Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 Schrader Bluff Oil Poolcn� us ®perrafing
2ni
March 21, 2018
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Commissioner Cathy Foerster
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
333 West 7"' Avenue, Suite 100
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Re: 2017 Annual Reservoir Surveillance Report
Nikaitchuq Schrader Bluff Oil Pool
Nikaitchuq Unit, North Slope Alaska
Dear Commissioner Foerster:
eni us operating co. Inc.
3800 Centerpoint Dr., Suite 300
Anchorage, AK 99503 - U.S.A.
Tel. 907-865-3300 Fax 907-865-3380
MAR 21 2018
AOGCC
The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission approved pool rules for the Schrader Bluff oil pool
within the Nikaitchuq Unit as Conservation Order 639. Rule number 12 of the order requires the filing
of annual surveillance report, which is enclosed hereto.
Should you have any questions, require additional information or wish to schedule a meeting to discuss
the report, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Ro ert Province
Manager — Land, Public Relations & Alaska Representative
Enclosures:
2017 Annual Reservoir Surveillance Report Schrader Bluff Pool — Nikaitchuq Field
RECEIVED
MAR 21 2018
#, A®GCC
2nn
ass operrMc ng
2017 Annual Reservoir Surveillance Report
Schrader Bluff Pool
Nikaitchuq Field
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
Page I i
Table of Contents
1. 2017 Development Activity Summary...................................................................................................3
2. Reservoir Pressure Surveys in the Nikaitchuq Schrader Bluff Pool.......................................................6
3. Pool Allocation Factors over the Year 2017........................................................................................11
4. Reservoir Management Summary.......................................................................................................12
4.1 Voidage Balance by Month of Produced Fluids and Injected Fluids on a Standard and Reservoir
Volume Basis with Yearly and Cumulative Volumes...................................................................................14
Page I ii
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
1. 2017 Development Activity Summary
The remaining development drilling at SID (Spy Island Drilling site) has been placed on hold for
rig preparation regarding the extended reach drilling exploratory well NNO1 in Harrison Bay
Block Unit 6423 Unit, North of the Nikaitchuq Unit area. The drilling plan is to continue
development drilling activity for the Nikaitchuq field after the culmination of the exploratory
well and with improved economic conditions.
Table 1 below summarizes the well work over activities performed during the year 2017:
Well Name
Well Type
WO Completion Date
Drilling Path
SP22-FN1
Oil Producer
4/15/2017
Spy Island
SP12-SE3
Oil Producer
3/17/2017
Spy Island
SP28-NW3
Oil Producer
3/27/2017
Spy Island
SP16-FN3
Oil Producer
4/4/2017
Spy Island
SP22-FN1
Oil Producer
4/15/2017
Spy Island
OP16-03
Oil Producer
11/25/2017
Oliktok Point
OP03-P05
Oil Producer
12/29/2017
Oliktok Point
Table 1.
2017 Well Workover summary for Nikaitchug
Field
Page 13
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
Figure 1 below shows the completed well paths and the OA reservoir, in the Nikaitchuq Unit
through December 2017:
Nikaitchuq Development Pattern - Dec 2017
Y, .I.
Yr �
,6.D.
w.D
`
r t
`\ �s
OF
0 200 4000 6ODD 8NO I000GR
, aso6o
.mom am am svw mm mmo
Schrader Bluff OA Sand-Deveb ment
DeY Blpnabe
eni
Figure 1. Nikaitchug Development Map. Green = producer, Blue = infector, = Dual lateral
producer, Purple = N Sand Appraisal well, dashed lines (----) planned development wells.
Page 14
Eni Petroleum —Alaska Development
The total well count in 2009 was 51 wells. The total well count at the end of 2017 was 55 wells
(not including the dual lateral well paths) and is summarized in Table 2 below:
OPP = Oliktok point development path (onshore)
SID =Spy Island Development path (offshore)
Table 2. Total well count for Nikaitchua Development
Oil production in the Nikaitchuq field has been and continues to respond positively to
waterflood. The field water injection profile below shows how the continuous water injection
positively impacts oil production, during the year 2017. Drop in oil production occurred due to
ESP / completion failures in some of the wells (see below).
