administratively
amend AREA INJECTION ORDER 10 under its Rule #8 to include:
UMIAT MERIDIAN
T12N R10E
T12N R11E
T13N R11E
Sections 1, 2, 11, and 12
Sections 1 through 12
Sections 27,28,33, and 34
All other terms of AREA INJECTION ORDER 10, as amended May 3, 1994, are
to remain the same.
Please contact me at 564-5232 if you or your staff have any questions or require
additional information.
RECEi\tED
SEP 2 7 1995
2:/4
Bruce J. Policky
Milne Point Unit Ex
/ Ala 10 Expansion
Alaska Oil & Gas Cons. Commission
Anchorage
cc:.
"--
c.~'
M. Bendersky
B. Cunningham
E. Dixon
J. Dillon
B. McMullen
B. Policky
S. Rossberg
Rt~~ E', \1£ D
sEP 2. ì 1995
~\as\(a 0\\ & Gas Cons. Commission
Anchorage
#14
~.
-..~...-
BP EXPLORATION
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.
900 East Benson Boulevard
P.O. Box 196612
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6612
(907) 561-5111
April 20, 1994
Mr. David W. Johnson, Chairman
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192
RE: Milne Point Unit, AREA INJECTION ORDER 10, September 19, 1986,
Amended December 30, 1991
Dear Mr. Johnson:
On March 2, 1992, the Milne Point Unit (MPU) was expanded to 71,153 acres by including seven
additional leases to the northwest. Exploration operations in this expanded Unit area (the
Northwest Milne #1 and No Point #1 wells) have been successful. In the near term, we are
planning to drill the L-14 producer and L-15 water injector into the expanded area. These wells
will be tract operations pending our future application to the Alaska Department of Natural
Resources for an expansion of the Kuparuk River participating area. We anticipate that the
Kuparuk River participating area expansion will include portions of four of the seven leases.
-'
Therefore, to timely inject water into the L-15 well, which will support the L-13 producer and other
future wells, your approval is requested to administratively amend AREA INJECTION ORDER 10
under its Rule #8 to include the following four lease area:
UMIAT MERIDIAN
T14N R9E
T14N R10E
Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 34, 35, & 36.
Sections 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, & 35.
In addition, in FINDING #3, the operator name should be updated to BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
rather than Conoco.
All other terms of AREA INJECTION ORDER 10, as amended December 10, 1991, are to remain
the same. A colored lease and Unit map is enclosed for your convenience.
Please contact me at 564-5672 or Bruce Policky, Exploitation Manager, at 564-5232 if you or
your staff have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
!Qa~~o~ ·
Milne Point Unit Asset Manager
IAIO 10 Amendment
cc: OXY USA, Inc., Mr. Don Romine
Rtc.t\\ltt)
~ _ 9 \<ð<dðc
o \J comm\Ss\ot\
O' \ &. Gas con$.
p.,\~s'a \ (1.t\cnotage
'@f)
''-'
.-
POINT UNIT
LASKA - MILNE
NORTH SLOPE, A
LOCATION ~:U'O/l' SEA
y.......--- -?'
D CHU~CH ~~'r'
St" ""
:~ ~ ALASlG4 '
fZ~~
-. .........,..,
;/
»
~
(1j
^
ø>
2 ~
~ z
5" (ì)
C') ~ I
::r C"") <.0
o 0
þJ::¡ -"
~ ~ c..o
C') c..o
å ..þ.
5!.
()
ff ().
Schrader .Blu ~
~ Participating A
Kupar.uk ~iver rea
[J ParticIpating A
M Tract Number
®
- Unit Boundary
,
~
ct
o
<
I
1 .5
-
----
@
~
"--- ~
@
ADL355019
@
@ ..
ADL255020 ® Mll.N~~~'~ ~ ~~
~ ' , ""'"
v --= .-: ADl355016 ,
ADL355021, " , @
. ®
V\?
R9E
Rile
RLOE
npt1y. 3194, LM12042
81')( - Cørtogr
~ (,
)
)
01: 22P¡'1 B. P. I:..Xt-'LUI"<H I lUI"I 1'1.1LI"I~ I"'""U..LI'II
~
'~
SP El'plor~tìo~ (Alaska) Inc.
900 Sast len~n Boulevard
P.O. Bole 1986'2
Anc/'lOtage, Aläaka 99519·15812
(90?) &G~·6H1
BP EXPLORATION
April 20, 1994
Mr. David W. Johnson. Chairman
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501·3192
RE: Milne Point Unit, AREA INJECTION ORDER 10t September 19, 1986,
Amended December 30, 1991
Dear Mr. Johnson:
On March 2, 1992. the Milne Point Unit (MPU) was expanded to 71,'53 acres by including seven
additional leases to the northwest. Exploration operations in this expanded Unit area (the
Northwest Milne #1 and No Point #1 wells) have been successful,. In the near term, we are
planning to drill the L·14 producer and L·15 water injector into the expanded area. These wells
will be tract operations pending our future application to the Alaska Department of Natural
Resources for an expansion of the Kuparuk River participating area. We anticipate that the
Kuparuk River partioipating area expansion will include portions of four of the seven leases.
Therefore, to timely inject water into the L·15 well, which will support the L..13 producer and other
future wells, your approval is requested to adm,inistratlvely amend AREA iNJECTION ORDER 10
under its R'ule #8 to include the following four lease area:
UMIAT MFFunlAN
T14N Rge Sections 11, , 2, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 34, 35, & 36.
T14N A10E Sections '5,18,17,18,19,20,21,22,27.28,29,30,31,32,33,34, & 35. .
In addition, In FINDING #3, the operator name should be updated to BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
rather than Oonooo.
All other terms of AREA INJECTION ORDER 101 as amendedCecember 10.1991, are to remain
the same. A colored lease and Unit map is enclosed for your convenience.
Please contact me at 564·5672 or Bruce Policky, Exploitation Manager, at 564·5232 if you or
your staff have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely.
JM \M..uJ,Ja.
Howard J. Mayson
Milne Point Unit Asset Manager
IAIO 10 Amendment·
;-} -
. 1. r~· ¡ \ /' ?::- r
l'
JUN 06 1994
f.\IUk¡ UII Q \;JQ;) uUIl::). ~ummiss,on
AncltQrage -
co:
OXV USA, Inc., Mr. Don Romine
III'X - ~~ . ;MM, ""'12IÞI/I
- ~ I
ISJ
I-"
..
N
N
-c
3
tt
""'(
I' ,-
~ (T
)<
""'(
r
'" c
A
I
-
I-
ç
-"
I-
r
:;
r
ì
C
!:
-'
-
IJJ
.þ.
'II
~
C
~ :z
-tS)
IJì
RUIi
I
I
1 ,
ADl ADl
, fJil1.439 ,.31S~6
~·:~0
7..4 -:::::
9'-\ç-
~Ç::,.~
'~,
RIDE
R9E
" -~,~
A0l355022
--@l
I
. ® --.. -:-;-
~- __pt~UNIT
ADI..355O?1_. _ : ADl355O\G
@)
ADL35S020
@
ADL.355019
@
\"
@)..
I
"'':J...:~:: "-':^",,~...:..::. -:.. :.-,;,~"'::~;,;'\,;". '~.~,:~ ::'~-:!O':'>"::':~-:;": -:......~-c....: *l..
3 Mi8B
_ I
" .5 0
I. ~ I
f771 Schrader Bruff
rLLI Par1lclpBl:lng Area
F"7I l<uparuk River
L-.J Partlcipaling Area
® Tract Number
- Unit Boundary
!
~
Q:
o
~
I
.... '"'\:'--""
~D ;"'''~CJl'r
. s.(...
USSR
~
0'
~!:A...t'G". Sf'"
L..OC.\l1C7ft MAP
NORTH SLOPE, ALASKA - MILNE POINT UNIT
-®
.~
#13
__7- c---..--
~o,.t~):o )
.r---
Conoco Inc.
Suite 200
3201 C Street
Anchorage. AK 99503
(907) 564-7600
November 7, 1991
Mr. Blair Wonzel!
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192
RE: Milne Point Unit - Schrader Bluff Pool
Area Injection Order Application
Dear Mr. Wonzel!:
Attached are the suggested modifications to the subject application, dated
September 3, 1991. Please replace the original pages 14, 15, 16 and 17 with the
attached pages.
Copies of these modifications have been sent to all interested lease holders listed
in Section C.
Please contact me at (907) 564-7615 if you have any questions or require additional
information.
Yours very truly,
,; .~~.-
{/ ~~,-",-:",-------:J , ~"-~~\
Steven L. Deckert
Senior Reservoir Engineer
RECEIVED
SLDj(lms)
File 500.21.02
NOV - 8 1991
Alaska Oil & Gas Cons. CommissijlO
Anchoraga
Attachments
cc: State of Alaska, DNA, Jim Eason
Arco Alaska Inc., Jim Ruud
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Tom Cook
BP Exploration Alaska Inc., Pete Zseleczky
Texaco Exploration, E.H. Nelson
Amerada, P.E. Bacon
Exxon Co. USA, Stuart Gustafson
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Dale Santii
OXY USA Inc., G.N. Buttram
~Ol\,-,CO )
Conoco Inc.
Suite 200
3201 C Street
Anchorage, AK 99503
(907) 564-7600
November 7, 1991
Mr. Blair Wonzel!
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192
RE: Milne Point Unit - Schrader Bluff Pool
Area Injection Order Application
Dear Mr. Wonzel!:
Attached are the suggested modifications to the subject application, dated
September 3, 1991. Please replace the original pages 14, 15, 16 and 17 with the
attached pages.
Copies of these modifications have been sent to all interested lease holders listed
in Section C.
Please contact me at (907) 564-7615 if you have any questions or require additional
information.
Yours very truly,
(~. ~~~~"'---~ ~~~
Steven L. Deckert
Senior Reservoir Engineer
SLDj(lms)
File 500.21.02
Attachments
cc: State of Alaska, DNR, Jim Eason
Arco Alaska Inc., Jim Ruud
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Tom Cook
BP Exploration Alaska Inc., Pete Zseleczky
Texaco Exploration, E.H. Nelson
Amerada, P .E. Bacon
Exxon Co. USA, Stuart Gustafson
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Dale Santii
OXY USA Inc., G.N. Buttram
""- --==V
'0-.-"
SECTION J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c) (9)
Compatibility With Formation and Confining Zones - Water sensitivity tests on
core samples showed no significant problems with formation plugging or clay
swelling. Prince Creek, Schrader Bluff Pool, and Kuparuk formation water are
compatible with the receiving and confining zones as noted in Figure J-4. The
Milne Point Central Facility Pad (CFP) will process the produced and injected
water. Scale and corrosion inhibition chemical treatment takes place at the CFP.
Scale and corrosion monitoring will continue with operation of the Schrader Bluff
Pool. Treatment will be varied to maintain optimum water injector operation and
ultimate hydrocarbon recovery.
B. TYPE OF FLUID - Miscellaneous water (including non-hazardous surface water)
and associated surfactantsjsolvents used in the washing and cleaning of the
facility, equipment within the facility, motor vehicles and other items related to the
production of oil at Milne Point. Volumes will be very low and should not exceed
10 bblJday.
14
·v_
~
SECTION J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c) (9)
Analysis of Composition of Fluid - Clean-up water with minor amounts of
surfactants / solvents.
Source of Fluid - Potable surface water used in clean-up operations.
Estimated Maximum Amount to be Injected - 10 BPD.
Compatibility with Formation and Confining Zones - Full compatibility with fresh
water. Miscellaneous water will be diluted to very small percentage of the injection
stream.
15
....../
~
SECTION K
Injection Pressure
20 AAC 25.402(c) (10)
The estimated average wellhead injection pressure is 500 psig. This will be well below
the equivalent formation parting gradient. Note that the A-3 Step Rate Test was
terminated at an equivalent gradient of 0.66 ps i/ft , Figure L-1. The well did not fracture
at the maximum test gradient.
The injection wells will be operated in such a manner that the bottomhole injection
pressure will not exceed the tested non-fracturing gradient of 0.66 psi/ft. The Operator
will supply the AOGCC with evidence of a higher non-parting gradient, in the form of a
Step Rate Injection Test or Fracture Stimulation Initial Shut-in Pressure, before increasing
the injection pressure above this prescribed limit. The maximum wellhead injection
pressures will be varied by well to account for formation depth variations across the field
to insure that formation parting gradient will not be exceeded. Schrader Bluff Pool true
vertical depth subsea tops vary from approximately 3400 to 4400 feet.
16
-~"'r
~-¿
SECTION L
Fracture Information
20 AAC 25.402(c) (11)
Normal water injection operations for the Schrader Bluff Pool will entail injecting below an
equivalent gradient of 0.66 psi/ft. Step Rate Injection Tests and fracture stimulation data
were used in determining the equivalent formation parting gradient.
Based on instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) data obtained prior to hydraulic fracture
stimulations of Schrader Bluff completions, the fracture gradient of the formation was
determined to range from 0.62 to 0.70 psi/ft. These fracture gradients were calculated
by the following formula:
F.G. = {ISIP + (0.052*P*H)} JH
where,
F.G. - fracture gradient, psi/feet
ISIP - instantaneous shut-in pressure, psi
P - density of injection fluid, ppg
H - true vertical depth of top perforation, feet
The ISIP data and corresponding calculated fracture gradient are summarized in the
attached table.
17
NOV 7 '91 8:28
FROM CONOCO ANC ENG/EXPL
PAGE.001
~
.,~
CONOCO INC.
DATE:
FROM:
CITY/STATE:
REQUEST FOR FACSIMILE
November 7, 1991
Steven L. Deckert
Anchorage, Alaska
******************************************************************************
TO:
COMPANY:
CITY/STATE:
Blair Wonzel1
Alaska 011 & Gas Conservation Commission
Anchorage, Alaska
FAX *: 276-7542
NO. OF PAGES:
*******************************************Å**~*~*******~***~******~****~*****
COVER + 3
******************************************~~**~*~*****************************
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
RfCîEIVED
NOV 71991
~.Rll.A G~s Cons.__
~~l~ ~cbºraøø·- ,.¡>~.. _.
****************************************A~***Å*************************Å***~**
FAX REPLY NUMBER: (907) 564-7655
Please notify my secretary) Linda Starrt at (907) 564-7611
if transmission 1s incomplete or illegible.
NOV 7 '91 8:28 FROM ~ONOCO ANC ENG/EXPL
PAGE.002
~
SECTION J
Injection fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c) (9)
Compatibility With Format.ion. _and_ Confining Zone~ - Water sensitivity tests on
core samples showed ·no significant problems with formation plugging or clay
swelling. Prince Creek, Schrader Bluff Pool, and Kuparuk formation water are
compatible with the receiving and confining zones as noted in Figure J-4. The
Milne Point Central Facility Pad (CFP) will process the produced and injected
water. SCale and corrosion inhibition chemical treatment takes place at the CFP ~
Scale and corrosion monitoring will continue with operation of the Schrader Bluff
Pool. Treatment wi1l be varied to maintain optimum water injector operation and
ultimate hydrocarbon recovery.
B. _TX.PE- OE~ FLUID - MisceUaneous water Øncluding non-hazardous surface water)
and associated surfactants/solvents used in the washing and cleaning of the
facility, equipment within the facility, motor vehicles and other items related to the
production of oil at Milne Point. Volumes will be very low and should not exceed
10 bbljday.
RfCEIVED
14
Nav Î 1991
A1askaOil.& Gas Cons. CJ!.~
Anchorage ; -~'.
NOV 7 '91 9:29 FROM CONOCO ANC ENG/EXPL
ï
PAGE.008
-
.~
SECTION J
Injection fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(0) (9)
Analysis of composition of Fluid .. Clean·up water with minor amounts of
surfactants/solvents.
~9IJr9'_ 9t.~l.Jid - Potable surface water used in clean-up operations.
Estimated Maximum Amount to be .Injected - 10 BPD.
Compatibility with Formation and Confining Zones .. Fun compatibility with fresh
water. Miscellaneous water will be diluted to very small percentage of the injection
stream.
R~CEIVED
NOV 71991
ðlaska OU & Gas Con~ ç.oJ1\_tma
¡ I Anchorage. :
15
16
NOV 71991
~ DJlA Gas Con& kQ,mmtUfafJ
'·'.l"l,¡; ðnchQra~" J"-"
REGEIVED
be exceeded. Schrader Bluff Pool true vertical depth subsea tops vary from
approximately 3400 to 4400 feet.
formation depth variations across the field to insure that formation parting gradient will not
limit. The maximum wellhead injection pressures will be varied by well to account for
Initial Shut-in Pressure, before increasing the injection pressure above this prescribed
The estimated average wellhead injection pressure is 500 pslg.. This will be well below
the eqUiVaJen, t, for~~~n/~,~r~~~tn,~o",!f-o.~,)I., iJt,tf¡,Ii~tr O,f,!è~tll!Q, ~~f-
Ir- <ß t~ -J.p:;-f 'Ffcp ú. re L -I, drd r\ (j f f;áJ.. c... {- [.~, ~e o! " ,~ þY( --~ Jt:
; , '( I I /
~ .~~ $'-r 7 (cl ~,~ tÆ'f ,
The injection wells will be operated in such a manner that the bottomhole injection
f 0 'SI-pd A 0 lit fì- CD d=u ' ~
pressure win not exceed the~ivalù~f~rmati"", tJØI ti..y gradient of 0.66 psi/ft. The
0;"" h '1.h e r ~, 96.. fee
Operator will supply the AOGCC with evidence of aneqÞw,,~ðfr-«ic~p~gradient
.greaterthoA-OJS6-pôilf4;.jn -the form of a Step Rate Injection Test or Fracture Stimulation
Injection Pressure
20 AAC 25.402(0) (10)
SECTION K
',,-./
"-'
PRGE.ØØ4
NOV 7 '91 9:30 FROM CO NO CO RNC ENG/EXPL
'---
,-,'
SECTION L
Fracture Information
20 AAC 25.402( c) (11)
Normal water injection operations for the Schrader Bluff Pool will entail injecting below an
equivalent gradient of 0.66 psi/ft. Step Rate Injection Tests and fracture stimulation data
I·
were used in determining the equivalent formation parting gradient.
r -
I
! .
Based on instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) data obtained prior to hydraulic fracture
stimulations of Schrader Bluff completions, the fracture gradient of the formation was
determined to range from 0~62 to 0.70 psi/ft. These fracture gradients were calculated
by the following formula:
L
F.G. = {ISIP + (O.052*P*H)} /H
f"
i where,
F.G. - fracture gradient, psi/feet
ISIP - instantaneous shut-in pressure, psi
P - density of injection fluid, ppg
H - true vertical depth of top perforation, feet
The ISIP data and corresponding calculated fracture gradient are summarized in the
attached table.
17
#12
'1,'
~
---
(CO( .)CO)
David l. Bowler
Division Manager
Conoco Inc.
Suite 200
3201 C Street
Anchorage, AK 99503
\
October 28, 1991
Mr. David W. Johnston
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192
RE: Milne Point Unit - Schrader Bluff Pool
Area Injection Order Application
Dear Mr. Johnston:
Attached please find proof of receipt of the Waterflood Application by all interested
parties listed in Section C of the subject application. Enclosed are copies of the
signed Registered Mail receipts.
The attached is being forwarded to the Commission as stated in the cover letter of
the subject application.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Steve Deckert
of this office at 564-7615.
Yours very truly,
~~~
David L. Bowler
Division Manager
SLD jlms
RECEIVED
OCT 31 1991
'SS\Oì
Alaska on & Gas Cons. CoJßm\
Anchoragè
Attachments
File: 500.21.02
~dÆ~
- ~;Þ
øJ
~;¡µ
Me
\~
~..':Þ'~ ,'..', *' ~'...
. '." .,,""... ..'-..."....
' . '~"'''''''''''''''_''''''_~,^J''''''''''''''''J"...~"-,_~~.,.
. . " - - . . ~ -. '," " ~. ." ,. .
. ",..,. . ^ . ,~ " - . " "',~,", . , . .
:"".'~ "''''f~ '~~('.,,..(...I'-:-:-~..,..,.....
. SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete Iterr.
and 4.
Put your address In the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent..
card from being returned to you. The returr rQÇelDt fee will provide YOU the name of the Der~
. delivered to and the date of dellv'1ry. For additional fees the following .ervlc8I are available. Con...
postmaster for fees and check box(es) for addltlonalservlce(.) requested.
1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's addren. 2. 0 Re.trlcted Delivery
t(Extra charge)t . tIExt,acharge)t
3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number \l J ;-Ç/ ,:
u_______.¡ f 71--¿""Z;11 >- f~'
state of Alaska i Type of Service:
Dept of Natural Resources:, ØRegistered,. 0 Insured
([j Certified' .' 0 COD
Attn: Jim Eason 0 Express Mall
3601 C street
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
5. Signature - Addressee
X
6. Signature - ~ jen
X I
7. Date of DeliVery
1- ~1
PS Form 3811, Mar. 1987
* U.S.G.P.O. 1987.178-268
1
~~,~ ""1" .... ..,....................--..:--'.....~...·..---....-.............-"._.r,........._ ~
~ii:"'.~c .;,"....:"';.;. , '. ,."
..-...r..,...,,,,.............~,.':o(I,":,(.,,(\,f'!-t'\"\.t:.....,...~:~:
'.'1 ~ """;'1"-~'.' "~'~:"'-('o~..:.....'t':''"l'7'''.
Alaska Inc.
Attn: Jim Ruud
P.o. Box 100360
Anchorage, Alaska
0360
I
¡
I
¡
99510-1
I
5. Signature - Addressee
X
6. Si9. nature -.. - Age,.en.' . .....
X.a... m~~··
7. O.'-:,6~II~ /6W:
PS Form 3811, Mar. 1987 . U.S.G.P.O. 1987-178-268
¡::~'rlf.''J~rr:.-r.,.1r".~:r..t'·r,1..:,'(.·'~\~·.~ <..,~,.,~,,"~ " ~
Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED.
8. Addressee's Address (ONL Y if
requeste,?:~ fee paid)
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
.';
. SENDER: Complete Items 1 and 2 when additional servIces are desired, and complete Items 3 1
p ta~~u~' address In the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this
c~rd from being returned to you. The return recelDt fee will provide YOU the name of the person
delivered to and the date of dellv9rv. For eddltlonal feel the following services are available. Consult
\' pOltmaster for fee. and check box(es) for addltlonalservlce(s) requested.
1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and add renee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery
t (Extra charge) t t (Extra charge) t
, 3. Art~~~<l.dro"od '0:________ - - 4. Art¡C'~FT?o~ 2- ý l.( ç 1z..
Chevron u. S . A. Inc. ~e,f Sorvico: .
Attn: Dale santii ARegistered 0 Insured
11111 s. Wilcrest 0 Certified 0 COD
o Express M¡¡II
Houston, Texas 77099 ~~~us~~
Always rt~~~ addressee
or ager . anLATE(~)\1 ~ RED.
5X' ~igr ~e _Addre.~s~ I 8. Ad! ~ff JWd~ (Q Y if ..'
0_ 9' -o¡ / reqé~£fð'1d'fe[ijid ~, (
~ ¡i1.,uro-Agon' __.~.. 7 ~#
7. Date of Delivery
.SENDER: Complete Items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete Items 3
and 4. .
Put your address In the "RETIJRN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do thIs will prevent this
card from being returned to you. Th~ return recelDt tee will provlçle yOU the name of the p~rson
d~Uvered ~9 and the date 91 devery. For additional fees the following services are avaJlable.Consult
postmaster for fees and check box(es) for additional servlce(s) requested. .' .
1. O. Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted D~lIvery
t(Extra charge)t t(Extr4,chargejt
·3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number
tp?o~ f.;.;'; 4~ s:Be; (
!!J R~gistered 0 Insured
o Certified 0 COD
o Express Mall
I
I
11
; t
( }
1\
.11
PS Form 3811, Mar. 1987
I
!"'--""- ('~~'''~''''/lII-.
* U.S.G.P.O. 1987-178·268
...,..,....,.._........w".J......._.._,....,_,_..__...,....
. . ..~ _ " ~... ......'. w ~ ..... ..... '"
. ~;J",?ER: Complete Iteml1 and 2 when addItIonal services are desired, and complete Items 3
PU~Yfur a%d~ess In the "RETURN TO'" Space on the reverse sIde. Failure to do this w/Uprevent this
car ,rom 8 ng returned to you. The retur'1 receipt fel" wl'l provide You ~h.e name of the Der n
dellverqd ~of Qnfd tht¡1 ~ate of d~lIv,ry. For additional fees the .folloWlng.le.. ..r...v...I.C8s ar.e. avallab...le C. on:~t
postmaster. or ees and check box(ea) for additional servlce(s) requested.:;' .
.1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2.0 Restricted· Delivery'
. _ t(Extra charge)t ' .,. t-(Extracharge)t'
. 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number
--------------·--\1 "P 71 z.;'~'-z, ýý ·,,5"10
TYPe of Service:
I2!P Aeglstere~;,;..·O Insured
o Certlfled~~'i;ì:::, ·,'0 COD.'
o Express,Mall ,,'
.Always obtain 'signature of addressee
.~ agent and DATE DELIVERED.
'f.~.. .Addre.s...see.·'.s......A. d. dress (ON. ,L......y.........i.r¡. ' 5. Signature - Addressee
.,' ,., requested and fee paid) .. .......' X
~'" ....:: ' " """,', - ' , , ,
,··.·;·:;·;~,i,:;.;.:"..:,DI: fJ . , 6. ~9'at~rl. t~.r. .0 - Ag.~ \ (]
:':~,~;i~~;tIVE ~ ~~,~ \-\~Q~~.
QQMesr;1? R~TUR:t heb%:!1r, PS F~rm 3811, Mar. 1987 * U.8.0.P.0.1987-17"280
._ ..~!~~~a .011 ~_Ga$ Cons. (;ommis'sion ...__._"._.,__
ßnchorage
,
11
I!
11
( I
, I
I'
BP Exploration Alaska
Attn: Pete Zseleczky
P.O. Box 196612
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-
6612
. .
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED.
8. Addressee's Address (ONt Y if
requested and fee paid)
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIP'
AIVlÌays'o~talns¡gnatureof addressee'
or agentancjDATE DEt.IVERED. ; 6. Signature _ Addressee
B:åJ~~~~iffl~~,;I;'ì.!V' lJD" i :. Slgn'ture - Ag,nt
";:il:>' ',', :. ,V J: : X ¡¿
Alas~!~ti~::'!io~-I:~ ::: ::::::.19B7(~
. C Drage I .....__.__..."..........._._.. ,
.,-,
..,;.,-:..........................
.SENDER: Complete Items 1 enq:l wh.n additional .ervlc.. ar.. d~i~~d,and complete Item. 3
P and 4. ddress In the" RETU RN T(;)" Spece on the rever.e .Id.. Failure to do thl. will prhev.nt thl.
. ut your a h ecth?t f.e will provide vou the name of t . D.rson
~~~?V::dmt:~I~~ :~~u~~:: o~o d~~~9r~. ;6~~~8IiJonal fe.. the following '.~Ice' ore available. Con.ult
postmaster for fees and check box(es) for ,d~ltlonal, ··~áce(.) re~u~·~.t~i~ted Delivery
1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and ad "...., a r.... . t('E trilchQrge)t
t (Extra charge)t . x
3. Article Address~~ to:__ _ _ _ "\ 4. Article Number L1' 'ð 8
rCnevron u. S . Ä. Inc · I f 7 I 7 - 7- ,,/-. S' ø
; Attn: Tom Cook . g:eOfservlce:
P 0 BOX 107839 ,Registered
· · ì Certified'
Anchorage, AK 99510-7839; 0 Express Mall
Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED.
8. þ'~~ressee's Address (ONL Y if
requested and fee paid)
I, ,
j i~
:( .:-1 ~,
l.' ~il~
~ ,',
o Inšur~d
o COD
5. Signature - Addressee
X
Age, a.-.
Ivery í- G~ 1:/
. * U.S.G.P.O. 1987·178·268
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
PS Form 3811, MaI. 1987
~,....,......,('~',.,..,....--~-- ,--"
. . - '. . . ~ ~ ..... - -. ,. -
__'A_....................... ~...~·~_·.....__.R
~;;::;:~:::i.¿;'",.".~c, .
.SENDER: Complete Itemstand 2 whet"! additional services arede.lred,< and complete Items 3
and 4.
