Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutO 189Other Order 189
Docket No: OTH-21-040
Swanson River Unit 241-33B
1. November 12, 2021 Notice of proposed enforcement action per 20 AAC 25.535
(b)(1) and 20 AAC 25.353 (b)(2)
2. November 24, 2021 Hilcorp’s response to Notice of Proposed Enforcement
3. December 9, 2021 Hilcorp’s civil penalty payment receipt
4. January 7, 2022 Hilcorp’s response to AOGCC Decision and Order
ORDERS
STATE OF ALASKA
ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
333 West Seventh Avenue
Anchorage Alaska 99501
Re: Compliance with Permit to Drill 221-
053, Swanson River Unit 241-33B
)
)
)
)
)
Other Order 189
Docket Number: OTH-21-040
December 29, 2021
DECISION AND ORDER
On November 12, 2021 the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) issued a
Notice of Proposed Enforcement Action (Notice) to Hilcorp Alaska, LLC (Hilcorp) for failing to
perform drilling operations in accordance with conditionally approved Permit to Drill (PTD)
221-053. The Notice proposed a specific corrective action and a $39,000 civil penalty under AS
31.05.150(a).
Summary of Proposed Enforcement Action:
The Notice proposed a civil penalty for violating three approval conditions while performing
drilling operations. The Notice also proposed that Hilcorp submit a detailed written explanation
that describes how recurrence of this violation will be prevented in future operations.
Violation - Failure to Comply with PTD Approval Conditions:
On August 27, 2021 the AOGCC conditionally approved PTD 221-053, authorizing Hilcorp to
drill well Swanson River Unit (SRU) 241-33B. The well was spudded on September 9, 2021.
Drilling and Completion operations permitted under this PTD ended on September 21, 2021. The
conditions imposed in the approved PTD were:
x Casing and liner lap test to 50% of burst – provide 24-hour notice for AOGCC to be able
to witness the casing mechanical integrity test (MIT) and formation integrity test (FIT);
x Review 7-5/8” leak off test (LOT) data and kick tolerance with AOGCC before drilling
6.75” hole section.
AOGCC investigation indicates Hilcorp failed to comply with these conditions of approval as
follows:
x On September 12, 2021, Hilcorp conducted the 7-5/8” casing MIT to 3500 psi. AOGCC
was not provided an opportunity to witness the MIT.
x On September 13, 2021, a FIT was performed after drilling out the 7-5/8” casing shoe.
AOGCC was not provided an opportunity to witness the FIT.
x On September 13, 2021, after performing the FIT, Hilcorp commenced drilling the 6.75”
hole section without providing AOGCC the FIT data and kick tolerance.
o On September 17, 2021, Hilcorp reached the total depth of the 6-3/4” hole
section.
o Hilcorp did not provide the required FIT data until AOGCC requested it on
September 22, 2021.
Other Order 189
December 29, 2021
Page 2 of 3
Mitigating Circumstances:
The factors in AS 31.05.150(g) were considered in determining the appropriate penalty.
Hilcorp’s lack of good faith in its attempts to comply with the clearly stated conditions on the
PTD, the potential seriousness of the violation, track record of regulatory non-compliance and
need to deter similar behavior in future operations are the factors which most heavily influenced
AOGCC’s decision and the penalty being assessed. Mitigating circumstances include no injury
to the public or the environment, and Hilcorp realized only minor benefits by failing to comply.
Findings and Conclusions:
Hilcorp neither requested informal review nor a public hearing regarding the notice of proposed
enforcement. By letter dated November 24, 2021 Hilcorp stated that it will pay the proposed fine
outlined in Docket Number OTH-21-040 and offered three actions to prevent recurrence:
The steps we are taking to prevent recurrence include the following:
x Advise company personnel on importance of adhering to conditions of approval
on the permit to drill
x Having discussions about upcoming steps in the drilling program on a daily basis
with the rig personnel
x Communicate to engineering staff the differences in processes between North
Slope Permits and Cook Inlet Permits
Hilcorp intends to prevent recurrence by having discussions with rig personnel daily about
upcoming steps in the drilling program. It is unclear how the planned discussions will add to the
daily communications already taking place at the time of these violations.
