Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 Eider Oil PoolZE
Emeka Emembolu
Head of Base Management
BP Exploration Alaska
March 31, 2011
Mr. Dan Seamount
Commissioner and Chair
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 W. 7th Ave #100
Anchorage, Alaska, 99501-3539
0
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.
900 East Benson Boulevard
P. 0. Box 196612
Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6612
(907)561-5111
Phone: (907) 564-55368
Fax: (907) 564-4440
Email emeka.emembolu@bp.com
Web: www.bp.com
RE: Duck Island Unit, Eider Oil Pool Annual Reservoir Surveillance Report
Dear Mr, Seamount:
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc., as operator of the Duck Island Unit, hereby submits the attached
Annual Reservoir Surveillance Report in accordance with the requirements of Conservation
Order 449. This report covers the period January 1 through December 31, 2010.
The report is organized according to the outline provided in Rule 12 of the conservation order.
A shut-in well list addressing 20 AAC 25.115 has been included in the Endicott Oil Pool
Reservoir Surveillance Report submitted in a separate filing.
BP reserves the right to alter the content of the analyses contained in this report at any time
based upon the most recent surveillance information obtained.
Should you have any questions please contact John Garing (564-5167) or Sierra Becia (564-
5862).
Emeka Emembolu
cc Kevin Banks, DNR
R. L. Skillern, BP
Eider File
Annual Reservoir Surveillance Report
Duck Island Unit,
Elder til Pool
January`201'0 through December 20110
by
March, 2011
Table of Contents
A. Progress of Enhanced Recovery Project implementation and Reservoir
Management summary
B. Voidage Balance by Month of Produced Fluids and Injected Fluids and
cumulative status
C. Analysis of reservoir pressure surveys within the pool
D. Results and Analysis of Production and Injection Log surveys, tracer surveys
and observation well surveys
E. Review of pool production allocation factors and issues over the prior year
F. Future Development Plans
2
A) Progress of Enhanced Recovery Project implementation and Reservoir
Management summary
BPXA drilled two wells into the Eider reservoir: 2-56A/EI 01 ("Elder 1 ") and 2-
30A/EI 02 ("Eider 2"). The Eider 2 well was shut in May 1999 at the end of the
approved test period, and the Eider 1 well was shut in September 1999. BPXA
converted the Eider 1 well to water injection in June 2000 after receiving the
proper Endicott partner approval. Production from Eider 2 well recommenced in
June 2000 with the start of water injection. Over the next couple of years, static
bottomhole pressure ("SBHP") measurements were obtained in both Eider
wells to determine the extent of pressure support. With SBHP's rising in the
Eider 1 well and falling in the Eider 2 well, there was a clear indication that the
producer / injector pair were not in pressure communication with one another.
BPXA converted the Eider 1 well back to production in July 2004 and
subsequently perforated shallower sands in both wells. The Eider 2 well was
sidetracked (2-30B/ME-01) in 2009 to the Minke target, a Sag River/Ivishak
formation satellite prospect.
Producer 2-56A/E101 was brought online once in 2009 to conduct a well test
which indicated that the production characteristics of the well had not changed.
(1 bopd, watercut — 100%). Since this well test, the well has been shut-in due to
uncompetitive water cut.
There were 0 days of production from the Ivishak formation for the time period
of January 2010 through December 2010. Cumulative production through
December 2010 was 2.75 mmstb oil, 26.52 bscf gas, and 5.52 mmstb water.
There was no injection into the Ivishak formation for the time period of January
2010 through December 2010. Cumulative injection through December 2010
was 4.33 mmstb water.
All produced fluids have been processed through the Endicott facility as
stipulated under conditions within the Endicott Facility Sharing Agreement.
Produced gas, other than that used for fuel, has been re -injected into the
Endicott reservoir gas cap.
3
C) Analysis of reservoir pressure surveys within the pool
One pressure survey was completed in September 2010 in 2-56A/E101.
Pressure data since startup are graphically represented in the next figure that is
a plot of pressure versus time.
These data indicate pressures have not changed significantly in the past year.
5
Extrapolated Pressure
at -9700 TVDss Datum,
Well
Date
psia
Data Source
2-56A/E101
9/10/10
4452
SBHP
Pressure data since startup are graphically represented in the next figure that is
a plot of pressure versus time.
These data indicate pressures have not changed significantly in the past year.
5
B) Voidage Balance by Month of Produced Fluids and Injected Fluids and Cumulative status
Elder
CUMULATIVE VOIDAGE JInjecdon-production)
-CumVWdap.(mmrvb) VS Ti..
E
CO
0
CO
CO
F-
O
O
T,
CO
m�
L
Ca
5500
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
Eider Pressure Data
Region: Eider Zone; Ivishak
Pressure vs. Time
0
Q
■ 0 0
o ■ �
■
■
98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
■ 2-30A o 2-56 0 2-56A BP Exploration, Endicott
L
D) Results and Analysis of Production and Injection Log surveys, tracer surveys and observation well surveys
No production, injection logging or tracer surveys were performed during 2010 on wells in the Eider Pool
E) Review of pool production allocation factors and issues over the prior year
The allocation factor for Eider well has been set at 1.0 when the wells are producing.
F) Future Development Plans
Reservoir characterization work on the Eider reservoir will continue. Upon identification of any potential targets, BPXA will
evaluate sidetracking existing wells in order to increase recovery from the Eider reservoir. The potential to redeploy the
remaining Eider well to targets outside the Eider Participating Area will also be considered.
7