Put your address in the" A ETU RN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do thl. will prevent this
card from being returned to. you. The return receipt fee will p,,;)Vlde you the 118me of the person
de.."vereq to and the date of de'.lv~rv.. For add. Itlonal fees the fOllOWing. .... r,.v.:...I.,C,. e. 8. reo avall..a. b, .11..e..........,...Con.l.Ilt
postmaster for fees and check box(es) for additional servlce(s) request.d"",j:"',, ,., >"
1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. ~.O Restrlçted Delivery;;
t(Extra charge)t \ ' t.(Extr4Charge)t,i,
!, ¡f"ICIO-Addre"ed to:___ 4, Article NU~ber 4
:1 Texaco Exploration P 7 J 7 ¿, 2 ~ 5S~
<'if t t .~e of Servlc~:, '
,/::1 An. Ms. E. H. Nelson ~~egistered,:~;~' ,I' 0 Insured
'i·,;1 550 w. 7th Ave., Ste 805 0 Certified I :~'\':". 0 COp:;:,
,:::'1 Anchorage, AK 99501-3375 0 Expres$Mall':' , '.;,
!:'?::I:I:(":'j
r'i':;'\" .i
). Signature - Addressee
(;:,{:" ,".
¡~.S....i9 .,..~".~~,e,'" -. nt~.. tC..-.. ..._..,.,..
C·~~c l
,~" ,'" ,II/_ :1I",',i' , , ,', )
'.',..Date of Delivery>.."
,":';\':"1-·//-P/ .,,,:
:; Form 3811, Mar. 1987 '
,'....:»
.:.".
C,* '. U.S.G.P.O. 1987.178.268
':,':\;<.':."
'r _.: '..,
" ,_. .1I_'~"~"or..t'....'!':~.,..""~,,!,,,,r;':.·.~ ~.. ..' ~
. ."."...."..".._~~.~~.__...-...--___.~___ --.. MO' ... _~_M' _____.._.__....... ..._......_......_-.,
-___._......M.......M.. ......
i.... . ....' - ~.-.~.~~... 0';':0..
"
~
·
j
,
¡
I
,.
·
~
·
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
.SENDER: Complete Item. , and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete Items 3
and 4.
Put your address In the "RETURN TO" Space on the rever.e side. Failure to do this will prevent thli'
card from being returned to you. The return receipt fee will provide vou the name of the persOn
~ellvered to and the date of dellv,rx. For additional fe88 the following lervlces are available. Conlult
pOltma'ter for feel and check box(es) for addltlonallervlce(s) requested.
1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery
t(Extra charge)t t(Extra charge)t
3. Article Addressed to: () 4. Article Number
P\LA6(A D\L A(\O Gt\S \...ÐVV\Ml~ro,j ~ ~ I Q. ~ L\l.\-Q'1 ~
~ \ \ò-ec.öO\ ùe:-~l.l.)6 Type of Service:
J\ ,....."" "'^ - \tt.~-e A.J.. (Y'... ~\ - ~ \ 9 'd . !X-Registered
TV'\..:..II'~ U \ ,-. '\ '-T' I G Certified
A't"t1J '. fV....ï<- .~A'-.Jio ~D\;hJ.'ð1"O-~ 0 Express Mall
o Insured
o COD
~ s~w;r:~~ {&v
6. ~nature - Agent
X
7,:: 2:J!~~{ 1%':~S'~RO''Þ7017.!Þ
Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED.
8. Addressee's Address (ONL Y if
requested and fee paid) (
DOMESTIC RETURN RECElp·
_._: .\i;....
Þli~ .SENDER: èoml?lIttt Items ,. and 2. when additional services are desired, and complete Items 3
J and 4., . .oo~'
Put your address In 'the "RETURN TO" Speoe on the r.verse side. Failure to do this will prevent this
card from being returned to you. Th~ returl1 r~çe'Dt fee will prqvlçle vou the name of the person
deUvered tQ al')d the date of"Qellv9rv. For additional fe~s the following services are available. Consult
POiRslt.r for feel and checkboxC,,) for addrtlonal servlce(.) requested.
. 1:·.. . Show to whòrri' dellvered,.dat" f,lnd Qddres8ee'l address. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery
.... ,¡ t(E~tra Ch4rgeJt t(Extra' charge)t
: '3. Artic(~ Addressed to: .' 4. Article Number
: OX,'· \.i ... ~ ç 'l \ .;).. ~ q4 tS ~ ~
17 ,Type of Service: ('"
~J)E"$ì1\ "1:JR\\/E.I þ\= ~ ~Q~ ~ Regist~ed 0 Insured
~ 0 Certifi~ci~ 0 COD
m\p\.A-V\10 \ \){ '-1 <:1101 0 Exp~ess'Mail
4\ttJ ,:\\J elL -;g \JttR.A-iv\'
Always obtain signature of addressee
or a~ent and DATE DELIVERED.
a. Addressee's Address (ONL Y if
requested and fee paId)
~o, IÞ7-178-2þ
DOMESTIC RETURN RECElp·
"",......,.,..,.."..,,..,.........
,i. :~~~E R: ComPletelt~~,~.:i1,~n~~~hena~dltlonal servlces..r:0'i~,f~Jr~d,a~d complete Items 3
,;Itutyour address In the "RETlJRN TO" Spaêe on the reverse side.' Fa'¡¡~'~~:'\t~ dàthlivvll{preven": this' .
\:card from being returned toyou.Th.e re)urp recel~.t fee will provld~'<9U \l'w name Qf the per,on
:.'".,;.,:..d;, e. .......'..IVE!rec;f '0 ,nd th~ d~,e. of çle."v~rv. f:.' or. addlt.IOnal f. eel the. .followl.n. .ø"".".'..,.,..r.,..v.. I,' c.,. 8..,....,....e... ..r, .e e'. V. "'_' "...'....._....". b.........I....,..... Con,ult
¡;,::P?tmaster for fees and check box(es) for addItional servlce(s) requen8d.'\\i¡\,ili:i.' ,':' .' ....:;::;..
,1!i¡"',:.i/:9.+:Sh()w to whom delivered, date, ar:'~ addressee's address. ',2.. (1 RestrIcted Delivery .
:~\!:<".':'I ..... . t (Extra charge)t .........'. .... .'.,.' , . .':. t.(Extro charge)t . '"
Addressed to: 4. ~'7lw;[ý4;:1 y
Exxon Co. USA 'Type of Service:,
Attn: stuart Gustafson ~egistere~:\{(,,:",,; 0 Insured
P.O. Box 196601B~:~t:~:~1~;;I.:'':D COD
Anchorage, Ak 99519-660 R E
AIW~ys obtain fJhtture of addressee
/1 . .. "tol¡entand D'i'"é DELIVEflED. .. .. eEl V E D
~~ißdre~ ?\-~'~??~~~~~~e;~{$lVLYif ,..9~T .311991
. ~~~~:::::~~P.O"987"7WM D:E~IC REruRN RECEIP:'åS~ .DiI;~~~;r~~~ Commission
~~:~:, Comple.. I"':.~>end 2:~~:~~~'tIO~.' .~rvl~e. '.r:d:~:~·~n:c:~~·I~~ 1_. 3
~'" .~8nd 4.
~ Pu' your address In the" RETU RN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this
{car from being returned to you. The return recelDt fee will provide you the name of the Derlon
~"deUvered to anç! the date of dellv,r'(. For additional fe.. the followIng se.rvlc" ere available. Consult
ì:pOAV,ter for fees and check box(8I) for additional servlce(s) fequened. '\'-,',..
-;1. .i Show to whom delivered, date, and oddreuee', oddr.... 2. CJ Restricted Delivery.
.,>'" t(Extracharge)t t.(ExtrQchorge)t
~,,~,.....trti,~le Addressed .to: . . 4. Article Num. ber. ", \
:~!~~XðU ~O.l)ÐA·.· ." . 7'\~~L..\L\-~91
;...:.'.~,...',)".....N, ..'F,....... 1.~~tX\-rcG.l6~.p~.. 1f~e~~::~~çe:· 0 Insured
:'\?'~:~O . t:?OX \ 9lt It:O t 0 Certified 0 COD.
:.:~~~~c.h~ro.Q.Q( ~ ~c;5 ,c, 0 Express Mall
.) '..:, (J Always obtain signature of addressee
. , or agent and DATE DELIVEREq.
5. Signature - Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (O!{L Y if
X requested and fee paid) ,
.~--
\
6. Sig.~aturA - ^oent
X "'~-ð
7 . Date of Deljve'~
4 _. ç_.~
PS Form 3811, Mar. 1987
;,1<
DOMESTIC RETURN RECF .
~f:lrf'.r'f',V;'f""r:"-I-;~-";· ......".,'<,
..".,,~..._..~~'..;'~~.~,·,;,--,~,~:~:"..2di~,~~:~'~~:::.;L.;~~~_:..'~~ ''':''':~l'~~~ ~;~'~_.'ti '"'_ _ '. _ _ "
"",0",'
·"rlf"......,."'.,....-..-....,-...-_....-·~··'·
_.._......,.._.........._........... _,~.... _" ti...__.~"",,,,.
. ...." -.. .. - _..:. - - _:~.- .... --..-,.. . ..,.,~ ~....:',.".".., ;',0," ."" " ". .,'.',,0 ..
. .._...~, --, ~. . ." ...
....... ~ -_.-'_"-0. . . ...
;>
~' ~
.SENDER: Complete Items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete Items'i~
and 4. '. ..
Put your address In the "RETURN TO" Sp~ce on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent th¡~
card from being returned to you. The return reçelPt fee will provide YOU the nflme of the persol'}
delivered to and the date of dellverv. For additional feel the following services are available. Consult
postmaster for fees and check box(es) for additional servlce(s) requested.
1. CJ Show to whom delivered, date, and addreSSee's odci~ess. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery
t(Extra charge)t t(Extra charge)t
3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number
Mr. Peter Bacon RB315504992
Amerada Hess Corporation Type of Service:,
1201 Louisiana, Suite 700 0 Registered' 0 Insured
Houston, Texas 77002-5681 gcertified 0 COD
., ~ Express Mail
. ,¡'...<:,:~~~~"AIWaYs obtain signature of addressee
/~~~.~··~:~~~:::-·,f~ \~,agent and DATE De.~!~e.Re..D(
¡f' ~( ~jl,-j.j '},J~;,~Addressee'sAddr~~i(~
¿..' r"\ ,Jjr,.'.~requested and,.[e~ai~~ ~ "
\~~.:~.\.'~' ( :. ,;'\ Î.' ,tl:.:';~:··'.;;'~.,'<f 0 rJ. ~ ~\: :\
\;> ,';~~-~'~'f ",J':/' {., '~,:~': !\I~~1 ~ .~
2 11991~·.<~~':~~~lj
PS Form 3811, Mar. 1987 . * U.S..G.P.O. 1987-178-268 DOMESTtC"RÈ'TO'RN RECEIP1
5. Signature - Addresse~
X~
6. S.ig~Ur - Agent
X ~
7. D of Delivery
(
#11
" \
~ ~-"--.j
--
Notice of Public Hearing
STATE OF ALASKA
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Re: The application of Conoco Inc. for an Area Injection Order.
Conoco Inc. by letter dated September 9, 1991 has applied for an
Area Injection Order for the Schrader Bluff Oil Pool in the Milne Point
Unit. The order would allow enhanced recovery operations to commence
in the Schrader Bluff Oil Pool.
A person who may be harmed if the requested order is issued
may file a written protest prior to 4: 00 pm October 7, 1991 with the
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (hereinafter the
Commission) , 3001 Porcupine Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, and
request a hearing on the matter. If the protest is timely filed and
raises a substantial and material issue crucial to the Commission's
determination, a hearing on the matter will be held at the above
address at 9: 00 am on October 22, 1991 in conformance with
20 AAC 25.540. If a hearing is to be held, interested parties may
confirm this by calling the Commission's office, (907) 279-1433 after
October 7, 1991. If no protest is filed, the Commission will consider
the issuance of an order without a hearing.
~~1a~
Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Published September 21, 1991
o~ 1m ~
---
TIMES
.={AGE
THE
I~
:::1"-.'
J
~=
9951~-ØØ4~
£.i¡ ü;.;~· ü
ANCHOHAGE
Notice of public HearllKJ
STATE OF ALASKA
Alaska 011 and Gas .
eonservqtlon comMIsSion
Re: Thé application ofConOCO
Inc. for an Arealnlectlon
Order.
tonoco .If'IC. .. þy~ ;letter . dated
sepfembilr ,.1991/hosOPPlled
fór an Area Inlectløn~OJ.'der fOr
tbe Schrader Bluff 011 . pool~ln
the Milne point Unit. The ordêr
would allow enhanced recoVerY
gperatlons to commence In the
Schrader Bluff 011 Pool.. .
A personwha ~Y be hàrmed
If the requested ørder Is Issued
may ,file a written proteSt prior
to 4:00 pmOdotler 71 1991,wlth
the· Alaska 011 and Gaseonser-
vatlon Con'imlsslon (hereloofter
the commission).· 3001· Porcu-
pine Drivel· AnchOrage. Alaska
99S01. and'r~ a hearing on
the matter. Uthe protest Is
timelY flledandfàJses a sub-
stantial ánd mátéí1al Issue au-
clalto ttié commIssion's deter-
mlnatlon','O.hearlmJ on the mat-
ter will be heldat:the aÞoVead-
dress at 9:00 a",on OdoÞer22.
1991. In confølil1ØnceWlth 20
MC 25.540.c If ahlarllKl Is to De
h81d.. Interested '.. PortleS ··mav
confirm this þy éalllng the COin-
mission's office. (907) 279-1G3
otter ()ctober 7,1991. If nO pro-
test Is filed. the commission Will
consider. the Issuance of the
order withoUt a heClrlnO. . .
R'UsselíA. ~1aSS.
Mr ... .,..~;
- ~ ~~~~J;4:~~
u¡~
PUBLICAT
AO~~GC
3Ø~1 POfcupine
ANCHORAGE~ A
PPOOF OF
Ø8-:,678
ISSUES
~Q ¡:-.:: 10i
"U F ! .i... J. i ; J.
Ø9/21!9i
AD
.:;r
in!:.
ULY
;:¡;
OF
A! i HLHtU
UN
TiJC
i ; i-
99:i01
A COpy OF WHICH IS HERETO
~~.!AS PUBLIS~ED IN. I. t S ~
OF THE ANCHORAGE TIMES
BEGINNING ON
ENDING Or
Dr
~
A~7a
LINES
- -
WAS
AD
THIS
DF
'":"~::- ~.-:-:Y-
¡¡¡:. ·JiLL
;L~l
.;(L.-,~~f·-¿L~ L
SIGNED
85
i...)
"_I':' __= i i.. ! .:.
T
";r·
1:)
AD
THiS
i:.J
nc
¡.J.i
Nü~~BER
THE PHICE
iHE AD
VED
\
RECE
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN
TO BEFORE ME THIS
í99i
1"""- _
-:.Jcw
¡¡~
DAY
--
1991
& Gas Cons, comm\ss\on
Anchorage
26
~CD
vL\
Alaska Oi
VoJyJi 1() Ø/7Þv
ALASKA
STATE OF
THE
PUBL.IC OF
01 AF\Y
,1.;2Ul'1ll
I
EXPIHES
CGMMISSIDr
..
#10975
STOF0330
A0085677
L
~
j)/¡qn~
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
8T ATE OF ALASKA.
THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT,
SSe
Notice of PubliC - Hearing
$TATE:O¡;ALA$I(A,
A'askëli~O¡( .11c:f . øas. :
Conservation.; Cornmì.sshm
·Re:_t~~~PI'c.âtíon bttCQflóCo
~?~foral)~rêa lnieèti~.5:)i--
:~e~f;~i~¡~Á~~t:i,~~
. Ordrr for.,!t}e'iSchradep 11ft
Oil, ~ . - - - he' Milr1eC:Poínt _
Unit.' _ el" woulda1/ow
el)hahC;"" Y:~ry-operatiorls
to com.m.:the Sçhrader'
BIUftOl.. . ~~._.. _.u.
¡ rA"p'ørson,\Yhò, may: b~
. !to ð. r.oin_ , e,.... d,.. _', i..f. '.f_h, e_ .'.r. ~. U_-è.'.st,' ed_ -.-. 0_ rd.er.·
ISISSu~'may cfile a'wfitten
I J)rof~.sfpriOr; to-~4:00 PIl19cto-,
'#er!l,-J~JTwitMhe :~'askª-=Qil--i
an(f~-GasÃCO"Sèrvati ,- "~
- :~n~~::ç.i~J~f:~~f!~~, __, ~J
Pnve, Anchol'"ë!ge,'Alàs '-,
9950J.anél,:request··. atJèar'iÌ1g ,
0." theD?itþer. .,It"t~~épr()tp~~;s
,tlmeIVfllei:f :a e:1Se$'fà;sub.
stanti¡;tkànclò'rr '.. e-
crU.ci~T: 't9 'ffi - m .~
èIetermil1âtic)fi . . ~--'-.-
fherntltferw!
abOYe . a'ddr -
OdOber' 22
mance with
hearing is ,f
eel parties·
by C:;ðlling
offiCe," (907)
! tober? i ·1
filed, the C
sider the isstl~
without anh~~
"'. ;r.e.~nifer . (:;~l,lqlJ.i.~.~...
being first duly sworn on oath
deposes and says that.... ..~~.~......
is the. Legal. .Rep.......of the
Anchorage News, a daily newspa-
per That said newspaper has
been approved by the Third Judi-
cial Court, Anchorage, Alaska, and
it now and has been published in
the English language continually
as a daily newspaper in Anchor-
age, Alaska, and it is now and
during all said time was printed in
an office maintained at the afore-
said place of publication of said
newspaper. That the annexed is a
true
copy of a... ~.Q. . . ç.dv.ß.r.t. i.R.e.IJJ~lJ. t
as it was published in regular
issues (and not in supplemental
form) of said newspaper on
.__9l?L} 99~ __ _
--~-'-_._-'.._-
_._-----~ -------~
---
_._0__- ____
----
and that such newspaper was
regularly distributed to its subscri-
bers during all of said period. That
the full amount of the fee charged
for the foregoing publication is not
in excess of the rate charged
private individuals; ~ .
signed ~ ¿tA~--1 ,~'f-
Subscribed and sworn to belore
h' ",1 fed I '- \..è ;\ ',. .-' ,\.J ,) -- -
me tIS.'::·... ay 0 ........:......".....'.:.:... .
C, \
19.'-.'..1.
REcEIVED
:: :'~:;: ::'::: ~: :~~ ~:~ ~ :~;::~)::: ::': :~(~: :~:':~ ~:~:: :'~
Notary Public In and tor
the State of Alaska.
Third DMaiOn.
Anchorage, Alaska
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
.... J.U.L Y. ..3,.. HI .9.9.4.......... ..19.....
SEP 27 1991
Alaska on & Gas Cons. Commissten
Anchorage
#10
L,
h~
CONOCO - AOGCC
SEPTEMBER 19, 1991
Attendance Sheet
Name
/lL !lfl577UG 5
'Ð () t.<. Î .úo W Ir L c...
4¡1~
~hvc'~ S+~NAre--
,.1 ,( l/ (, ".)/f~ ¡_\ c¡ ¿:;' {J ~,
" ~,.' ¡ \. t l"~ , - 0 V'\.-v 1
ù/tvu:1 'Joh:..s~
11()~CC
iPu 5 5 I:> 0 CA. G ¿ A S 5 ;:to ~ L c.....
#9
..-'
(cor }CO J
~,
David L Bowler
Division Manager
Conoco Inc.
Suite 200
3201 C Street
Anchorage, AK 99503
September 3, 1991
Mr. David W. Johnston, Chairman
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192
RE: Milne Point Unit - Schrader Bluff Pool
Area I njection Order Application
Dear Mr. Johnston:
Pursuant to the provisions of 20 MC 25.402, 20 MC 25.460, and Conservation Order
No. 255, Conoco Inc., on behalf of the Milne Point Unit Working Interest Owners, hereby
applies for the approval of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission to establish
an Area Injection Order for the Schrader Bluff Pool in the Milne Point Unit. Three copies
of this application have been included for your use. Applications for conversion to water
injection of five Schrader Bluff Pool wells will follow on Forms 10 - 403.
Copies of this application have been sent to all interested lease holders listed in Section
C by registered mail with return receipt requested. Copies of these receipts will be
forwarded to the Commission when available.
Please contact Steve Deckert, Senior Reservoir Engineer, at (907) 564-7615 if you have
any questions or require additional information.
Yours very truly,
~~/-( Q
David L. BO~
Division Manager
SLD/SLC
File 500.21.02
RI(IIVED
SEt.. 51991
1IIIIIIta~"'"
.W'- ;:-n.
Attachments
cc: State of Alaska, DNR, Jim Eason
Arco Alaska Inc., Jim Ruud
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Tom Cook
BP Exploration Alaska Inc., Pete Zseleczky
Texaco Exploration, E.H. Nelson
Amerada, P. E. Bacon
Exxon Co. USA, Stuart Gustafson
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Dale Santii
OXY USA Inc., G.N. Buttram
ORIGINAL
AREA INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION
FOR
MILNE POINT UNIT - SCHRADER BLUFF POOL
ENHANCED RECOVERY WELLS
AUGUST 1991
PREPARED FOR
ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
PREPARED BY
CONOCO INC.
MILNE POINT UNIT
AREA INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION
SCHRADER BLUFF POOL
ORIGINAL
--
.~
"'-'"
MILNE POINT UNIT
AREA INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION
SCHRADER BLUFF POOL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section/Regulatory Cite Subject Page
A. 20 AAC 25.460 Area Injection Order 1
B. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (1) Plat 3
C. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (2) Operators/Surface Owners 4
D. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (3) Affidavit 5
E. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (4) Description of Operation 6
F. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (5) Pool Information 7
G. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (6) Geological Information 8
H. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (7) Well Logs 10
I. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (8) Casing Information 11
J. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (9) Injection Fluid 13
K. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (10) Injection Pressure 16
L. 20 MC 25.402(c) (11) Fracture Information 17
M. 20 MC 25.402(c) (12) Formation Fluid 19
N. 20 MC 25.402(c) (13) Freshwater Aquifer Exemption 20
O. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (14) Hydrocarbon Recovery 21
P. 20 AAC 25.402(d) Mechanical Integrity 22
Q. 20 AAC 25.402(h) Wells within Area 23
R. Conservation Order 225 Legal Description of the 24
Current Schrader Bluff Pool
S. 20 MC 25.402(e) Variance Requests 25
20 AAC 25.030(g)
Figure
Figure B-1
Figure B-2
Figure F-1
Figure F-2
Figure 1-1
Figure 1-2
Figure J-1 a & b
Figure J-2 a & b
Figure J-3 a & b
Figure J-4
Table L-1
Figure L-1
MilNE POINT UNIT
AREA INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION
SCHRADER BLUFF POOL
List of Figures & Tables
Title
Milne Point Unit Well Plat
Milne Point Unit Tract Plat
Schrader Bluff Pool Type Log - MPU A-1
M PU Structure Map
Top of Schrader Bluff Pool-NA Sand
Typical Schrader Bluff Pool Injector
Typical Kuparuk River Pool Well
Kuparuk Formation Water Analysis
Prince Creek Formation Water Analysis
Schrader Bluff Formation Water Analysis
Mixed Water Compatibility
Injection Step Rate Test
Injection Step Rate Test
A
-~
"-'
SECTION A
Area Injections Order
20 AAC 25.460
Conoco Inc., as operator of the Milne Point Unit (MPU), requests an area injection order
be issued for currently proposed and other future injection wells for the enhanced
recovery of oil and gas. The area injection order is requested to encompass all lands
within the boundary of the MPU/Schrader Bluff Pool, which are coincident. Conoco
requests that the order allow Conoco to drill, operate, convert or plug and abandon wells
within the MPU by filing Form 10-401 or Form 10-403.
The Oil and Gas Conservation Commission may, at its discretion , issue an area injection
order if certain requirements are met. The MPU injection operations meet the
requirements of 20 MC 25.460(a). Existing wells can be described by one of two well
types, Schrader Bluff Pool or Kuparuk River completion. Future wells will be cased and "
completed with substantially the same characteristics. Injection wells within the same field
are operated by a single operator and are used for other than hazardous waste injection.
1
--.
.---
SECTION A (continued)
Area Injections Order
20 AAC 25.460
The cumulative effect of drilling and operating additional enhanced recovery injection wells
will result in an increase in hydrocarbon recovery. All injection wells will be drilled,
constructed, operated, and abandoned in accordance with the Commission rules to
contain fluids to the Schrader Bluff Pool.
2
~
-..."...
SECTION B
Plat
20 AAC 25.402{ c) (1)
Figure B-1 is a plat showing the location of all wells that penetrate the uppermost injection
zone within the MPU boundary, Le., the area covered by this area injection order
application. Note that two basic well types are depicted; 1). Schrader Bluff Pool wells with
a typical TO of approximately 4350' TVOSS and 2). Kuparuk River Pool Wells with a
~.
typical TO of approximately 7500' TVDSS. Figure B-2 is a plat showing Milne Point Unit
outline, Tracts, and section numbers.
3
l'~lL.L\ji~ i JLJ L if ~ 1ì ~ 1~1 JL 1
NA WELL INTERCEPTS
~J .. , ~..
~~
.-....1....-
f ---..---
I
!
'.- [..----.--.-----.----.
I
, ¡
""d~~'"
.... .---- .~".
l . ,,----
32-14
~
....~. .....___._~_____. ~..___....._____1-1
.~-_._- ---...--
--.--....-
- .~-........._--_...-_.-
_. L"
. r---···----·· -.-----..-...---
I
¡
r---I .
",--.--
...
~5
.___.__ . L - 6
--- l
AL·3 ÀL-t0
L-t~L-2
...................--
N-t
N- t R.
N-1B
--..-..-...-,---
, .
.....-.... .... -....---.... ...
,.. . .............______.L_._....___.................._
U. SHPT
À
..------.- ....-...-
_.__.__.__. _____~_~1J~._.._._..__..
1.
--'c=1" --'
~~ 111 ltl
BA ~ C-l t
C t 1° ¡,. ¡;.C-2
t-t_~..Ll1'15.1 ~ _
C-B"''' -18
C-16
-----
FIGURE
~
I
"
. .~
0-2A .J .;Q(~
a-19\
B-B
lB. 1\:~~B-t2 ~
.... B-1'!
-to t t¡ ,8-5
B-7~~ ~ß SA
B-~_B4. ~1~"t3
E-2 B~2 B-15
CfP-21
32-25 ÂE-B
A. ..E-6
Ä.E-.7
ÅE - 5
A-3 A-1
Â.Â.
A-2À
.
. ,.. ~
PRJDHDE 1
Â.
B-1.
. ..
--
('
_-.ì'\.._~r ~
.. .'--~
BEE :HEY 1
Å
-----
(
---~_................,............. "'-.._-_.~......-._-_.
J-1 J-2 ÂG-8'~~7
Â. A ÅG-4 Â[j-3
G- SA Å.G-6
J-i . J-qÂ. G¡t _ Å G-2
WS-25
Â. .. I-I. H-'! H-3
r:-4A A À
H- t H¡2
1-3Â. l-1A.. Â.
. \ 1..'-
.....'--
---,..~..,-----
...J
EILEEN 1A
FIGURE B-2
'"
I T13N-R10E I T13N·R11E
~/<"~~(~~~~/~'~/~~~~~~~f~f~'~~f"~(rf'f'l/~""f"'"'<
\, CHEVRON @ CONOCOETAL f3\ CONOCOETAL f2\ CONOCOETAL ~~ '"".UNIT BOU~WARY
, \.::V . HJJ1JJ I: \V ~ "
'6 6 ,,~ 6 6" (:;'\
'/"" " ~IIIIIII n 1111111 " 0 0 EN 0 T EST RAe T N U M 8 E R
: . ADL-319717 1265 AG..~
III 1IIIIIIIIIrrnlll1111 IIlIlIrf ~1I11 - I A\ ""11"1 SCHRADER BLUFF
, ê Ë co~oco ET AL ~ PAR T C I PAT IN GAR E A
~ 7: a. 10 11: 12 7 8 ~' . OUTLINE
: :) \ "-
.- \,: :'11I1I1I1Iu.m-ñ' n . "
(r \, ADL-25$9 I 2533 AC. ADL-47434 2560 AC. ADL-47433 I 2S60 AC. /:I.~L-~432v 1268 AC.~À, '---. ~
\;.;)¡{IIÚ{d~rf~{¡I(;I)¡(~Ó;1ilf 1I11IIIftllñ Q fÃ\ ' Ý,-/ .J' ~. '-' ~ -r. é ,-..-~..<./" r'"'' /' /~
\~HEVROH ~2J CONOCO ® ~ ~ CONOCO ET AL CD C~NOCO ET AL CD CONoea ET AL '\
~ \, CHEVRON CHEVRON 1) ~ ~f7\ Q '\
If 1 4 ~ 1 3;> 1 B 11 16 15 14 13 ?1tM-tr: 17 16 V 1 5 ~ ~
~ ~ .