Hilcorp’s 3
rd bulleted step for preventing recurrence, an inaccurate assessment of AOGCC’s
application of approval conditions, is troubling. Differences between North Slope and Cook
Inlet permit conditions are the result of AOGCC’s case-by-case reviews rather than solely
geographic differences. Hilcorp’s compliance issues can only be addressed by reading the
conditions of approval attached to each permit – regardless of where in the State of Alaska the
permitted work occurs.
In its November 24, 2021 letter Hilcorp attempted to minimize its compliance problems by
stating “no written regulations were broken during the drilling of this well” (SRU 241-33B) and
also provided additional context for the violations noted by AOGCC. Hilcorp’s claim that it was
“overly transparent” in communicating with AOGCC during the drilling operations, is rebutted
by its acknowledgement that it did not comply with the test notification requirements of AOGCC
Industry Guidance Bulletin 10-01A, “Test Witness Notification”. Clearly written conditions of
approval on the Permit to Drill, Form 10-401, and changes and directives attached to the work
procedure by AOGCC, have the full force of regulation.
The AOGCC finds that Hilcorp failed to comply with conditions attached to PTD 221-053.
Hilcorp has not disputed the findings in the Notice of Proposed Enforcement and has paid the
civil penalty proposed by AOGCC.Hilcorp has not provided any information that would
warrant changing the proposed penalty amount.
Other Order 189
December 29, 2021
Page 3 of 3
The AOGCC also finds that the steps listed in Hilcorp’s November 24, 2021 response to the
notice of violation are unlikely to prevent recurrence of this type of violation unless they are
systematically applied on every approved PTD and Sundry application. Hilcorp has not
addressed how that will be managed.
Now Therefore It Is Ordered That:
Hilcorp is assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $39,000 for failing to comply with the
approval conditions in PTD 221-053.Within 10 days of the date of AOGCC’s final decision,
Hilcorp shall provide a detailed written explanation that describes how it intends to prevent
recurrence of this violation. The written explanation is sought pursuant to 20 AAC 25.300.
As an Operator involved in an enforcement action, Hilcorp is required to preserve documents
concerning the above action until after resolution of the proceeding.
Done at Anchorage, Alaska and Dated December 29, 2021.
Jeremy M. Price Jessie L. Chmielowski
Chair, Commissioner Commissioner
cc: AOGCC Inspectors
Phoebe Brooks (AOGCC)
RECONSIDERATION AND APPEAL NOTICE
As provided in AS 31.05.080(a), within 20 days after written notice of the entry of this order or decision, or such further
time as the AOGCC grants for good cause shown, a person affected by it may file with the AOGCC an application for
reconsideration of the matter determined by it. If the notice was mailed, then the period of time shall be 23 days. An
application for reconsideration must set out the respect in which the order or decision is believed to be erroneous.
The AOGCC shall grant or refuse the application for reconsideration in whole or in part within 10 days after it is filed.
Failure to act on it within 10-days is a denial of reconsideration. If the AOGCC denies reconsideration, upon denial, this
order or decision and the denial of reconsideration are FINAL and may be appealed to superior court. The appeal MUST
be filed within 33 days after the date on which the AOGCC mails, OR 30 days if the AOGCC otherwise distributes, the
order or decision denying reconsideration, UNLESS the denial is by inaction, in which case the appeal MUST be filed
within 40 days after the date on which the application for reconsideration was filed.
If the AOGCC grants an application for reconsideration, this order or decision does not become final. Rather, the order
or decision on reconsideration will be the FINAL order or decision of the AOGCC, and it may be appealed to superior
court. That appeal MUST be filed within 33 days after the date on which the AOGCC mails, OR 30 days if the AOGCC
otherwise distributes, the order or decision on reconsideration.
In computing a period of time above, the date of the event or default after which the designated period begins to run is
not included in the period; the last day of the period is included, unless it falls on a weekend or state holiday, in which
event the period runs until 5:00 p.m. on the next day that does not fall on a weekend or state holiday.
Jessie L.