Well Name Date
SP12-SE3 June 2017
OP03-P05 July 2017
SP05-FN7 August 2017
OP16-03 November 2017
Page 15
Eni Petroleum — Alaska Development
Planned Activity (2009)
Activity up to date
(December 2017)
OPP
SID
Total
OPP
SID
Total
a
Injector
8
12
20
8
13
21
CL
F
Producer
11
15
26
11
18
29
a
Disposal
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
Water Source
3
0
3
3
0
3
Total
23
28
51
23
32
55
Dual Lateral Well Paths
8 9
17
OPP = Oliktok point development path (onshore)
SID =Spy Island Development path (offshore)
Table 2. Total well count for Nikaitchua Development
Oil production in the Nikaitchuq field has been and continues to respond positively to
waterflood. The field water injection profile below shows how the continuous water injection
positively impacts oil production, during the year 2017. Drop in oil production occurred due to
ESP / completion failures in some of the wells (see below).
Well Name Date
SP12-SE3 June 2017
OP03-P05 July 2017
SP05-FN7 August 2017
OP16-03 November 2017
Page 15
Eni Petroleum — Alaska Development
9
—Inle<don �Ul Race
Figure 2. Nikaitchuq Field Production and Events summary 2015-2017
with 2017 WO (see yellow triangles)
Reservoir Pressure Surveys in the Nikaitchuq Schrader Bluff Pool
Similar to previous years, reservoir pressure monitoring activities were executed by controlling
intake BHP's as shown in Figures 2a & 2b for OPP and SID, respectively. These plots show how
intake pressures have been gradually stepped down while Eni monitored signs of sand
production, rising water cuts (WC), gas -oil ratios (GOR) and balancing voidage across all sectors
in the field.
Intake pressure at OPP goes from 450-850 psi (See Figure 2a). However, the pressure spread is
larger at SID where some ESPs have reached lift capacity (See Figure 2c). Larger capacity ESP's
are planned for future workover opportunities.
Monthly and cumulative Voidage Replacement Ratios are monitored to understand whether or
not enough water is being injected in the field (See section 4.1). Maps of dynamic pressures are
extremely helpful for monitoring activities (see Figure 3). The reservoir pressure measurements
were also used to support the Nikaitchuq reservoir model pressure map of 2017 as shown in
Figure 3.
Page 16
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
ee
imII
wraw
AA
G6
D
{
Ol�!IMilo
i ima
♦ •
♦
♦
dA
C
—Inle<don �Ul Race
Figure 2. Nikaitchuq Field Production and Events summary 2015-2017
with 2017 WO (see yellow triangles)
Reservoir Pressure Surveys in the Nikaitchuq Schrader Bluff Pool
Similar to previous years, reservoir pressure monitoring activities were executed by controlling
intake BHP's as shown in Figures 2a & 2b for OPP and SID, respectively. These plots show how
intake pressures have been gradually stepped down while Eni monitored signs of sand
production, rising water cuts (WC), gas -oil ratios (GOR) and balancing voidage across all sectors
in the field.
Intake pressure at OPP goes from 450-850 psi (See Figure 2a). However, the pressure spread is
larger at SID where some ESPs have reached lift capacity (See Figure 2c). Larger capacity ESP's
are planned for future workover opportunities.
Monthly and cumulative Voidage Replacement Ratios are monitored to understand whether or
not enough water is being injected in the field (See section 4.1). Maps of dynamic pressures are
extremely helpful for monitoring activities (see Figure 3). The reservoir pressure measurements
were also used to support the Nikaitchuq reservoir model pressure map of 2017 as shown in
Figure 3.
Page 16
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
imII
wraw
{
Ol�!IMilo
i ima
.�i��i�iiYli�ii'7�Y3'ai■■li!■�
al'f!'lllli�
d471■'■Il��ES
��
.,,,
l�itf
l��i1��1�■�
,,,
R
�i
�y71l�
�ta►ar:�
�el
��1
!!I�!>i�1■�I�iit1Y
foil
Nikaitchuq
Production
—Inle<don �Ul Race
Figure 2. Nikaitchuq Field Production and Events summary 2015-2017
with 2017 WO (see yellow triangles)
Reservoir Pressure Surveys in the Nikaitchuq Schrader Bluff Pool
Similar to previous years, reservoir pressure monitoring activities were executed by controlling
intake BHP's as shown in Figures 2a & 2b for OPP and SID, respectively. These plots show how
intake pressures have been gradually stepped down while Eni monitored signs of sand
production, rising water cuts (WC), gas -oil ratios (GOR) and balancing voidage across all sectors
in the field.