- : '\
'-= \ : '\
"= + -- + - - -- - :110} - -- -~
~ - '\
~ ~
- ~ '\
'C 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 ::2111:, 20 21 22 '\
S ADL- ADL-25516 : '\ ADL-47439 ADL-315846'\
~ '315848 ".\' ' . '\
\';:ÅDL-25514 2560 AC. ADL-25515 2544 AC. 1280 AC. 1280 AO. ADL-47437 2560 AC. ADL-47438 ;?544AO. 12M AO. 1280 AC. "
:;;¡¥)l)U)'Y1~Y')lY')l! lllllllllllllll!tllllIlIlIIlIlIIC:' . . . . I I HL ~... / .1.1 .I / .I /. J'¡ J ,; f\.
I ~ ~HEVRON @fONoeO@CHEVRON0 CONoeo ~ V® ~ ',~ ~ ~ _l:J;~C1m~.
\,:: :: ,,~l~ ~ ~ r....-
,,30 29:: 28 27 26 25 30 : 29 " ':f~~!1,.,Ew.C3.0.c,& A. ~~~~~~
,,:: æ '~~/- AREA.::'" '
,,:: :: I " -:: 1$1 ===--f'/Áf'HouBrON,TX/ rI· .1
" + r--~ + - + - ~I¡¡' -" MILNE POINT UNIT
" 0 - .. "'
" I ~ : ,ª " HaRTH SLOPE, ALASKA
" 3 1 3,2: 33 34 35 36 3 1 ="1 S 32 " ~ . 2 M Il E S
" CON aco : .. "
" ADL-25517 lET AL =ADL-25906 2560 AO ADL-2S518 2560 AC 'ADL-28231 $55 AC '\
\, 2235 AC. 320 AC.: ',' ..' "
1'7/.1 ,¡',/,., J /, //,¡, ;~"Y:;IY~H~PY~'Y ~;.y.u)~I'y~'y~I~~~)ljJ!)~.9 ~ J; J... ~
(
¡
I
~
(
T73N·R9£
, a
(.
--'
SECTION C
Operators/Surface Owners
20 AAC 25.402(c} (2)
The surface owners and operators within the area of this area injection order and
extending 1A mile beyond the boundary (excluding Conoco) are:
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
Attn: Jim Eason
3601 C Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
BP Exploration Alaska Inc.
Attn: Pete Zseleczky
P.O. Box 196612
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6612
ARCO Alaska Inc.
Attn: Jim Ruud
P.O. Box 100360
Anchorage, Alaska 99510-0360
Texaco Exploration
Attn: Ms. E.H. Nelson
550 W. 7th Ave., Ste 805
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3375
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Attn: Dale Santii
11111 S. Wilcrest
Houston, Texas 77099
Amerada
Attn: P.E. Bacon
1202 Louisiana, Ste 700
Houston, TX 77002-5681
Exxon Co. USA
Attn: Stuart Gustafson
P.O. Box 196601
Anchorage, Ak 99519-6601
4
~
'=-"'2"!.~
SECTION D
Affidavit
20 AAC 25.402(c} (3)
Affidavit of P. M. Shannon
STATE OF ALASKA
THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
I, P. M. Shannon, declare and affirm as follows:
1. I am over 19 years of age. I am employed by Conoco Inc. as a Supervising
Reservoir Engineer. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth in
the affidavit.
2. On ~af, i; ! f1¡ . the surface owners/operators listed in Section C were
provided a copy of this permit application.
DATED at Anchorage, Alaska this
3,t:!
day of ~ ,1991.
I! ~ 4-d~
P. M. Shannon
Subscribed and affirmed before me at Anchorage, Alaska on ¥ · ~ , 1991.
:d-~A' ~
Nótary Public in and for the
State of Alaska
My Commission eXPiref/JILl~ 199 5'
5
.--
---
----
.-~'
-.---
SECTION E
Description of Operation
20 AAC 25.402{c) (4)
Approval is requested to inject water into the Milne Point Unit - Schrader Bluff Pool to
enhance recovery of oil and gas. Additional methods of enhanced oil recovery may be
used in the future. Future injection wells will continue to be designed, constructed,
operated, and monitored to ensure the injected fluid is entering the oil reservoir. All wells
will be maintained in a condition to ensure that neither hydrocarbons nor injection water
exit the Schrader Bluff Pool and enter other strata.
6
.-
--
--
.~
SECTION F
. Pool Information
20 AAC 25.402(c) (5)
The Schrader Bluff Formation in the Milne Point Unit is classified as the Schrader Bluff Oil
Pool within the boundaries of the Milne Point Unit. The Schrader Bluff Oil Pool is defined
in AOGCC Conservation Order No. 255 as the strata that correlate with the accumulation
found in the Conoco Milne Point Unit A-1 (formerly Conoco Milne Point Unit #1) well
between the measured depths of 4,174 and 4,800 feet. Figure F-1 is a type log that
shows the Schrader Bluff sands in the Milne Point Unit A-1 well. Figure F-2 is a subsea
depth structure map of the top of the uppermost Schrader Bluff Pool sand, that is the NA
sand.
7
FIGURE F-1.
SOURCES: WERNER (1987. 1981)
~ SCHRADER
~ BLUFF
~
o
o
--------..
PRINCE
CREEK
SAGAVAN-
IRKTOK
GP. FORMATION
FORMAL
NORTH SLOPE
SANDS
SAK
WEST
sequence
mudstone/
SANDS
UGNU
INFORMAL
KUPARUK
RIVER UNIT
shale
M
B SANDS L
o
W
C E
~R
"'"5 ~
13 N
.ç. --c-
~, ~ SANDS.
1- F
~ A
L
o
W
E
R
o
B· SANDS
u.
.---.
u
p
P
E
R
L
SANDS
K
SANDS
INFORMAL
MILNE POINT
UNIT
TERMINOLOGY
'-/
-..
~~~:~~~'. ...
. I .~~~
4~·-"'-"
-----......
~
..{
:.~~
A
B
~A
..
~ B
..
C
D
A
¿!
.--
..
'i2:-
~
-==v-
~
RES
SP
TYPE LOG
MILNE PT. UNIT
A-l
._-:~
m
~
o
~
(.)
<
f-1
~
~
u
-?-
~
~
<C
~
f-i
~
r:q
~
GR
AGE
t
Uï
~
.\ . \ ~
?~ ~~
6
\ " )
"1~
. ~ _ ErLEEN nAI
(
-~-
BEE-HEY 1
Å
(
~
1\
~.,
~
6'e
(7
~ I
Ò-&.' ; ,\RJOHOE 1 \
f? \ J _ ,j. ~ c \ _I
FIGURE F-2.
.. - I
I
~-
-.
\
.\
. ...,
"'-
:&. ~I .II.
I'"
lVi.l ~ 1 ~ L I l ) ~ 11' ~ ' r i
TOP OF NA STRUCTURE
\
\v~ ...l\ßøø
~ee--/
"
'~ . ~-G:6øe
7e" "... _ _ ,~
" "'" "'-, At¡ØØ C\ \~
';.-;L-5 '~<eJ ~
- ~-=t._I.-:! L -:-6 -
L - 3 ÅL - Ú~
L-~
- .,
, - \
- '\- ~........ ~
,(\ ?.
I V~ ,$t9
~ee e\
~J. "', .
í.Y . v>
~ -<-e
J6'\. &e
.~~
,
U~~~'l'm
G
C_'
'~
SECTION G
Geological Information
20 AAC 25.402(c) (6)
The stratigraphy of the late Cretaceous age Schrader Bluff Formation is depicted in Figure
F-1, which is the type log from the Conoco Milne Point Unit A-1 well. The three columns
on the right side of this diagram show the different terminology schemes applied to these
sands. At Milne Point, Conoco and its partners informally divide the Schrader Bluff into
J
two intervals: N andO.These intervals contain a total of seven reservoir sands which
vary in thickness from 5 to 40 f~et.
At Milne Point, an erosional surface lies atop the Schrader Bluff. This surface separates
the late Cretaceous age, shallow marine shelf and distal deltaic sediments of the Schrader
Bluff from the early Tertiary age, delta plain clastics that lie above.
Figure F-2 is a generalized NA structure map for the Milne Point Unit showing locations
where wells intersect the NA horizon. The regional structure of the Schrader Bluff sands
is a homocline that dips between 1 and 2 degrees toward the northeast. Within the Milne
Point Unit, these sands lie between 3,600 and 4,600 feet subsea. Two sets of normal
8
-
'--
SECTION G
Geological Information (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c) (6)
faults cut the Schrader Bluff: one trending north, and the other trending northwest.
Displacement along these faults ranges from 30 to 150 feet, and averages about
50 feet. Two-thirds are downthrown to the west and south.
Reservoir quality of the Schrader Bluff ranges fr()1'T'I good t() very good.. n The tlNtI interval
contains very fine to finenn,grained sandstQn~n éllJcI siltyuªªndstone (litharenite and
feldspathic sublitharenite) beds that range in thickness from~?.t() 33 feet. They have an
average porosity of 25 percent and an average permeability of 630 millidarcies. OA and
OB consist of very fine grained sandstone and silty sandstone (litharenite) beds that are
between 20 and 40 feet thick. These two beds have an average porosity of 26.5 percent
and an average permeability of 280 millidarcies.
The confining zone above the Schrader Bluff Formation consists of a mudstone and
siltstone sequence that ranges from 10 to 65 feet in thickness. OA is separated from NE
by a ~O to 50 foot section of mudstone and siltsone. The lo~e!nnç()f'lfining zone for the
Schrader Bluff is 2,000 feet of Seabee shale.
9
H
'~'
SECTION H
Well Logs
20 AAC 25.402(c) (7)
All openhole logs from wells in the MPU are sent to the Commission as the logs are
completed. A type log for the MPU is included as Figure F-1.
10
1
-
~
SECTION I
Casing Information
20 AAC 25.402( c) (8)
Typical wells are cased and cemented in one of two formats, as shown in Figures 1-1 and
1-2. Schrader Bluff Pool Wells, Figure 1-1, have 7 inch casing and cement sheaths across
the subject interval. Kuparuk River Pool wells, Figure 1-2, have 7 and 9 5/8 inch casing
and cement sheaths across the Schrader Bluff Pool. Future wells will be cased and
cemented in essentially the same manner.
20 AAC 25.412(a}: Injection wells will be cased with safe and appropriate casing and
tubed to prevent leakage, and will be cemented to protect oil, gas and freshwater
sources.
20 AAC 25.412(b): Current wells are cased and cemented in accordance with 20 AAC
25.030 and all production casing is pressure tested to 15g_Q_J~_si prior to completing the
well. Future wells drilled for injection of fluids will be cased, cemented, and pressure
tested in conformance with 20 AAC 25.030.
11
·.....__f
SECTION I
Casing Information (continued)
20 AAC 25.402{c} (8)
20 AAC 25.412(c): Wells to be converted from production to injection will be retested
to a surface pressure of 1500 psi or 0.25 psijft multiplied by the true vertical depth of the
casing shoe, whichever is greater. This will not subject the casing to a hoop stress that
will exceed 70% of the minimum yield strength of the casing. If the pressure declines
more than 10% within 30 minutes, then corrective measures will be taken to achieve a
satisfactory pressure test before initiating injection.
20 AAC 25.412( d): Injection wells will be equipped with tubing and packer to isolate the
injection interval. The minimum burst pressure of the tubing will exceed the maximum
surface injection pressure by at least 25%.
20 AAC 25.412(e): Sufficient notice will be given so that commission representative(s)
may witness casing pressure tests.
12
--
.!,~
Injector
Pool
Bluff
TypìCQl SchrQder
(All Depths
TVD)
........... of. +,~V~V"V"'V·V-V·V"V4V·V·'
"++..+..-++7VVVV~Vvvvv
~ .. -+ + .vvvvvvv~vV'
......... +-.JVVVV1IiVVVVV
.. ... ... ... . v v v V v:v V" V 'V'
.+..."'..."...'" ~ v v v v v v v v v V
... .. .. + VVVVV"I7Vvv,,"'
- + + + ;rvvvvvvvvvv
..'" .. ... ........ +. VV V V V V V 'V V "9' ""
+ + + +7VVVVVVvvvv
.. ... .. .. 'VVVVVVVV"YV"
_ .... ... ..... + +"!'1 V 9 V V V V V V V V
.. .. .. ... vvvvv~vvv"t
_ .. ... .. IilVVVV VVVV
.. .. .. of'VVVVV ""V"
+...+.........+."1VVVV'Ç
~+++.vvvv"V
... ..... +i1VVvv"",
I-.+.·.+.'vvvvv
... ........ ,i:1VVVV'f!';,
++......vvvvv
....++...+++vvvvv~
....... vvvvv
.. .. .. +'1VVO'V1:
......... vv.vvv
...+.......++I7VVVV~
++++QVVVV
... ... ... .. çvvvv'Ç
...+........+.... VVVVV
... .. ..... +I;rVVvv'\
~........ -vvvvv
... ... ... +I1VVvv,,"
'".............++ VVVVV
.. ... .. .. .qvvvv~
.. .. .. -+ 9VVVV
,..++........+...~vvvv'\
......... vvvvv
... .. .. +41;1 V V V V '\
+.."'...+..+. vvvvv
Þ-......+9VVVV~
.......+vvvvv
.. ... ... .. 'Q"vvvv~
~"+"'4+++ vvvvv
oJ ... .. ..Q'vvvv~
~+"'+Þ-vvvvv
+ + ... +9'vV'vv'\
;";v.l.v;~ vvvvv
VVVVVVVVVV'I.
7VVVV~Vvvvv
VVVVVVVVVV\
7VVVV,\;Vvvvv
vvvvvvvvvV"<
7VV....V...vvvvv
VVVVVVVVVV\
~vv'Vv,...vvvvv
VVVVV~vVV\
7VV<VV VVVV
vvvvv vv't
I1VV'VV'Ç " . .
vvvvv
:t'vV'YV'Ç
~...............,............. ~
vvvvvvvvvv"+ + + +
CeMented to surfo.ce ...... qvVvVvVvvVVvVVVVVvVv~ 4:":":":
", v v V v v V Q V V V v.... .... .... ....
-"qVVVVVVVVV'" .. .. .... .
VvV~~VvVvVvVvVvVvVvVI :..: ..:..:.
VVVVVVVVVV..... .. .. ..
~vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv~:..:..:..:
'VVVVVVVVVV~ .. .. ..
13 3/81, S4 tI/f1:, K-SS, Veld vvvvvvvvvvv"...............
·vv~_v~vvvv:v .. .... .. ....
115' VVVvQ':"vvvvvvvvvV: ..: + : +: +
7f1VVV~... .. .. ..
vvvvv'" .. .. ..
7VVV9V....... ..
vvvvv#................·
7VVVV~ .. .. ..
vvvvv1......... ..
7vvvvr...............
VVVVV\ .. .. ..
IVVVVV..........
vvvvv" .... .. ..
'vvvvvvvvvvf : ... : ..: .. :
7QV'OVV-- .. .. ....
vvvvV1 .............+
7VVVQv'+ + + ..
vvvvv.... .. ... ..
7 V' V V V v,. ... .. .. ... .. .. ..
Diesel 1800' - 0' _.._ 7VVVVVVvvvv. + +............
"-..-.._.. QVVVV'..........
PerMafrost C CeMent -··-.~~v~vV(~:·"':''''>
...... lVVVVV........
....... V V V V V ,. + .. .. .. .. .. ....
7VV'O'Vv\" .. ... ..
VVVVV'" .. .. ..
.......·......·~vvvvVVVVVv:. .. :...:..:..
rv... v v v v .... .. ... ..
'0 v"V V v..... .. ... +
7 V V ~v 'V..............
.. -.. _. __lvV vvvv v vò;,~:VvVVVVV"Ç
PerMo.frost E 1800' - 0' V-V·VVVQV~vv"\
7VVVVVVvvvv
VVVVVI1VVVQ1;
7VVVVvvvvvv
VVVVVI1VVvv,,\
7VVQVVVVVvv
vvvVVVVVVV1;
7VV~V VVVQV
vvvv VVVV1;
7VV VVVVV
VVVVV1;
vvvvv
VVVVV\
... ... + ...
+ + ... +
+ + + +
... ... -+ +
.... + + +
+ .. + of-
.. + + of-
.. .. + +
.. + + +
.. + .. +
"-"_.'_ of- + + ..
-.¡:-.......-.. ..
+ .. .. +
+ .. .. +
.. .. of- ..
.. .. + +
-:::;~:.~. --.--
'Wells Equipped 'With
PerMafrost C CeMent
5000 psi AP I
Tree
Arct~ Pack Downsqueeze
1800'
2400'
-,
PerP"lo.fros-t
1800'
CeMented to surfo.ce
-..--.-.--.-- ..----..-
Clo.ss G 2400' -1800'
9 S/8~ K-S~ 36 ~/f~ Btts
2400'
+ + .. +
.... .... + ..
+ ... ... ..
... + ~ ..
... ... .. ..
... .... ... of-
.. .. ... +
.... ... ... +
.. ... ... +
... ... + ..
... .. ... ..
... ... .... +
.. .... .. +
.. .... .... +
... .... ... ..
.... + + +
+ .... -+ ...
.... ... ... +
... ... ... +
Mud
.-..-..-
2 7/81, 6.5 ~/ft, L -80 Tubing
'VVVVV .... v.... V V
vvvvv~ ~vvvv~
·vvvvv 'VYVVV
vvvvv~ ~vvvv~
.-..-..-..-..- ovvvvvZ Z....VYVV
··~vv....v..3 ·.I1V<VVV~
·vvvvv VYv....v
VVVVV v~vv~
_:..:!I'.'lZ..VJU1 _ _ x.Y..."f_'V.:Y__
vvvvv, VVVVV'I.
-·v·".-v-vv - - ...........9-"VJiW.-
VVVVV\ VVVVV\
-;v'vv-vv - - y·~;.-vv·-
- 9-V~' 9 ~ - - ~y...q... .rr-~-
·Vvv~v ~?y~V
-QV"'~¡o"VQ~ - - oi""vv·vv,,:-
"vvvvv y.y~V
vvvvv' ~vvvv,
~:v:v~:v:v:\
3300'
Ugnu K, L, M-So.nds
3800'
SBP N & O-So.nds
4100'
Packer @ 3700'
-------..----..-.--..-
-..-..-
.-..-..-
_.._..__._.._.4____.._
Perfs
Class G CeMent 4350' - 2800'
----..-.--..-..-
500' o.bove Ugnu K -So.nd
7', 26 #/ft, L -80, Btts, 4350'
TD 4350J
I-I
Figure
TypiCQl KUPQrUk \Jell
(All Depths TVD)
,,··......·"..·..r........ ~
V'O'~VVVV9VV'''''''''' -+
vvvvv""vv'VvV"'..............·
VVVVVVVVVV\ .. .. .. .
vvvvVVVV9VV.. ~ . ..
vvvvv'Vvvvv-...·..·.....·
vV..Jl-vvvvvvvv. .. .. .. .
__ ·V \' 1;1 V vv v v v v '.. .. .. ..
vvvvV","VVVV9"> .. .. ..
. v V" v v v v v v v,........·.....
vvvvvvvvvvv...... ..
vV'Q'''V'vvvvvv''' .. .. ..
13 3/8", S4 tllft, K-SS. Veld vvvvvvvvvvv,..............
-vvv;:avvvvv .. .. .. ..
vvvv vvvvV\......'
vv '1V'O'vv'''+++
rvvvvvÞ'......+.·...
vvvvv'- .. ... ..
'VV'9VV'" .. ... ..
vvvvv'..·...........·
7VVVV9\ .. .. ..
vvvvV'" .. .. ..
Ivovvr......·.....
V9VVV\ .. .. ..
'vvvvv...... ..
vvvvv· .. .. ..
. . -4;vvvV¿~f :..: .. :.. :
1VVVVV· ~ ..
VVQVV' ..........+
7VVVVv'.... ... ..
vvvvv~....""..~
7VVVVVVvvvv
VVVVV7VVVV..
. 7VVVVVVvvvv
......... .VVVVV7vvvv..
~~ Vv Vv Vv Vv Vv VVVV v..
IVVVv-Jlvvv....v
VVVVV7VVVV..
IVVVVVV~VV
VVVVV7VVVV..
7vvvvvvvv........
7V.Nv VVVv"7 VvVVVv'fT...,"'V....
CeMented to surface ___.' - 7VVVVVVVVVV7VVvVVV....vv..
VVVVVVVVVV'l:
PerMafrost E CeMent Lead ~v~~~:~:;:v~
7vvvvvvvv....v
'V''VVVV7VVVV't
7VVVVV"'VV""V
vvVvv;rvvvv~
7VVVVvvvvvv
VVVVV:7VVvv,<
7VV~V ",vv""""
vvvv vvvv,<
7VV vVVVV
vvvvv,",
vvvvv
vvvvv,<
.. + .. ...
.. .. .. +
.... ... .. +
.. .. .. ..
.... .. ... ...
.. .. ... ...
... .. ... ..
.. .. .. ..
.. ... .. 4-
.. .. .. +
. :. -.-..... ..
.. . .. +
.. .. ... ...
.. .. .. ..
.. + .. +-
.. + .. +
. ... + +
.... + ... +
+ . . . . .. + ~ V~V·V~V"'9 ~v·v~v..v ·v·,
-.".4o..·.'7VVVVVV'\"VVV
~ ... .. . . 'f1 V V V V;V V V V v'
... .. + ...;rvvv.,""VVV.V
...4o .. 'VVVVVV,,"V"9"
.+4o+..·.·,vvvvvvvvvv
+ . .. + vvvvvvvvvv'"
. .. .. ...;rVVVVVVVVvv
......+.+.+ VVVVVVV'\'V'9'
.. + + +?VVVVVvvvvv
.. ... + ... ~vvvvvvv"'vv'
..... ... .. .. ... .. .,;r V V V V V V V V V V
.. + . + VV.V'V~"''9''''''
. + .. ... -7VVVV VVV'\I'
....·++VVVVV ...."
....++.....+·+~VVVV~
,.. ..... .. ;VVVV'v
+ +.... +:t'VVV'9''\
...+......+.' vvvvv
I- + ... .. O'V'VV'9''Ç
++.....VVVVV
1-.+...........I1VVVV'\
I- ... ...... vvvvv
... ... . +I7VVVV1t
....... vvvvv
1-........·..+;:1VV'Vv~
.. + + + VVVVV
I- ... ... .. ","VVVV'Ç
."'...+~...+: VVVVV
.. ... .... +-Q'VVVV'\
.. ~'Y -4w . .... v v v v v
VVVVV"'VVVV~
'JVVVVÇVVVVV
VVVVV"'VVVV~
1VVVV'<1VVVVV
VVVVV'07VVVV\
7VVVVÇ VVVVV
VVVVV'07VVVV'\
:7VVVVÇ VVVVV
VVVVV'07VVvv,<
1VVVV,"VVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV'\
7VVVV,"VVVVV
VVVVV7VVV",,\
"7VVVV<;VVVVV
VVVVV7VVVV,\
:7VVVV,"VVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV\
7VVVV<i:"VVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV\
:7VVVVÇ '\I'VVVV
VVVVVVVVVV'<
.3VVVVÇ"VVVVV
VVVVVVVVVV\
7VVVV<i:"VVVVV
VVVVV&VVV'<
;rvvvv VVVV
VVVVV VV\
7VVVV<;, . - -
VVVVV
:7VVVVç
..... ... .... ..
... ... .... .....
+ ... .... +
.. ... .... ...
... .. .... ...
.. ... ... +
... ... ... ..
... .. .... ..
... .. .... ..
.. .. ... ...
... .. . ..
.. + .. ..
... .. .. +
... .. .... ..
.. ... .. of-
.... ... ... ...
+ ... .. ..
. ... ... ...
.. .... .... ..
CeMented to surfnce
PerMnfrost C
-'
115'
Arctic Pack Downsqueeze
Diesel 1800' 0' _"
PerMafrost C CeMent
1800' - 4500' ......... .
~
\.,felt equipped with
API 5000 pSi tree
.........
_.._.._-~-
-..-.--..-
Class G CeMent Tail
9 S/8~ K-5~ 36 ~/f~ Btts
4500'
_.__.._.~-
Mud
.--..-
Cla.ss G CeMent 7500'
/
6000'
·VVVVV YVYVV
vvvvv~ RVVVV~
'vvvvv VyvVV
vvvvv~ vvvvv~
'vvvvv ""vvvv
~vv.;?vvvvv~ "VVyVVVyVv'\
vvvvv, vvvvv~
- '7v~vv,,;V'~" - _. . Nv""....V..-
.' 'vvvvv VYVVV
. /-. ·~vY.l:lv~·· - -. .""",vvV'y"'Vvv'\··-
vvvvv~ vvvvv~
·vvvvv ~y~VV
. ·VVQV-V,·· - - - 'vvvvV-~'
'vvvvv YVVVV
V9VVV' ~vvvv,
. V v Q'ov,¡ _______________ "",,,:,:" V V
.v'Vvvv~~."v"fT~V"'\
Perfs
Perfs
7', 26 ~/ft, L-80, Btts, 7500'
TD 7500'
Figure
I -2
7000'
7150'
7200'
Perr1Qfrost
1800'
4100'
Schro.der Bluff Pool
N & O-Sands
4400'
Middle KUPQruk
Lower KUPQruk
:::r
.......~/
SECTION J
Injection Fluid
20 AAC 25.402(c) (9)
Water is to be injected to enhance hydrocarbon recovery at the MPU.
A. TYPE OF FLUID - Water
Analysis of Composition of Typical Fluid
1. Prince Creek Formation (Make up water) - Figure J-1 a and J1 b.
2. Kuparuk River Formation - Figure J-2a and J-2b.
3. Schrader Bluff Pool Formation (Well G-1) - Figure J-3a and J-3b.
Source of Fluid - The primary source of injection fluid is from water supply wells
produced from the Prince Creek Formation. Produced water from Kuparuk River
and Schrader Bluff Pool oil producing wells is reinjected ~y commingling it on the
surface with Prince Creek water.
Estimated Maximum Amount to be Injected Daily - 40,000 BWPD
13
~\
/ '~/
,,\ '
~:<0- /
~«'
{; tì~//
'-
SECTION J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c) (9)
Compatibility With Formation and Confining Zones - Water sensitivity tests on
core samples showed no significant problems with formation plugging or clay
swelling. Prince Creek, Schrader Bluff Pool, and Kuparuk formation water are
compatible with the receiving and confining zones as noted in Figure J-4. The
Milne Point Central Facility Pad (CFP) will process the produced and injected
water. Scale and corrosion inhibition chemical treatment takes place at the CFP.
Scale and corrosion monitoring will continue with operation of the Schrader Bluff
Pool. Treatment will be varied to maintain optimum water injector operation and
ultimate hydrocarbon recovery.
B. TYPE OF FLUID - Miscellaneous water (including non-hazardous surface water)
and associated surfactants/solvents used in the washing and cleaning of the
facility, equipment within the facility, motor vehicles and other items related to the
production of oil at Milne Point. Volumes will be very low and should not exceed
10 bbljday.
14
~-~!
SECTION J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c) (9)
Analysis of Composition of Fluid - Clean-up water with minor amounts of
surfactants / solvents.
Source of Fluid - Potable surface water used in clean-up operations.
Estimated Maximum Amount to be Injected - 10 BPD.
Compatibility with Formation and Confining Zones - Full compatibility with fresh
water. Miscellaneous water will be diluted to very small percentage of the injection
stream.
15
800'39~d 0000000000000 30000
--
.''"-.r'
5Þ:0{ {5. L2 9n~
CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORA TORIES OF ALASKA, INC.
A-~
I ~.~.~::~_ \
:.J ..--A1'Oftte.
,
5633 8 Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99518
~ .~ . ,. ~
TELEPHONE
(907) 562·2343
WATER ANALYSIS REPORT
OPERATOR Conoco ~ I nc.
WELL NO.
FIELD KAPARUK
COUNTY
STATE Alaska
REMARKS & CONCLUSIONS:
Barium
Strontium
Iron
Cations
Sodium .............
Potassium. . . . . . . . . . .
Calcium. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Magnesium. . . . . . . . . .
Iron ................
mgll
881
6.2
93
18
meq 11
38.32
0.16
4.64
1.48
----
Total Cations ....... . .
44.60
Total dissolved solids, mg/l . . . . . . . . . .