Chmielowski
Digitally signed by
Jessie L. Chmielowski
Date: 2021.12.29
10:38:42 -08'00'
Jeremy Price
Digitally signed by Jeremy
Price
Date: 2021.12.29 13:09:18
-09'00'
Bernie Karl
K&K Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 58055
Fairbanks, AK 99711
Mailed 12/29/21 SJC
1
Carlisle, Samantha J (OGC)
From:Carlisle, Samantha J (OGC)
Sent:Wednesday, December 29, 2021 2:05 PM
To:AOGCC_Public_Notices
Subject:Other Order 189 (Hilcorp, Swanson River Unit)
Attachments:other189.pdf
Compliance with Permit to Drill 221-053, Swanson River Unit 241-33B
Samantha Carlisle
Executive Secretary III
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7th Avenue
Anchorage, AK 99501
(907) 793-1223
INDEXES
By Samantha Carlisle at 11:27 am, Jan 07, 2022
w
Hilcorp Alaska LLC
P.O.Box 61529
Hnimtnn TY 779f)A_1r90
—ownerl.
40012563
Check Date: 12/03120211 Check Number-
42009207
og
*****$39,000.00
Hw.
1900035051 11/2912021 122921 $0.00 $39,000.00
RECEtVIED
DEL 0 j 2021
AOGCC
THIS CHECK IS PRINTED ON CHEMICALLY REACTIVE PAPER THAT HAS VISIBLE FIBERS AND A WATERMARK —HOLD TO LIGHTTO VIEW
AMEGY BANK
Hilcorp Alaska LLC
P.O.Box 61529
Houston TX 77208-1529
PAY
TO
T H -E
ORDER
or
Void After 90 DavS
Check No
Check Date
Check Amount
42009267
12/0312021
*****$39,000.00
Th-irty-Nine Thousand Dollars And Zero Cents
STATE OF ALASKA
AOGCC
333 WEST 7TH AVE
ANCHORAGE AK 99501-35.39
Authorized Signature
11'42009207,14 1:113110SEID: 04444077413iis
Hilcorp Alaska, LLC
Monty M Myers
3800 Centerpoint Dr., Suite 1400
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
November 24, 2021
VIA EMAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL
Commissioner Jessie L. Chmielowski
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7th Avenue
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Subject: Docket Number: OTH-21-040
Notice of Proposed Enforcement
Compliance with Permit to Drill 221-053 (SRU 241-33B)
Dear Commissioner Chmielowski,
We will pay the fine outlined in Docket Number OTH-21-040.
The steps we are taking to prevent recurrence include the following:
x Advise company personnel on importance of adhering to conditions of approval on the
permit to drill
x Having discussions about upcoming steps in the drilling program on a daily basis with the
rig personnel
x Communicate to engineering staff the differences in processes between North Slope
Permits and Cook Inlet Permits
We wanted to provide some additional context for the situations outlined. While we did not
specifically and in writing provide 24 hours advance written notice for some of the conditions on
the permit, we did keep AOGCC staff abreast of developments on SRU 241-33B (PTD 221-053),
including email and oral communications with AOGCC staff throughout the process. We
highlight this fact to note that we were overly transparent with the AOGCC staff as to the current
status of the well and to inform them of the specific task we were about to perform. Two of the
violations proposed occurred within 24 hours of a previous notice that was submitted and waived
by AOGCC. We would also like to highlight that no written regulations were broken during the
drilling of this well.
Sincerely,
Monty Myers
Drilling Manager
By Samantha Carlisle at 3:27 pm, Nov 24, 2021
Digitally signed by Monty M Myers
DN: cn=Monty M Myers, c=US,
o=Hilcorp Alaska, LLC, ou=Technical
Services - AK Drilling,
email=mmyers@hilcorp.com
Reason: I am approving this document
Date: 2021.11.24 11:32:55 -09'00'
Monty M
Myers
Alaska Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission
333 West Seventh Avenue
Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3572
Main: 907.279.1433
Fax: 907.276.7542
www.aogcc.alaska.gov
November 12, 2021
CERTIFIED MAIL –
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7018 0680 0002 2052 9464
Monty M. Myers
Drilling Manager
Hilcorp Alaska, LLC
3800 Centerpoint Drive, Suite 1400
Anchorage, AK 99503
Re: Docket Number: OTH-21-040
Notice of Proposed Enforcement
Compliance with Permit to Drill 221-053 (SRU 241-33B)
Dear Mr. Myers:
Pursuant to 20 AAC 25.535, the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) hereby
notifies Hilcorp Alaska LLC (Hilcorp) of a proposed enforcement action.