Intake pressure at OPP goes from 450-850 psi (See Figure 2a). However, the pressure spread is
larger at SID where some ESPs have reached lift capacity (See Figure 2c). Larger capacity ESP's
are planned for future workover opportunities.
Monthly and cumulative Voidage Replacement Ratios are monitored to understand whether or
not enough water is being injected in the field (See section 4.1). Maps of dynamic pressures are
extremely helpful for monitoring activities (see Figure 3). The reservoir pressure measurements
were also used to support the Nikaitchuq reservoir model pressure map of 2017 as shown in
Figure 3.
Page 16
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
950
850
750
2
m 650
550
450
350
BHP at Depth of Heel
Figure 2a. Intake BHP measurements in year 2017 for active wells at OPP
—OP32-01
—OP17-02
—OP16-03
—OPM-06
—OP&04
—OP3-05
—OP4-07
—OPIO-W
---OP10-09
oP451
--OP34-53
Page 17
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
1200
1100
1000
900
a
800
6
G_
m
6W
500
400
300
BHP @ Heel
Figure 2b. Intake BHP measurements in year 2017 for active wells at SID
On the injector side, wellhead pressure limits are defined based on an equivalent gradient of
0.60 psi/ft to avoid injection at pressures that can fracture the reservoir and preserve the
wellbore integrity.
Page 18
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
>.
6m
Im
—Qro6.
—0102A3
—dll-01
—011303
-42454
—013P0)
-- 0124..
—0112
0
Q
J I . .
lan 11 1— 1]
Mar. 17 Apr 17
MaV'11 May t! Jun 17 Jul, 12 Aug, 12 ", 12 0c112 Nov -12 Dr,11
Figure 2c.
Wellhead pressure
measurements in year 2017 for injectors at OPP
10m
9m
Nm
7m
600
�£ Sm
4m
3m
2m
lm
—502-SE4
—5111 FN6
—5113F1M
—$NO Nfi
—SII) SE2
—5114FN2
—$I2SN2
—SQ6NW2
—SR452
—432 W2
5134..6
505 W4
Page 19
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
Q
r- V1
r 111
U
I l
land) 1..17Mail]
Apr17
May 17 May 17 lunl2 Jul17 Aug 17
MP 17 O[I-12 Nov -1] O -12
Figure
2d.
Wellhead pressure
measurements in year
2017 for injectors at SID
Page 19
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
Figure 3. Pressure map of Nikaitchug Field in 2017
Page 1 10
Eni Petroleum—Alaska Development
3. Pool Allocation Factors over the Year 2017
Production from all wells producing from the Schrader Bluff pool is commingled at the surface
into a common production line. Theoretical production for individual wells from the pool is
calculated on a daily basis by using well test allocation. Wells are tested, at least twice per
month for a minimum of 24 times per year per well. For the year 2017, 998 well tests were
performed. Measurements are performed on a multiphase meter.
Daily theoretical production for a well is calculated using the last valid well test and the amount
of time a well was on production for a given day. For example, if there is a valid well test on the
first of the month and another on the fifth of the month, the allocation factor for that well
would be calculated on the first through the fourth of the month using the test on the first of
the month. Subsequently, the allocation factor will be recalculated on the fifth of the month
using the new valid test measured on the fifth. On the monthly level, our AVOCET Manager
Production software sums up the allocated volumes from each time period between valid well
tests.
(Minutes on production/1440 min utes/day)*Daily Rate (stb/d) well test=Theoretical Daily
Production)
The daily allocation factor for the field is calculated by dividing the actual total production for
the day by the sum of the theoretical daily production for each individual well. Daily allocated
production is assigned to each well by multiplying its theoretical daily production by the daily
allocation factor.
The average allocation factor for 2017 has been 1.12
1.1900
1.1700
1.1500
1.1300
1.1100
1.0900
1.0700
1.0500
,ao°a� `Jaci a�� Qin �aJ ice �o�A oJy� ��ac ��ac ��ac Fie`
dee P > P Qtia O` oe e`e
January
1.1238
February
1.1223
March
1.1172
April
1.1662
May
1.1200
June
1.1066
July
1.1199
August
1.1060
September
1.1068
October
1.0951
November
1.1179
December
1.1320
Figure 4. Average field allocation factor trend for 2017
Page 111
Eni Petroleum —Alaska Development
4. Reservoir Management Summary
For the year 2017, the Nikaitchuq OA reservoir monitoring activities have supported the aiming
of replenish reservoir energy by replacing the voidage created with water injection and
optimizing the field production performance through workover activities. Reservoir energy is
evaluated by monitoring surface and bottom -hole pressures. In addition to surface gauges
measuring tubing pressures, Nikaitchuq oil producers are equipped with downhole gauges
which allow real-time bottom -hole pressure monitoring.