NaC' equivalent, mg/l .............. _
Observed pH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2567
2549
7~85
1991 LAB NO. 91.4113-2
DATE August,
LOCATION
FORMATION
INTERVAL
SAMPLE FROM
MAKE-UP WATER \>t-\'J\.c.e ~jr~e~
~þ
,
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
5.4
1.6
0.36
fAC-£,-
,
Anions
Sulfate. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chloride. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Carbonate. . . . . . . . . . .
eJcarbonate ........ .
Hydroxide. . . . . . . . . . .
meqlt
mrll)
NO 1
- 1500
---
42.30
--~~
_ ._14~
Total Anions. . . . . . . . . . __ 44.60
Specific resistance @ 680 F.:
Observed .......... _...-1..2 ohm-meters
Calcutated ......... __.g_~~ ohm·meters
WATER ANALYSIS PATTERN
Scale
MEQ per Unit
Sample above described
._~
I
1
f
t! Cf
PI'
¡
~ i Í L
~ l : t
.:t: HC01
! i : ~
¡i'
I, .
,. ,
! .---+-L
..~ . ,) so.
" 1 ¡ . ·
¡ j! II
¡.¡ ~ ¡
.. ,.,i cOJ
· ¡ 1'1' ..
I Ii
. . ¡I
i' ~ 11;:
I . ::
Na C. 10 Na
;. I
, . 'I !(
Ca \ HC03 1 Ca ~ !.
. I
( "', I ·
~ :.1
Mg ~ I f so. 1 Mg i I
'1 I
J
Fe -II I f' '. CO] Fe
d 1 1 1
1 I
11 I . ! ' #'
! I
(Na value In above graphs Includes Na. K. and ll)
NOTE: MOll = Milligrams per Uter Meqfl - MUflgrams equfvalent per mer
FTGTTRF. .T - 1;:)
L00 . 3·~:Hjd 000000001210000[ ~10000
.~-
r~
20:ÞI Ib~ 92 9n~
""-
CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORY
A DIVISION or: COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
5633 e STREET ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 00518 TELEPHONE (907) &32·2343 FAX: (007) ~1'6301
IMlLISIS REPORt ay SAWPLt for WOR&ord.rt 37351
D4t. a.pòrt Print.d: lUG 26 ~1 t 12:38
!-..Iftt Sa.ph ID1 KUPARœ WAne.
WSID :UA
( - -.ttete4l . tu:. .
. ,1,td lUG 13 91 t 16: 10 hu.
r~.(T.avith :1S 1£Q01RED
CUeøt ~ :COIOCO IHC
Cl1.nt teet :COIfOCOP
no . ro I JOW! &fiClIVIO
&eq I
OIclu.4 By :3ItVl DECaR!
r. ,.U CotIþht.d. :100 21 91 :s.ncl ".portl ta:
œr.tor, ~uitor :st~tHE ~ID! l)COMOCO ttiC
.1eüecS ., : 2)
. ~ ..
~~-~_..w....._...._.... _____ _ w....._._......_..........~~_........._~.........._._..._.M._e............................___
ChelÛab l-tf .: 91·U13 Lab Sap1 ID~ 1
)(a.tux: otB!&
fetäntt.r t..t.d
k..u1t
·-----___-~_.___4___________________________________________________________________~______~-_________________
~thod
Ulovablt
tlll1t1
ROOTIXE OILFIELD WAtKR
ICP-2S ELEMENT 5CAN
ALUKIMUJ(
nSEttle
BUtUt(
nlYLLlUW
IOROH
CiDKIUM
CALCI1.fl(
CBaOKJUM
COPPER
IkOR
LEAD
ICAGMESHDf
NlNGANESE
NICUL
PBOSPIIORUS
POtASSIUM
SELlMIUK
SILICON
SILVEa
SODIUM
staoNTIUW
rIM
VAHADItß(
UMC
URCONIUK
n/~
Q.l0
Jro(0.10)
20
)(D(O.OS)
18
1(1)(0.10)
60
ND(O.05)
lID(o.OS)
0.3~
t(Ð(O.10)
24
{LOSS
MOeo.os)
1.6
42
MD(O.l)
17
tlD(O.OS)
6S00
S.CJ
0.21
HD(O.OS)
MD(0.05)
KD(O.OS)
Unit.
n/.
ag/1
w¡/l
rtIlI1
"4/1
.¡/l
IIfI/1
~/l
øq/l
.g/l
Jr1J/l
.;/1
øq¡1
"9/1
req/l
.¡/l
fIIJ/l
-.g/l
erq/l
DIlll
øq/l
11II3/1
119/1
-J/l
mq/l
r-t1/1
FIGURE J - Ib
It! 2()o.1·ICP
!PA 2.00.1*tCf
£PA 200.1tlCP
BfA. 200.T'lcr
If A 200.1·ICP
If A 200.7+ICf
If A 200.1"lcr
IPA 200.1+¡Cf
£PA 200.7&rCp
ErA 200.7-rcp
If A 200.7a1Cf
EfA 200.7"ICf
!Pi 200.1·ICr
EPA 200.1&1Cr
If A 200.Y+rCl'
irA 200.7· ICP
IPA 200.1+ZCP
EPA 200.7*Icr
f:PA 200.1"Icr
EPl 200.7+1cr
IPA 200.7&ICr
ErA 200.7+ICP
EPA 2otJ.1"'ICP
I:PA 200.7&I<:P
!PI. 200.7·ICP
tPA 2OU.JetcP
nja
200'39~d 0000000000000G~0000
-
8Þ:01 15, L2 9n~
CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORA TORIES OF ALASKA, INC.
, . .
5633 8 Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99518
TELEPHONE
(907) 562·2343
WATER ANALYSIS REPORT
OPERATOR Conoco t roc.
WELL NO.
FIELD KAPARUK
COUNTY
STATE Al aska
REMARKS & CONCLUSIONS:
Barium
Strontium
Iron
Cations
Sodium ....... _ . . . . .
Potassium. . . . . . . . . . .
Calcium. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Magnesium. . . . . . . . . .
Iron ................
mgll
5896
42
60
74
meq/t
__.£56.46
1.08
2.99
__-L.~
-----
Total Cations. . . . . . . . .
262.50
Total dissolved solids, mgll . . . . . . . . .. _
NaC' equivalent, mg/l ..............
Observed pH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15130
14651
7.79
1991 lAB NO. 91.4113-1
KAPARUK WATER µ~~J) ~u.c:h~
SlCf-- ~
DATE August,
lOCATION
FORMATION
INTERVAL
SÄMPLE FROM
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
21
5.9
0.35
AnIons
Sulfate. . . _ . . . _ _ _ . . . .
Chloride. . . . . . . . . _ _ . .
Carbonate _ . . . . . . . . . .
Bicarbonate .. . . . . . . .
Hydroxide. . . . . . . . . . .
~)
BOUO
--
2250
Total Anions. . . . . . . . . .
meq¡f
225.60
36.90
262.50
Specific resJstance @ 68° F.:
Observed .......... ~ 45 ohm-meters
Calculated ... _ . . . . . o. 47 ~ ohm-meters
WATER ANALYSIS PATTERN
Scale
MEa per Unit
Sample above described
Na
CI
Ca
.. HCO;J
Mg>
,.
t
SO.
,I
IL·
l i- CO2
i
I
!
Fe
, I
,
I,
I!
._~-- ..
I
I
.j !
I j
!I
100
Na ~
¡
i
. .
I ; I
I ¡
,.,
10
Ca
I
I ¡
1
ì 1
..'( "
,. II
Mg ~ I,
1
Fe
'I
,L
IlL
~¡ .. ~' :
I !.
I I
I!
f t '
i: .
i
'I ;
, ! 4
.. 4 ,
,fj
I j
fl L..
(Na value In above g....phs 'nclud.. Na, K, and LI)
N(')TF'. '-Ant1 = Ulfll"r..m__ n..r IIt..r M....fI = Millin....... ..""Iv..I...t nð" I/t...
! i ; i
.: :
; :'
¡. . I
Iii
-I
II
I
I j I
I .
i; ,
,
I ~ ,
II I': ji 1:! J
I . ~ f . . .
, :: If : : ~ :
t j ..,.
t; f !:: .
I
r
- q
¡ I ~ ~ L
I':; ; i,
" . : ;
I;
, I .1
,í I:
!! .'1'
"1
: I t
'! I,
" I
r, . t
: f4
Ii
I .'
-' I ¡
¡
i '
f
CI
HCO;J
SO"
COJ
I
f
l
FIGURE .J - 2a
60.0.· 39tJd 0.0.000.00.0.0.00.0.P'· "10.0.0.0.0.
.~-
9 S. : 0. I I 6, L 2. 9 n tI
"-"
CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORY
A DIVISION OF COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FAX: (907) 561-5301
ANALYSIS REPORT IT 3ANPLE for WORIoldert 37351
Dett aeport Pr1nted: lUG 26 91 . 12:38
:l1lnt Saaplt ID:NW-UP WAtla ~\~,~ ~~~~"-- - ~0
-tISID : VA
Collected. . hra .
..ce1Ted lUG 13 91 . 16:10 bu.
......,tu..rnd with :18 &lQOlUD
Client NUIe :CONOCO lie
Client leet :OOMOCOP
BPO t PO t 110M! UCEIVlD
aeq t
OrdeItd Iy :stlVl DECURt
-¡nalJl11 Coøpleted :100 21 91 3.M a.portl to:
-¡:::::::::~~:~:~::~~~.........._-_..._.._............._..--~~.:::.............................__._.......
Chealab atf t: 914113 Lab Sapl ID: 2
Matrix: OTII!&
Paraø.ttt tilted
a..u1t
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method
Allowable
Liaib
BOUTIN! OILfIELD WAtER
ICP-2S ILEMEM1 SCAM
lLOOMUK
WlKIC
URIUN
BlRtLLIUK
loaON
C1DIŒ UK
CALCIUM
CBlOOU)(
COPPI&
lAOM
LEAD
MAGK!SIUM
WGAflSE
IlICOL
PHOSPHO!US
POnSSIUX
SILlIUQ)(
SILICOJ
SILVER
30Dm
stRONTIUM
TIM
VAMADIUM
UMC
1 !ReoMIUM
n/e
ND(O .10)
ND(O.10)
5.4
IID(O.OS)
MD{O.OS)
HD(O.10)
93
MD(O.05)
W(O.OS)
0.36
)(1)(0.10)
18
0.12
MD(O.CS)
IID(O.20)
6.2
n(O.IO)
4.2
ID(O.OS)
880
1.6
ID(O.IO)
ID(O.OS)
W(O.OS)
ID(O.OS)
Unitt
n/e
JIll/I
fill/I
w¡/1
114/1
fill/I
øq/l
DIl/I
øq/l
ttIJ/l
lIIJ/l
øq/l
w¡/1
"9/1
Jag/I
fflJ/l
w¡/1
fIIl/l
W¡/l
Jig/I
-.¡/l
JIIJ/l
fllJ/l
w¡/l
Ø/J/l
fItJ/l
~~, 1=:!r=!1:!
FIGURE J - 2b
BPA 2CO.78ICP
EP! 200.78ICP
!Pi 200.l-ICP
EPl 200.l-ICP
EPA 200.l8tCP
IPA 200.18ICP
EPl 200.18ICP
IP1200.1*ICP
!PA 200.7·ICP
EPl 200.7*ICP
EPl 200.7*ICP
!PA 200.1-ICP
£PA 200.7·ICP
IPi 200.l81CP
BPA 200.781CP
!P! 200 .1· rcp
IPA 2QO.7·ICP
IPl 200.1*ICP
¡fA 200.1·ICP
EFi 200.7·ICP
!Pl 200.7·ICP
IPA 200.1·ICP
!Pi 200.1·1CP
IPi 200.1·ICP
BPA 200.78ICP
IPl 200.7-ICP
n/a
Þ0Ø·39~d 0000000000000"00000
~~
~~
~' ,~\1,~
" 'r""X
~-~<I:.
T £ :.gJ-1_..I ~ ,__ ¿ª-__S~ n t}
.~
"" ----/
CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LA BORA TORIES OF ALASKA, INC.
P.O. BOX 4-1276
Anchorage, Alaska 99509
TELEPHONE
(907) 562-2343
ANCHORAGE INDUSTRIAL CENTER
5633 8 Street
WATER ANALYSIS REPORT
OPERATOR Conoco, Inc.
WELL NO. G1-MILNE POINT ~~
FIELD KAPARUK
COUNTY
STATE Alaska
_ DATE August,
- ~ LOCATION
FORMATION
INTERVAL
SAMPLE FROM
19 91 LAB NO. 91. 4113 - 3
REMARKS & CONCLUSIONS:
G1 PRODUCED WATER
Barium
Strontium
Iron
mq/l
O1g/1
rng /1
;t<-
9.9
5.4
ND(O.5)
Cations mg/1 meg/1 Anions mg/1 meg/1
Sodium . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. ... ... ... 7292 317.22 Sulfate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 0.27
Potassium. . . . . . . . . . . 160 4.10 Chloride. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9400 265.08
Calcium. . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 5.99 Carbonate . . . . . . . . . . .
Magnesium. . . . . . . . . . 130 10.69 Bicarbonate ......... 4430 72.65
Iron ... . ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. .. .. .. .. . Hydroxtde . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Cations ......... 338.00
Total Anions. .. . . . . . . .
338.00
Total dissolved solids, mg/1. . . . . . . . . .
NaC1 equivalent, mg/1 ..............
Observed pH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19297
18479
7.RO
Specific resistance @ 68c F.:
Observed ..........
Calculated ..... ~ . . .
0.39. ohm-meters
o . 39 ohm·meters
WATER ANALYSIS PATTERN
Scale
Sample above described M EQ per Unit
Na
\
~ \
\
.: . I
i /- / I
I r
: I
: /:
¡#Jþ, If.
"'..
.,
.'''~
'...,
I
i. I ¡I
Ca
Mg
Fe I
t II
,1
I, C1 100 Na ~
I
¡
! I HC03 10 Ca
I'
I
- ¡ SO" 1 Mg'
I
- f I C03 1 Fe ' ! i
II
I
j (
¡ HI
C1
! ;
¡
HC03
SO~
¡ C03
- Ii
; ! i J ~
L
,II I! .
(N. v.lue In .bov. graph. Include. Na. K. end l1)
NOTE: Mg'1 ;: MIIlIg(~m. per IItM Meq/1 = Milligram equlyalent per Iller
. . . . ... . _.
FIGURE J - 3a
ør0·38~d 00000000000001 10000
.. .. . ----
--
'"-"
~~:~1 _rs. L2 ~n~
CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL IABORATORY
A DIVISION OF COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FAX: (907) 581-5301
ANALYSIS REPORt BY SAMPLE for WORlorderl 31351
Date F..port Printed: lUG 26 91 . U:.O
""",Uem Suple ID:Gl MILNE PT - ~~ ~.{¿ \, "'~
mlo :01
"ollect.d . hr..
.ce1Ted AUG 13 91 . 16:10 bu.
'ruuETed with :AS REQUIUD
Client Ma.
Cl1ent Acct
IPO .
¡.q I
Ordtted By
:COIOCO IE
:COHOCOP
:St!VI DKC(ßT
PO t MOlE P.!ClIVlD
~
nalydl Coapl,ttG :1.00 21 91
~I.tory SuptrT1~or: IPHlH C. ID
le1..,ed " :
JIt
...........-..... .. . .- -...-....._._...................__._......~~._-.--.........--.............---....................
Chetûe.b &e£ I: 91~13 Lab SIIp1 ID: 3
Mattix: otlŒB.
ParoeteI t'lted
a..ult
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------
lOOTIMI OILfIELD ~T!&
ICP-2S !LEMEn SCAlf
lLOOMtD(
WEKlC
IAlIUM
tRILLIUM
10101
C1DNl(ß(
CALCIUM
CBROMIU)(
COPPER
1&011
LEAD
MlGM!SIUM
KAIGlN!SE
JlICUL
PBOSPHO&US
POTASSIUM
SELlIIUM
SILICOH"
sa VIR
SODIUM
mOM'ltUM
tIll
VAH1DIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
n/.
){D(1.0)
Jm(1.0)
9.9
lCD(O.S)
6.9
ND(1.0)
120
1D(0.05)
MD{o.OS)
)(DCo.OS)
MD(1.0)
130
IWCO.S)
)cDCO.S)
MD(2.0)
160
G(1.0)
3.7
)(D(O.S)
7700
S.4
){D(1.0)
)ß}(O.S)
IfD(O.S)
KD(O.S)
Unit.
n/a
ag/I
fIl/l
fllJll
rtq/l
fII/l
IIIJ/l
Wl/l
-.¡/l
W9/1
~/l
fttJ/l
JJt{1
w¡/l
w¡/l
fIIJ/l
ItIJ/l
1II/1
DJ{1
Wl/l
fJld/1
fIIJ/l
aq!l
aJ/1
DllJ/l
119/1
FIGURE J - 3b
~...._--
S.nd aepott. to:
l)coøoco lie
2)
IMthod
EP! 200.7·ICP
EPA 200.1cICP
!PA 200.7-1CP
1P1 200. 7*ICP
!P! 1.00.7*ICP
IPA 2oo.1*ICP
!fA 200. ?*ICP
IP! 200.1*ICP
IPl 200.7*ICP
EPl 200.1-1CP
IPA 200.1*ICP
U! 200.7*lCP
EPI 200.1*ICP
EPA 200.7cICP
EPl 200.7*ICP
IP1 2oo.7*ICP
IPl 2oo.1*1CP
IPl 200.1·ICP
EPA 2oo.1*ICP
EPI. 200.1cICP
EPl 200.1*ICP
!Pi 200 .1* ICP
IP1 200.1*ICP
!PA 200.7*ICP
!Pi 200.7*ICf
EPI 200.7·ICP
Allowable
Lillit.
n/.
200'39t1d
000000000000e 00000
r~
"-
8 Þ : 17 1 T 6, L2 9nlj
CHEMICAL & GEOLOGICAL LABORATORY
A OIVISION OF COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEER1NG CO.
,~---
-
5633 B STREET ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99518 TELEPHONE (907) 562-2343 FAX; (907) 5tH·5301
F(DERAL TAX 1.0. 936-0937920
Date Of Report: August 26, 1991
Date Analysis Completed: August 23, 1991
Chem Lab Reference Number: 91-4113-6
Client Sample ID: Composite Sample
Kuparuk Water. ~ake-up Water, G 1--~qua1_ Parts '\
(~~~v-\C) , (~f'<\C.~ ~~'~e.~7 C S~,^-rc..ð€r Blu-Ç+)
Langlier Index at 80. degrees F. + 1.23
LangJier Index at 80 degrees F. may indicate calcium carbonate seating
tend ency .
CompatibHty: Observations were made of sample composite at the
following intervals after mixing: 15 m1nutes; 4 hours; 24 hours.
Measurements were made of pH. color J and turbidfty. AU observations
were made at 70 degrees F.
SarrmLe 10 terva 1 Qtl Çofor c PG.U Iurbidity, NTU.
15 minutes 7.97 5 1.8
4 hours 7.85 5 1.8
24 hours 7.86 5 2.8
No significant precipitation wa3 noted.
Analyst: Peter 6ronikowski
Reviewed and Approved
~~on
Manager. Quality Assurance
FIGURE J - 4
.~
~
SECTION K
Injection Pressure
20 AAC 25.402(c) (10)
The estimated average wellhead injection pressure is 500 psig. This will be well below
the equivalent formation parting gradient. Note that the A-3 Step Rate Test was
terminated at an equivalent gradient of 0.66 psijft, Figure L-1. The well did not fracture
at the maximum test gradient.
The injection wells will be operated in such a manner that the bottomhole injection
pressure will not exceed the tested non-fracturing gradient of 0.66 psijft. The Operator
will supply the AOGCC with evidence of a higher non-parting gradient, in the form of a
Step Rate Injection Test or Fracture Stimulation Initial Shut-in Pressure, before increasing
the injection pressure above this prescribed limit. The maximum wellhead injection
pressures will be varied by well to account for formation depth variations across the field
to insure that formation parting gradient will not be exceeded. Schrader Bluff Pool true
vertical depth subsea tops vary from approximately 3400 to 4400 feet.
16
---L
'-
'-
SECTION L
Fracture Information
20 AAC 25.402(c) (11)
Normal water injection operations for the Schrader Bluff Pool will entail injecting below an
equivalent gradient of 0.66 psi/ft. Step Rate Injection Tests and fracture stimulation data
were used in determining the equivalent formation parting gradient.
Based on instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) data obtained prior to hydraulic fracture
stimulations of Schrader Bluff completions, the fracture gradient of the formation was
determined to range from 0.62 to 0.70 psi/ft. These fracture gradients were calculated
by the following formula:
F.G. = {ISIP + (O.052*P*H)} /H
where,
F.G. - fracture gradient, psi/feet
ISIP - instantaneous shut-in pressure, psi
P - density of injection fluid, ppg
H - true vertical depth of top perforation, feet
The ISIP data and corresponding calculated fracture gradient are summarized in the
attached table.
17
-~
--
SECTION L
Fracture Information (continued)
20 AAC 25.402{c) (11)
WELL
ISIP
(PSI)
833
1117
960
1000
911
934
781
754
974
FRAC
GRADIENT
(PSI/FT)
G-1
G-3
H-3
H-4
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
J-1
AVERAGE
0.64
0.70
0.67
0.68
0.66
0.67
0.63
0.62
0.68
0.66
NOTES:
1)
2)
ISIPs obtained from hydraulic fracture stimulations.
Frac gradients calculated based on top perforation.
One Step Rate Inject{Rn Test has been performed on a Schrader Bluff Pool Well. MPU
A-3 was extensively injection tested in November and December 1983. Table L-1
summarizes test results data and Figure L-1 is a graphical representation. Equipment
limitations did not allow continuing the test to higher pressures and rates. However, the
test results did indicate that the formation had not parted at a rate of 2140 BWPD with
top-perf pressure of 2769 psig, an equivalent injection gradient of 0.66 psi/ft. This test
indicates an injection gradient of 0.66 psi/ft will not initiate fractures. A Step Rate Injection
Test is regarded as a more accurate way of measuring injection parting pressure than
from fracture stimulation ISIPs.
18
Injection Step Rate Test
Schrader Bluff Pool - Milne Point Unit
MPU Well A-3
Test Top-Perf Equiv . Curve
Rate Pressure Grad Fit (
BPD PSIG psi/ft PSIG
0 1771 0.42 1775
302 1931 0.46 1923
605 2006 0.48 2071
970 2279 0.54 2250
1450 2569 0.61 2485
2140 2769 0.66 2822
Table L-1
(
In~ec:ion S:ep-Ra:e Tes~
Schrader Bluff Pool - Milne Point Unit
MPU Well A-3
Top-Perf I njection Pressure, psig
3000
· .
· ,
· ,
· ,
2500- ...................... .......¡ ................................J~!~-
: -----~ j !
200 0 ...=~~::1~~~..._..~i"""..."....."'.....,...,.,."..,.,··,·,·'··'·1·'·"'·,,··,·..·,",·,··,·,·,·,..····,,··,··.....".,..,..,..,..."...,.,......"...................,..............,..............'",......,...,.,.""",..
......."..... ""'"''''''
1500 _......
....."",,,..,...,,,......
...."....,............................,...,........,....
· ,
, .
· ,
, .
·,..,····,·,""',··,,·..··..,··..···..·,·....··,,·'.."'·1..··'.."......'.....'....'..."..."'..'..".'."""...'..'.!.........".",..",..,.""""
..,......,...."."...,.".
1 0 0 0 -,.........."",...."".."...
"....,.".",.."..".,¡.......,.".
.........,.................,..,.........,.".....".....".,....,.
, ,
, ,
· ,
, .
. . .. , , , . , , . . " . .. , . , , " . . .. .. . . , " . , . , . . '. " . . , , . , .. , . ... . .. , . ... , . " , . . .. . .. ..' , . . . . " . . . , . , . . . , , . , . , .. ~. . . . . .. . . . , . . . .. . . , , . . , , , . . . , , , , ". . . . . , " .. . .... . . . . , . .. .. ... .
500 -"".. ".. ".... , "...... " " " " "",, " "".""..
""",,,.....,,,,,,,.,,.
,........""....,..,......",....,....,..,.....,......
, ,
,...".""...,..............,.".".".",,\,.................................................,.....................'"''''''''''''
· ,
, ,
· ,
· ,
· .
i
...................................
o
o 500
1000 1500 2000
Injection Rate, BPD
2500
(
~
",I,,· Test Points
· Curve Fit
Figure L-1
y,
....,.,.-'
'.--
SECTION M
Formation Fluid
20 AAC 25.402(c) (12)
A Water Analysis for the Schrader Bluff Pool formation is included as Figures J-3a and J-
3b.
19
,~
!\
-"
SECTION N
Freshwater Aquifer Exemption
20 AAC 25.402 (c) (13)
It was the conclusion of AOGCC Aquifer Exemption Order No.2, July 8, 1987, that "Those
portions of freshwater aquifers lying directly below Milne Point Unit qualify as exempt
aquifers under 20 MC 25.440". The Milne Point Unit and Schrader Bluff Pool areas are
coincident.
20
o
-
----
SECTION 0
Hydrocarbon Recovery
20 AAC 25.402(c) (14)
Primary recovery, by natural drive mechanisms, from the Schrader Bluff Pool is estimated
to be 12 percent of the OOIP (original-oil-in-place). Secondary recovery, by waterflooding,
from the Schrader Bluff Pool is estimated to be an additional 9 percent of the OOIP.
21
~
......,..-"
-~
SECTION P
Mechanical Integrity
20 AAC 25.402(d) and (e)
All wells are pressure tested prior to completion, and all wells are in accordance with
25.402(d) and (e). If converted to injection, the casing will again be pressure tested in
accordance with 20 AAC 25.412(c).
Mechanical integrity of all Injection Wells will be demonstrated by the operator by
monitoring the pressure in the casing/tubing annulus during actual injection. The
casing/annulus pressure is then monitored on a weekly basis and recorded by the well
site operator. The monitored annulus pressure will be reported monthly on the Monthly
Injection Report (Form 10-406).
22
Q
·
~h~
-
SECTION Q
Wells within Area
20 AAC 25.402{h)
The wells within the area of review (Le., MPU) are shown on the plat (Figure B-1). To the
best of Conoco Inc. 's knowledge, the wells within the area were constructed in
compliance with 20 MC 25.030, and where applicable, abandoned to prevent the
movement of fluids into freshwater sources. Drilling plans, well casing and completion
records are available on Forms; 10-401 IIPermit to Drill", 10-403 IIReport of Sundry Well
OperationsU, 10-407 IIWell Completion of Recompletion Report and Logu.
23
'<
'-",.-'
.......~......--
SECTION R
Schrader Bluff Pool Area
Milne Point Unit
Conservation Order No. 255 ( July 2, 1990)
Umiat Meridian
T13N R9E Sections 13, 14, 23, and 24.
T13N R10E All Sections.
T13N R11E Sections 5,6,7,8,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,30,31 and 32.
The Milne Point Unit and Schrader Bluff Pool areas are coincident. An MPU plat with
Section, Township and Range is available as Figure B-2.
24
s
'-'
.--
SECTION S
Underground Injection Control Variances
20 AAC 25.450
Water injection will not occur into, through, or above a freshwater source or non-exempt
freshwater aquifer. Conoco Inc. requests one variance for Schrader Bluff Pool water
injection wells within the boundary of the Milne Point Unit.
A variance is requested from the cement bond log requirement of 20 AAC 25.030(g) (3).
Schrader Bluff Pool well completions (for both injectors and producers) have surface
casing set and cemented below fresh water bearing sands and production casing set and
cemented at TO. Schrader Bluff Pool injection wells will have radioactive tracer logging
performed on initial completion and subsequently on a periodic basis. This will verify that
injection water is entering only the Schrader Bluff Pool. Any indications of out of zone
water injection will result in immediate injection well shut-in. Remedial actions to correct
any problems will be implemented before return to water injection. Therefore, Conoco
respectfully requests a variance from 20 AAC 25.030(g) (3) for all Schrader Bluff Pool
wells which are completed in this manner.
25
¥~.
~O( )CO)
November 1, 1991
Conoco Inc.