Nature of the Apparent Violation or Noncompliance (20 AAC 25.535(b)(1)).
Hilcorp failed to comply with conditions of approval in the approved Permit to Drill (PTD) for well
SRU 241-33B (PTD 221-053).
Basis for Finding the Violation or Noncompliance (20 AAC 25.535(b)(2)).
On August 27, 2021 the AOGCC conditionally approved PTD 221-053, authorizing Hilcorp to drill
well SRU 241-33B. The well was spudded on September 9, 2021. Drilling and Completion operations
permitted under this PTD ended on September 21, 2021. The conditions imposed in the approved PTD
were:
- Casing and liner lap test to 50% of burst – provide 24 hour notice for AOGCC to be able to
witness the casing mechanical integrity test (MIT) and formation integrity test (FIT);
- Review 7-5/8” leak off test (LOT) data and kick tolerance with AOGCC before drilling 6.75”
hole section.
AOGCC investigation indicates Hilcorp failed to comply with these conditions of approval as follows:
- On September 12, 2021, Hilcorp conducted the 7-5/8” casing MIT to 3500 psi. AOGCC was
not provided an opportunity to witness the MIT.
- On September 13, 2021, a FIT was performed after drilling out the 7-5/8” casing shoe.
AOGCC was not provided an opportunity to witness the FIT.
- On September 13, 2021, after performing the FIT, Hilcorp commenced drilling the 6.75” hole
section without providing AOGCC the FIT data and kick tolerance.
- On September 17, 2021, Hilcorp reached the total depth of the 6-3/4” hole section.
Docket Number: OTH-21-040
Notice of Proposed Enforcement
November 12, 2021
Page 2 of 2
- Hilcorp did not provide the required FIT data until AOGCC requested it on September 22,
2021.
Proposed Action (20 AAC 25.535(b)(3)).
For failure to comply with the conditions of approved PTD 221-053, the AOGCC intends to impose a
civil penalty on Hilcorp under AS 31.05.150(a) in the amount of $39,000 1 ($10,000 for each of the
three conditions of approval that were violated plus $1,000 per day for the nine days in between
performing the FIT and providing the data to AOGCC).
In addition to the imposed civil penalty, AOGCC intends to require Hilcorp to provide a detailed
written explanation that describes how Hilcorp intends to prevent recurrence of this violation.
Rights and Liabilities (20 AAC 25.535(b)(4))
Within 15 days after receipt of this notification – unless the AOGCC, in its discretion, grants an
extension for good cause shown – Hilcorp may file with the AOGCC a written response that concurs
in whole or in part with the proposed action described herein, requests informal review, or requests a
hearing under 20 AAC 25.540. If a timely response is not filed, the proposed action will be deemed
accepted by default. If informal review is requested, the AOGCC will provide Hilcorp an opportunity
to submit documentary material and make a written or oral statement. If Hilcorp disagrees with the
AOGCC’s proposed decision or order after that review, it may file a written request for a hearing within
10 days after the proposed decision or order is issued. If such a request is not filed within that 10-day
period, the proposed decision or order will become final on the 11th day after it was issued. If such a
request is timely filed, the AOGCC will hold its decision in abeyance and schedule a hearing.
If Hilcorp does not concur in the proposed action described herein, and the AOGCC finds that Hilcorp
violated a provision of AS 31.05, 20 AAC 25, or an AOGCC order, permit or other approval, then the
AOGCC may take any action authorized by the applicable law including ordering one or more of the
following: (i) corrective action; (ii) suspension or revocation of a permit or other approval; and (iii)
imposition of penalties under AS 31.05.150. In taking action after an informal review or hearing, the
AOGCC is not limited to ordering the proposed action described herein, as long as Hilcorp received
reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard with respect to the AOGCC’s action. Any action
described herein or taken after an informal review or hearing does not limit the action the AOGCC
may take under AS 31.05.160.
Sincerely,
Jessie L. Chmielowski
Commissioner
cc: Phoebe Brooks
James Regg
Bryan McLellan
1 AS 31.05.150(g) requires AOGCC to consider nine criteria in setting the amount of a civil penalty.
Jessie L.
Chmielowski
Digitally signed by Jessie L.
Chmielowski
Date: 2021.11.12 08:20:48
-10'00'