Eight injector wells (See Figure 5), four in Spy Island (5111-FN6, 5119-FN2, 5113-FN4, S125 -N2)
and four in Oliktok Point (0111-01, OP -12, 0113-03, 0124-08) have also been treated with unique
Tracerco tracers in 2015 in order to evaluate the water flow patterns, the breakthrough time
and the sweep efficiency of the water injection. During the year 2017 the tracer sampling was
carried out regularly.
Resman tracers deployed in some of the Nikaitchuq oil producers are now expired and no
longer useful for hydrocarbon inflow evaluations.
Three OPP injectors (0106-05, 0107-04 & 0111-01) and two SID injectors (SI14-N6 & 5120-N4) are
equipped with DTS fiber optics which helps to determine the level of injectivity along the
horizontal injection intervals of the injectors. Figure 5 below, shows the Nikaitchuq field map
with Resman, Tracerco tracers and the wells injector with DTS fiber optic.
Page 112
Eni Petroleum —Alaska Development
Figure 5. Nikaitchug map showing wells with Resman, Tracerco tracers and DTS Fibers
Page 1 13
En! Petroleum — Alaska Development
Nikaitchuq Field - Reservoir Monitoring Map
If
LEGEND
Water njemwith D -S
Schrader Bluff OA Send -Development
7
7-
eni
Figure 5. Nikaitchug map showing wells with Resman, Tracerco tracers and DTS Fibers
Page 1 13
En! Petroleum — Alaska Development
4.1 Voidage Balance by Month of Produced Fluids and Injected Fluids on a Standard and
Reservoir Volume Basis with Yearly and Cumulative Volumes
Approximately 7.5 million barrels of oil was produced from the Nikaitchuq field during the year
2017, at an average daily production of 20,600 bopd. Injected volumes of water during this time
was about 16.5 million barrels at an average daily rate of 45,300 bwpd.
Table 5 below summarizes the entire voidage replacement for the Nikaitchuq field in 2017. The
spikes in the graph are typically associated with Alyeska proration days.
1.15
1.10 - -
1.05 - \ - -f--
1.00--
0.95
0.90 - -
0.85
Jan -17 Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
Table 5. 2017 Nikaitchug Field Monthly Production/Infection Volumes
and Voidage Replacement Ratio graph
Page 1 14
Eni Petroleum -Alaska Development
Production
Injection
Monthly
Oil
Water
Gas
Water
VRR
BBL
BBL
MCF
BBL
BBL
Jan -17
632,550
579,882
102,268
1,317,437
1.07
Feb -17
. 575,900
542,891
83,035
1,171,950
1.03
Mar -17
644,176
619,523
93,762
1,226,676
0.95
Apr -17
685,074
625,689
100,235
1,333,360
1.00
May -17
730,625
710,201
100,988
1,409,149
0.96
Jun -17
578,106 1
609,531
80,550
1,313,014
1.09
Jul -17
653,170
731,237
90,954
1,454,488
1.03
Aug -17
632,132
728,788
92,695
1,471,665
1.06
Sep -17
596,018
702,561
90,473
1,414,997
1.07
Oct -17
612,731
747,008
88,334
1,468,356
1.06
Nov -17
570,528
717,726
80,166
1,437,611
1.10
Dec -17
599,796
829,602
86,247
1,530,042
1.05
Total
7,510,806
8,144,639
1,089,707
16,548,745
1.04
1.15
1.10 - -
1.05 - \ - -f--
1.00--
0.95
0.90 - -
0.85
Jan -17 Feb -17 Mar -17 Apr -17 May -17 Jun -17 Jul -17 Aug -17 Sep -17 Oct -17 Nov -17 Dec -17
Table 5. 2017 Nikaitchug Field Monthly Production/Infection Volumes
and Voidage Replacement Ratio graph
Page 1 14
Eni Petroleum -Alaska Development