3201 C Street, Suite 200
Anchorage, AK 99503-3999
(907) 564-7600
Alaska oil and Gas Conservation commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Dear Sirs:
step rate tests and pressure falloff surveys have been performed on
five waterflood injection wells in the Milne Point unit. The
objectives of this work were to determine formation parting
pressures and to calculate effective fracture lengths. This
information was used to verify any fractures induced by operating
at our current fieldwide pressure do not propagate far enough to
short-circuit the water flood. The results of this testing are
summarized below:
Measured Normal Calculated
Well Frac Press Operating Press Parting? Length
MPU B-8 6485 psi 6205 psi No 76 ft
MPU B-14 5735 psi 5605 psi No 87 ft
MPU C-15 5650 psi 5955 psi Yes 68 ft
MPU C-19 NIA 5982 psi Yes 58 ft
MPU E-5 6110 psi 6067 psi Yes 17 ft
We are apparently injecting above formation fracture pressure in
the C-Pad and E-Pad areas. However, fracture lengths calculated
from pressure falloff surveys indicate the water front is not being
bypassed by the relatively short fracture wings. Because of the
uncertainty involved in measuring actual formation parting
pressure, ~racture lengths were also calculated for the B-Pad
wells. These calculations also indicate the flood front is not
being bypassed. No changes to injection pressures are needed.
We will keep the Commission informed of the results of any
subsequent testing and fracture length calculations. Please contact
Jim Andrew at 564-7621 if you have any questions or need more
specific information.
Sincerely,
RE€EIVED
t};;:- /, /' '-r J
f .. ../ /----/.// ¿....' J
,_ /{. . .' ~ /C.2?o;¿.'-:;/
A. E. Hastings/
Director of External Affairs
NOV - 6 1991
Alaska Oil & Gas Cons. Commission
Anchorage
cc: DEH, File 500.21, Milne Point - DLW/WJS, VLH/HDS
'---~_...'
l CO r,.: CO )
Conoco Inc.
Suite 200
3201 C Street
Anchorage, AK 99503
(907) 564-7600
November 7, 1991
Mr. Blair Wonzel!
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3192
RE: Milne Point Unit - Schrader Bluff Pool
Area Injection Order Application
Dear Mr. Wonzel!:
Attached are the suggested modifications to the subject application, dated
September 3, 1991. Please replace the original pages 14, 15, 16 and 17 with the
attached pages.
Copies of these modifications have been sent to all interested lease holders listed
in Section C.
Please contact me at (907) 564-7615 if you have any questions or require additional
information.
Yours very truly,
'". -\. . .~ ~._. ~ .\- \.
.(~ /c --<.:.^---~~~.¡,-----J " ~0..
Steven L. Deckert
Senior Reservoir Engineer
RECEIVED
SLDj(lms)
File 500.21.02
NOV - 8 1991
Alaska Oil & Gas Cons. Co.mmlsß\on
AncbQraga
Attachments
cc: State of Alaska, DNR, Jim Eason
Arco Alaska Inc., Jim Ruud
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Tom Cook
BP Exploration Alaska Inc., Pete Zseleczky
Texaco Exploration, E.H. Nelson
Amerada, P.E. Bacon
Exxon Co. USA, Stuart Gustafson
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Dale Santii
OXY USA Inc., G.N. Buttram
.'--;:"~
--
SECTION J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402{C) (9)
Compatibility With Formation and Confining Zones - Water sensitivity tests on
core samples showed no significant problems with formation plugging or clay
swelling. Prince Creek, Schrader Bluff Pool, and Kuparuk formation water are
compatible with the receiving and confining zones as noted in Figure J-4. The
Milne Point Central Facility Pad (CFP) will process the produced and injected
water. Scale and corrosion inhibition chemical treatment takes place at the CFP.
Scale and corrosion monitoring will continue with operation of the Schrader Bluff
Pool. Treatment will be varied to maintain optimum water injector operation and
ultimate hydrocarbon recovery.
B. TYPE OF FLUID - Miscellaneous water (including non-hazardous surface water)
and associated surfactantsjsolvents used in the washing and cleaning of the
facility, equipment within the facility, motor vehicles and other items related to the
production of oil at Milne Point. Volumes will be very low and should not exceed
10 bbljday.
14
<.-~
--
SECTION J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c) (9)
Analysis of Composition of Fluid - Clean-up water with minor amounts of
surfactants / solvents.
Source of Fluid - Potable surface water used in clean-up operations.
Estimated Maximum Amount to be Injected - 10 BPD.
Compatibility with Formation and Confining Zones - Full compatibility with fresh
water. Miscellaneous water will be diluted to very small percentage of the injection
stream.
15
~~o?
'-
SECTION K
Injection Pressure
20 MC 25.402(c) (10)
The estimated average wellhead injection pressure is 500 psig. This will be well below
the equivalent formation parting gradient. Note that the A-3 Step Rate Test was
terminated at an equivalent gradient of 0.66 psi/ft, Figure L-1. The well did not fracture
at the maximum test gradient.
The injection wells will be operated in such a manner that the bottomhole injection
pressure will not exceed the tested non-fracturing gradient of 0.66 psi/ft. The Operator
will supply the AOGCC with evidence of a higher non-parting gradient, in the form of a
Step Rate Injection Test or Fracture Stimulation Initial Shut-in Pressure, before increasing
the injection pressure above this prescribed limit. The maximum wellhead injection
pressures will be varied by well to account for formation depth variations across the field
to insure that formation parting gradient will not be exceeded. Schrader Bluff Pool true
vertical depth subsea tops vary from approximately 3400 to 4400 feet.
16
~
'--
SECTION L
Fracture Information
20 AAC 25.402(c) (11)
Normal water injection operations for the Schrader Bluff Pool will entail injecting below an
equivalent gradient of 0.66 psi/ft. Step Rate Injection Tests and fracture stimulation data
were used in determining the equivalent formation parting gradient.
Based on instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) data obtained prior to hydraulic fracture
stimulations of Schrader Bluff completions, the fracture gradient of the formation was
determined to range from 0.62 to 0.70 psi/ft. These fracture gradients were calculated
by the following formula:
F.G. = {ISIP + (0.052*P*H)} /H
where,
F.G. - fracture gradient, psi/feet
ISIP - instantaneous shut-in pressure, psi
P density of injection fluid, ppg
H - true vertical depth of top perforation, feet
The ISIP data and corresponding calculated fracture gradient are summarized in the
attached table.
17
.~
--
SECTION J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402( c) (9)
Compatibility With Formation and Confining Zones - Water sensitivity tests on
core samples showed no significant problems with formation plugging or clay
swelling. Prince Creek, Schrader Bluff Pool, and Kuparuk formation water are
compatible with the receiving and confining zones as noted in Figure J-4. The
Milne Point Central Facility Pad (CFP) will process the produced and injected
water. Scale and corrosion inhibition chemical treatment takes place at the CFP.
Scale and corrosion monitoring will continue with operation of the Schrader Bluff
Pool. Treatment will be varied to maintain optimum water injector operation and
ultimate hydrocarbon recovery.
B. TYPE OF FLUID - Miscellaneous water (including non-hazardous surface water)
and associated surfactantsjsolvents used in the washing and cleaning of the
facility, equipment within the facility, motor vehicles and other items related to the
production of oil at Milne Point. Volumes will be very low and should not exceed
50 bbljday.
G/""") --::.- j /---"",-/
, r é ¿/Y; "
/ / . J
14
r//
9/
1t, c- r:: 1Io<.U: 'J cu e. It "-
0;-'j,''''';/5 s~C_:I¡J ;:';&.5
. Ir. 15" /~ ~"J )7 0 r ¡he
./ ./ ..
Sd,,"!,!d 8/t.Jf' A...~ 1....,J~-I,'ð,.)
OJdM A¡;f¡,~I~I1.
~ec. J ---;::C¿Ff~}-¡Þ.h-!"
J .. (S- D ri;1,L, )"J U.J ð J.t;) (I
-Þ 1< -I b \Îú. rh') p rtO> $- 5 fJ ~ (,6 /?! '!)'\. - 8 {Ls-"
-~~
'-
SECTION J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402( c) (9)
Analysis of Composition of Fluid - Prince Creek formation for drinki~,~L~a!~~ with
minor amounts of surfactantsjsolvents approved by the U.S. Department of Labor.
/(
Source of Fluid - Surface Facility wastewater.
Estimated Maximum Amount to be Injected - 50 BPD.
Compatibility with Formation and Confining Zones - Full compatibility with fresh
water. Miscellaneous water will be diluted to very small percentage of the injection
stream.
o / J¿ /,~ /' C
/
/
/
j-- u.ç, j-?~
l
9;>/
,;
/
¡~
15
'-
SECTION K
Injection Pressure
20 AAC 25.402(c) (10)
The estimated average wellhead injection pressure is 500 psig.
The maximum wellhead injection pressure for enhanced recovery water injection wells in
t(
\
the Schrader Bluff Pool is 885 psig. This pressure is based on a formation parting
gradient of 0.66 spijft, 12.70 ppg, minus a safety factor of 0.5 ppg. Schrader Bluff Pool
true vertical depth subsea tops vary from approximately 3400 to 4400 feet. The maximum
wellhead injection pressure will be varied by well to account for formation depth variations
across the field to insure that formation parting pressures will not be exceeded.
it.
/ t
/
0.052 * (FGEMW - 0.5 - 8.33) * H
MWIP =
MWIP =
MWIP =
MWIP =
FGEMW =
H =
('{
'\
0.052 * (12.70 - 0.5 - 8.33) * 4400
~,
''''.
",
885 psig -"-.
Maximum Wellhead Injection Pressure, psig
Fracture Gradient Equivalent Mud Weight, 12.7 per gallon
True Vertical Depth of Top Perf, Feet
o r-/ 9 /~-c
",
'l
16
"-~>
'-'
SECTION L
Fracture Information
20 AAC 25.402{c) (11)
Normal water injection operations for the Schrader Bluff Pool will entail injecting below the
formation parting gradient of 0.66 psi/ft. Step Rate Injection Tests and fracture stimulation
data were used in determining the formation parting gradient.
Based on instantaneous shut-in pressure (ISIP) data obtained prior to hydraulic fracture
stimulations of Schrader Bluff completions, the fracture gradient of the formation was
determined to range from 0.62 to 0.70 psi/ft. These fracture gradients were calculated
by the following formula:
F.G. = {ISIP + (0.052*P*H)} /H
where,
F.G. - fracture gradient, psi/teet
ISIP - instantaneous shut-in pressure, psi
P - density of injection fluid, ppg
H - true vertical depth of top perforation, feet
The ISIP data and corresponding calculated fracture gradient are summarized in the
attached table.
17
o í J ~ I >,_/::j- / J
J /
I
~. /
J ¿.".~ Ÿ'./} J
/
f
-::;) ..~--""/¡-
#8
Tom Painter
Division Manager
Conoco Inc.
3201 C Street
Su ite 200
Anchorage, AK 99503
. ;~)r~ [.!.l(:;~_
,~~~/~?~G -\ i
,~"..,-:¡ , --1--'1
i\-~~-d'~r; n0-J
~:.'_: __c._;.;~~ \ \ "
"'. r::; " -' ;-. 0 \.. I -,
\~~~~îffi
\"c;¡-"¡:Y\EC,H\ ~
j oJ I r". ___ _ .___~
\~1A!-!E.Cr\,-=\
\£lç~ ._-,-~~~~
~
~o~
February 1, 1988
Mr. Chat Chatterton
State of Alaska
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3Û01 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, AK 99501
Dear Mr. Chatterton:
Conoco received~·1' TO L " , IlIL dated July 8, 1987 from the Alaska Oil and
Gas Conservatio Commission (AOGCC) which exempted those portions of all freshwater aquifers
lying directly below the Milne Point Class II injection activities.
We plan to begin drilling some new wells within the Mile Point Unit in March, 1988. Our
plans include the pumping of excess non-hazardous fluids that are developed solely from well
operations or necessary to control the fluid level of reserve pits into surface/production
casing annuli.
In order to facilitate the above described plans, Conoco requests Administrative Relief
under Rule 8 of Area Injection Order 10 to amend Rule 2 of the injection order to exempt
the pumping of excess non-hazardous fluids into surface/production casing annuli from the
stated requirements of Rule 2.
Please contact Jim Dosch at 659-6336 you should have any questions.
Yours very truly,
",/-.
"--"60
T'¡¡(í'~- ~pa!nter
\. /Div sion Manager
00.21-02
RECEIVED
Ft:¡ R-ù
... -co:-~ ~ ,
ii
'~.-
A1aslœ Oil & Gas Cons. Commission
Anchorage
#7
\\to sr"'l:
0~ ~<S"
;po ft 0
<" _ -z..
-~w
:D <.:)
~ ~
~ o~
1-)': 0'\~
""l. PRO"'í~
U.S:--L:'T'JVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Aü'ì::j'~CY
REGION 10
1200 SIXTH AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
NDV 4 1986
REPL Y TO
ATTN OF:
MIS 409
John R. Kemp, Division Manager
Conoco Incorporated
3201 C Street, Suite 200
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
RE: Termination of EPA Emergency Permits at the Milne Point Unit (Kuparuk
River Field)
Dear Mr. Kemp:
The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission issued the Conoco
Incorporated an Area Injection Order No. 10 for the Milne Point Unit (Kuparuk
River Field) on September 19, 1986. Therefore, the following EPA Emergency
Permits for injection wells are terminated in accordance with 40 CFR 144.40:
AK-2R0073-E through AK-2R0085-E
AK-2R0215-E and AK-2R0216-E
AK-2R0234-E through AK-2R0239-E.
Also, EPA rule authorization under either 40 CFR 144.21 or 40 CFR 144.22 for
other existing injection wells is terminated.
Sincerely,
r~ j(~
Robert S. Burd
Director, Water Division
cc: C. V. Chatterton, AOGCC
" ~
··'.0
Þ.l~).st(a (11! t:
#6
"
"-
'--
I
L.
i
I
c> (}J-V\; ~~ ~ Ap ~~ 0 ~f;&øw
1 I 6
t::
-...
I
.
,
I
i
I
¡-._-~--_.._-----_._--_.__.._----_._._.
· 8
) 12 7 ,
Eileen
ø
~ \ l (R' 0- ~'F Il^~ J: ~ .
" ). -" _ . ¡; r ?!
, . ~ . , " : ",.' " - " ~ ik, -~
,i/\i'1 J ¿:ULiI
ùate
.
-'
~ n s
~onoco )
RECEIVED
MILNE POINT UNIT SEP 15 1986
FIGURE B-1
Alaska Oil & Gas Cons. Con Isslon
Anchorage
~-. .---.-.--- ------_. -- -
BASE MAP
w/BOTTOM HOlE'LOCATIONS
A-~ () ItJ / 0
------~ --------
1" - 2000'
5/27/86
#5
~
''¥/
STATE OF ALASKA
2
OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
3
HEARING
- --,........--_~- ~ - --<=-
4
Regarding the Injection Order Application for the Milne Point Unit
5
6
September 15, 1986
9:00 a.m.
3001 porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska
7
8
9
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT:
10
CHAT CHATTERTON, CHAIRMAN
WILLIAM BARNWELL, MEMBER
LONNIE C. SMITH, MEMBER
11
12
PRESENT FOR CONOCO:
13
Al Hastings
Warren Hairford
Rod Schulz
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
b.'J õ= C ç ~ \1 ç D
ti\.t L..~\iib..
22
UCT 2 ~2 1986
At ka Oil & Gas Cons. Commission
t\las Anchorage
23
24
25
R & R COURT REPORTERS
810 N STREET, SUITE 101
277-0572 - 277-0573
509W.3RDAVENUE
277-8543
1007W.3RDAVENUE
272-7515
ANCHORAGE. ALASKA 99501
--
~/
~/
-2-
PRO C E E DIN G S
MR. CHATTERTON: Thank you. Good morning. I
2
would like to make note of the time, it's about 9:05 a.m. on
3
September the 15th, 1986. We are located in the conference room
4
of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission at 3001 Porcupine
5
Drive.
Our purpose here this morning is to hear testimony from
6
Conoco regarding an application that they have made to the
7
Commission which requires a decision on the part of the Commission.
8
I would like to introduce those people here at the head
9
table. At my extreme right, your left, is Ann Prezyna. She
10
is our -- from the A.G. 's Office, Attorney General's Office,
11
and does work for the Commission, and has for a long while.
12
Immediately to my right, to your left of me, is Commissioner
13
Bill Barnwell.
I am Chat Chatterton. To my left is Commissioner
14
Lonnie Smith. And to the far left is Meredith Downing with
15
R & R Court Reporters who will be taking down the proceedings
16
before us.
17
At this time to be more specific as to why we are here,
18
I would like to have
call upon Commissioner Smith to read
19
our notice of the opportunity for this hearing into the record.
20
Lonnie?
21
MR. SMITH: This is the notice published in the
22
Anchorage Daily News on August 15th, 1986.
"The Alaska -- the
23
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission has been requested
24
by letter dated July the 28th, 1986, to issue an~rder for area
25
~ -~ ';-'" ,," ,"" ~ ìi "E- 'D"
~;"¡('~ Ib ~ "I" i.
i'\ b ~ L. s \i
R & R COURT REPORTERS
,,- ~ì ') 1986
~.... L .i.
810N STREET, SUITE 101 509W.3RDAVENUE 1007W.3RDAVENUE
277-0572 - 277-0573 277-8543 272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
AJas:<a 0\1 & Gas Cons. Com TIisslc~
Anchorage ~
~~
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
~~'
---'
-3-
injection to provide authorization for utilizing surface wells
permitted in accordance with 20 AAC 25.005 or 20 AAC 25.280,
to inject fluids underground for purposes of enhancing oil
recovery from the Milne Point Unit in the Kuparuk River field.
Parties who wish to protest the granting of~the _- referenced
request are allowed 15 days from the date of this publication
in which to file a written requst for a hearing.
The place
of filing is the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission,
3001 Porcupine Drive, Anchorage, Alaska, 99501.
If a protest and request for hearing is timely filed,
a hearing on the matter will be held at the above address at
9:00 a.m. on September the 15th, 1986, in conformance with
20 AAC 25.540.
If a hearing is to be held, interested parties
may confirm this by calling the Commission's office 907-279-1433
after August the 30th, 1986.
If no such protest is timely filed,
the Commission will consider the issuance of the order without
a hearing.
Lonnie C. Smith, Commissioner, Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission.
MR. CHATTERTON:
Okay. Thank you, Lonnie, very
much. The -- I believe the record should show that a protest
was timely filed. We received a protest to the application
of Conoco within the 15-day period, and accordingly why the
opportunity for this hearing has been -~ we've made -- we've
availed ourselves and followed out exactly what the notice is.
The -- and Conoco is now here represented by technical
R & RCOURT REPORTERS
810N STREET. SUITE 101
277-0572 - 277-0573
509W.3RDAVENUE
277-8543
1007W.3RDAVENUE
272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
-
,--'
-4-
people I believe to put on testimony, and that is in effect in
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
support of your application for this area injection order, is that
correct?]
MR. HAIRFORD: Yes, sir.
MR. CHATTERTON: Is there anyone, obviously there
isn't, but I'll ask the question, there is no one in the audience
representing the protestant in this case I do not believe, is
that correct? Silence is consent, there is no one in the audience.
Let me go off the record for a moment here.
(Off record)
(On record)
MR. CHATTERTON: This is Chat Chatterton. While
we were off the record, why we discussed a little bit about where
to proceed from here, because we indeed have no presence of the
protestant, and we felt that it would be a little bit inefficient
to proceed and have Conoco offer testimony that would be a total
redundancy to the written application, and all of the testimony
in the exhibits and so forth and so on that were attached to
that application that was submitted some weeks ago to the
Commission.
So we felt that the
in the interest of efficiency
we would not proceed with that.
So accordingly, we are going to go forward and read
into the record the protestant's undated letter that has led
to this gathering here this morning. Lonnie, would you be so kind
as to read that?
R & R COURT REPORTERS
810N STREET, SUITE 101
277-0572 - 277-0573
509 W. 3RD AVENUE
277-8543
1007 W. 3RD AVENUE
272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
".~.,/
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
~-
.~
.~-
-5-
MR. SMITH: This letter was received by certified
2 mail August the 22nd, 1986.
It's from the Barrow News -- the
3 Barrow Sun Newspaper, Business Office, 3933 Geneva Place,
4 Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, addressed to Lonnie C. Smith, Corrmissioner.
5 Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, 3001 porcupine Drive,
6 Anchorage, Alaska, 99501.
7
"Reference:
Formal protest and request for public hearing
8 ln the matter of the application of Conoco, Inc., for an area
9 injection order for the Milne Point Unit of the Kuparuk River
10 Field.
11
"Dear Commissioner Smith: This letter is to formally
12 protest the granting of this permit and to request a public
13 hearing accessible to the residents of the North Slope.
14 "The intent of the law -- the state law on public notices
is clear:
It intends that the affected public be notified prior
to the issuance of such a permit. The Commission, however,
instead of informing the people of the North Slope Borough
villages whose tax base and environment would be most directly
affected, buried a purported notice in an Anchorage newspaper
hundreds of miles away from the North Slope Borough.
That is
just not good enough, because the Anchorage News is not in general
circulation at At- --"
I can't pronounce this name of the village,
A-t-q-a-s-u-k, "Nuigsui t, Barrow, et cetera, where, instead.c of,
every family receives a subscription to a local newspaper, the
Barrow Sun.
R & R COURT REPORTERS
810 N STREET, SUITE 101
277-0572 - 277-0573
509 W. 3RD AVENUE
277-8543
1007W.3RDAVENUE
272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
.~
"..,...-'
-6-
"The people of the North Slope Borough have been sensitized
2
previously tro the need for adequate public notice.
If there
3 is nothing improper about what you are doing in the Borough,
4 and we do not believe that there is, the Commission should have
5 no problem with the use of public notices that actually reach
6
the people of the Borough.
It would certrainly not cost more
7 to reach the people instead of burying -- burying the notices
8 many miles away.
9 "We lhave previously contact the Commission about such
10 a lack of notice to the poeple of the North Slope Borough. The
11 first time we were promised in writing that the procedures would
12 be chnged to reach the people living in the North Slope Borough,
13 so we did not pursue the matter. This time when we called we
14 heard the -- the very same words we heard when we asked the
15 now former malyor of the North Slope Borough why his notices
16 of contracts and the meetings were buried in the very same way in
17 the same Anchorage paper.
18 "It is good pbulic policy, costs less money, nad is
19 the intent of the law to properly inform the people of the North
20 Slope Borough when the Commission takes an action that might
21
directly affect them.
To attempt to do otherwise raises questions
22 of intent, particularly in view of the Borough's recent experiences.
23 We suggest the Commission follow the lead of the new North Slope
24 Borough Mayor and attempt to keep the people informed with public
25 notices that actually reach the public.
In the absence of that,
R & R COURT REPORTERS
810N STREET, SUITE 101
277-0572 - 277-0573
509 W. 3RD AVENUE
277-8543
1007W.3RDAVENUE
272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
'....,.""...
'-"
-7-
a public -- a public hearing will have to be held in the North
2
Slope Borough so that the residents of the Borough, the public,
3
can be heard.
4
"Reasonable people ought to be able to sit down and
5
work out a reasonable solution to this situation so that it
6 does not delay or embarrass the oil industry. We are certainly
7 willing to try.
Please give us a call if you have any ideas
8 on the subject.
Sincerely yours, J. Lindauer, Publisher. II
9
MR. CHATTERTON: Thank you, Lonnie.
I would
10 like to ask the applicant, Conoco, if they would -- I'm told
11 that they have one of their staff people who plans to put on
12 the expert testimony, the technical testimony.
I would like
13 to have him introduced and -- and state -- have him state his
14 name and his qualifications, and what -- what he had -- what
15 part he might have played in the
in the application that
16 was submitted to us some weeks ago?
17
MR. SCHULZ: My name is Rod Schulz.
18
MR. CHATTERTON: Rod, you -- you might -- I'll
19 ask Meredith, but you might want to sit down, unless you want
20 to get up, because I think .....
21
MR. SCHULZ: Okay. Well, I just want to
22
MR. CHATTERTON:
(indiscernible,
23 simultaneous speech) a lot better.
24
MR. SCHULZ:
get rid of this.
25
MR. CHATTERTON:
Okay.
R & R COURT REPORTERS
810 N STREET, SUITE 101
277-0572 - 277-0573
509 W. 3RD AVENUE
277-8543
1007W.3RDAVENUE
272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
-
.~
-8-
MR. SCHULZ: Give it to you. This is Exhibit One,
2 which is a copy of our injection order application submitted
3 to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.
4
MR. CHATTERTON: Okay.
5
MR. SCHULZ:
I'd like to now state my qualifica-
6 tions to give expert testimony on behalf of Conoco, Incorporated,
7 a wholly owned subsidiary of DuPont.
8
MR. CHATTERTON:
please go ahead, Rod.
9
MR. SCHULZ: Okay.
In May, 1982, I received
10 a four-year Bachelor of Science degree in petroleum engineering
11
from the University of Kansas.
During this time I worked for
12 the Kansas Bureau of Air Quality to conduct interviews and collect
13 data for the Environmental Protection Agency.
14 I've been employed since college graduation by Conoco,
15 Incorporated, in various petroleum engineering assignments.
16 The first two and a half years I worked in the Corpus Christi
17 Divisoin and was -- was involved with work in the environmentally
18 sensitive Aransas Natinal Wildlife Refuge.
19 I've worked as a reservoir engineer for Conocom Anchorage,
20 Alaska, since April 1st, 1985. My responsibilities include
21 the handling of EPA and AOGCC injection permit applications and
22
related correspondence.
I also do all of the reservoir engineering
23 for the Kuparuk River formation, which ig the only reservoir
24 presently producing oil at Milne Point.
25 I'm a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers,
R & R COURT REPORTERS
810NSTREET,SUITE 101
277-0572 - 277-0573
509 W. 3RD AVENUE
277-8543
1007W.3RDAVENUE
272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
.~
'--,
-9-
~
the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, and the Gas
2
Processors Association.
I recently authored a._copyrighted Society
3 of Petroleum Engineers Technical Paper that is now being used
4 by internationally recognized educators in the petroleum
5
engineering curriculum at the University of Kansas.
I have
6 also co-authored a copyrighted technical paper for the American
7 American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
8 By the way, I'd like to mention that the Society of
9 Petroleum Engineers technical paper was concerning a well, a
10 state of the art completion of a well that was within a few miles
11 of the Davy Crocket National Forest, which was an environmentally
12 sensi ti ve area.
13 Moving on, I'd like to state that I passed the engineer-
14 in-training exam in 1982, and I am currently pursuing the
15 qualifictions required to become a registered professional
16 eng ineer .
17 As specified by the Alaska Administrative Code, Title 20,
18 Chapter 25, Section 540, part (C)(5), I respectfully request
19
to serve as
I respectfully request approval to serve as an
20 expert witness by the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.
21
MR. CHATTERTON: Thank you, Rod. The Commission
22 certainly recognizes your professional background and -- and
23 accepts you as an expert witness to testify in the matter before
24 us.
25 Rod, as we mentioned in off the record -- in -- when
R & R COURT REPORTERS
8JONSTREET,SUITE 101
277-0572 - 277-0573
509 W. 3RDAVENUE
277-8543
1007W.3RDAVENUE
272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
~~
~
-10-
~
we were off the record, why we don't -- don't -- well, let me ask
2 you this question if I may: Do you have anything to offer this
3 morning that would be over and above what is -- was in the
4 your application package that would have a bearing on the merits
5 of whether or not the Commission issues this requested area
6 injection order?
7
MR. SCHULZ: No, sir, I just have more details
8 concerning the injection application.
9
MR. CHATTERTON: Right. We
we have met with
10 you off and on informally and explored some of these detail
11 matters with you that were over and above what your initial
12 application, is that correct?
13
MR. SCHULZ: Yes, sir, that is correct.
14
MR. CHATTERTON: Thank you very much.
Is there
15 anything in your application for this area injection order for
16 the Milne Point Unit portion of the Kuparuk Oil Pool that is
17 is materially different than the authorization that you are
18 currently operating under that was issued by the U.S. Environmental
19 Protection Agency?
20
MR. SCHULZ:' No, sir, this ___- this injection
21 order application submitted by Conoco to the AOGCC is congruous
22 to the application that we are currently operating under, that
23 being an underground injection control permit issued by the
24 Environmental Protection Agency on December 24th, 1984.
25
MR. CHATTERTON:
Thank you.
1'm going to see
R & R COURT REPORTERS
810 N STREET, SUITE 101
277-0572 - 277-0573
509 W. 3RD AVENUE
277-8543
1007 W. 3RD AVENUE
272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
~~-
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
'-::._~
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
~
-
"._,,'
C E R T I F I CAT E
- _._--~-----------'--'-'-~ "'---~--- ~- ,--=----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SSe
STATE OF ALASKA
I, Meredith L. Downing, Notary Public in and for the State
of Alaska and electronic reporter for R & R Court Reporters, Inc.,
residing at Anchorage, Alaska, do hereby certify;
That the annexed and foregoing transcript of hearing
Conservation Commission was taken
September, 1986, commencing at the
the offices of the Alaska Oil and
3001 Porcupine Drive, Anchorage,
before the Alaska Oil and Gas
before me on the 15th day of
hour of 9:00 o'clock a.m. , at
Gas Conservation Commission,
Alaska, pursuant to notice;
That this transcript, as heretofore annexed, is a true and
correct transcr iption of the testimony given by the wi tnesses,
takert by me electronically and thereafter transcribed by me;
That the original of the transcript has been retained by
me for the purpose of filing the same with the Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission, Anchorage, Alaska, as required; and
That I am not a relative, employee, attorney, nor counsel
of any of the parties, nor am I financially interested in this
action.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed my seal this 17th day of October, 1986.
'-'- '-- --"'- -- --- ~
SEA L
R & R COURT REPORTERS
810NSTREET,SUITEI01 509W.3RDAVENUE 1007W.3RDAVENUE
277-0572 - 277-0573 277-8543 272-7515
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501
--
-
TESTIMONY OF ROD SCHULZ
BEFORE THE ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION CO~MISSION
REGARDING THE INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION FOR THE
MILNE POINT UNIT
(September 15, 1986)
Conoco is the operator of the Milne Point Unit (MPU) , which is the
third producing unit on the north slope of Alaska. Production com-
menced in November, 1985, and the unit is currently producing 10,000
BOPD.
Conoco is presenting testimony concerning an Inj ection Order
Application for the MPU which was properly filed with the Alaska Oil
and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC). This permit is congruous to
the EPA approved injection permit under which Milne Point is currently
operating.
My name is Rod Schulz and I will now state my qualifications to give
expert testimony on behalf of Conoco Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
of DuPont.
In May, 1982, I received a four-year Bachelor of Science (BS) degree
in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Kansas. During this
time I worked for the Kansas Bureau of Air Quality to conduct inter-
views and collect data for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
I have been employed since college graduation by Conoco Inc .in
various petroleum engineering assignments.
The first 2~ years I
worked in the Corpus Christi Division and was involved with work in
the environmentally sensitive Aransas National Wildlife Refuge.
'---'
-
I have worked as a reservoir engineer for Conoco in Anchorage, Alaska
since April 1, 1985. My responsibilities include the handling oÍ EPA
and AOGCC injection permit applications and related correspondence. I
also do all of the reservoir engineering for the Kuparuk River
formation, which is the only reservoir presently producing oil at
Milne Point.
I am a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Society of
Professional Well Log Analysts (SPWLA), and the Gas Processors Asso-
ciation (GPA). I have held elected offices in the GPA and SPwLÄ. I
recently authored a copyrighted SPE technical paper that is now being
used by internationally recognized educators in the petroleum
engineering curriculum at the University of Kansas.
I have also
co-authored a copyrighted technical paper for the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME). I passed the engineer-in-training (EIT)
exam in 1982, and I am currently pursuing the qualifications required
to become a registered professional engineer.
As specified by the Alaska Administrative Code, Title 20, Chapter 25,
Section 540, part (C) (5), I respectfully request AOGCC approval to
serve as an expert witness for Conoco Inc.
The Milne Point Unit was formed in 1979. After being evaluated from
1980-83, surface facilities were built, transported and installed in
1984-85.
Development drilling occurred from January, 1985, through
February, 1986. Production is from the Kuparuk River Formation
through 25 producers and 16 injectors. Water injection is needed for
-.....r
c__
waterflooding the oil reservoir.
This doubles the oil recovery and
maximizes the production of our non-renewable natural resource.
Conoco's MPU is part of the Kuparuk River Field. The remainder of the
field produces approximately 250,000 BOPD and is operated by ARCO
Alaska's Kuparuk River Unit (KRU). ARCO submitted an Injection Order
Application to the AOGCC, which was approved on June 6, 1986. The MPU
and KRU produce from correlative geologies and are similar in many
respects.
Also, Area Inj ection Orders for the Prudhoe Bay Eastern Operating
Area, Prudhoe Bay Western Operating Area, and the Endicott Unit have
been recently submitted to and approved by the AOGCC.
Conoco is currently operating under an Underground Injection Control
(UIC) permit approved by the EPA on December 24, 1984. This was in
accordance with federal regulation 40 CFR 144.34. Conoco has complied
wi th EP A regulations and all of Conoco' s inj ec tion wells have EP A
approved UIC permit numbers. These are listed in Section Q, page 22,
of Exhibit 1, which is a copy of Conoco's Injection Order Application
for the Milne Point Unit.
Effective June 19, 1986, the EPA granted underground injection control
to the State of Alaska.
This transfer of governmental regulatory
authority requires Conoco and several other oil companies to submit
new Injection Order Applications to the AOGCC. Conoco's application
to the AOGCC parallels the UIC permit approved by the EPA. I will now
outline Conoco's Injection Order Application.
~~
~
OUTLINE OF CONOCO'S INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION
Section A of Exhibit 1 specifies that the Injection Order Application
is for an area permit. This is similar to Conoco' s EPA UIC permit
application of August 2, 1984, which was approved on December 24,
1984.
Section B of Exhibit 1 is a base map of the Milne Point Unit (MPU)
with the bottom-hole locations of all pertinent ÞŒU wells. As illus-
trated, most of the wells are deviated holes drilled from the Band C
pads.
Section C of Exhibit 1 identifies the surface owners and operators
within the area injection order and extending \ mile beyond the MPU
boundary. This includes ARCO Alaska Inc. and Standard Alaska Produc-
tion Company.
Section D of Exhibit 1 is my affidavit concerning 20 AAC 25.402 (c)
(3) .
Section E is a brief description of the MPU injection operation.
Section F of Exhibit 1 defines the producing oil pool at Milne Point.
Figure 1 is a log correlation between a Milne Point well and West Sak
River State No.1, which defines the Kuparuk River Oil Pool by Rule 2
of Conservation Order No. 173.
~-
.~
Section G of Exhibit 1 is a brief geologic description of the Kuparuk
River Formation, which also includes a type log and structural contour
map. Most of the Milne Point oil production is from the Middle and
Lower Kuparuk Sands, with a minor amount coming from the Laminated
Zone.
All open-hole well logs from the MPU are sent to the AOGCC, as stated
in Section H.
Section I of Exhibit 1 provides appropriate casing information for MPU
wells.
Information about the injection fluid used at Milne Point is provided
in Section J.
See tion K s ta tes the inj ec tion pressures, and See tion L provides
fracture information.
Section M describes the formation fluid at Milne Point.
Section N of Exhibit 1 states that waterflooding at Milne Point, which
was approved by the EPA, is expected to double the oil recovery.
Section 0 verifies the mechanical integrity of MPU wells, and Section
P addresses the wells within the area of the MPU.
~-'
--
Section Q lists all MPU injection wells and corresponding EPA assigned
and approved UIC permit numbers.
Section S of Exhibit 1 states the variances requested, which mayor
may not be approved by the AOGCC.
As previously mentioned, Conoco's injection operations at the MPU have
been approved by the EPA.
All of our inj ection wells have EPA ap-
proved UIC permit numbers. The Injection Order Application submitted
to the AOGCC is the result of a transfer of governmental regulatory
authority from the EPA to the AOGCC. As a prudent and environmentally
conscious operator of the MPU, Conoco is not proposing any significant
changes to the EPA approved injection operations at Milne Point.
As a qualified expert witness I will be happy to answer any questions
concerning Conoco's Injection Order Application for the MPU submitted
to the AOGCC on July 28, 1986.
CERTIFIED MAIL 'i~-A!.M~ 8/7.."2/ 8~
B--row Sun Newspaper
B>.-/iness Office
3933 Geneva Place
Anchorage, Alaska 99508
~
Lonnie C. Smith
Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
re: Formal protest and request for public hearing in the matter of the
application of Conoco Inc. for an Area Injection Order for the Milne
Point Unit of the Kuparuk" River Field.
Dear Commissioner Smith:
This letter is to formally protest the granting of this permit and to
request a public hearing accessible to the residents of the North Slope.
The intent of the state law on public notices is clear: it intends that
the affected public be notified prior to the issuance of such a permit.
The commission, however, instead of informing the people of the North
Slope Borough villages whose tax base and environment would be most
directly affected, buried a purported "notice" in an Anchorage news-
paper hundreds of miles away from the North Slope Borough. That is just
not good enough because the Anchorage News is not in general circulation
in Atqasuk, Nuigsuit, Barrow, etc. where, instead, every family receives
a subscription to a local newspaper-the Barrow Sun.
. The people of the North Slope Borough have been sensitized previou~ly to
the need for adequate public notice. If there is nothing improper about
what you are doing in the Borough, and we do not believe that there is,
"the commission should have no problem with the use of public notices
that actually reach the people of the Borough. It would certainly not cost
more to reach the people instead of burying the notices many miles away.
We have previously contact the commission about such a lack of notice to
the people of the North Slope Borough. The first time, we were promised
in writing that the procedures would be changed to reach the people living
in the North Slope Borough. So we did not pursue the matter. This time
when we called we heard the very same words we heard when we asked the now
former mayor of the North Slope Borough why his notices of co~tracts and
and meetings were buried in the very same way in the same Anchorage paper.
It is good public policy, costs less money, and is the intent of the law
to properly inform the people of the North Slope Borough when the comm-
ission takes an action that might directly affect them. To attempt to do
otherwise raises questions of intent, particularly in view of the Borough'
recent experiences. We suggest the Commission follow the lead of the new
North Slope Borough Mayor and attempt to keep the people informed with
public notices that actually reach the public. In the absence of that, a
public hearing will have to be held in the North Slope Borough so that
the residents of the Borough-the public-can be heard.
Reasonable people ought to be able to sit down and work out a reasonable
solution to this situation so that it does not delay or embarass the oil
industry. We are certainly willing to try. Please gtv~~~I~~~l if you
have any ideas on the subject. ~[L[ V tU
s»~~
J. Lindauer
Publisher
AUG 2 2 1986
f' cc:
NSB Mayor, Rep. Adams
Sen. Ferguson
Alaska Oil & Gas Cons. Commission
4n~hnr~nA
I';)
I C/
=""
"-
.-I
"-
TESTIMONY OF ROD SCHULZ
BEFORE THE ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
REGARDING THE INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION FOR THE
MILNE POINT UNIT
(September 15, 1986)
Conoco is the operator of the Milne Point Unit (MPU) , which is the
third producing unit on the north slope of Alaska. Production com-
menced in November, 1985, and the unit is currently producing 10,000
BOPD. Conoco is presenting testimony concerning an Inj ection Order
Application for the MPU which was properly filed with the Alaska Oil
and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC). This permit is congruous to
the EPA approved injection permit under which Milne Point is currently
operating.
My name is Rod Schulz and I will now state my qualifications to give
expert testimony on behalf of Conoco Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary
of DuPont.
In May, 1982, I received a four-year Bachelor of Science (BS) degree
in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Kansas. During this
time I worked for the Kansas Bureau of Air Quality to conduct inter-
views and collect data for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
I have been employed since college graduation by Conoco Inc. in
various petroleum engineering assignments.
The first 2~ years I
worked in the Corpus Christi Division and was involved with work in
the environmentally sensitive Aransas National Wildlife Refuge.
REtE\'JEÐ
SEP 1 '5 1986
. Gas Gûl,.:.J.....vIIÜIH5sion
NasKa 0'\ &. Anchorage
-
-'
I have worked as a reservoir engineer for Conoco in Anchorage, Alaska
since April 1, 1985. My responsibilities include the handling of EPA
and AOGCC injection permit applications and related correspondence. I
also do all of the reservoir engineering for the Kuparuk River
formation, which is the only reservoir presently producing oil at
Milne Point.
I am a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Society of
Professional Well Log Analysts (SPWLA), and the Gas Processors Asso-
ciation (GPA). I have held elected offices in the GPA and SP~ãA. I
recently authored a copyrighted SPE technical paper that is now being
used by internationally recognized educators in the petroleum
......
engineering curriculum at the University of Kansas.
I have also
co-authored a copyrighted technical paper for the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME)¡ I passed the engineer-in-training (EIT)
exam in 1982, and I am currently pursuing the qualifications required
to become a registered professional engineer.
As specified by the Alaska Administrative Code, Title 20, Chapter 25,
Section 540, part (C) (5), I respectfully request AOGCC approval to
serve as an expert witness for Conoco Inc.
The Milne Point Unit was formed in 1979. After being evaluated from
1980-83, surface facilities were built, transported and installed in
1984-85.
Development drilling occurred from January, 1985, through
February, 1986.
Production is from the Kuparuk River Formation
through 25 producers and 16 injectors.
Water injection is needed for
RECEIVED
SEP 1 5 1986
Alaska all & Gas Cons. \.""I¡¡¡¡II~¡;)On
An~horaae
---
~
<-
~~
wa terflooding the oil reservoir. This doubles the oil recovery and
maximizes the production of our non-renewable natural resource.
Conoco's MPU is part of the Kuparuk River Field. The remainder of the
field produces approximately 250,000 BOPD and is operated by ARCO
Alaska's Kuparuk River Unit (KRU). ARCO submitted an Injection Order
Application to the AOGCC, which was approved on June 6, 1986. The MPU
and KRU produce from correlative geologies and are similar in many
respects.
Also, Area Inj ection Orders for the Prudhoe Bay Eastern Operating
Area, Prudhoe Bay Western Operating Area, and the Endicott Unit have
been recently submitted to and approved by the AOGCC.
Conoco is currently operating under an Underground Injection Control
(UIC) permit approved by the EPA on December 24, 1984. This was in
accordance with federal regulation 40 CFR 144.34. Conoco has complied
with EPA regulations and all of Conoco' s inj ection wells have EPA
approved UIC permit numbers. These are listed in Section Q, page 22,
of Exhibit 1, which is a copy of Conoco's Injection Order Application
for the Milne Point Unit.
Effective June 19, 1986, the EPA granted underground injection control
to the State of Alaska.
This transfer of governmental regulatory
authority requires Conoco and several other oil companies to submit
new Injection Order Applications to the AOGCC. Conoco's application
outline Conoco's Injection Order Application.
to the AOGCC parallels the UIC permit approved by the EPA. I will now
RECEIVED
SEP 1 5 1986
Alaska Oil & Gas COII~. vv¡lImission
An~horaae
~
-'
'--
OUTLINE OF CONOCO'S INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION
Section A of Exhibit 1 specifies that the Injection Order Application
is for an area permit. This is similar to Conoco' s EPA UIC permit
application of August 2, 1984, which was approved on December 24,
1984.
Section B of Exhibit 1 is a base map of the Milne Point Unit (MPU)
with the bottom-hole locations of all pertinent ÞŒU wells. As illus-
trated, most of the wells are deviated holes drilled from the Band C
pads.
Section C of Exhibit 1 identiÍies the surface owners and operators
within the area injection order and extending ~ mile beyond the MPU
boundary. This includes ARCa Alaska Inc. and Standard Alaska Produc-
tion Company.
Section D of Exhibit 1 is my affidavit concerning 20 AAC 25.402 (c)
(3) .
Section E is a brief description of the MPU injection operation.
Section F of Exhibit 1 defines the producing oil pool at Milne Point.
Figure 1 is a log correlation between a Milne Point well and West Sak
River State No.1, which defines the Kuparuk River Oil Pool by Rule 2
of Conservation Order No. 173.
RECEIVED
SEP 1 5 1986
Alaska on & Gas Cons. (;ommission
Anehorage
~---
-
.-'
Section G of Exhibit 1 is a brief geologic description of the Kuparuk
River Formation, which also includes a type log and structural contour
map. Most of the Milne Point oil production is from the Middle and
Lower Kuparuk Sands, with a minor amount coming from the Laminated
Zone.
All open-hole well logs from the MPU are sent to the AOGCC, as stated
in Section H.
Section I of Exhibit 1 provides appropriate casing information for MPU
wells.
Information about the injection fluid used at Milne Point is provided
in Section J.
Section K states the inj ection pressures, and Section L provides
fracture information.
Section M describes the formation fluid at Milne Point.
Section N of Exhibit 1 states that waterflooding at Milne Point, which
was approved by the EPA, is expected to double the oil recovery.
Section 0 verifies the mechanical integrity of MPU wells, and Section
P addresses the wells within the area of the MPU.
RECE\\JED
SEP 151986
0'\ & Gas Cons. commission
A\a.s1<a 1 Anchorage
.~
, -'
-
-
Section Q lists all MPU injection wells and corresponding EPA assigned
and approved UIC permit numbers.
Section S of Exhibit 1 states the variances requested, which mayor
may not be approved by the AOGCC.
As previously mentioned, Conoco's injection operations at the MPU have
been approved by the EPA. All of our inj ection wells have EPA ap-
proved UIC permit numbers. The Injection Order Application submitted
to the AOGCC is the result of a transfer of governmental regulatory
authority from the EPA to the AOGCC. As a prudent and environmentally
conscious operator of the MPU, Conoco is not proposing any significant
changes to the EPA approved injection operations at Milne Point.
As a qualified expert witness I will be happy to answer any questions
concerning Conoco's Injection Order Application for the MEU submitted
to the AOGCC on July 28, 1986.
RECEIVED
SEP 1 5 1986
Alaska Oil & Gas Con~. lJUIJlflilssÎon
Anchorage
#4
'--"
NAME
AI0 tv £. f (¿flY;') f+
g)-J/ D (?¡ \(" v\ uJe ({
O¡f/(]Ø~
I /ÌléT
Á- l)¡~/N!¡;: ( - ..~ vt'll ,H
/lL ///15 77~W
~CN J. J-l;¡IRPORD
{(oj 5::j¿¡/¿
V~~5 ¿;u, /LÇXS~'
LuL( ({~~ V~v" Ir( c-fA.
~
. ./
~--
ç~ } J( . A I [J c~7i / û
ATTENDANCE SHEET
CONOCO INC. PUBLIC HEARING
SEPTEMBER 15, 1986
CaMP ANY
ItHy 6ev.erecl'5 Óf~1.9-
41t¡ 5~ 0.'( C4d GÇ5 C'ö~5'V. COtA~.
/J-Ot7c~
A'6~G: C ~
CO,¿/O C 0
(!, 0 Noeo
CO/!/é?eD
~?-# ~/~Sß~
R-OC-C C
R£(,E\\lEU
SEP 11)1986
. & Gas Cons. commission
tJas\œ. 0\\ AAcnorage
#3
MEMORA~'~UM Statr of Alaska
ALASKA OIL & GaS CONSERVATION COl'1tvfISSION-'
TO: Memo to· Fj_le
DATE: September 2, 1986
FILE NO.: 1. S.ll
TELECOPY NO: 276-7542
TELEPHONE NO.: 279-1433
THRU:
SUBJECT:
Telephone call from
Mr. John Lindauer at
9:04 am, Sept. 2, 1986,
concerning Notice of
Public Hearing
published Aug. 15, 1986
in the Anchorage Daily
News
FROM:Lonnie C. Smith
Commissioner
1¿Ç¡
My recollection of the substance of our comments are paraphrased
as follows:
Upon inquiry, I confirmed that the hearing would beheld on
September 15, 1986.
Mr. Lindauer did most of the talking and was quite wound-up
about the state providing proper public notice to the people
of the North Slope Borough (NSB).
He stated several times that he knew the intent of state
law, that the law's interpretation was clear to him and that
in this case public notice should be provided in the publi-
cation that is read by most people in the NSB.
He further stated that the Anchorage Daily News was not the
most widely read publication in Barrow, but that the Barrow
Sun was because:
1. The NSB purchased a subscription of the Sun for each
resident and
2. The trouble of the previous NSB administration had all
stennned from "burying" notices in the Anchorage newspaper
legal sections.
I challenged him on the latter issue stating that our notices
were proper to be in the Anchorage News which is reported to be
the one newspaper in the state with the greatest circulation and
that notices of this type were never put on the front page, but
in a proper section set aside for such.
Mr. Lindauer said they would be happy to discuss this matter at
length, that they were reasonable people but that they would push
it through the public hearing and other legal options available.
I attempted to explain that the particular issue of this notice
is almost inconsequential since the EPA had already been adminis-
tering over this area and "that it was simply to transfer that
power to our agency. Mr. Lindauer seemed completely uninformed
02-001 A (Rev 1 Q..84)
and uninterested in the reason and facts of the Notice, but is
obviously interested in having any and all state notices pub-
lished in his own publication, The Barrow Sun newspaper.
September 2, 1986
- ') -
Hemo to Files
TELECOPY NO.
(907) 276-7542
August 25, 1986
Hs. J. Lindauer
Publisher
Barrow Sun Newspaper
Rusiness Office
3933 Geneva Place
Anchorage, Alaska. 99508
Dear Ms. Lindauer:
Thank you for your undated letter protesting the grantiJlg of an
AreA, Inj ection Order for the Hilne Point Unit, as applied for by
Canaeo Inc., and requesting a public hearing.
Your protest and hearing request was received timely. Therefore,
to conform with the August 1, 1986 notice of an opportunity for
public hearing, the commission vJill nO"tv hold the public hearing
for Conoco's application at the time, date and place specified bv
the notice.
For your ready reference, we have enclosed a copy of
20 MC 25.540 which sets forth the procedure for public hearings
conduct~d before the commission on the subject issue. He look
forward to receiving your testimony.
Sincere ly, ._
~i ( .
~'M( f/", j.J ~7;~
(/~ ~
Lonnie C. Smith
Connnis s ioner
dlf:l.C.4
Enclosure
cc: Senator Frank Ferguson
Representative Al Adams
George Ahmaogak, Sr., Mayor NSB
Conoeo Inc.
Bar:ow Sun N~WSpa%~)~ L{~
.. "- "'uslness Offlce C'?-~~;'.~ r l
CËRTIFIED MAIL fí~ e.~u-á. g/'2- ,-I g~\ .;)933 Geneva Placet f:":;": Fv-:f-lD
Lonnie c. Smith C :J Anchorage, AIaSka¡;9c9~p~=,
I¡: . _..~j ~
Commissioner ¡ -" I ¡
~~~~k~o~;;p~~~ ~~~v~onservation Commission IrF'}~:t #J
Anchorage , Alaska 995 0 1 I,! ¡~: %~I-_ul
re: Formal protest and request for public hearing in the matteti~q~~~n~~~
application of Conoco Inc. for an Area Injection Order for the ¡~__l.n~:>~
Point Unit of the Kuparuk River Field. 1FT] _____J
Dear Commissioner Smith:
This letter is to formally protest the granting of this permit and to
request a public hearing accessible to the residents of the North Slope.
The intent of the state law on public notices is clear: it intends that
the affected public be notified prior to the issuance of such a permit.
The commission, however, instead of informing the people of the North
Slope Borough villages whose tax base and environment would be most
directly affected, buried a purported "notice" in an Anchorage news-
paper hundreds of miles away from the North Slope Borough. That is just
not good enough because the Anchorage News is not in general circulation
in Atqasuk, Nuigsuit, Barrow, etc. where, instead, every family receives
a subscription to a local newspaper-the Barrow Sun.
The people of the North Slope Borough have been sensi tized pre_viou~ly to
the need for adequate public notice. If there is nothing improper about
what you are doing in the Borough, and we do not believe that there is,
the commission should have no problem with the use of public notices
that actually reach the people of the Borough. It would certainly not cost
more to reach the people instead of burying the notices many miles away.
We have previously contact the commission about such a lack of notice to
the people of the North Slope Borough. The first time, we were promised
in writing that the procedures would be changed to reach the people living
in the North Slope Borough. So we did not pursue the matter. This time
when we called we heard the very same words we heard when we asked the now
former mayor of the North Slope Borough why his notices of contracts and
and meetings were buried in the very same way in the same Anchorage paper.
It is good public policy, costs less money, and is the intent of the law
to properly inform the people of the North Slope Borough when the comm-
ission takes an action that might directly affect them. To attempt to do
otherwise raises questions of intent, particularly in view of the Borough's
recent experiences. We suggest the Commission follow the lead of the new
North Slope Borough Mayor and attempt to keep the people informed with
public notices that actually reach the public. In the absence of that, a
public hearing will have to be held in the North Slope Borough so that
the residents of the Borough-the public-can be heard.
Reasonable people ought to be able to sit down and work out a reasonable
solution to this situation so that it does not delay or embarass the oil
industry. We are certainly willing to try. Please gtf~~~I~~~1 if you
have any ideas on the subject. ~LLL V tU
Si~ce,rêly.. yours,
f..L U t ,
-:7-' ~C-E~
J. Lindauer
publisher
AUG 2 2 1986
cc:
NSB Mayor, Rep. Adams
Sen. Ferguson
Alaska Oil & Gas Cons. Commission
Anchorage
ClNM CHECK
77.~~: '.'
....-...:; H" . BBPI
OHOU> I: 8BI1Ø
MÆ
t line oller tOR 9./&'1,Y~fJ~ to the nght .
of the rl:lu'tr alJ~U
. .
-II.. .
t .;;1':
~
.. :. , -. . r II. .' '" .
··.~,œ'I_.
P 467 727 952
'-
ç)~Þ.GE. -4.~
cr p~l, '-'f :
z
r
. ~.
,. ....,'.. .. i:;:··
..,. 'r-.... \,,'
. _~~L. W~A,{S '7"E::r
1 ,""'- ". . J"~~"'--
....,.".....~;,..;-¡ 10 rnn~:~···
^:j!f·~h~~:'·ê: ..... , . ) · "'1
,,\ . . '," 'I' .It.
. . .~'.
LC?nnie C. SJ.ni th
Commissioner
Alaska Oil and G?S Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
RECEiVED
1.. ,-
j.;, U(.; ? r..: 10 8 ('
~ '- :'v 'Q
,\ ¡"".,I<a ..,:, ,~ .,
.....jQ,;¡¡ VII á. \..:¡as Cans C '.
.. . omm¡SSiOn
,:...f1C:--;ct:¡çe
MEMORAf"'JUM Stat ~ of Alaska
ALASKA OIL & GAS CONSERVATION C01~~ISSION
lU: Memorial to File
DATE: August 15, 1986
FILENO.: 1.C.20
TELECOPY NO: 276-7542
TELEPHONE NO.: 279-1433
THRU:
FROM:
~.~ .
C. V. .. tteon
Chai_
SUBJECT:
Notice of opportunity
for Hearing - Conoco
Application. for Area
Injection Order
At approximately 10:45 AM, August 15, 1986, I received a phone
call from Jackie Lindauer, editor of the Barrow Sun.
Jackie, had read our Notice of Opportunity for subject public
hearing in this morning's edition of the Anchorage Daily News.
She sounded quite incensed because we had not advertised in her
paper - the Barrow Sun.
T related to Jackie that our money was in short supply and
becaus'e statutory law did not require us to publish outside of
borough in which hearing was to be held, we would be hard pressed
to justify spending funds for peripheral advertising.
Jackie, believes the notice should appear in a newspaper pub-
lished within the affected borough - the "open government"
syndrome. She 1;'lent on to say that she was going to have. to "give
me a hard time on this one", and would be taking steps to achieve
a statutory change with respect to advertising.
I closed off by saying that was fine and to have at it.
;
- ,
02-001 A (Rev 10-84)
#2
Notice of Public Hearing
STATE OF ALASKA
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Re: The application of Conoco Inc. for an Area Injection Order
for the Milne Point Unit in the Kuparuk River Field.
The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission has been
requested, by letter dated July 28, 1986, to issue an order for
area inj ection to provide authorization for utilizing service
wells permitted in accordance with 20 AAC 25.005 or 20 AAC 25.280
to inject fluids underground for purposes of enhancing oil
recovery from the Milne Point Unit in the Kuparuk River Field.
Parties who wish to protest the granting of the referenced
request are allowed 15 days from the date of this publication in
which to file a written request for a hearing. The place of
filing is the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, 3001
Porcupine Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. If a protest and
request for hearing is timely filed, a hearing on the matter will
be held at the above address at 9:00 AM on September 15, 1986, in
conformance with 20 MC 25.540. If a hearing is to be held,
interested parties may confirm this by calling the Commission's
office, (907) 279-1433, after August 30, 1986. If no such
protest is timely filed, the Commission will consider the issu-
ance of the order without a hearing.
~~
Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Published August 15, 1986
STATE OF ALASKA
'''ADVERTISING
ORDER
F
R
o
M
Anchorage Daily News
P. o. Box 149001
Ane~rage, Alaska 99514-9001
T
o
p
U
B
L
I
S
H
E
R
Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Coomission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
ADVERTISING ORDI;RNO.
AO-
08-5568
AGENC}p.ot-ITACT'R
LTa1.yn .i..ofV811S
DME~t 13, 1986
PHONE
279-1433
(907)
DATES ADVERTISEMENT REQUIRED:
August 15, 1986
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OFt1~
~-
55
DIVISION.
BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC THIS DAY
PERSONALLY APPEARED~~~/~' mHO,
BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, ACCORDING TO LAW, SAYS THAT
HE/SHEISTHE~I + OF~~
PUBLISHED AT~t-?~ IN SAID DIVISION
, ?J .. AND STATE OF ~ ~~ AND THAT THE
ADVERTISEMENT, OF WHICH THE ANNEXED IS A TRUE COPY, WAS
PUBLISHED IN SJID PUBLICATION ON THE /!fd:." DAY OF
¥r 191£, AND THEREAFTER FOR t>
CONSECUTIVE DAYS, THE LAST PUBLICATION APPEARING ON THE
I!1I:DAY OF ~~ 198t" AND THAT THE
RATE CHARGED THEREON IS NOT IN EXCESS OF THE RATE
C~GED PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS. " .
~4l -"'- .J'~_"'
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
THIS ~ DAY OF ~~".J-".~>....~~ 19~
.~ /'
~2~ .............. ......~~ '-'-~ .~~ .) ~ ....-_ '...<,.....:~<. .e:.- ."'......Q.-........~----
~~T~~~ :I~~~~~ :~I~~~TE O~~yè::;~~::;\c-;,?:", 3, Cj~
02-901 (Rev. 6-85)
PUBLISHER
REMINDER~
INVOICE MUST BE IN TRIPLICATE AND MUST REFERENCE
THE ADVERTISING ORDER NUMBER.
A CERTIFIED COpy OF THIS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE INVOICE.
ATTACH PROOF OF PUBLICATION HERE.
,
Notice of PUblic Hearing
STAT.EOF ALASKA
Alaska 011 and Gas
COnserva,ion CQmmission
Re: The application of ~onoco
Inc. for an Arealnlectlon. Or-
der for the Milne Point Un..lt 10
the Kuparuk River Field.
The Alaska 011 and Gas conser-
vatlon commissionhasbêen
requested, by letter dated July
28 . 1986, to issue an order for
a¡ealnledion to.. provide a!J-
thorlzation' for utilizing service
wells permitted In accordance
wlth-:20 MC25.005or 20 AAC
25:28ô.:~ tolnlect ~fluids under-
grOUnd torpurøQSeSof enhanc-
, ing 011 recovery fl"omthe MII~
, pólntUnltln the l<uparuk RIV-
er Field.
Parties whO wish to protest the
granting of the referenced re-
auesf are allowed 15 days. fro~
thed..d.. a. te ..off.hl.S..·..... PUb.I..i.catlon. .10 II.
which to fll~..a wrItten request.
for a hearing. The place of,
filing Is the Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation commission, 3001
Porcupne . Drive, Anchorage,
Alaska 99501. . If a protest and
request . for hearing is timelY
fUèd, a hearing on the matter
*11I be .held attheaboye ad-
dressat 9:00 AM on Septe!"ber
15, 1986¡in confotma~ce ~Ith 20
AAC 25.540.lfahearln~ IS to be
held, . Interested partl!!s .'. may
éQnflrmthis þy calling the.
Commission's office, (907) 219-
143, after August 30,1986. If no
such protest is timely flied, the!
eo"'mission will consi~er the:
lùuance onhe order without a
hearing.
Is/LOMie C. Smith
Commissioner .
Alaska . Oil and Gas conserva-
tion Commission .
. Pub: AUgust 15, 1986
A<i-œ-5S68 .'.
#1
I.
í
( ,r-~?':~ ,~.,.M"~ ~\
'. ..~ ~ ~ .....;;..,,;, __J
-~ __T
If;
'-
--
}
John R. Kemp
Division Manager
Conoco Inc.
3201 C Street
Suite 200
Anchorage. AK 99503
(907) 564-7600
Warren J. Hairford
Division Operations Manager
Gordon A. Hitchings
Division Projects Manager
July 28, 1986
Mr. C. V. Chatterton, Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Dear Mr. Chatterton:
Attached please find two copies of Conoco' s Inj ection Order Application
f or the Nilne Point Unit. Supporting information is included in appro-
priate sections of the document.
Please contact Mr. Rod Schulz at 564-7600 if you have questions or
require additional information.
Ù~;, r" t_r~~y yours,
, // Jû :/
VI/V~/1,-?-
/ John R. Kemp
~/DiViSion Manager
ljm
Att
cc/att:
R. C. Herrera, Manager
Exploration Planning/Environment/Lands
Standard Alaska Production Company
Mr. Tom Fink, Manager
Environmental Conserva~ion
ARCO Alaska, Inc.
'I..
(-
¡' . ~ -=-'../-,,"", "r--- .'- ~ )'
\ ...~ .;~ ''''w''';
~. \ '
--
~.
j.
John R. Kemp
Division Manager
Conoco Inc.
3201 C Street
Suite 200
Anchorage, AK 99503
(907) 564-7600
í c-Aro::tiJD
r/?..c ~
Warren J. Hairford
Division Operations Manager
Gordon A. Hitchings
Division Projects Manager
July 28, 1986
Mr. C. V. Chatterton, Commissioner
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Dear Mr. Chatterton:
Attached please find two copies of Conoco IS Inj ection Order Application
for the Milne Point Unit. Supporting information is included in appro-
priate sections of the document.
Please contact Mr. Rod Schulz at 564-7600 if you have questions or
require additional information.
Very truly yours,
ORIGINAL SIGNED 8Y
J. R. KEM~
·John R. Kemp
Division Manager
RRS/ljm
7e~. 6r (AOGCC Area Injection Permit)
óõ,J,(J'I/
Att
cc/att:
R. C. Herrera, Manager
Exploration Planning/Environment/Lands
Standard Alaska Production Company
Mr. Tom Fink, Manager
Environmental Conservation
ARCO Alaska, Inc.
bcc/att:
R. R. Schulz
J. T. Dosch
bcc:
W. J. Hairford
D. I. Robertson
A. E. Hastings
RECEIVED
SEP 1 5 1986
, . . 0\\ & Gas Cûn~. vvli!mission
þJas}<a Anchorage .
/--
',-,
'''"-''
MILNE POINT UNIT
AREA INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION
... -..:
RECEiVED
SEP 1 5 1986
. Qil & Gas {jOIl~. vV¡¡HfJlSsion
Alaska Anchorage
,;
-~'h
'_'O¡~~.""'...._:...'~.._
/------
"r_.., -'
MILNE POINT U~IT
AREA INJECTION ORDER APPLICATION
Section/Regulatory Cite
A. 20 AAC 25.460
B. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(1)
C. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(2)
D. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (3)
E. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(4)
F. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(5)
G. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(6)
H. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(7)
I. 20 AAC 25.402(c) (8)
J. 20 AAC 2S.402(c)(9)
K. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(10)
L. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(II)
M. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(12)
N. 20 AAC 25.402(c)(14)
o. 20 AAC 25.402(d)
P. 20 AAC 25.402(h)
Q. AOGCC Request
R. AOGCC Request
s. 20 AAC 25.402(e)
20 AAC 25.030(g)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subject
Area Injection Order
Plat
Opera~ors/Surface Owners
Affidavit
Description of Operation
Pool Information
Geologic Information
Well Logs
Casing Information
Injection Fluid
Injection Pressure
Fracture Information
Formation Fluid
Hydrocarbon Recovery
Mechanical Integrity
Wells Within Area
Wells Permitted by the EPA
Legal Description of the
Curren~ MPU Participating
Area
Variance Requests
-1-
rr
Page
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
MILKE POINT U~IT
AREA I~JECTION ORDER APPLICATION
List of Figures
Title
Figure B-1
Plat Hap
Figure F-l
Log Correlation to W. Sak River
State No. 1
Figure G-1
Generalized Stratigraphic Section
Figure G-2
Top of Kuparuk River Formation
Structure Map
Figure I-I
Typical Well Bore Sketch
Figure J-1
Prince Creek Formation Water
Analysis
Figure J-2
Kuparuk Formation Water Analysis
Figure J-3
Gas Analysis
-2-
Page
4A
SA
IDA
lOB
12A
1SA-lSB
lSC-lSD
15E-15F
§(
~~- .-
/
--
l'
SECTION A
Area Injection Oràer
20 AAC 25.460
Conoeo Inc., as operator of the Milne Point Unit (~œU), requests an area
injection order be issued for current and proposed injection wells fer
the enhanced recovery of oil or gas.
The area inj ec tion order is
requested to encompass all lands within the boundary of the }ŒU. Conoce
requests that the order allow Conoco to drill, operate, convert or plug
and abandon wells within the MPD by filing Form 10-401 or Form 10-403.
The Oil and Gas Conservation Commission may, at its discretion, issue an
area injection order if certain requirements are met. The }ŒU injection
operations meet the requirements of 20 AAC 25.460(a). Existing wells
are dt:scribed and identified by type. Inj ection wells are within the
same field, are operated by a single operator and are used for other
than hazardous waste injection.
The cumulative effect of drilling and operating additional enhanced
recovery injection wells will result in an increase in hydrocarbon
recovery. All injection wells will be drilled, constructed, operated,
and abandoned in accordance with the Commission rules to prevent
movement of fluids into fresh water strata.
. .
-3-
"'.
tr
-..~/
-'..."....-
SECTION ]j
PLAT
20 AAC 25.402(c)(1)
Figure B-1 is a plat showing the location of all wells that penetrate
the uppermost injection zone within the MPU boundary, i.e., the area
covered by this area injection order application.
-4-
r;
,__ J<"_ :.._.;.:"':~
-~---'
SECTION C
Operators/Surface Owners
20 AAC 25.402(c)(2)
The surface owners and operators within the area of this area injection
order and extending 1/4 mile beyond the boundary (excluding Conoco)
are:
State of Alaska
Department of Natural Resources
Attn: Jim Eason
3601 C Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
ARCO Alaska Inc.
Attn: Julie Athans
P.O. Box 100360
Anchorage, Alaska 99510-0360
Standard Alaska Production Company
Attn: Jean Parsons
900 E. Benson Blvd.
P.O. Box 196612
Anchorage, Alaska 99519
-5-
~
-"-
SECTION D
Affidavit
20 AAC 25.402(c)(3)
Affidavit of Rodney R. Schulz
STATE OF ALASKA
THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
I, Rodney R. Schulz, declare and affirm as follows:
1. I am over 19 years of age. I am employed by Conoco Inc. as a
Reservoir Engineer. I have personal knowledge of the matters
set forth in the affidavit.
2.
On
I
T,'
~' ~' I)'
? ~f
1986, the surface owners/operators
listed in Section C were provided a copy of this permit
application.
DATED at Anchorage, Alaska this ~ b":/. day of
. ...- L""
,1986.
/'
/; I (
/C-~_, !/" t~...:'(--
Rodney R. S:h~
Subscribed
WI 1(,((/ ~7f
L. v'
and
affirmed
before
me
at
Anchorage,
Alaska
on
,1986.
,1?{an cl '1nC((¿;d/Ui~
No't~ry Public in and for the St£{e
of Alaska
4 jge¡ /r¡()
1/ I
My Commission expires:
J
-6-
"
r
SECTION E
Description of Operation
20 AAC 25.402(c)(4)
Current and proposed injection operations at the ~æu are for the
t=uhanced recovery of oil and gas.
Two types of enhanced recovery injection wells are currently used: water
injection and gas injection. Additional methods of enhanced oil recovery
may be used in the future. Future injection wells will continue to be
designed, construe ted, operated and monitored to ensure the inj ection
fluid is entering the oil reservoir.
used for enhanced oil recovery.
The Kuparuk River formation is
-7-
"
._~."
~~....".~
SECTION F
Pool Information
20 AAC 25.402(c) (5)
The Kuparuk River Formation in the Hilne Point Unit is part of the
Kuparuk River Field, which is classified as the Kuparuk River Oil Pool.
The Kuparuk River Oil Pool is defined by Rule 2 of Conservation Order
No. 173 as the strata that are common to and correlate with - the
accumulation found in: the Atlantic Richfield Company West Sak River
State No. 1 Well between the depths of 6,474 and 6,880 feet, measured
depth, or 6387.9 and 6793.9 feet, subsea.
Figure F-l is a log
correlation between W. Sak River State No. 1 and Milne Point Unit well
32-25 (formerly Kavearak Point 32-25). Figure G-l is a detailed type
log from Milne Point Unit well B-1.
-8-
.:
~
-I'
,
. I
\
]
.. I
'..¡
~
, .
, , , . I,.~
-I'
OIL
}I ~\ ;1'
~. ~ ; ~
~ '. ,~
. t
I \ \
! n"
o '-? -' _
..
'.-C: - .
~
.-¡:- ..,
t~- ,
r- .
,j-
f' :I
JJ~
~ .
~--
\.....~-
.! 'a~~
i '1)-'
i ¡») .
~ ~'l :
§ nr:
¡ ¡} :. '"..
i -n :
,
I
. ,
: ,~
....~
l'
~
DIL .
(\
g --'\r-
. -.-[-
1~
E -.-1í-
o (J
î.
-, --'r-
MIºº~US!l~8ßU!~~_1' _: __it_._
--~- , g - -?~
-<-.-- - -~)...:?~
· . . ....
· _. 0__._,
· 0
:~ : ) 0 ~:
.. :~o~n;:nJS!lP~ß!'!!U>!LI'- ~. -. ~~~
. --~- .----. 0 - --~-:.-
. ,. . .....: Q ~~-=--
_. -·-ll';,-
___:/"- -
; _.~';
t. . j
. I ~
; "! =\ n
-to !~~~ '&
t ' . .
I ';';' I
., ,
. . ;~:i~ .,!
, ~ I ~) .
r-:.~ ! ~
. - -,l,.. C>
. ,. "c... ~
, ...
: .:).
" -i??
. . .:,...
. . ~
.: 't· ~
~ :: ,
-. ... ~
- .
J ·s. ~~
! ~r::. <3
-)" .
i . .. . .. ,
I ~ .
: e:,.-\ '
¡ .
~
"
UPPER KUPARUK SO.
----
\, "\
.)
MILNE POINT UNIT
KUPARUK RIVER FIELD
FIGURE F-1
MILNE POINT UNIT LOG CORRELATION TO W. SAK RIVER STATE NO.1
W. SAK RIVER 8T A TE NO. 1 J<A VEARAf< POINT 32-25
"~
i I ~
....
,
00
tþ
I
-~
'-~
SECTION G
Geologic Information
20 AAC 25.402(c)(6)
The stratigraphy of the Kuparuk River Formation is depicted in Figure
G-1, which is a well log of B-1. The average subsea depth is 7,000 ft.,
and the thickness of the reservoir sands varies from five to forty-five
feet. The Lower Cretaceous age Kuparuk River Formation ~s divided into
Middle and Lower members which are separated by an interbedded silt and
shale interval known as the Laminated Zone. Most of the reservoir is
comprised of the Middle and Lower Kuparuk sands, with minor reserves in
the L8 and L9 portions of the Laminated Zone.
The l-iiddle Kuparuk is quartzose, very fine to very coarse grained, and
contains significant amounts of glauconite and siderite.
It has an
average permeability and porosity of approximately 200 md and 22%,
respectively.
The Laminated Zone is an interbedded silt and shale
interval below the Middle Kuparuk. Two thin sands, the L8 and L9, lie
in the Laminated Zone and contribute to production. Below the Laminated
Zone lies the Lower Kuparuk sands. These sands are quartzose, fine to
very fine grained and have an average permeability and porosity of
approximately 100 md and 21%, respectively.
-9-
.:
'-
'-~~...
SECTION G
Geologic Information (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c)(6)
The Kuparuk
(Figure G-2).
River Field of the Milne Point is a structural trap
It is bounded on the southwest by a NW-SE trending fault
with oil/water contacts on all other sides of the anticlinal structure.
The conf ining interval above the Kuparuk River Formation consists of
more than 2,000' of Cretaceous shale. The lower confining interval is
the Kingak shale, which exceeds 1,500' in thickness.
-10-
,<
/
~..-
r ~~
, /- ¡ ~.
. ~=== L.___ _~ t ~
73001-7060) --- -.-----..:.... - ...,,,n ~;.?:-~
- ,....... l
- ...
--~ -~ r. '- ~ .___ _ :. ..:_~ : ~ ,-';:;
730-4(-10641 -- ~- --<'-: r .__:-
-' I .
7:516/-7076) .' < ~ÞI ~.-,--.~ U " :::'~'-~~--==--_-:-
-~ I e
...- I
_J~ I ,.
: ~-:-r- r- ~,
~. -----:: .ç....
,--... ,-
.~~ I <,
. -:::~ r -r-
- - I ,-
·1 .
. .
I
,-'
\"
~ ': ¿,~
" , I,
-~..:~ ::Jr;::: ,~;~~:(x- ·
.~~ ;/
, --'-<--<- -- .:>
. /- ~~ ~--_.~-~-
or< -.j;' ~, i, ~ P' ..., 1-', -,c""';=í,'"")
..£ . ,.-....... ....,. I J_\
,.~¡...".. .., "t
'.; '8f7:·,~· ..':"~ .~
C~ ~ ~ '::-: ,71 ~·~1 r ~ ~:. b~·.\~·
" ..Lj__1.J ~ - -. ..--, '-', ¡
¿..~ L- '~
t,-~-
~ I
J":-.
.;~
;-~---j
:.:=:sFL-i~ ~-
", '
IlD-~~L~ !
R
-,
~:
I
~,--- i :~-=--=-=--
/- - ~ -._~-===
t--- -
-..~-_.. - -- --
~
, ..¡
: 1-----4
~-J
. J
;--;-~
. ;..-:. :
~
SP--:~
- I ... --..::;:;::::
-60~RãY~
.-...." I ~..
~ 1
-S
)
- --.-.- -<-
, ...
._~~
,...
==-=-=- -=-_:==c..-:---:~ ==
---- ---~-
_ . L_____
::::===:-.':" ~~
=-=.::...:..::- ===:::::=-=-;~ -
~
. -- - ~=-==:
----=:::::--
<~ -.. ~ "';; ,:7;~:1:-';
~ "r' Jr. . .' ".¡~
:' ~ -:t t :;':~L-L"_<c- _ ._:--,_
' ,-. - b::i..J -,. . ft.- '___,. ~
--'-. - -¿--- . -; ;""1- ~,--:; :::'.:! -_; >~,__~
~ - ·~t·, 'f, / " ."
. · r·.. ,
-... 1 S ~ -., . ___
q: " J]j >! ; '::!' 1:-:0
-." U t ~ '-" .... t ~d.. . Y..;::
';-~ r· .'-'.. 1:. :t._ r-
---, < - - , . - - - - -,
>, ~ -.
' ;- ~
--" : ~\ :
' '-, S~-,
'\ - -~
'- "
s---: I ~(
r-;~_J~; ¡ _.,__
Ot:~ ;0 C>O
1 lI£[;!lnI I1IOJCTIOII
rl_-~~-_----~-----~--
DEEP :II DUCT 1011
Of'~ ~ "XI
¡-=--r -.---=:_~-
¡ ~~k-~_:~
t "
::or...
,~ESISTlVrrY o..s ."1.
-- 5" =.l ---=---:
~- \; -
..
IllUY<Iln
~ T AliEOlIS-POTÐíTlAL
~ ~""A CAY
::'J
:1
.~
-lnA-
7466 (-7226)
739J (-71511
LK, 7402.1-71621
LOWER
KUPARUK 74211-7181)
SANDS LK2 7442 1-72011
7376 (-7136)-~
nZI (-70811
-LQ
- oJ
=L8
LAMINATED
ZONE
7217 (-6977)-
7212 (-697'2)
MK2
MIDDLE
KUPARUK
SANDS
7i89 1-69491
7168 {-6928}-'~
UK ìi73 (-69331
m I 7!S4 (-6'94-4)
10
BUSHING ELEV. · 46'
KELLY
'ry;)
M. R U. 8-i
TYPE - LOG
~"='-
FIGURE G-1
" "
I
.....
o
OJ
I
."
" I [
, .
Ie
It
I :. II
I.
I
II
"
',.
-----
-------T ~I
-- -- 10
··~--------»-------r»- - ,
:"" ,
\
\
-
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I.
"
It
II
lJ
"
II
,. .
--~~ -., .
II
.I
I
ø..
- -,. --,. - . ,.
["
a
IS
-
u
II
I
.. \1'
- --.-.---_..-.,
~
--
---
II
..
, .
/....
¡...
I J
II
" ~
.o'
, ,:.' - .......": 10 . . 21
I' !
: I J
.
-.
II
..
20
~f
... ".,
..
.... II
.... .
.
--~-IO [
FIGURE" G-2
--;;
" 10 :-____~, a
--u .
I
I
I
I
I
"_..~ ~~--'
, ". " ------------ . >.. I
.-.J,~ " ;.'00"---- .
.-----~~ ~
00 .
. 0" ,:.
. ."--- ,.........
,~: · .' ì
· ( ""6'00' I '
-~ ,...~
. ,,~ 2~
'0 I " ....~ '
OO~ ___:i-. -I)~- ~:'.. --,.' l ) i
,,~ .. 0/';
.......... - ,00 ,
, , II
'- - .
u____m_ ::_m_:_____..:'~o:------m--i .
II
I'
þ-. ,
II
·~:~~.u
10
II
It
10
II
II II [
I'
11
: -.'.'. 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
t-------- J;
I I.
---..-.
~-------: II
n I
I
~
~
r ',h-
I
I..
II
II
------j
POINT UNIT
MILNE
BOUNDARY
"
\
----
10
1 ,
--.#-~
~ I"
, .'
~
.
.
12
rll
..
.
..
I'
II
10
II
12
'" .....
"
...------
-;"I [
J
jl
J
----...,
--------""j
It
II
----'2
Î
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
_:....
I I
I ....'
..
,.
J
I"
N
----;;
I'
-..--
--
[conoco)
WII .." "",.., ",..,
~1"ucrUl'l "'A" .
TOP KUPARlJK RIVER
FOHMATION
--
'-
SECTION H
\.Jell Logs
20 AAC 25.402(c)(7)
All openhole logs from wells in the MPU are sent to the Commission as
the logs are completed. A type log for the }ŒU is included as Figure
G-l.
-11-
~
~
S:r:CTION I
Casing Information
20 AAC 25.402(c)(8)
Typical wells are cased as shown in Figure I-I.
American Petroleum
Institute (API) casing specifications are included on each drilling
permit application. All casing is cemented in accordance with 20 MC
25.402 (b) and all production casing is pressure tested to 2,000 psi
prior to completing the well. In wells converted from production to
injection, th~ casing is retested in accordance with 20 AAC 25.412(c).
-12-
~
-'
FIGURE 1-1
MILNE POINT UNIT
TYPfCAL WELL BORE SKETCH
-.,,-
.oJ - _.':' ...""~" _.,..~ '" ":\'<~.
, .. . L· . .. .. . '..
>:.:~~"..:.~..'.~ ".~.~:_.:... .:~...~ I
..: .:.":; ...'..::..... ~~.:.<~.~~.' : ~.:..-
".J~·.I. ..........: ..-- ·~-'~'I
... ,0· .·.~·_.·..r.·.·.
:~: ~'::.~.~:. '.'>'~: . . ~ '
~.', '.' .:,.... .:.; /~~ J:~::.-.;
". .. 0'. :c,..... ...;
.. .. .. ~ . . ... - ..
:.... ,..:'::.... .::..~.: -.:,'.
'. . , . . ., . . . . '. . . ':: . . - 1 3 3/8· @ 100'
- - - ~Tk:~ - - - - - - - - - }';'[ - Permafrost to 1800'
<'.~.-:':: -- ~ ",7-. ·
:....~: _ ~,(j 4·_. _ _ Down squeezed cement
:..;..--.:..-.~£;. :fl- .. ~,,:'
~:.;.;....~ ç' ~.. ............- 9 5/8· @ 4500' TV D
....;.r?v·. _. 4 :':-;-S-"-¡-
:;.>-.~--_~ - ~.. 4',"9.4 ( 8 e low t h a bas e 0 f the
\ "';"" , 4":; þo ¡¡ \ W est S 8 k 1 . 8 n d. )
Oil basad, non-freezable,
low thermal conductivity fluid
· Slant type hole_
· Average angle 45°
~.
. - .:2:
o· ....' .
~~
.~-~.'.;;:!
--.
..... ..
.'
'.. ..
- .
<'.<;:::: :.
.. . ....
. ,. ..
. ....
... -'. "
... 't.~..' _
, .J.".
.. ..."
. . t· _ .
~:;~}:t;;./jj-7' @ 7000' rye
NOT E ;' E a c h well I. e quI p p 'e d with a n
API 5000 psla tree
-12A-
-;:
-"-"
.~-
SECTION J
Injection Fluid
20 AAC 25.402(c)(9)
Water and gas are injected to enhance hydrocarbon recovery at the ¥œu.
A.
TYPE OF FLUID
Water
Analysis of Composition of Typical Fluid
1. Prince Creek Formation (similar to ARCO's West Sak Formation)-
Figures J-1a and J-1b
2. Kuparuk River Formation - Figures J-2a and J-2b.
Source of Fluid - The primary source of injection fluid is water
supply wells that produce from the Prince Creek Formation.
Produced water from oil producing wells is reinjected by
commingling it on the surface with Prince Creek water.
Estimated Maximum Amount to be Injected Daily - 40,000 BWPD
-13-
l;
-.
-~-
SECTIOj\ J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c)(9)
Compatibility With Formation and Confining Zones Water
sensitivity tests on core samples showed no significant problems
with formation plugging or clay swelling from Prince Creek or
Kuparuk formacion water. Prince Creek and Kuparuk formation water
are compatible with the confining zones.
B.
TYPE OF FLUID
Gas
Analysis of Composition of Fluid - See Figures J-3a and J-3b.
Source of Fluid - Kuparuk Reservoir
Estimated Maximum Amount to be Injected Daily - 5 MÞlSCFPD
Compatibility with Formation
and Confining Zones
Full
compatibility because it is being reinj ected into the producing
zone.
-14-
rf
~
SECTION J
Injection Fluid (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(c)(9)
c.
TYPE OF FLUID
Miscellaneous water (including non-hazardous
surface water) and associated surfactants/solvents used in the
washing and cleaning of the facility, equipment within the
facility, motor vehicles and other items related to the production
of oil at Milne Point . Volumes will be very low and should not
exceed 200 bbl/day, or 2% of the typical daily injection volume.
fulalysis of Composition of Fluid
Prince Creek for~ation [se~
Section J (a) (1)] or drinking water with minor amounts of surfac-
tants/solvents approved by the U.S. Department of Labor.
Source of Fluid
Surface facility wastewater
Estimated Maximum Amount to be Injected
200 BPD
Compatibility with Formation and Confining Zones Full
compatibility because it is osmotically treated Prince Creek water
diluted to less than 2% of the injection stream.
-15-
a
--~
(¥
FIGURE J-1a
WATER A~ALYSIS REPORT
c ü ~~ 0 CO I N C A
¡:, f, iJ Due T ION F: I:: S E i~1 R C H D T Ii I S I {J N
F' 0 N C f.¡ .: I T Y I 0 1< L. AHa (I ¡.;
I...J D902
IDE NT T FIe t. T ION: 11 I Li,~ E F' T. W (1 T E F, ~J E L ~ ::: B - -j
FIe L. D : K U P A AUK A I V EAr ~1 f, MAT ION: p r:~ I U C E C r~ E E K
DEPTH: STATE: AK CO;JNTY: COUNTr:~Y:
S I; M P L E r:· 0 I NT: F'r, 0 D ATE S TeD ~1 F' () SIT E D ¡.i TEe 0 L LEe T [D: '1 0/0 1 /82
(4NA;_ '( .S· I ,S' ¡::~[,\'UL T ~~
SF' Eel FIe G ru) V I T Y: i A 003 :-.; [S 1ST I V I r ( AT 73 J) [G F i. 350 0 -H·1 ì·í E T E ¡:;.: .:;'
PH : G. 00
ì-¡EQ./L
TOT.".L ~;'(:,)L TS
fIYPf\()r.ru SUl...rIDI:
( CIILOf, I DL (CL)
S U L F ;,iT .: ~\ 0 ¡j )
CARDON~d"[ (C03)
Ð I C tl r:: [< [I N '''I T F. (I-I C r 3 )
H Y D i~ 0 X '¡Î...: (n I )
t~\ c~ . :2
t-i G / L
:3 9 ~: ()
o
22no
4
o
SOD I U ì1 (N;:',;"
t-1 [ [~ / L.
46 ~ i)
;-í G / L
1079
1', '
.:... Ö
I '~ t)
Mf¡GNESIUM (MG)
C I~d_.. C I U M (C I~ )
Btfl:;; T UM (Dt-I)
Ir~ON .: tIG/L;' TnT¡:~L
S U Sf F' [: ì-J P [ D S () L I 1) S
'1 ,. 1
20
133
o
0.0
0.0
I .
\.) .. (:i
0.0
1- I I) I .~: ~ .
(~ . 4~"J
1 1
OT:~ER tlNAL YSIS
K 460 (MG/L)
Tr::¡:,~C[ ANALYSIS
. ~.
ì1 G / L
MG/L
SILVEF: (¡;G)
ALUl1 I NUM .; .)L)
ItORON ([I)
BEr,YLLIUM (DE)
CAD M I U t1 (C D :,
CIII~()M 1 UM u:rn
rOr'f'Eí:: (CIJ)
I r':LHJ I. IT: :'
M t~ N (~ I) N r s [ (M N )
MOL YVDLtJUti ('1 D)
( . c'~~
{ .. 1 5
.07')
<.. 25
( .. () 1 :.J
NICKEL (NI)
LEAD (PB)
ANT I riClNY (sn)
TIN (s~n
STRONTIUM (SR)
TITANIUM TI)
TII,:',LLJUh TL)
V ¡.; N ,:) D I: U n './ )
ZINC (ZN)
-'" A. ~t::'"'
\ . I,:.' ( ..)
(A005
\..015
( .03
( r, r.,..
. 4__4
.21
2..5
, '.)"\~
\ .. l, .-..:J
< ~ ~~ (.)
. () ü
.21
< A05
< ,()25
-:: . ()2S
l
-15A-
..
- ·f;
:,-
FIGURE J-1b
'---,
-<.-----
(
IDE N T I FIe ¡'~ T ION: r1 I L N E F' T. I..J (:¡ T E r, t·J ELL ;): 8 - 1 ( con t . )
I.J 8902
WATER ANALYSIS PATTERN
LOG (1 r, I T H ì-\ ::: C .... ~1 E (~ P [ F, L ]: T E r,
-. : ----......- : --..-- : -.----- 1----· ; --....--- : _.,....._- : __0__- ~ ..-.-..-..- : -.--- : ---- : ..- i
~..Itl
j(-
)~
:CL
-+-
+-
1--
Ctl
.jt
.,-:-
; He [I =~
-+- ....
MG
++
)~
"*
:SD4
: __ : .._.___ : 0_.___- : __0__ ~ ____: .__.___. : _....___ : _~___ : ______ : ._.____.. : .____ : ._ :
5
..
.:>
")
.:..
o
::::
..}
·-t
~5
C{;LCIUM CARBON~TE SC~\LING TFNDENCI ES
(
DEC
F
60
80
100
1 .",
-~,
i :. ()
'160 :
1BO:
+(.
... : ._ - __ 0- : _ _0 _._ : __ _ __ _ : _ __._._ : "'0 _ _.0 _ : _ _ _ _ : ___._ _ __ : 0_.' .._ __ _ : _. :
)(.
~"
)\.
li
"'("
.)~
: - : ---- : .----- : ----: ".. ---I ---- : ---- : ------ : .--~-- : - :
.- 2 ,,0 - 1 . ~~: - 1 ,,0 - 0 " ::: 0 0 .. 5 1. 0 1.. 5 2 " 0
'-' N D r:r..: S ri T U r~ {~ rED < ..".. S I - - > s U F' E F< S I; T l.H~ í~ rED
( N () I ~ S C /~) L I N G :. ( :;' C (} L I N G )
'. --·ta
. .
GYPSUM SCALING TENDENCIES
BAS04 SCALING TENDENCIES
.'.
IP ) kC .--) SCALE
I F' ì ( C -- -. > set. L E
- - -- -- -.. -. - .- -"- - - ._"- - - - - - - - ..... -- -. - .- - --- - .- - - -
- - -- -_ -._ - ._ - -.._ - -.. - - - __ - - -e·. ._ __ _.. _. _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ ~
DEG F IF' I<C I NTEF.:PF.:ET
----- --------- --------- -----.-- .-..-
60 1 . :1?[-O7 :2 . 2? [: -- 04 NO SC,~I...¡:~
80 1 . 3 'j> E -- 0 7 .:.. 4,,>[,-,04 NU SC(.,LE
1 00 1 .37[-07 2 " 49 E .... (.~ 4 NO SC~IL[
1 20 t 39[-,07 ') 4 ') E -- (-) 4 NO S C I~/l.. [
.. .... ..
·10 1 :\ C? F .- 0 "7 r) ._, [,,04 ND :;C/~L[
.:.. .. ..) J
1 bO , 39F ··..0·( ::.! \ ~.~[ ,,,04 NU SC,:'}LE
l i ," ., í ::.~..'[ ··('17 í . '/ U [.- (1 ·1 tJO :¡.(. tlL r
,_.,1)
DEG F IP KC INTERPRET
_._____ _________ --____._0._- _.________
Ü(-) 0,,00[+00 i " 0 Ü E>- 1 (-) NO SettLE
'100 0.. 00E -t·oo 1 " 0 (-) [ .-.j 0 NO SCr'"¡LE
120 0.0(-)[+00 i " ~ ø E -. (-) 9 NO SCALE
.¡ 40 O.OO[}OO 1 .. D \~ [ .... 0 ~.. ND SC,~LE
1ÓO O.n0C+00 ~~ .. 3()[ ·..·\)9 t~D S G,~ L E
'1 un o .. (II...ì r: n) Ü ':.\(i[ '. ,....... : .!t..: SCI~LE ' -
~.
-15B-
... ,,--, ~ ... . ~
. -
. .
...__ I:
. -....
-15D-
DEG F IF' KC INTERPRET
------ -------- ....----....--- ---..-......-----
80 6.. 9~}E -on 5.00E-09 SCALE
100 6.. 9'5E-08 6..60F.:-0? SCf~LE
120 6.95E-08 8.60[-09 SCAl.E
140 6.. 95E'-08 1..15E-OB SCALE
i/,) 0 6..95E-08 1..55E-08 SCALE
180 6..95£-08 2.04E-08 SCALE '. ..
. ~.
r)::-r. F TP Kf~ INTERPRET
----- -------- -------- ....--------
l,(} 4. O?f7 --07 1 .. onr -0~1 Nn SCALE
no 4 . ()~r---"()7 i .. 1/IF-()~ NO SCAL.E
1<1., 4 . () ~ F=" .-., 7 1 .. 22r··-01 Nn SCt-ILI::
1::'0 4 . () 2 r --0 7 1 .. ~~F·-03 NO SCALE
140 4 . ():? F .- () 7 1 .15[-0:\ NO SCt"'lLE
1AO 4.02[u07 1..11[-03 NO SCALE
1A() 4..0~E-07 f . O!)E -01 NO SCALE
--------------------~---------~--~
---------------------------------
IF' } KC --) SCALE
. IF' } KC --) SCt~LE
BASD4 SCALING TENDENCIES
GYPSIJM SCALING TENDENCIES
-2.. 0 -1.. '5 - i .. 0 -0.. 5 0 0 .5 1.. 0 1.5 2.. 0
UNDEF<SATLlF<ATED (-- SI --) SUPERSATURATED
(NONSCALING) (SCALING)
-:----:----:----:----:----:----:----:----:-
orrr
F -:----:----:----:----:----:----:----:----:-
~0 *
80 *
100 *
120 *
140 *
160 *
180 *
'-} 4 ~ ,., 1 (-) 1 2 3 4 5
.....
rr"./..CIUtf C~r::BON~iTE SCALING TENDENCIES
:-:.._--:----:----:----:----:----:----:----:----:----:-:
NA; *' * :CL
+ +
I
+ + I
I
CA: * *" :HC03
+ +
+ +
MG: * *' :S04
-:----:----:----:----:----:----:----:----:----1----:-:
LOG~RITHMIC-MEQ PER LITER
WATER ANALYSIS PATTERN
! D F. NT T FTC t"\ T T () N: M J J... N E ¡:. T.. UN IT, WE L L. ~ C - 4 SAM P L E 3, rES T 1
W 89:: /)
'-
(
FIGURE J-2b
'-
co
'-
l~1 ('.~ T eRA N A l. Y S T S r~ I:: P c) 1< T
CONOr:o INCA
F'F.:nn\r:TION F,ESEf~r\r,H DIVISION
rnNCA CITY, OKLAHOMA
W 8926
TorNTTFTCATTON: MTLNF PT. UNIT, WELL ~C-4, SAMPLE 3, TEST 1
F"TFI..O: MILNE PTA
DFF'TH: STI~ TE: AI<
SAMPI.E POINT: SEP{)RATOR
FOR MAT ION: L 0 tJ [R K UP A F< U K
COUNTY: COUNTRY:
DATE COLLECTED: 10/03/82
ANALYSIS RESULTS
SPECIFIC GR{)VrTY: 1.022 RESISTIVITY AT 73 DEG F 0.215 OHM METERS
PH: 7..30
481 A 6
o ')
0.0
3 ~~ . 4
MG/L
31000
o
17100
10
o
2040
SODIUM (NA)
MER/L
504.3
MG/L
11600
MEQ/L
TOTA'- SAI.TS
HYDROGFN .\'1 JLF T DF.
r.HLnRrD[ eCL)
.\ 1 1/. FAT r-: (S 0 -1 )
CAnnnNATF (Cf1:1)
rn: r.Ar, no N ti T r-: (1-Ir:O:)
UYT)F~·OXYI. (01 t)
MAGNESIUM (MG)
C {~ LeI U M (C A )
Ð A I~ I U M (Ð A )
IRON (MG/L.) TOTAL
SUSPENDED SOLIDS
2..3
7.6
1 A 3
12.. DISS..
41
1'>2
90
0..0
78
TRAce t^-INf)l. Y S I S
ì1 G 1 '-
MG/L
.033
.018
.50
1 . 7
..087
NICKEL (NT)
LEAD (PB)
ANTIMONY (SB)
TIN (SN)
STRONTIUM (SR)
TITANIUM (TI)
THALLIUM (TL)
VANADIUM (V)
ZINC (ZN)
.18
< ..25
<..25
..75
16
<..025
<.50
..027
(..025
.~TI vrR ("'¡;)
ta, (IMTNIJM (AI.)
finr,nN (Fn
nrRY' .1. J l1M (HF.)
CADMIUM «(:0)
r.Hr.:OM {(JM (rr,)
r.OPPER <r.U)
IROtJ (FF)
H^Nr.ANESr:: (MN)
H n L Y fi n EN ( M (M n )
< . f 5
3(S
(.005
.022
..... .
-lSC-
- .
-15E-
<
~
SE
2
OfFSET
-~. 3
LT
PL.
ER
00000
STECTED P~S
3(3
~
E J E C: T E J
r'K5
~
.-.
. ~
DE
~ï AR::"'\
58
'=
a
~rALS
':-::4K
1-10
1
.,
..
"3
5
6
.,
a
?
o
1
PEA~
N~ME
C02
ET~~r..¡E
t-IITROGEH
METH~t·lë
PRO?HNi:
13a9UT~HE
r~- EU TAli E
I'30PEIITAN
N- P EtITAt'~E
P"iE:<;I"¡~'3
ø
RES U I.
SP GI~
C.~:Zl
() . 0 ~ .~
Ð . Q Q ::
o . 4 7 ~:
o . ø s ';
o . Q 1 :!
Q . Q 1 I:
Q.OO~
o . 0 a :;
0.001
66
':
<3
T
3
6
.;
.s
t
o
5
6
'5
1
:HA
~ECALC
:'ITLE:
r~
EL
NO
NG?H GRAVITY æ
3
S.~MPl E:
0.1.
C'
-,
E,
1
S
J
J
J
]
': 6 p
25
A b 3 OF
- .3
T I 11:~
C N I I~ )
1 . :~;~ 0;-
3 . la:3 ":'
~ . . ~ 13 ~;
5 . :~ I) .:.
-:¡ ,~,~,
'" . ..J .,J ....
2 . '3 '3 ~¡
3 . .3:3.:·
+ . ,) (HI
5 . l:~ ~I
5. H~C
6
t"ETHOD
T] 11E
OfFSET
el. ~ e e
~I . ~ e e
~I . ~ e e
tl . ~ c e
(.(~~
tl . e c c
fl . ~ e e
(I . c: e e
c;l . C C (!
~I . ~ e e
42
2
C;
A r;~
CO
~I
3,
~.
'"7 ., C'
.;J ,,-..J
3 1
~I
9
1
t
é,
EA
U t~ l' S
13~9
672Ø
C2€ó
39:3
58~4
55~4
a~42
'3248
4703
óO::! '3
45ErØ
:::4
RAV
H P R 13 6
~G?A
S-....
...~
CQ:JE
S8
as
S';
VB
aD
EV
VB
S'l
\;\/
G
"!
"?
L·ll .... 2
~SE:)
-1.. 1 ~
~) . 5 ~
!J . I} i)
.~ . :.~ '5
lL S '5
7' 5':'
7 l.)
"J QS
6 1~
...
"
~
~
.
\
orES:
CD t~O C Jj
MOD 5'5
MILNE PO
FUEL Gt~S
4~e; ~~U';
NT
VOL U t1 E:
~J0C'~
\lESS
4/16
-..
L
8
'4Q 1 SE
2
OFF5ET
-~3
.'1UL T
PL
E.~
ØQ20~
:JETECTED
PKS
30
=:: J E c: T E :)
F'f<S
e
~HH
DENT
At( EA
59
I.
'.
g
~o ¡':'L S
.,
;;~EC~LC
~T [ TL E :
~ -I
:)
J': H ~) N N E L
.",
. )
=FEHK
;::) NO
1
2
3
5
6
1
a
~
a
1
P Erl~
N~r~~
C02
ET~~N=:
r-l I í K oj G ¡: 1'~
ME7HHNE
P ~ tJ r: A t~ E
I sa 3U TI4I~E
N-E:.JTHNE
ISO?ENTAN
N-='ENìClNE
HEXHNE£
CJ
a
J
3
ace
MO:;!
c~.ei3
R E5UL
MC L ~:(,
1 . 41] .~.
6 . 2 2 ':
0.8 3'~
85.357
3 . a 3 '~i
8 . 5 4 ':
\3 . a 2 1:1
0. t 4 ':
C . C'3!:
0.03;
:: s r1 (;:-- Z
S ~ í'1 P !. =:
I
ø
T
4-
1
3
1
7
7
3
8
'.;
PC!
2 S~.
t
]
J
J
J
J
~" T
-3
T I :1'::
(M I J~
1 , :~:~
3 . :J:3
<t . ,';':3
5 . :Z::3
-:11 ,. ,. .
'" . .~ .:J ...
2 . '3 '5 :i
3 . -3 13 ~-
4- . ., 13 f:
5 , L ,Z ~I
5. '1-i~~:
F
GURE
TI
or
~I
~I
- ~I
- ('
~I
~I
(I
~I
~I
~I
(I
J-3a
11
F
.
.
c_
6 12
ì' E THO D :. ~:
E A~~
: = ï C C!
c: e 7 EI
277 31'
~ 27 ¿.
~ 5 6 3 2 :;
124 31
1 1 S E.
~ 34 :'
~ 58 1
249 1
~ ee
--1
42
~.
Gri":,
E.04 .
U ~~ T S
·1 3 ~ S
67~O
n,.,'" ~
"..i~::O
3g::e
5S~~
55~4
0042
924S
.. 7 ;:1 3
6623
~ S l:1 \3
- I
..; ....
.=. t: ~
.... .. .
r .; ~ ;:
'- J,-J ...._
E3
- -
..... ...
.8\1
'/B
Q'"
_D
3'1
va
S'}
\j 'J
G
¡:.P?
:_~ ~J
",
'?
L"::
_ - ( t
.... ._ ___ I
-+ I'~
. ,...
o . ':. :;
s.se
~.]S
1) . ~:;
.., [7-
, ..).;
1 . : Ij
.... ,..., r:
" . l.J.J
(. . :j ~
-l:SF-
...'-
r~. ..
'-
"
.
...
)
SE
2
aFFS~ï
'·3
'JL T
?L
~.~
ccocø
:;TECTED
PKS
3C
E:J E C TE:)
PY.S
E
II
)iHLS
Hr4NN£L I~G J
ËAK PE~K
NO' !~Hr1E:
1 GO:?
2 E i H A t..J E
'3 NtIRCGEI~
5 11 E i ~,.::¡ t~ :¿
IS ? POP ~ t"¡ =:
7 t 31J SU TANE
8 N-3U7.4I.JE
~ I S rJ P E ~~ T H N
o N- P ENT~t.JE
1 HE"<~NE;3
DENT
'1R EA
34
S4t1P
RESU
BiU/
G.øø
C. 1 a
0.30
866.8'3
37.r;s
2 1 . CO
26.75
5.83
3.95
1 79
58
ø
.
I..
I:
I~I
·l
(I
.:
I:
I"
'.
'.
ì
+
I:
TLË:
r~G? A
ETU/ ~'r3
8
-t ¡--- ~ 6
E~2 5 ¿,
'r
F
o
I]
C
o
S 1
1 1
S t
7 1
8 J
~ J
~
3
j S 1 ¡~
1 -.~
r I 11'::
(M·ll·\
1 . :~ ;~
3 . ¡a:3
q. . ·~:3
3 . .~ ì~
~ t '3 ~3 .;.
2 . . 3 ~j :;
3 . :313.:·
~ . '3 ~~ EI
5 . 1:; ~I
S . .;. i~ ~~
;)r1E
Q F~F S = T
(I . ~ e Q
~I . ~ e 2
~I . ~ C 2
~I . (: e e
~I . ~ 22
~I . ~ 2 ~
tI.~ec
Ç/. ~ ee
~I . 'l e c
fl. ¡z 2 e
A~! EA
CCUNTS
E\ 1 3 '; 9
3 ¡. 6 7 2 0
'·Ø2.E5
3 2 :i 3 :;; :: Q
3158::4-
E. 5 5 ~ 4
~I a Q -1. 2
19248
J 4 7 ~I 3
6a~9
4 2 €. 4- 5 ~\ ø
,...-....
~ - .-
COD~
53
3B
B'/
VB
BE
B '.J
VB
3\/
'IV
G
.~
....
J 1 <1
l~ S EC .'
<+. 1 0
-11 ;:: ¡.;:
w . ..¡ ..
:J . 2·J
~5 ~ ~~
('!..1:';¡
..: . "5::1
7 . ~ t-1
7.05
6 . :-35
........n~
oJ-;jb
S
I"'ETHOD
£...
~~.
ÐTU
~Gr: ~
:;..¡. A?R
(" :
öb
-.~-~
---
SECTION K
Injection Prebsure
20 AAC 25.402(c) (10)
The maximum wellhead injection pressure for enchanced recovery injection
wells in the Kuparuk River Formation is 2,700 psig for water and 4,900
psig for gas. This is the maximum discharge pressure of the injection
equipment.
The average injection pressure in the Kuparuk River
Formation injection wells is estimated to be 2,100 psig for water and
4,400 psig for gas.
-16-
..
--~
SECTION L
Fracture Information
20 AAC 25.402(c)(11)
The proposed maximum injection pressures for the enhanced recovery and
fluid disposal wells will not initiate fractures in the confining strata
which might enable the injection or formation fluid to enter freshwater
strata.
'0
('
v
Discussion
Normal injection operations will not entail injecting above the Kuparuk
Fomation parting pressure.
However, in isolated situations, future
operations may necessitate injecting over the parting pressure to
maximize oil reèovery.
These inj ection pressures will not breach the
integrity of the confining zone. The Kuparuk Formation is overlain by
more than 2,000 feet of confining shale acting as an impermeable
barrier. Any fractures which may initiate in the Kuparuk Formation will
not significantly penetrate the confining shale.
-17-
(.
.~-4'
'-~-'
SECTION H
Formation Fluid
20 AAC 25.402(c)(12)
A water analysis for the Kuparuk River formation is included as Figures
J-2a and J-2b.
-18-
'.
'-'
-
SECTION N
Hydrocarbon Recovery
20 AAC 25.402(c)(14)
Waterflooding increases oil recovery approximately 100 percent from an
estimated 13 percent of the original-oil-in-place (GOIP) from primary
recovery to an expected 26 percent of the OOIP with secondary recovery.
-19-
. ,
'--
SECTIO~ 0
Mechanical Integrity
20 AAC 25.402 (d) and (e)
All wells (production and injection) were pressure tested prior to
completion, and all wells are in accordance with 25.402(d) and (e). If
converted to inj ection, the casing will again be pressure tested in
accordance with 20 AAC 25.412(c). The casing annulus pressure is then
monitor~d on a weekly basis and record~d by the drill site operator.
-20-
(:
....-
"-"
'-
SECTIO~ P
Wells within Area
20 AAC 25.402(h)
The wells within the area of review (i.e., MPU) are shown on the plat
(Figure B-1). To the best of Conoco Inc. 's knowledge, the wells within
the area were constructed, and where applicable, abandoned to prevent
the movement of fluids into freshwater sources.
-21-
/
"-'
SECTION Q
EPA-UIC Permitted Injectors
Hell UIe Permit Number
B-SA AK-2ROO77-E
B-7 AK-2ROO73-E
B-8 AK-2ROO74-E
B-12 AK-2ROO75-E
B-14 AK-2R0076-E
B-17 AK-2R0234-E
B-18 AK-2R0235-E
B-19 AK-2R0236-E
C-6 AK-2R0078-E
C-8 AK-2R0239-E
C-10 AK-2R0215-E
C-11 AK-2R0216-E
C-12 AK-2R0081-E
C-15 AK-2R0082-E
C-19 AK-2R0237-E
CFP-2 AK-2R0083-E
E-2 AK-2R0085-E
-22-
Tract
2
3
4
4A
5
6
9A
10
--~~
--
SECTION R
Kuparuk Participating Area
Milne Point Dnit Agreement
State of Alaska
(Effective October 1, 1985)
Legal Description
T13N, R10E, D.M.;
Section 1: S/2
Section 2
Section 11
Section 12
T13N, R10E, D.M.;
Section 3
Section 4
Section 9
Section 10
T13N, R10E, D.M.;
Section 15
T13N, R10E, D.M.;
Section 16: N/2, SE/4, NE/4 SW/4
R E CE I V E D
T13N, R10E, D.M.;
Section 13
Section 14
Section 23: N/2, SE/4, E/2 SW/4
Section 24
SEP 1 5 1986
Alaska on & Gas Cons. Commission
Anchorage
T13N, R11E, D.M.;
Section 18: W/2 W/2, NE/4 NW/4, NW/4 NE/4, E/2 SW/4,
S/2 SE/4
Section 19
Section 20: SW/4, W/2 NW/4, SE/4 NW/4, W/2 SE/4,
SE/4 SE/4
T13N, RIOE, D.M.;
Section 25
Section 26: E/2 NE/4
T13N, RIOE,
Section 5
Section 6
Section 7:
Section 8:
D .M. ;
NE/4, E/2 NW/4, NW/4 NW/4, NE/4 SE/4
N/2, SE/4, N/2 SW/2, SE/4 SW/4
-23-
--
'-~
SECTION S
Underground Injection Control Variances
20 AAC 25.402(~)
20 AAC 25.030(g)
Conoco Inc. requests two variances from certain requirements for
injection wells within the boundary of the ~lilne Point Unit.
A variance is requested from the 200 psi change in casing pressure
reporting requirement of 20 AAC 25.402(e).
This section requires
immediate notice to the Commission and corrective action if the casing
pressure subjects the casing to a hoop stress that exceeds 70% of the
minimum yield strength of the casing, or if there is more than a 200 psi
change in the pressure between consecutive reaàings. Conoco requests a
variance to use only the 70% limit as the trigger tor immediate notice
and corrective action.
By using the 70% yield pressure limit, the
injection wells can be monitored to detect leaks and operated safely.
In contrast, àue to changes in injection pressures and fluid tempera-
ture, the 200 psi change is not a viable mechanical integrity test for
injection wells in the Milne Point Unit.
Water and gas injection wells at the Milne Point Unit are similar to the
Kuparuk River Formation injectors in the Kuparuk River Unit (KRU), which
is operated by ARCO Alaska, Inc. ARCO demonstrated2 that the 200 psi
-24-
~-
~-
SECTION S
Undergrounà Injection Control Variances (continued)
20 AAC 25.402(e)
20 AAC 25.030(g)
limit in casing pressure change was not a practical test of mechanical
integrity.
Because of the similarity between MPU and KRU Kuparuk
Formation wells, the variance request stated above is appropriate for
all MPU Kuparuk River Formation injection wells.
A variance is requested from the cement bond log requirement of 20 AAC
25.030(g)(3). Milne Point Unit well completions (for both injectors and
producers) have surface casing set and cemented below fresh water
bearing sands and production casing set and cemented at TD.
In these
completions, the cemented surface casing already provides isolation for
shallow fresh water sands, while external casing packers (ECPs) in
addition to cement across the productive interval (s) provide a good
casing-formation seal on the production casing to further prevent the
migration of hydrocarbons. Radioactive tracer logs on several injection
wells at Nilne Point prove that the inj ected fluid is entering the
Kuparuk formation, as intended.
This further verifies the mechanical
integrity of Milne Point wells and the appropriateness of a variance.
Therefore, Conoco respectfully requesLs a variance from 20 AAC
25.030(g)(3) for all existing and future Kuparuk wells at Milne Point
which are completed in this manner.
RECEIVED
C. ::: D 1 5 1986
\..; L.. \ .J..
-25-
A1aska Oil & Gas Cons. líummissiQn
AnchoragE')
"y-
~
REFERENCES
1. Kuparuk River Unít Area Injectíon Order Application, ARCO Alaska,
Inc., April 21, 1986.
2. Letter from J.D. Weeks, Kuparuk Operations Manager for fillCO Alaska,
lIle. J to Chat Chat terton J Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission, March 27, 1986, RE: Kuparuk River Unit J
Variance Request.
RECE\VED
SEP 151986
Oil & Gas Coos. Commission
A\as\<.a Anchorage
-26-
.'
---
(COI')CO)
-'--~-
Warren J. Hairford
Division Operations Manager
Conoco 'nc.
3201 C Street
Suite 200
Anchorage, AK 99503
(907) 564-7600
!gg~f~f Or<--
1'-"",,,",, .'~'f-,- ,~.. .
¡~~3d::J Wlc:;,
~..~ ;¡ -'~.
,-"" .,-~ -
I ¡
It)
______ ~,1
~ ;:; ;~ ~;¿2;~~~
l STi\ <f '¡-'~c~ I
'.' C", r, ~í' ;;;.~» {.... Ü .1
¡v I H ¡ ! :;;:,..d I í
1£ILE: ,:
John R. Kemp
Division Manager
Gordon A. Hitchings
Division Projects Manager
May 12, 1986
Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
3001 Porcupine Drive
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Attn: C. V. Chatterton
Gentlemen:
We are in receipt of your March 14, 1986 letter urging Conoco to apply for an
Area Inj ection permit for Milne Point. We have been in contact and are
working with the Commission and with other North Slope operators informally
in the preparation of the subject permit application.
We regret that our May 2nd letter to Mr. Burd (Director, EPA), copies to you,
caused concern in the Commission. Conoco has not, nor will not, commence
annular injection without the proper regulatory agencies approvals.
As suggested in your May 7th letter, a meeting to review annular injection
status and plans at Milne Point would be in order. Conoco suggests a meeting
on Wednesday, May 14th at 3:00 p.m. Please contact Warren Hairford at
564-7615 if this time is agreeable to the Commission.
Sincerely,
Manager
cc: Douglas L. Lowery
Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation
Pouch 1601
Fairbanks, Alaska 99707
Robert Burd, Director
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency
1200 Sixth Avenue, MIS 437
Seattle, Washington 98101
Ã.OGCC
Conservation Order
~o'!!"
t œ !es
_.. __ ._.0 _.. _"" __ ___ __.. _.... __.. _.... _.... _e. _.. _.... _.__a__a. _..._.__..._..._.._.._.. -.. - ...-...-...-..-...-- --..- ....-...-...-..-""--"-..- ..- ...---- ..-...-..--..-...-..-...-- --..-...-...-...-..-.....,
OY'ERSIZED DOCUMENT
.J5MM format
.. -.. --.... -.. -...-.. -.. -.. --.. --.... - ...--.. -.. -- -- ..-.--.. -...-.. --.. -...--.. -- --..-..-.--...-...- ...-...- ..-------...-...----...-...----...-...-----.-...-..- ---....-..-. .-""-."-..-""-."-."-.--."-..-
See Oversized
Documents fiIlIl1I Roll
file NUlllllber If:rð ðJ.. 0
# of Documents ;Z
~T